A modular governance architecture in-the-making: How transnational standard-setters govern sustainability transitions

Research Policy

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 618-633

  Manning, Stephan ^a   Reinecke, Juliane ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Coffee production; Experimentalist governance; Modular architecture; Sustainability transitions; Transnational standards; Triple bottom line

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING; INNOVATION;

EMERGING ARCHITECTURES; EXPERIMENTALIST GOVERNANCE; GOVERNANCE ARCHITECTURES; MITIGATING GOVERNANCE; MODULAR ARCHITECTURES; MULTI-LEVEL PROCESS; SUSTAINABILITY TRANSITION; TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84977510926     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (129)

1. 4C, Goals of the 4C Association. 2010 Available at: 〈http://www.4c-coffeeassociation.org/en/goals.php?PHPSESSID=cootb4civ5rui9kpcm3hgc6qi2〉 [accessed February 16, 2010].
2. Abbott, K.W., Snidal, D., International ‘standards’ and international governance. J. Eur. Public Policy 8:3 (2001), 345–370.
3. Ansari, S., Wijen, F., Gray, B., Constructing a climate change logic: an institutional perspective on the “Tragedy of the Commons”. Organ. Sci. 24:4 (2013), 1014–1040.
4. Ansell, C.K., Pragmatist Democracy: Evolutionary Learning as Public Philosophy. 2011, University Press, New York, NY., Oxford.
5. Baldwin, C.Y., Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of firms: a synthesis. Ind. Corp. Change 17:1 (2008), 155–196.
6. Baldwin, C.Y., Clark, K.B., Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity. 2000, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. Baldwin, C., von Hippel, E., Modeling a paradigm shift: from producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organ. Sci. 22:6 (2011), 1399–1417.
8. Banerjee, S.B., Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reinvention of nature. Organ. Stud. 24:1 (2003), 143–180.
9. Bansal, P., Roth, K., Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Acad. Manage. J. 43:4, (2000), 717–736.
10. Bartley, T., Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: the rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. Am. J. Sociol. 113:2 (2007), 297–351.
11. Bechky, B.A., Sharing meaning across occupational communities: the transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14:3 (2003), 312–330.
12. Boersma, F., The urgency and necessity of a different type of market: the perspective of producers organized within the fair trade market. J. Bus. Ethics 86:S1 (2009), 51–61.
13. Boli, J., Thomas, G.M., World culture in the world polity: a century of international non-governmental organization. Am. Sociol. Rev. 62:2 (1997), 171–190.
14. Bos, J.J., Brown, R.R., Farrelly, M.A., A design framework for creating social learning situations. Global Environ. Change 23 (2013), 398–412.
15. Brunsson, N., Rasche, A., Seidl, D., The dynamics of standardisation: three perspectives on standards in organisation studies. Organ. Stud. 33:5–6 (2012), 613–632.
16. Callon, M., The sociology of an actor-network. Callon, M., Law, J., Rip, A., (eds.) Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology, 1986, Macmillan, London, 19–34.
17. Coenen, L., Benneworth, P., Truffer, B., Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Res. Policy 41 (2012), 968–979.
18. CRECE, Monitoring and Evaluation of Nespresso AAA Sustainable QualityTM Program in Colombia. 2013, Centro de Estudios Regionales Cafeteros y Empresariales Available at: 〈http://www.rainforestalliance.org/sites/default/files/publication/pdf/crece-program-report_0.pdf〉 [accessed March 7, 2014].
19. Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S., The discipline and practice of qualitative research. Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S., (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2000, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1–28.
20. Dingwerth, K., Pattberg, P., World politics and organizational fields: the case of transnational sustainability governance. Eur. J. Int. Relat. 15:4 (2009), 707–744.
21. Eberlein, B., Abbott, K.W., Black, J., Meidinger, E., Wood, S., Transnational business governance interactions: conceptualization and framework for analysis. Regul. Govern. 8:1 (2014), 1–21.
22. Elkington, J., Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. 1998, New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, BC.
23. Ethiraj, S.K., Levinthal, D., Bounded rationality and the search for organizational architecture: an evolutionary perspective on the design of organizations and their evolvability. Adm. Sci. Q. 49:3 (2004), 404–437.
