Enhancing urban landscape configurations by integrating 3D landscape pattern analysis with people’s landscape preferences

Environmental Earth Sciences

Volumn 75, Issue 12, 2016, Pages

  Chen, Ziyue ^a,b   Xu, Bing ^a,c,d  

^a BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b JOINT CENTER FOR GLOBAL CHANGE STUDIES   (China)

^c TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

3D pattern analysis; Evaluation; Landscape preferences; Lidar; Urbanization

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; SURVEYS;

3D PATTERNS; EVALUATION; LANDSCAPE CONFIGURATION; LANDSCAPE PATTERN ANALYSIS; LANDSCAPE PREFERENCES; LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING; URBAN LANDSCAPE PATTERNS; URBANIZATION;

OPTICAL RADAR;

AIRBORNE SURVEY; DECISION MAKING; LAND EVALUATION; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; LIDAR; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; URBAN AREA; URBANIZATION;

CAMBRIDGE [CAMBRIDGESHIRE]; CAMBRIDGESHIRE; CANVEY ISLAND; CHINA; ENGLAND; ESSEX [ENGLAND]; JIANGSU; NANJING [JIANGSU]; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84975842621     PISSN: 18666280     EISSN: 18666299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-016-5272-7     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Antonarakis AS, Richards KS, Brasington J (2008) Object-based land cover classification using airborne LiDAR. Remote Sens Environ 112:2988–2998
2. Aoki Y (1991) Evaluation methods for landscapes with greenery. Landsc Res 16:3–6
3. Arnberger A (2006) Recreation use of urban forests: an inter-area comparison. Urban For Urban Green 4:135–144
4. Axelsson P (2000) DEM generation form laser scanner data using adaptive TIN models. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens XXXIII(part B4):110–117
5. Bartels M, Wei H (2010) Threshold-free object and ground point separation in LIDAR data. Pattern Recogn Lett 31(10):1089–1099
6. Bernath K, Roschewitz A (2008) Recreational benefits of urban forests: explaining visitors’ willingness to pay in the context of the theory of planned behavior. J Environ Manag 89:155–166
7. Bhatti M, Church A (2003) Home, the culture of nature and meanings of gardens in late modernity. Hous Stud 19(1):37–51
8. Brennan R, Webster TL (2006) Object-oriented land cover classification of lidar derived surfaces. Can J Remote Sens 32(2):162–172
9. Canas I, Ayugab E, Ayugac F (2009) A contribution to the assessment of scenic quality of landscapes based on preferences expressed by the public. Land Use Policy 26:1173–1181
10. Chen ZY, Gao BB (2014) An object-based method for urban land cover classification using airborne Lidar data. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens. doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2332337
11. Chen YH, Su W, Li J, Sun ZP (2009) Hierarchical object oriented classification using very high resolution imagery and LIDAR data over urban areas. Adv Space Res 43:1101–1110
12. Chen ZY, Devereux B, Gao BB, Amable G (2012) Upward-fusion urban DTM generating method using airborne Lidar data. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 72:121–130
13. Chen ZY, Xu B, Devereux B (2014) Urban landscape pattern analysis based on 3D landscape models. Appl Geogr 55:82–91
14. Chen ZY, Xu B, Devereux B (2016) Assessing public aesthetic preferences towards some urban landscape patterns: the case study of two different geographic groups. Environ Monit Assess 188(1):1–17
15. Daniel TC (2001) Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landsc Urban Plan 54:267–281
16. David CH, Wang XY (2002) Urban land cover classification from high resolution multi-spectral IKONOS imagery. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2002. IGARSS.2, 1204-1206
17. Dramstad WE, Tveit M, Fjellsta WJ, Fry GLA (2006) Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure. Landsc Urban Plan 78:465–474
18. García L, Hernández J, Ayuga F (2006) Analysis of the materials and exterior texture of agro-industrial buildings: a photo-analytical approach to landscape integration. Landsc Urban Plan 74(2):110–124
19. Hill RA, Thomson AG (2005) Mapping woodland species composition and structure using airborne spectral and LiDAR data. Int J Remote Sens 26:3763–3779
20. Howley P (2011) Landscape aesthetics: assessing the general publics’ preferences towards rural landscapes. Ecol Econ 72:161–169
