Stakeholder engagement: A key component of integrating genomic information into electronic health records

Genetics in Medicine

Volumn 15, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 792-801

  Hartzler, Andrea ^a   McCarty, Catherine A ^b   Rasmussen, Luke V ^c   Williams, Marc S ^d   Brilliant, Murray ^e   Bowton, Erica A ^f   Clayton, Ellen Wright ^g   Faucett, William A ^d   Ferryman, Kadija ^h   Field, Julie R ^f   Fullerton, Stephanie M ⁱ   Horowitz, Carol R ^j   Koenig, Barbara A ^k   McCormick, Jennifer B ^l   Ralston, James D ^m   Sanderson, Saskia C ^j   Smith, Maureen E ^c   Trinidad, Susan Brown ⁱ  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b ESSENTIA INSTITUTE OF RURAL HEALTH   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d GEISINGER HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^e MARSHFIELD CLINIC   (United States)

^f VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^h NEW SCHOOL FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^j MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^l MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^m GROUP HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

electronic health records; genomics; health information technology; personalized medicine; stakeholder engagement; translational medical research

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; CHANGE MANAGEMENT; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD CERTIFICATION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; GENOMICS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; MEANINGFUL USE CRITERIA; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PHARMACOGENOMICS; POLICY; REVIEW; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; GENOMICS; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALIZED MEDICINE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE (U.S.); PRACTICE MANAGEMENT, MEDICAL; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84885160797     PISSN: 10983600     EISSN: 15300366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.127     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Pulley JM, Denny JC, Peterson J F, et al. Operational implementation of prospective genotyping for personalized medicine: the design of the Vanderbilt PREDICT project. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2012;92:87-95.
2. Manolio TA, Chisholm RL, Ozenberger B, et al. Implementing genomic medicine in the clinic: the future is here. Genet Med 2013;15:258-267.
3. Gottesman O, Kuivaniemi H, Tromp G, et al. The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network: past, present, and future. Genet Med 2013;15: 761-771.
4. Metzker ML. Sequencing technologies-the next generation. Nat Rev Genet 2010;11:31-46.
5. Drmanac R. The advent of personal genome sequencing. Genet Med 2011;13:188-190.
6. Downing GJ, Boyle SN, Brinner KM, Osheroff JA. Information management to enable personalized medicine: stakeholder roles in building clinical decision support. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2009;9:44.
7. Moorthie S, Hall A, Wright C F. Informatics and clinical genome sequencing: opening the black box. Genet Med 2013;15:165-171.
8. Carman KL, Dardess P, Maurer M, et al. Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32:223-231.
9. Martin-Sanchez F, Maojo V, Lopez-Campos G. Integrating genomics into health information systems. Methods Inf Med 2002;41:25-30.
10. The eMERGE Network. http://emerge.mc.vanderbilt.edu/. Accessed 28 March 2013.
11. McCarty CA, Chapman-Stone D, Derfus T, Giampietro P F, Fost N; Marshfield Clinic PMRP Community Advisory Group. Community consultation and communication for a population-based DNA biobank: the Marshfield clinic personalized medicine research project. Am J Med Genet A 2008;146A:3026-3033.
12. McCarty CA, Chisholm RL, Chute CG, et al.; eMERGE Team. The eMERGE Network: a consortium of biorepositories linked to electronic medical records data for conducting genomic studies. BMC Med Genomics 2011;4:13.
13. McCarty CA, Garber A, Reeser JC, Fost NC; Personalized Medicine Research Project Community Advisory Group and Ethics and Security Advisory Board. Study newsletters, community and ethics advisory boards, and focus group discussions provide ongoing feedback for a large biobank. Am J Med Genet A 2011;155A:737-741.
14. Brothers KB, Morrison DR, Clayton EW. Two large-scale surveys on community attitudes toward an opt-out biobank. Am J Med Genet A 2011;155A:2982-2990.
15. Lemke AA, Wu JT, Waudby C, Pulley J, Somkin C P, Trinidad SB. Community engagement in biobanking: experiences from the eMERGE Network. Genomics Soc Policy 2010;6:35-52.
16. Lemke AA, Wolf WA, Hebert-Beirne J, Smith ME. Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing. Public Health Genomics 2010;13:368-377.
17. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 2001.
18. Bates DW, Gawande AA. Improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med 2003;348:2526-2534.
19. Lorenzi NM, Kouroubali A, Detmer DE, Bloomrosen M. How to successfully select and implement electronic health records (EHR) in small ambulatory practice settings. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2009;9:15.
20. Lorenzi NM, Novak LL, Weiss JB, Gadd CS, Unertl KM. Crossing the implementation chasm: a proposal for bold action. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:290-296.
21. Ash JS, Sittig D F, Seshadri V, Dykstra RH, Carpenter JD, Stavri PZ. Adding insight: a qualitative cross-site study of physician order entry. Int J Med Inform 2005;74:623-628.
22. Berg M. Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges. Int J Med Inform 2001; 64: 143-156.
23. Lorenzi NM, Riley RT. Organizational issues = change. Int J Med Inform 2003;69:197-203.
24. Koen P, Ajamian G, Burkart R et al. Providing clarity and a common language to the 'fuzzy front end.' Res Tech Manag 2001;44:46-55.