24. European Commission, Contributing to Sustainable Development: The Role of Fair Trade and Non-Governmental Trade-Related Sustainability Assurance Schemes. 2009 Available at: 〈http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX: 52009DC0215:EN:NOT〉 [access 9/30, 2011].
25. Fairtrade, Guidance document on Fairtrade coffee standard: productivity and quality improvement. 2012 Available At: 〈http://www.fairtrade.net/fileadmin/user_upload/content/2009/products/EN-Guidance-document_Productivity_Quality-Improvement_2012-01-11_Final.pdf〉 [accessed October 1, 2015].
26. Fairtrade, New Fairtrade Climate Standard Enables Smallholders and Rural Communities to Fight Climate Change. 2015 Retrieved October 28, 2015, from 〈http://www.fairtrade.net/singleview+M57768251959.html〉 (1 October 2015).
27. Ferraro, F., Etzion, D., Gehman, J., Tackling grand challenges pragmatically: robust action revisited. Organ. Stud. 36:3 (2015), 363–390.
28. Fjeldstad, Ø.D., Snow, C.C., Miles, R.E., Lettl, C., The architecture of collaboration. Strateg. Manage. J. 33:6 (2012), 734–750.
29. Fourcade, M., Cents and sensibility: economic valuation and the nature of “nature”. Am. J. Sociol. 116:6 (2011), 1721–1777.
30. Fransen, L., Multi-stakeholder governance and voluntary programme interactions: legitimation politics in the institutional design of corporate social responsibility. Socio-Econ. Rev. 10:1 (2012), 163–192.
31. Fuenfschilling, L., Truffer, B., The structuration of socio-technical regimes—conceptual foundations from institutional theory. Res. Policy 43 (2014), 772–791.
32. Garud, R., Gehman, J., Metatheoretical perspectives on sustainability journeys: evolutionary, relational and durational. Res. Policy 41:6 (2012), 980–995.
33. Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., Changing competitive dynamics in network industries: an exploration of Sun Microsystems’ open systems strategy. Strateg. Manage. J. 14:5 (1993), 351–369.
34. Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., Technological and organizational designs for realizing economies of substitution. Strateg. Manage. J. 16:S1 (1995), 93–109.
35. Garud, R., Gehman, J., Karnøe, P., Categorization by association: nuclear technology and emission-free electricity. Res. Sociol. Work 21 (2010), 51–93.
36. Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., Langlois, R., Managing in the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks, and Organizations. 2009, Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA.
37. Gawer, A., Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: toward an integrative framework. Res. Policy 43 (2014), 1239–1249.
38. Geels, F.W., Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res. Policy 31 (2002), 1257–1274.
39. Geels, F.W., From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Res. Policy 33:6/7 (2004), 897–920.
40. Geels, F.W., Schot, J.W., Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy 36:3 (2007), 399–417.
41. Geels, F.W., Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Res. Policy 39 (2010), 495–510.
42. Genus, A., Coles, A.-M., Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions. Res. Policy 37 (2008), 1436–1445.
43. Giddens, A., Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. 1979, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA.
44. Giddens, A., The Constitution of Society, Outline of the Theory of Structuration. 1984, Polity Press, Cambridge.
45. Gilbert, D., Rasche, A., Waddock, S., Accountability in a Global Economy: The Emergence of International Accountability Standards. Business Ethics Quarterly 21:1 (2011), 23–44.
46. Girard, M., Stark, D., Distributing intelligence and organizing diversity in new-media projects. Environ. Plann. A 34:11 (2002), 1927–1949.
47. Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L., The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. 1967, Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago.
48. Gray, R., Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Account. Organ. Soc. 35:1 (2010), 47–62.
49. Grunwald, A., Technology policy between long-term planning requirements and short-ranged acceptance problems. new challenges for technology assessment. Grin, J., Grunwald, A., (eds.) Vision Assessment: Shaping Technology in the 21st Century Society. Towards a Repertoire for Technology assessment, 2000, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, 99–148.
50. Helms, W.S., Oliver, C., Webb, K., Antecedents of settlement on a new institutional practice: negotiation of the ISO 26000 Standard on social responsibility. Acad. Manage. J. 55:5 (2012), 1120–1145.