21. Howley P, Donoghue CO, Hynes S (2012) Exploring public preferences for traditional farming landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 104:66–74
22. Huang JP, Zhou CH, Lee XH, Bao YX, Zhao XY, Fung J, Richter A, Liu X, Zheng YQ (2013) The effects of rapid urbanization on the levels in tropospheric nitrogen dioxide and ozone over East China. Atmos Environ 77:558–567
23. Jensen LM (1997) Classification of urban land cover based on expert systems, object models and texture. Comput Environ Urban Syst 21(3–4):291–302
24. Johansen K, Arroyo LA, Armston J, Phinn S, Witte C (2010) Mapping riparian condition indicators in a sub-tropical savanna environment from discrete return Lidar data using object-based image analysis. Ecol Ind 10:796–807
25. Ke YH, Quackenbush LJ, Im J (2010) Synergistic use of QuickBird multispectral imagery and LIDAR data for object-based forest species classification. Remote Sens Environ 114(6):1141–1154
26. Kraus K, Pfeifer N (2001) Advanced DTM generation from LIDAR data. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sensing XXXIV(part 3/W4):23–30
27. Lee Y, Kozar KA (2009) Designing usable online stores: a landscape preference perspective. Inf Manag 46:31–41
28. Long HL, Liu YQ, Hou XG, Li TT, Li YR (2014) Effects of land use transitions due to rapid urbanization on ecosystem services: implications for urban planning in the new developing area of China. Habitat Int 44:536–544
29. Myint SW, Gober P, Brazel A, Clarke SG, Weng QH (2011) Per-pixel vs. object-based classification of urban land cover extraction using high spatial resolution imagery. Remote Sens Environ 115(5):1145–1161
30. Ndubisi F (2002) Ecological planning: a historical and comparative synthesis. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
31. Nielsen AB, Olsen SB, Lundhede T (2007) An economic valuation of the recreational benefits associated with nature-based forest management practices. Landsc Urban Plan 80:63–71
32. Ode Å, Fry G (2002) Visual aspects in urban woodland management. Urban For Urban Green 1:15–24
33. Ode Å, Fry G, Tveit MS, Messager P, Miller D (2009) Indicators of perceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference. J Environ Manag 90:375–383
34. Rauwald KS, Moore CF (2002) Environmental attitudes as predictors of policy support across three countries. Environ Behav 34(6):709–739
35. Roth M (2006) Validating the use of Internet survey techniques in visual landscape assessment—an empirical study from Germany. Landsc Urban Plan 78:179–192
36. Sevenant M, Antrop M (2009) Cognitive attributes and aesthetic preferences in assessment and differentiation of landscapes. J Environ Manag 90:2889–2899
37. Smith EL, Bishop ID, Williams KJH, Ford RM (2012) Scenario Chooser: an interactive approach to eliciting public landscape preferences. Landsc Urban Plan 106:230–243
38. Tian GJ, Qiao Z (2014) Assessing the impact of the urbanization process on net primary productivity in China in 1989–2000. Environ Pollut 84:320–326
39. Tveit M (2009) Indicators of visual scale as predictors of landscape preference; a comparison between groups. J Environ Manag 90:2882–2888
40. Ulrich RS, Simons RF, Losito BD, Fiorito E, Miles MA, Zelson M (1991) Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol 11:201–230
41. Vosselman G (2000) Slope based filtering of laser altimetry data. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens XXXIII(part B3/2):935–942
42. Wang Q (2014) Effects of urbanisation on energy consumption in China. Energy Policy 65:332–339
43. Yang J, McBride J, Zhou J, Sun Z (2005) The urban forest in Beijing and its role in air pollution reduction. Urban For Urban Green 3:65–78
44. Zhang J, Foody GM (1998) A fuzzy classification of sub-urban land cover from remotely sensed imagery. Int J Remote Sens 19(14):2721–2738
45. Zhao M, Kong ZH, Escobedo FJ, Gao J (2010) Impacts of urban forests on offsetting carbon emissions from industrial energy use in Hangzhou, China. J Environ Manag 91(4):807–813
46. Zheng B, Zhang YQ, Chen JQ (2011) Preference to home landscape: wildness or neatness? Landsc Urban Plan 99:1–8
47. Zhou D, Xu H, Wang L, Lin Z (2015) Assessing urbanization quality using structure and function analyses: a case study of the urban agglomeration around Hangzhou Bay (UAHB), China. Habitat Int 49:165–176