Genomic data in the electronic medical record: Perspectives from a biobank community advisory board

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 16-24

  Kimball, Brittany C ^b   Nowakowski, Katherine E ^b   Maschke, Karen J ^a   McCormick, Jennifer B ^b  

^a HASTINGS CENTER   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Community advisory board; Genomics genetics; Medical record; Pharmacogenomics study

Indexed keywords

DNA;

CONFIDENTIALITY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; GENOME; GENOMICS; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIVACY; RESEARCH ETHICS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CONFIDENTIALITY; DNA; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; ETHICS, RESEARCH; GENOME; GENOMICS; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; OWNERSHIP; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIVACY; RESEARCH DESIGN; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84928044616     PISSN: 15562646     EISSN: 15562654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1556264614553922     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Beskow, L. M., & Dean, E. (2008). Informed consent for biorepositories: Assessing prospective participants' understanding and opinions. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 17, 1440-1451.
2. Bielinski, S. J., Olson, J. E., Pathak, J., Weinshilboum, R. M., Wang, L., Lyke, K. J., . . .Kullo, I. J. (2014). Preemptive genotyping for personalized medicine: Design of the right drug, right dose, right time-Using genomic data to individualize treatment protocol. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 89, 25-33.
3. Biesecker, L. G. (2012). Opportunities and challenges for the integration of massively parallel fenomic sequencing into clinical practice: Lessons from the ClinSeq project. Genetics in Medicine, 14, 393-398.
4. Biesecker, L. G., Mullikin, J. C., Facio, F. M., Turner, C., Cherukuri, P. F., Blakesley, R. W., . . .Green, E. D. (2009). The ClinSeq project: Piloting large-scale genome sequencing for research in genomic medicine. Genome Research, 19, 1665-1674.
5. Bogner, H. R., Wittink, M. N., Merz, J. F., Straton, J. B., Cronholm, P. F., Rabins, P. V., & Gallo, J. J. (2004). Personal characteristics of older primary care patients who provide a buccal swab for apolipoprotein E testing and banking of genetic material: The spectrum study. Community Genetics, 7, 202-210.
6. Brunham, L. R., & Hayden, M. R. (2012). Whole-genome sequencing: The new standard of care? Science, 336(6085), 1112-1113.
7. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
8. Drmanac, R. (2012). The ultimate genetic test. Science, 336(6085), 1110-1112.
9. Facio, F. M., Brooks, S., Loewenstein, J., Green, S., Biesecker, L. G., & Biesecker, B. B. (2011). Motivators for participation in a whole-genome sequencing study: Implications for translational genomics research. European Journal of Human Genetics, 19, 1213-1217.
10. Fullerton, S. M., Wolf, W. A., Brothers, K. B., Clayton, E. W., Crawford, D. C., Denny, J. C., . . .Jarvik, G. P. (2012). Return of individual research results from genome-wide association studies: Experience of the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network. Genetics in Medicine, 14, 424-431.
11. Godard, B., Marshall, J., & Laberge, C. (2007). Community engagement in genetic research: Results of the first public consultation for the Quebec CARTaGENE project. Community Genetics, 10, 147-158.
12. Gollust, S. E., Gordon, E. S., Zavac, C., Griffin, G., Christman, M. F., Pyeritz, R. E., . . .Bernhardt, B. A. (2012). Motivations and perceptions of early adopters of personalized genomics: Perspectives from research participants. Public Health Genomics, 15, 22-30.
13. Haga, S. B., Barry, W. T., Mills, R., Ginsburg, G. S., Svetkey, L., Sullivan, J., & Willard, H. F. (2013). Public knowledge and attitudes toward genetics and genetic testing. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers, 17, 327-335.
