Transition management: A reflexive governance approach

Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 103-130

  Kemp, René ^a   Loorbach, Derk ^b  

^a MERIT ^*  (Germany)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881822892     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Ashford, Nicholas, Wim Hafkamp, Frits Prakke and Philip Vergragt (2001), Pathways to Sustainable IndustrialTransformation: Cooptimising Competitiveness, Employment and Environment, Cambridge, MA: Ashford Associates.
2. Beck, Ulrich (1997), The Reinvention of Politics: Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
3. Butter, Maurits (2002), Een handreiking voor transitiebeleid, Delft: TNO-STB.
4. Coenen, Frans (2002), 'The role of stakeholders in changing consumption and production patterns', expert report for OECD seminar 'Improving Governance for Sustainable Development', held 22-3 November 2001, available at http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/50/21/1940033.pdf.
5. Collingridge, David (1980), The Social Control of Technology, London: Pinter.
6. Dirven, Jan, Jan Rotmans and Arie-Pieter Verkaik (2002), 'Samenleving in Transitie. Een vernieuwend gezichtspunt', LNV, ICIS en Innovatienetwerk Groene Ruimte in Agrocluster, April.
7. Eising, Rainer, and Beate Kohler-Koch (1999), 'Introduction: network governance in the European Union', in Rainer Eising and Beate Kohler-Koch (eds.) The Transformation of EU Governance, London: Routledge.
8. Etzioni, Amitai (1986), 'Mixed scanning revisited', Public Administration Review, January/February, 8-14.
9. Geels, F.W. (2002a), 'Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study', Research Policy, 31(8/9), 1257-74.
10. Geels, F.W. (2002b), 'Understanding the dynamics of technological transitions, a co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis', PhD thesis, Enschede: Twente University Press.
11. Gibbons, M., H. Nowotny, C. Limoges, M. Trow, S. Schwartzman and P. Scott (1994), The new production of knowledge: the Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Grunwald, Armin (2000), 'Technology policy between long-term planning requirements and short-ranged acceptance problems. New challenges for technology assessment', in John Grin and ArminGrunwald (eds),Vision Assessment: Shaping Technology in the 21st Century Society. Towards a Repertoire for Technology Assessment, Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.
13. Gunderson, L.H. and B. Holling (2002), Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, Washington DC: Island Press.
14. Kasemir, B. and M. Van Asselt (1999), 'Integrated assessment: multiple perspectives in interaction', International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 11 (4), 407-25.
15. Kemp, René, and Luc Soete (1992), 'The greening of technological progress: an evolutionary perspective', Futures, 24 (5), 437-57.
16. Kemp, René and Jan Rotmans (2001), 'The management of the co-evolution of technical, environmental and social systems', paper for international conference 'Towards Environmental Innovation Systems', September 27-9 2001, Garmisch Partenkirchen, Germany' forthcoming in Matthias Weber and Jens Hemmelskamp (eds) TowardsEnvironmental Innovation Systems, SpringerVerlag.
17. Kemp, René and Jan Rotmans (2002), 'Managing the transition to sustainable mobility', paper for international workshop 'Transitions to Sustainability through System Innovations', University of Twente, 4-6 July; published in Boelie Elzen, Frank Geels and Ken Green (eds), System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy, Cheltenham UK and Northampton, MA, Edward Elgar, pp. 137-67.
18. Kemp, R. and J. Rotmans (2005), 'The management of the co-evolution of technical, environmental and social systems', in M.Weber and J. Hemmelskamp (eds), Towards Environmental Innovation Systems, Heidelberg/New York: Springer Verlag, pp. 33-55.
19. Kohler-Koch, Beate (1999), 'The evolution and transformation of European governance', in Rainer Eising and Beate Kohler-Koch (eds), The Transformation of EU Governance, London: Routledge, pp. 14-35.