51. Henderson, R.M., Clark, K.B., Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Adm. Sci. Q. 35:1 (1990), 9–30.
52. Hess, D.J., Sustainability transitions: a political coalition perspective. Res. Policy 43 (2014), 278–283.
53. Hoffman, A.J., Climate Governance at the Crossroads: Experimenting with a Global Response after Kyoto. 2011, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
54. Hoffman, A.J., Bazerman, M.H., Changing practice on sustainability: understanding and overcoming the organizational and psychological barriers to action. Sharma, S., Starik, M., Husted, B., (eds.) Organizations and the Sustainability Mosaic: Crafting Long-Term Ecological and Societal Solutions., 2007, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 84–105.
55. ICO, Total Production of Exporting Countries. 2013, International Coffee Organization (ICO) 〈http://www.ico.org/prices/po.htm〉 [access: 07/22/2014].
56. ISEAL, ISEAL Code of Good Practice for Setting Social and Environmental Standards. 2010 Available at: 〈http://www.isealalliance.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=Page.ViewPage&Page ID=1046〉 [Accessed January 16, 2010].
57. Janesick, V.J., The choreography of qualitative research design: minuets, improvisations, and crystallization. Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S., (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2000, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 379–399.
58. Jessop, B., Governance and Metagovernance: On Reflexivity, Requisite Variety, and Requisite Irony. Bang, H.P., (eds.) Governance as social and political communication., 2003, Manchester University Press, Manchester, 142–172.
59. Kemp, R., Loorbach, D., Transition management: a reflexive governance approach. Voss, J.-P., Bauknecht, D., Kemp, R., (eds.) Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, 2006, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 103–130.
60. Kemp, R., Loorbach, D., Rotmans, J., Transition management as a model for managing processes of coevolution towards sustainable development. Int. J. Sustainable Dev. World Ecol. 14 (2007), 1–15.
61. Kivimaa, P., Government-affiliated intermediary organisations as actors in system-level transitions. Res. Policy 43 (2014), 1370–1380.
62. Kolk, A., Corporate social responsibility in the coffee sector: the dynamics of MNC responses and code development. Eur. Manage. J. 23:2 (2005), 228–236.
63. Kuhlmann, S., Technology assessment as constructive design and governance. Reinders, A., Diehl, J.C., Brezet, H., (eds.) The Power of Design, 2012, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
64. Langley, A., Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Manage. Rev. 24:4 (1999), 691–710.
65. Latour, B., Science in Action. 1987, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
66. Lauridsen, E.H., Joergensen, U., Sustainable transition of electronic products through waste policy. Res. Policy 39 (2010), 486–494.
67. Lawrence, T.B., Hardy, C., Phillips, N., Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: the emergence of proto-institutions. Acad. Manage. J. 45:1 (2002), 281–290.
68. Levy, D.L., Lichtenstein, B.M.B., Approaching business and the environment with complexity theory. Bansal, P., Hoffman, A.J., (eds.) The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment, 2011, OUP Oxford, Oxford, UK, 591–610.
69. Lindblom, C.E., The science of muddling through. Public Adm. Rev. 19:2 (1959), 79–88.
70. Loconto, A., Fouilleux, E., Politics of private regulation: ISEAL and the shaping of transnational sustainability governance. Regul. Govern. 8 (2014), 166–175.
71. Maguire, S., Hardy, C., The emergence of new global institutions: a discursive perspective. Organ. Stud. 27:1 (2006), 7–29.
72. Manning, S., Boons, F., von Hagen, O., Reinecke, J., National contexts matter: the co-evolution of sustainability standards in global value chains. Ecol. Econ. 83 (2012), 197–209.
73. Manning, S., von Hagen, O., Linking local experiments to global standards: how project networks promote global institution-building. Scand. J. Manage. 26:4 (2010), 398–416.
74. Markard, J., Raven, R., Truffer, B., Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects. Res. Policy 41 (2012), 955–967.
75. Meyer, J.W., World society, institutional theories, and the actor. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36:1 (2010), 1–20.
