Exploring public preferences for traditional farming landscapes

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 104, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 66-74

  Howley, Peter ^a   Donoghue, Cathal O ^a   Hynes, Stephen ^b  

^a Rural Economy Research Centre Ireland   (Ireland)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Environmental value orientations; Ireland; Landscape preferences; Traditional farm landscapes

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; BUDGET CONTROL; POPULATION STATISTICS;

AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES; DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES; IRELAND; LANDSCAPE PREFERENCES; PHYSICAL ASPECTS; PUBLIC PREFERENCES; TRADITIONAL FARM LANDSCAPES;

AGRICULTURE;

ARABLE LAND; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES; HOUSEHOLD SURVEY; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; PERCEPTION; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; RESIDENT POPULATION; TRADITIONAL AGRICULTURE;

IRELAND;

EID: 81455124782     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.09.006     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Ackrill R.W. The CAP and its reform-half a century of change?. EuroChoices 2008, 7:13-21.
2. Arriaza M., Canas-Ortega J.F., Canas-Madueno J.A., Ruiz-Aviles P. Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 2004, 69:115-125.
3. Arriaza M., Gomez-Limon Z., Kallas Z., Nekhay O. Demand for non-commodity outputs from mountain olive groves. Agricultural Economics Review 2008, 9:5-21.
4. Balling J.D., Falk J.H. Development of visual preference for natural environments. Environment and Behaviour 1982, 14:5-28.
5. Barr S. Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviors: A UK case study of household waste management. Environment and Behaviour 2007, 39:435-473.
6. Bishop I.D. Visualization in landscape and environmental planning: Technology and applications 2005, Taylor and Francis, New York.
7. Boel M.F. Delivering on the potential of the new CAP. EuroChoices 2005, 4:6-11.
8. Bromley D., Hodge I. Private property rights and presumptive policy entitlements: Reconsidering the premises of rural policy. European Review of Agricultural Economics 1990, 17:197-214.
9. Brush R., Chenoweth R.E., Barman T. Group differences in the enjoy-ability of driving through rural landscapes. Landscape Urban Plan 2000, 47:39-45.
10. Buijs A.E., Pedroli B., Luginbuhl Y. From hiking through farmland to farming in a leisure landscape: Changing social perceptions of the European landscape. Landscape Ecology 2006, 21:375-389.
11. Burrell A.M. The 2003 CAP reform: Implications for the EU dairy sector. Outlook on Agriculture 2004, 33:15-26.
12. Daniel T.C. Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning 2001, 54:267-281.
13. Dearden P. Factors influencing landscape preferences: An empirical investigation. Landscape Planning 1984, 11:293-306.
14. Dramstad W.E., Sundli Tveit M., Fjellstad W.J., Fry G.L.A. Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure. Landscape and Urban Planning 2006, 78:465-474.
15. European Commission (1992). The European Community's Fifth Environmental Action Programme. Available at: http://www.ncte.ie/environ/fifth.htm.
16. Firbank L.G. Striking the balance between agricultural production and biodiversity. Annals of Applied Biology 2005, 146:163-217.
17. Herzog F. Agri-environment schemes as landscape experiments. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2005, 3:175-177.
18. Hietala-Koivu R. Agricultural landscape change: A case study in Ylane, southwest Finland. Landscape and Urban Planning 1999, 46:103-108.
19. Howley P., Donnellan T., Hanrahan K. Potential impact of CAP reform post 2013 on the cereal and livestock sectors: An Irish case study. Journal of Farm Management 2010, 13:731-746.
20. Hunziker M., Felber P., Gehring K., Buchecker M. Evaluation of landscape change by different social groups: Results of two empirical studies in Switzerland. Mountain Research and Development 2008, 28:140-147.
21. Multifunctional agriculture: A new paradigm for European agriculture 2003, Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, Hampshire. G.V. Huylenbroeck, G. Durand (Eds.).
22. Hyytiä N., Kola J. Finnish citizens' agriculture towards multifunctional agriculture. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 2006, 9:1-22.
23. Kaltenborn B.P., Bjerke T. Association between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences. Landscape and Urban Planning 2002, 59:1-11.
24. Kantelhardt J. Impact of the Common European Agricultural Policy (CAP) reform on future research on rural areas. Outlook on Agriculture 2006, 35:143-148.
25. Kaplan R., Kaplan S. Cognition and environment. Functioning in an uncertain world 1983, Ulrichs Bookstore, Ann Arbor, MI.
26. Kaplan R., Kaplan S. The experience of nature. A psychological perspective 1989, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
27. Kaplan S. Environmental preference in a knowledge-seeking, knowledge-using organism. The adapted mind. Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture 1992, 581-598. Oxford University Press, New York. J.H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, J. Tooby (Eds.).
28. Kearney A.R., Bradley G.A. The effects of viewer attributes on preference for forest scenes: Contributions of attitudes, knowledge, demographic factors and stakeholder group membership. Environment and Behaviour 2011, 43:147-181.
