The Maximum Entropy Fallacy Redux?

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2016, Pages

  Aurell, Erik ^a,b  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAXIMUM-ENTROPY;

MAXIMUM ENTROPY METHODS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; DIRECT COUPLING ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MAXIMUM ENTROPY; NONHUMAN; PHYSICS; POTTS MODEL; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS; STATISTICAL PHYSICS; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENTROPY; MOLECULAR MODEL; STATISTICAL MODEL;

PROTEIN;

CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENTROPY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 84975832688     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004777     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Moult J, Fidelis K, Kryshtafovych A, Schwede T, Tramontano A, (2014) Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—round x. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics82: 1–6.
2. de Juan D, Pazos F, Valencia A, (2013) Emerging methods in protein co-evolution. Nature Reviews Genetics14: 249–261. doi: 10.1038/nrg341423458856
3. Michel M, Hayat S, Skwark MJ, Sander C, Marks DS, et al. (2014) PconsFold: improved contact predictions improve protein models. Bioinformatics30: i482–i488. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu45825161237
4. Ovchinnikov S, Kamisetty H, Baker D, (2014) Robust and accurate prediction of residue—residue interactions across protein interfaces using evolutionary information. Elife3: e02030. doi: 10.7554/eLife.0203024842992
5. Morcos F, Jana B, Hwa T, Onuchic JN, (2013) Coevolutionary signals across protein lineages help capture multiple protein conformations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences110: 20533–20538.
6. Wu FY, (1982) The potts model. Reviews of modern physics54: 235.
7. Morcos F, Pagnani A, Lunt B, Bertolino A, Marks DS, et al. (2011) Direct-coupling analysis of residue coevolution captures native contacts across many protein families. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences108: E1293–E1301.
8. Hopf TA, Colwell LJ, Sheridan R, Rost B, Sander C, et al. (2012) Three-dimensional structures of membrane proteins from genomic sequencing. Cell149: 1607–1621. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.01222579045
9. Marks DS, Hopf TA, Sander C, (2012) Protein structure prediction from sequence variation. Nature Biotechnology30: 1072–1080. doi: 10.1038/nbt.241923138306
10. Stein RR, Marks DS, Sander C, (2015) Inferring pairwise interactions from biological data using maximum-entropy probability models. PLoS Comput Biol11: e1004182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100418226225866
11. Jaynes ET, (1957) Information theory and statistical mechanics I. Physical review106: 620–630.
12. Jaynes ET, (1957) Information theory and statistical mechanics II. Physical review108: 171–190.
13. van Nimwegen E, (2016) Inferring Contacting Residues Within and Between Proteins: What Do the Probabilities Mean?PLoS Comput Biol.
14. Shannon C, (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal27: 379–423, 623–656.
15. Tetchner S, Kosciolek T, Jones DT, (2014) Opportunities and limitations in applying coevolution-derived contacts to protein structure prediction. Bio-Algorithms and Med-Systems10: 243–254.
16. Ekeberg M, Hartonen T, Aurell E, (2014) Fast pseudolikelihood maximization for direct-coupling analysis of protein structure from many homologous amino-acid sequences. Journal of Computational Physics276: 341–356.
17. Wainwright MJ, Jordan MI, (2008) Graphical models, exponential families, and variational inference. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning1: 1–305.
18. Montanari A, (2015) Computational implications of reducing data to sufficient statistics. Electron J Statist9: 2370–2390.
19. Amari SI, Amari SI, Barndorff-Nielsen OE, Kass RE, Lauritzen SL, Rao CR, (1987) Chapter 2: Differential Geometrical Theory of Statistics. In: Differential geometry in statistical inference. Hayward, CA: Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Volume 10 of Lecture Notes—Monograph Series. 19–94. doi: 10.1214/lnms/1215467059 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/lnms/1215467059.
20. Feinauer C, Skwark MJ, Pagnani A, Aurell E, (2014) Improving contact prediction along three dimensions. PLoS Comput Biol10: e1003847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100384725299132
21. Petersen B, Petersen TN, Andersen P, Nielsen M, Lundegaard C, (2009) A generic method for assignment of reliability scores applied to solvent accessibility predictions. BMC Structural Biology9: 51. doi: 10.1186/1472-6807-9-5119646261
22. Skwark MJ, Raimondi D, Michel M, Elofsson A, (2014) Improved contact predictions using the recognition of protein like contact patterns. PLoS Comput Biol10: e1003889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100388925375897
23. Jones DT, Singh T, Kosciolek T, Tetchner S, (2014) MetaPSICOV: Combining coevolution methods for accurate prediction of contacts and long range hydrogen bonding in proteins. Bioinformatics31: 999–1006. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu79125431331
24. Blythe RA, McKane AJ, (2007) Stochastic models of evolution in genetics, ecology and linguistics. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment: P07018.
25. Mustonen V, Lässig M, (2010) Fitness flux and ubiquity of adaptive evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences107: 4248–4253.
26. Bo S, Mazzolini A, Celani A, (2014) Adaptation and irreversibility in microevolution. Europhysics Letters108: 68002.
27. Kirkpatrick T, Cohen E, Dorfman J, (1982) Fluctuations in a nonequilibrium steady state: Basic equations. Physical Review A26: 950–971.
28. Law BM, Sengers JV, (1989) Fluctuations in fluids out of thermal equilibrium. Journal of Statistical Physics57: 531–547.
29. Bertini L, Sole AD, Gabrielli D, Jona-Lasinio G, Landim C, (2002) Macroscopic fluctuation theory for stationary non-equilibrium states. Journal of Statistical Physics107: 635–675.
30. Derrida B, (2007) Non-equilibrium steady states: fluctuations and large deviations of the density and of the current. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment: 635–675.
31. Brotto T, Bunin G, Kurchan J, (2015). Extending the applicability of thermal dynamics to evolutionary biology. arXiv:1507.07453.