76. Nespresso, Nestlé Nespresso: Creating Shared Value through Real Farmer Income. 2012 Available at: 〈http://sustainabilitymbachallenge.com/〉 [accessed December 6, 2012].
77. Nespresso, The Nespresso AAA sustainable quality(tm) program: delivering long-term excellence. 2015 Available at: 〈http://www.nespresso.com/positive/nl/en#!/sustainability/aaa-sustainable-quality〉 [accessed: 12/10/2015].
78. Newig, J., Voss, J.-P., Monstadt, J., Editorial: Governance for sustainable development in the face of ambivalence, uncertainty and distributed power: an introduction. J. Environ. Policy Plann. 9:3/4 (2007), 185–192.
79. Newton, T.J., Creating the new ecological order? Elias and actor-network theory. Acad. Manage. Rev. 27:4 (2002), 523–540.
80. Nicolini, D., Practice as the site of knowing: insights from the field of telemedicine. Organ. Sci. 22:3 (2011), 602–620.
81. Perez-Aleman, P., Collective learning in global diffusion: spreading quality standards in a developing country cluster. Organ. Sci. 22:1 (2011), 173–189.
82. Perez, M.G., World's Top 10 Coffee-Consuming Countries in 2011. 2011 〈Bloomberg.com〉 [access: 7/22/2014].
83. Pettigrew, A.M., Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice. Organ. Sci. 1:3 (1990), 267–292.
84. Pichop, G.N., Kemegue, F.M., International coffee agreement: incomplete membership and instability of the cooperative game. Southwest Bus. Econ. J. 14 (2005/6), 25–38.
85. Pinch, T.J., Bijker, W.E., The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Bijker, W.E., Hughes, T.P., Pinch, T.J., (eds.) Social construction of technological systems, 1987, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 17–50.
86. Ponte, S., The “latte revolution”? Regulation, markets and consumption in the global coffee chain. World Dev. 30:7 (2002), 1099–1122.
87. Rasche, A., Collaborative Governance 2.0. Corp. Govern. 10:4 (2010), 500–511.
88. Rasche, A., Global policies and local practice. Bus. Ethics Q. 22:4 (2012), 679–708.
89. Raven, R.P.J.M., van den Bosch, S., Weterings, R., Transitions and strategic niche management: towards a competence kit for practitioners. Int. J. Technol. Manage. 51:1 (2010), 57–74.
90. Reinecke, J., Manning, S., Von Hagen, O., The emergence of a standards market: multiplicity of sustainability standards in the global coffee industry. Organ. Stud. 33:5–6 (2012), 791–814.
91. Rip, A., A co-evolutionary approach to reflexive governance— and its ironies. Voss, J.-P., Bauknecht, D., Kemp, R., (eds.) Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, 2006, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
92. Rip, A., Kemp, R., Technological change. Rayner, S., Malone, E., (eds.) Human Choice and Climate Change, vol. 2, 1998, Battelle, Columbus, OH.
93. Romijn, H.A., Caniels, M.C.J., The Jatropha biofuels sector in Tanzania 2005–2009: evolution towards sustainability?. Res. Policy 40 (2011), 618–636.
94. Sabel, C.F., Zeitlin, J., Experimentalist governance. Levi-Faur, D., (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Governance, 2012, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
95. SAN, Sustainable Agriculture Standard. 2008 Available at: 〈http://sanstandards.org/sitio/〉 [accessed March 6, 2009].
96. Sanchez, R., Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strateg. Manage. J. 16:S1 (1995), 135–159.
97. Sanchez, R., Mahoney, J.T., Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strateg. Manage. J. 17:Winter (1996), 63–76.
98. Schatzki, T.R., Practices and actions a Wittgensteinian critique of Bourdieu and Giddens. Philos. Soc. Sci. 27:3 (1997), 283–308.
99. Schot, J.W., The usefulness of evolutionary models for explaining innovation. The case of the Netherlands in the nineteenth century. Hist. Technol. 14 (1998), 173–200.
100. Shove, E., Walker, G., CAUTION! Transitions ahead: politics, practice, and sustainable transition management. Environ. Plann. A 39:4 (2007), 763–770.