14. Harris, E. D., Ziniel, S. I., Amatruda, J. G., Clinton, C. M., Savage, S. K., Taylor, P. L., . . .Holm, I. A. (2012). The beliefs, motivations, and expectations of parents who have enrolled their children in a genetic biorepository. Genetics in Medicine, 14, 330-337.
15. Hartzler, A., McCarty, C. A., Rasmussen, L. V., William, M. S., Brilliant, M., Bowton, E. A., . . .Trinidad, S. B. (2013). Stakeholder engagement: A key component of integrating genomic information into electronic health records. Genetics in Medicine, 15, 792-801.
16. Hayden, E. C. (2012). Sequencing set to alter clinical landscape. Nature, 482(7385), 288.
17. Hull, S. C., Sharp, R. R., Botkin, J. R., Brown, M., Hughes, M., Sugarman, J., . . .Wilfond, B. S. (2008). Patients' views on identifiability of samples and informed consent for genetic research. American Journal of Bioethics, 8(10), 62-70.
18. Kaufman, D. J., Murphy-Bollinger, J., Scott, J., & Hudson, K. L. (2009). Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research. American Journal of Human Genetics, 85, 643-654.
19. Kettis-Lindblad, A., Ring, L., Viberth, E., & Hansson, M. G. (2006). Genetic research and donation of tissue samples to biobanks. What do potential sample donors in the Swedish general public think? European Journal of Public Health, 16, 433-440.
20. Lemke, A. A., Wolf, W. A., Hebert-Beirne, J., & Smith, M. E. (2010). Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing. Public Health Genomics, 13, 368-377.
21. Ludman, E. J., Fullerton, S. M., Spangler, L., Trinidad, S. B., Fujii, M. M., Jarvik, G. P., . . .Burke, W. (2010). Glad you asked: Participants' opinions of re-consent for dbGaP data submission. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5(3), 9-16.
22. Maher, B. (2011). Human genetics: Genomes on prescription. Nature, 478(7367), 22-24.
23. McCarty, C. A., Garber, A., Reeser, J. C., & Fost, N. C. (2011). Study newsletters, community and ethics advisory boards, and focus group discussions provide ongoing feedback for a large biobank. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 155A, 737-741.
24. McCarty, C. A., Nair, A., Austin, D. M., & Giampietro, P. F. (2007). Informed consent and subject motivation to participate in a large, population-based genomics study: The Marshfield Clinic Personalized Medicine Research Project. Community Genetics, 10, 2-9.
25. McCormick, J. B., Hammer, R. R., Farrell, R. M., Geller, G., James, K. M., Loftus, E. V. Jr., Sharp, R. R. (2012). Experiences of patients with chronic gastrointestinal conditions: In their own words. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 10, Article25. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-10-25.
26. McGuire, A. L., Hamilton, J. A., Lunstroth, R., McCullough, L. B., & Goldman, A. (2008). DNA data sharing: Research participants' perspectives. Genetics in Medicine, 10, 46-53.
27. Nvivo Qualitatitve Data Analysis Software. (2008). Version 8 [Computer software]. QSR International Pty Ltd. Doncaster, Victoria, Australia.
28. Olson, J. E., Ryu, E., Johnson, K. J., Koenig, B. A., Maschke, K. J., Morrisette, J. A., . . .Cerhan, J. R. (2013). The Mayo Clinic Biobank: A building block for individualized medicine. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 88, 952-962.
29. Ormond, K. E., Cirino, A. L., Helenowski, I. B., Chisholm, R. L., & Wolf, W. A. (2009). Assessing the understanding of biobank participants. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 149A, 188-198.
30. Trinidad, S. B., Fullerton, S. M., Bares, J. M., Jarvik, G. P., Larson, E. B., & Burke, W. (2010). Genomic research and wide data sharing: Views of prospective participants. Genetics in Medicine, 12, 486-495.
31. Wong, M. L., Chia, K. S., Yam, W. M., Teodoro, G. R., & Lau, K. W. (2004). Willingness to donate blood samples for genetic research: A survey from a community in Singapore. Clinical Genetics, 65, 45-51.