20. Kooiman, Jan (1993), 'Governance and governability: using complexity, dynamics and diversity', in Jan Kooiman (ed.), Modern Governance. New Government-Society Interactions, London: Sage, pp. 35-48.
21. Latour, B. (1991), 'Technology is society made durable' in J. Law (ed), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, Routledge: London, pp. 103-31.
22. Lee, Kai N. (1993), Compass and Gyroscope. Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment, Washington DC: Island Press.
23. Lindblom, Charles (1965), The Intelligence of Democracy, New York: Free Press.
24. Lindblom, Charles E. (1979), 'Still muddling, not yet through', Public Administration Review, November/December, 517-26.
25. Lindblom, Charles (1997), 'A Century of Planning', in Michael Kenny and James Meadowcroft (eds) Planning Sustainability, London and New York: Routledge, 39-65.
26. Loorbach, Derk, and JanRotmans (2002), 'Society in technology and technology in society', paper presented at the international conference 'Engineering Education for Sustainable Development' (EESD), 24/25 October, Delft, The Netherlands.
27. March, J.G. and J.P. Olsen (1995), Democratic Governance, New York: The Free Press.
28. Mayntz,Renate (1994), 'Governing failures and the problem of governability: some comments on a theoretical paradigm', in Jan Kooiman (ed.), Modern Governance. New Government-Society Interactions, London: Sage, 9-20.
29. McElroy, M. (2003), The New Knowledge Management: complexity, learning and sustainable innovation, Burlington: Butterworth-Heinemann.
30. Meadowcroft, James (1997), 'Planning for sustainable development: what can be learned from the critics?', in Michael Kenny and James Meadowcroft (eds) Planning Sustainability, London and New York: Routledge, 12-38.
31. Mesarovic, Mihaljo (2001), 'Evolution of sustainability concept', mimeo.
32. Midgley, G. (2000), Systemic Intervention: Philosophy, Methodology and Practice, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
33. NMP-4 (2000), 'Een wereld en een wil. Werken aan duurzaamheid', ('A world and a will. Working on sustainability'), The Hague.
34. NRLO (1999), 'Innovating with ambition, opportunities for agribusiness, rural areas and the fishing industry', The Hague.
35. Rip,A. and R.Kemp (1998), 'Technological change', in S.Rayner and E.L. Malone (eds), Human Choice and Climate Change, Volume 2, Columbus, OH: Battelle Press, 327-99.
36. Rosenberg, N. (1976), 'The direction of technological change: inducement mechanisms and focusing devices', in Nathan Rosenberg, Perspectives on Technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Rotmans, J. (1998), 'Methods for IA: the challenges and opportunities ahead', Environmental Modelling and Assessment, 3 (3), 155-79.
38. Rotmans, Jan, René Kemp, Marjolein van Asselt, Frank Geels, Geert Verbong and Kirsten Molendijk (2000), 'Transities en Transitiemanagement. De casus van een emissiearme energievoorziening'. Final report of study 'Transitions and transition management' for the 4th National Environmental Policy Plan (NMP-4) of the Netherlands, October 2000, Maastricht: ICIS and MERIT.
39. Rotmans, Jan, René Kemp and Marjolein van Asselt (2001), 'More evolution than revolution. Transition management in public policy', Foresight 3 (1): 15-31.
40. Scharpf, F. (1994), 'Community and autonomy. Multi-level policy making in the EU', Journal of European Public Policy, 1, 219-42.
41. Schnabel, P. (2000), SCP presentation, The Hague.
42. Senge, Peter (1990), The Fifth Discipline. The Art and Practices of the Learning Organization, New York: Currency Doubleday.
43. Walker, Warren E., S. Adnan Rahman and Jonathan Cave (2001), 'Adaptive policies, policy analysis, and policy-making', European Journal of Operational Research, 128, 282-89.
44. WCED (1987), Our Common Future, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45. Weiss, Andrew and Edward Woodhouse (1992), 'Reforming incrementalism: a constructive response to the critics, Policy Sciences, 25(3), 255-73.