101. Shove, E., Walker, G., Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life. Res. Policy 39 (2010), 471–476.
102. Shrivastava, P., The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Acad. Manage. Rev. 20:4 (1995), 936–960.
103. Sidwell, M., Unfair Trade. 2008 Available at: 〈http://www.adamsmith.org/publications/economy/unfair-trade-20080225961/〉 (access: 7/24/2014).
104. Siggelkow, P., Persuasion with case studies. Acad. Manage. J. 50:1 (2007), 20–24.
105. Sinha, K.K., Van de Ven, A.H., Designing work within and between organizations. Organ. Sci. 16:4 (2005), 389–408.
106. Smith, A., Raven, R., What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Res. Policy 41 (2012), 1025–1036.
107. Smith, A., Stirling, A., Berkhout, F., The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Res. Policy 34 (2005), 1491–1510.
108. Smith, A., Stirling, A., Moving outside or inside?. Objectification and reflexivity in the governance of socio-technical systems. J. Environ. Policy Plann. 9:3–4 (2007), 351–373.
109. Smith, A., Voss, J.-P., Grin, J., Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: the allure of the multilevel perspective and its challenges. Res. Policy 39 (2010), 435–448.
110. Sørensen, E., Metagovernance. Am. Rev. Public Adm. 36:1 (2006), 98–114.
111. SSI, The state of sustainability initiatives review 2014. Int. Inst. Sustainable Dev., 2014 Available at: 〈www.iisd.org/pdf/2014/ssi_2014.pdf〉 [accessed January 3, 2014].
112. Star, S.L., The ethnography of infrastructure. Am. Behav. Sci. 43 (1999), 377–391.
113. Strauss, A., Corbin, J., Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. 1990, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
114. TCC, Tropical Commodity Coalition: Coffee Barometer. 2012 Available at: 〈http://www.teacoffeecocoa.org/tcc/Publications/Our-publications〉 [accessed Sept 9, 2012].
115. Timmermans, S., Epstein, S., A world of standards but not a standards world: toward a sociology of standards and standardization. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 36:1 (2010), 69–89.
116. Tolbert, P.S., Zucker, L.G., The institutionalization of institutional theory. Clegg, S., Hardy, C., (eds.) Studying Organization. Theory and Method, 1999, Sage, London, 169–184.
117. Tsoukas, H., A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organ. Sci. 20:6 (2009), 941–957.
118. Valente, M., Theorizing firm adoption of sustaincentrism. Organ. Stud. 33:4 (2012), 563–591.
119. Van Driel, H., Schot, J., Radical innovation as a multi-level process: introducing floating grain elevators in the port of Rotterdam. Technol. Cult. 46:1 (2005), 51–76.
120. Voss, J.-P., Bornemann, B., The politics of reflexive governance: challenges for designing adaptive management and transition management. Ecol. Soc., 16(2), 2011, 9 lang;http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss2/art9/〉.
121. Voss, J.-P., Newig, J., Kastens, B., Monstadt, J., Noelting, B., Steering for sustainable development: a typology of problems and strategies with respect to ambivalence, uncertainty and distributed power. J. Environ. Policy Plann. 9:3–4 (2007), 193–212.
122. Voss, J.-P., Truffer, B., Konrad, K., Sustainability foresight: reflexive governance in the transformation of utility systems. Voss, J.-P., Bauknecht, D., Kemp, R., (eds.) Reflexive goverrnance for sustainable development, 2006, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 162–188.
123. Walsh, I.J., Bartunek, J.M., Cheating the fates: organizational foundings in the wake of demise. Acad. Manage. J. 54:5 (2011), 1017–1044.
124. WCED, Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future., 1987, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
125. Weick, K.E., Sensemaking in Organizations. 1995, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
126. Wittgenstein, L., Philosophical Investigations. second ed., 1997, Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.
127. Yanow, D., Tsoukas, H., What is reflection-in-action?. A phenomenological account. J. Manage. Stud. 46:8 (2009), 1339–1364.
128. Yin, R.K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods. third Ed., 2003, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
129. Zhou, Y.M., Designing for complexity: using divisions and hierarchy to manage complex tasks. Organ. Sci. 24:2 (2013), 339–355.