25. Martin-Sanchez F, Iakovidis I, Nørager S, et al. Synergy between medical informatics and bioinformatics: facilitating genomic medicine for future health care. J Biomed Inform 2004;37:30-42.
26. Hoffman A, Montgomery R, Aubry W, Tunis SR. How best to engage patients, doctors, and other stakeholders in designing comparative effectiveness studies. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:1834-1841.
27. O'Haire C, McPheeters M, Nakamoto EK, et al. Methods for Engaging Stakeholders to Identify and Prioritize Future Research Needs. Methods Future Research Needs Report No. 4. AHRQ Publication No. 11-EHC044-EF. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Rockville, MD, 2011.
28. Adida B, Kohane IS. GenePING: secure, scalable management of personal genomic data. BMC Genomics 2006;7:93.
29. Johnson CM, Johnson TR, Zhang J. A user-centered framework for redesigning health care interfaces. J Biomed Inform 2005;38:75-87.
30. ISO/TC. Ergonomics of human-system interaction-Part 210: Human-centered design for interactive systems. International standard ISO 9241-210:2010. ISO/TC 159/SC 42010. http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue-detail. htm?csnumber=52075. Accessed 28 March 2013.
31. Middleton B, Bloomrosen M, Dente MA, et al. Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: recommendations from AMIA. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20(e1):e2-e8.
32. Horsky J, Schiff GD, Johnston D, Mercincavage L, Bell D, Middleton B. Interface design principles for usable decision support: a targeted review of best practices for clinical prescribing interventions. J Biomed Inform 2012;45:1202-1216.
33. Osheroff JA, Teich JM, Middleton B, Steen EB, Wright A, Detmer DE. A roadmap for national action on clinical decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:141-145.
34. Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Harvey E, Oxman AD, Thomson MA. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group. BMJ 1998;317:465-468.
35. Schulman J, Kuperman GJ, Kharbanda A, Kaushal R. Discovering how to think about a hospital patient information system by struggling to evaluate it: a committee's journal. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:537-541.
36. Carspecken CW, Sharek PJ, Longhurst C, Pageler NM. A clinical case of electronic health record drug alert fatigue: consequences for patient outcome. Pediatrics 2013;131:e1970-e1973.
37. Shah NR, Seger AC, Seger DL, et al. Improving acceptance of computerized prescribing alerts in ambulatory care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13: 5-11.
38. Holtzblatt K, Wendell JB, Wood S. Rapid Contextual Design: A How-to Guide to Key Techniques for User-Centered Design (Interactive Technologies). Elsevier; 2005.
39. Haga SB, Burke W. Pharmacogenetic testing: not as simple as it seems. Genet Med 2008;10:391-395.
40. Larson EB. Building trust in the power of "big data" research to serve the public good. JAMA 2013;309:2443-2444.
41. McCarty CA, Wilke RA, Giampietro PF, Westbrook S, Caldwell MD. Marshfield Clinic Personalized Medicine Research Project (PMRP): design, methods and recruitment for a large, population-based biobank. Pers Med 2005;2:49-79.
42. GINAhelp.org. GINA & You: understanding GINA, the genetic information discrimination act of 2008. http://www.ginahelp.org/GINA-you.pdf. Accessed 28 March 2013.
43. Streicher SA, Sanderson SC, Jabs EW, et al. Reasons for participating and genetic information needs among racially and ethnically diverse biobank participants: a focus group study. J Community Genet 2011;2:153-163.
44. Sanderson SC, Diefenbach MA, Streicher SA, et al. Genetic and lifestyle causal beliefs about obesity and associated diseases among ethnically diverse patients: a structured interview study. Public Health Genomics 2013;16:83-93.
45. Horowitz CR, Robinson M, Seifer S. Community-based participatory research from the margin to the mainstream: are researchers prepared? Circulation 2009;119:2633-2642.
46. Newman ED, Lerch V, Jones JB, Stewart W. Touchscreen questionnaire patient data collection in rheumatology practice: development of a highly successful system using process redesign. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012;64:589-596.
47. Delbanco T, Walker J, Bell SK, et al. Inviting patients to read their doctors' notes: a quasi-experimental study and a look ahead. Ann Intern Med 2012;157:461-470.
48. Roden DM, Pulley JM, Basford MA, et al. Development of a large-scale de-identified DNA biobank to enable personalized medicine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2008;84:362-369.
49. Pulley J, Clayton E, Bernard GR, Roden DM, Masys DR. Principles of human subjects protections applied in an opt-out, de-identified biobank. Clin Transl Sci 2010;3:42-48.
50. National Committee for Quality Assurance. http://www.ncqa.org/AboutNCQA. aspx. Accessed 28 March 2013.
51. Leapfrog Group. http://www.leapfroggroup.org. Accessed 28 March 2013.
52. Health Level Seven International. Clinical Genomics Workingroup. http://www.hl7.org/Special/committees/clingenomics/index.cfm. Accessed 28 March 2013.
53. Middleton B. The clinical decision support consortium. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009;150:26-30.
54. Relling MV, Klein TE. CPIC: Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium of the Pharmacogenomics Research Network. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011;89: 464-467.
55. Burton H, Adams M, Bunton R, Schröder-Bäck P. Developing stakeholder involvement for introducing public health genomics into public policy. Public Health Genomics 2009;12:11-19.
56. Goddard KA, Knaus WA, Whitlock E, et al. Building the evidence base for decision making in cancer genomic medicine using comparative effectiveness research. Genet Med 2012;14:633-642.
57. Green RC, Berg JS, Grody WW, Kalia SS, Korf BR, Martin CL, et al. ACMG Recommendations for Reporting of Incidental Findings in Clinical Exome and Genome Sequencing. Genet Med 2013;15:565-574.