Lineage relationship of CD8+ T cell subsets is revealed by progressive changes in the epigenetic landscape

Cellular and Molecular Immunology

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 502-513

  Crompton, Joseph G ^a,b   Narayanan, Manikandan ^c   Cuddapah, Suresh ^d   Roychoudhuri, Rahul ^a   Ji, Yun ^a   Yang, Wenjing ^e   Patel, Shashank J ^i,j   Sukumar, Madhusudhanan ^a   Palmer, Douglas C ^a   Peng, Weiqun ^e   Wang, Ena ^f,g   Marincola, Francesco M ^f,g   Klebanoff, Christopher A ^a   Zhao, Keji ^h   Tsang, John S ^c   Gattinoni, Luca ^a   Restifo, Nicholas P ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES   (United States)

^d NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f SIDRA MEDICAL AND RESEARCH CENTER   (Qatar)

^g NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^h NATIONAL HEART LUNG AND BLOOD INSTITUTE   (United States)

ⁱ GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^j NONE   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTONE H3; HISTONE;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CD8+ T LYMPHOCYTE; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EFFECTOR CELL; EPIGENETICS; GENE ACTIVATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOMICS; HISTONE MODIFICATION; IMMUNOLOGICAL MEMORY; LYMPHOCYTE DIFFERENTIATION; MEMORY T LYMPHOCYTE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; ONTOGENY; STEM CELL; T LYMPHOCYTE SUBPOPULATION; ANIMAL; C57BL MOUSE; CELL LINEAGE; CYTOLOGY; ENHANCER REGION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; GENETICS; IMMUNOLOGY; LYMPHOCYTE SUBPOPULATION; METABOLISM; METHYLATION; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN PROCESSING;

ANIMALS; CD8-POSITIVE T-LYMPHOCYTES; CELL LINEAGE; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; ENHANCER ELEMENTS, GENETIC; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HISTONES; IMMUNOLOGIC MEMORY; LYMPHOCYTE SUBSETS; METHYLATION; MICE, INBRED C57BL; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL;