29. Kent R.L., Elliott C. Scenic routes and protecting natural and cultural landscape features: A greenway skeleton. Landscape and Urban Planning 2000, 33:341-355.
30. Kline J., Wichelns D. Measuring public preferences for the environmental amenities provided by farmland. European Review of Agricultural Economics 1996, 23:21-436.
31. Latacz-Lohmann U., Hodge I. European agri-environmental policy for the 21st century. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2003, 41:123-139.
32. Lyons E. Socio-economic correlates of landscape preference. Environment and Behaviour 1983, 15:487-511.
33. Moreddu, C., Antón, J., von Lampe, M., Martini, R., Tallard, G., & Vavra, P. (2004). Analysis of the 2003 CAP reform. Paris: OECD. Available at: Accessed 06.07.10. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/62/42/32039793.pdf.
34. Moss J., Binfield J., Patton M., Zhang L., Westhoff P. Health Check: Major surgery or cosmetic procedures?. EuroChoices 2008, 7:11-16.
35. Myers R. Classical and modern regression with applications 1990, Duxbury, Boston.
36. Nassauer J.I. Framing the landscape in photographic simulation. Journal of Environmental Management 1983, 17:1-16.
37. Orland B. Aesthetic preference for rural landscapes: Some resident and visitor differences. Environmental aesthetics: Theory, research, and application 1988, 364-378. Cambridge University Press, New York. J. Nasar (Ed.).
38. Oueslati W., Salanie J. Landscape valuation and planning (editorial). Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2011, 54:1-6.
39. Park J.J., Jorgensen A., Swanwick C., Selman P. Relationships between environmental values and the acceptability of mobile telecommunications development in a protected area. Landscape Research 2008, 33:587-604.
40. Paracchini, M. L., Terres, J. M., Peterson, J. E., Hoogeveen, Y. (2007). High nature value farmland and traditional agricultural landscapes. Available at: http://www.landscape-europe.net/files/21-34%252520correctie.pdf.
41. Phillips A. The nature of cultural landscapes - A nature conservation perspective. Landscape Research 1998, 23:21-38.
42. Pruckner G. Agricultural landscape cultivation in Austria: An application of the CVM. European Review of Agricultural Economics 1995, 22:173-190.
43. Rambonilaza M., Dachary-Bernard J. Land-use planning and public preferences: What can we learn from choice experiment method?. Landscape and Urban Planning 2007, 83:318-326.
44. Reser J.P., Bentrupperbaumer J.M. What and where are environmental values? Assessing the impacts of current diversity of use of 'environmental' and 'World Heritage' values. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2005, 25:125-146.
45. Rourke, T. (2007). The application of affordance theory to explain the landscape preferences of travelers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Clemson University, SC.
46. Ruto E., Garrod G. Investigating farmers' preferences for the design of agri-environment schemes: A choice experiment approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2009, 52:631-647.
47. Slangen L. Policies for nature and landscape conservation in Dutch agriculture: An evaluation of objectives, means, effects and programme costs. European Review of Agricultural Economics 1992, 19:331-350.
48. Strumse E. Demographic differences in the visual preferences for agrarian landscapes in western Norway. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1996, 16:17-31.
49. Swinbank A., Daugbjerg C. The 2003 CAP reform: Accommodating WTO pressures. Comparative European Politics 2006, 4:47-64.
50. Thompson S.C.G., Barton M. Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes towards the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1994, 14:149-157.
51. Ulrich R.S. Visual landscapes and psychological well-being. Landscape Research 1979, 4:17-23.
52. Van Den Berg A.E., Vlek C.A.J., Coeterier J.F. Group differences in the aesthetic evaluation of nature development plans: A multilevel approach. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1998, 18:141-157.
53. Van den Berg A.E., Koole S.L. New wilderness in the Netherlands: An investigation of visual preferences for nature development plans. Landscape and Urban Planning 2006, 78:362-372.
54. Vanslembrouck I., van Huylenbroeck G., van Meensel J. Impact of agriculture on rural tourism: A hedonic pricing approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics 2005, 56:17-30.
55. Vos W., Meekes H. Trends in European cultural landscape development: Perspectives for a sustainable future. Landscape and Urban Planning 1999, 46:3-14.
56. Wherett J.R. Creating landscape preference models using Internet survey techniques. Landscape Research 2000, 25:79-96.
57. Yang B.E., Brown T.J. A cross cultural comparison of preferences for landscape styles and landscape elements. Environment and Behaviour 1992, 24:471-507.
58. Yrjölä T., Kola J. Consumer preferences regarding multifunctional agriculture. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 2004, 7:1-22.
59. Zube E.H., Pitt D.G., Evans G.W. A lifespan developmental study of landscape assessment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1983, 3:115-128.
60. Zube E. Themes in landscape assessment theory. Landscape Journal 1984, 3:104-110.
61. Zube E.H., Simcox D.E., Law C.S. Perceptual landscape simulations: History and prospect. Landscape Journal 1987, 6:62-80.