EID: 84977536611     PISSN: 16727681     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/cmi.2015.32     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Burnet FM. Immunological recognition of self. Science 1961; 133: 307-311.
2. Sallusto F, Lenig D, Forster R, Lipp M, Lanzavecchia A. Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions. Nature 1999; 401: 708-712.
3. Romero P et al. Four functionally distinct populations of human effector-memory CD81 T lymphocytes. J Immunol 2007; 178: 4112-4119.
4. Plumlee CR, Sheridan BS, Cicek BB, Lefrancois L. Environmental cues dictate the fate of individual CD81 T cells responding to infection. Immunity 2013; 39: 347-356.
5. Spangrude GJ, Heimfeld S, Weissman IL. Purification and characterization of mouse hematopoietic stem cells. Science 1988; 241: 58-62.
6. Weissman IL. Translating stem and progenitor cell biology to the clinic: barriers and opportunities. Science 2000; 287: 1442-1446.
7. Weissman IL. Stem cells: units of development, units of regeneration, and units in evolution. Cell 2000; 100: 157-168.
8. Gattinoni L et al. A human memory T cell subset with stem cell-like properties. Nat Med 2011; 17: 1290-1297.
9. Gattinoni L et al.Wnt signaling arrests effector T cell differentiation and generates CD81 memory stem cells. Nat Med 2009; 15: 808-813.
10. Zhang Y, Joe G, Hexner E, Zhu J, Emerson SG. Host-reactive CD81 memory stem cells in graft-versus-host disease. Nat Med 2005; 11: 1299-1305.
11. Lugli E et al. Superior T memory stem cell persistence supports longlived T cell memory. J Clin Invest 2013; 123: 594-599.
12. Kaech SM, Cui W. Transcriptional control of effector and memory CD81 T cell differentiation. Nat Rev Immunol 2012; 12: 749-761.
13. Intlekofer AM et al. Effector and memory CD81 T cell fate coupled by T-bet and eomesodermin. Nat Immunol 2005; 6: 1236-1244.
14. Roh TY, Cuddapah S, Cui K, Zhao K. The genomic landscape of histone modifications in human T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103: 15782-15787.
15. Araki Y et al. Genome-wide analysis of histone methylation reveals chromatin state-based regulation of gene transcription and function of memory CD81 T cells. Immunity 2009; 30: 912-925.
16. ShinHMet al. Epigenetic modifications induced by Blimp-1 Regulate CD8(1) T cell memory progression during acute virus infection. Immunity 2013; 39: 661-675.
17. Scharer CD, Barwick BG, Youngblood BA, Ahmed R, Boss JM. Global DNA methylation remodeling accompanies CD8 T cell effector function. J Immunol 2013; 191: 3419-3429.
18. Margueron R, Reinberg D. Chromatin structure and the inheritance of epigenetic information. Nat Rev Genet 2010; 11: 285-296.
19. Leek JT et al. Tackling the widespread and critical impact of batch effects in high-throughput data. Nat Rev Genet 2010; 11: 733-739.
20. Wei G et al. Global mapping of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 reveals specificity and plasticity in lineage fate determination of differentiating CD41 T cells. Immunity 2009; 30: 155-167.
21. Schones DE et al. Dynamic regulation of nucleosome positioning in the human genome. Cell 2008; 132: 887-898.
22. Barski A et al. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell 2007; 129: 823-837.
23. Best JA et al. Transcriptional insights into the CD8(1) T cell response to infection and memory T cell formation. Nat Immunol 2013; 14: 404-412.
24. Russ BE et al. Distinct epigenetic signatures delineate transcriptional programs during virus-specific CD8(1) T cell differentiation. Immunity 2014; 41: 853-865.
25. JeannetGet al. Essential role of the Wnt pathway effector Tcf-1 for the establishment of functional CD8 T cell memory. PNAS 2010; 107(21): 97777-82.
26. Zhao DM et al. Constitutive activation ofWnt signaling favors generation of memory CD8 T cells. J Immunol 2010; 184: 1191-1199.
27. Zhou X, Xue HH. Cutting edge: generation of memory precursors and functional memory CD81 T cells depends on T cell factor-1 and lymphoid enhancer-binding factor-1. J Immunol 2012; 189: 2722-2726.
28. Tejera MM, Kim EH, Sullivan JA, Plisch EH, Suresh M. FoxO1 controls effector-to-memory transition and maintenance of functional CD8 T cell memory. J Immunol 2013; 191: 187-199.
29. Kim MV, Ouyang W, Liao W, Zhang MQ, Li MO. The transcription factor Foxo1 controls central-memory CD81 T cell responses to infection. Immunity 2013; 39: 286-297.
30. Hess Michelini R, Doedens AL, Goldrath AW, Hedrick SM. Differentiation of CD8 memory T cells depends on Foxo1. J Exp Med 2013; 210: 1189-1200.
31. Kurachi M et al. The transcription factor BATF operates as an essential differentiation checkpoint in early effector CD81 T cells. Nat Immunol 2014; 15: 373-383.
32. Joshi NS et al. Inflammation directs memory precursor and shortlived effector CD8(1) T cell fates via the graded expression of T-bet transcription factor. Immunity 2007; 27: 281-295.
33. Pipkin ME et al. Interleukin-2 and inflammation induce distinct transcriptional programs that promote the differentiation of effector cytolytic T cells. Immunity 2010; 32: 79-90.
34. Intlekofer AM et al. Requirement for T-bet in the aberrant differentiation of unhelped memory CD81 T cells. J Exp Med 2007; 204: 2015-2021.
35. Intlekofer AM et al. Anomalous type 17 response to viral infection by CD81 T cells lacking T-bet and eomesodermin. Science 2008; 321: 408-411.
36. Rao RR, Li Q, Odunsi K, Shrikant PA. The mTOR kinase determines effector versus memory CD81 T cell fate by regulating the expression of transcription factors T-bet and eomesodermin. Immunity 2010; 32: 67-78.
37. Yeo CJ, Fearon DT. T-bet-mediated differentiation of the activated CD81 T cell. Eur J Immunol 2011; 41: 60-66.
38. Szabo SJ et al. A novel transcription factor, T-bet, directs Th1 lineage commitment. Cell 2000; 100: 655-669.
39. Szabo SJ et al. Distinct effects of T-bet in TH1 lineage commitment and IFN-gamma production in CD4 and CD8 T cells. Science 2002; 295: 338-342.
40. Rutishauser RL et al. Transcriptional repressor Blimp-1 promotes CD8(1) T cell terminal differentiation and represses the acquisition of central memory T cell properties. Immunity 2009; 31: 296-308.
41. Shin H et al. A role for the transcriptional repressor Blimp-1 in CD8(1) T cell exhaustion during chronic viral infection. Immunity 2009; 31: 309-320.
42. Kallies A, Xin A, Belz GT, Nutt SL. Blimp-1 transcription factor is required for the differentiation of effector CD8(1) T cells and memory responses. Immunity 2009; 31: 283-295.
43. Pearce EL, Poffenberger MC, Chang CH, Jones RG. Fueling immunity: insights into metabolism and lymphocyte function. Science 2013; 342: 1242454.
44. Ciriacy M, Breitenbach I. Physiological effects of seven different blocks in glycolysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 1979; 139: 152-160.
45. Fearon DT. The expansion and maintenance of antigen-selected CD8(1) T cell clones. Adv Immunol 2007; 96: 103-139.
46. Crompton JG et al. Akt inhibition enhances expansion of potent tumor-specific lymphocytes with memory cell characteristics. Cancer Res 2015; 75: 296-305.
47. Obar JJ, Lefrancois L. Memory CD81 T cell differentiation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010; 1183: 251-266.
48. Sukumar M et al. Inhibiting glycolytic metabolism enhances CD81 T cell memory and antitumor function. J Clin Invest 2013; 123: 4479-4488.
49. Youngblood B, Hale JS, Ahmed R. T-cell memory differentiation: insights from transcriptional signatures and epigenetics. Immunology 2013; 139: 277-284.
50. Bannard O, Kraman M, Fearon D. Pathways of memory CD81 T-cell development. Eur J Immunol 2009; 39: 2083-2087.
51. Hawkins RD et al. Distinct epigenomic landscapes of pluripotent and lineage-committed human cells. Cell Stem Cell 2010; 6: 479-491.
52. Zhu J et al. Genome-wide chromatin state transitions associated with developmental and environmental cues. Cell 2013; 152: 642-654.
53. Fearon DT, Manders P, Wagner SD. Arrested differentiation, the selfrenewing memory lymphocyte, and vaccination. Science 2001; 293: 248-250.
54. Restifo NP, Gattinoni L. Lineage relationship of effector and memory T cells. Curr Opin Immunol 2013; 25: 556-563.