Photoacoustic Molecular Imaging: From Multiscale Biomedical Applications Towards Early-Stage Theranostics

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 420-433

  Liu, Yajing ^a   Nie, Liming ^a   Chen, Xiaoyuan ^b  

^a XIAMEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING   (United States)

Author keywords

Early stage theranostics; Multiscale biomedical application; Photoacoustic imaging; Smart contrast agents

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL STORAGE; MOLECULAR IMAGING; PHOTOACOUSTIC EFFECT; ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS;

BIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS; BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS; COMPLEX BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; CONTRAST AGENT; PHOTO-ACOUSTIC IMAGING; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; STATE OF THE ART; THERANOSTICS;

MEDICAL APPLICATIONS;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

CIRCULAR DETECTION SYSTEM; CONTRAST; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; IMAGING; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MOLECULAR IMAGING; NONHUMAN; PHOTOACOUSTIC MICROSCOPY; PHOTOACOUSTIC TOMOGRAPHY; PHOTOACOUSTICS; PLANAR DETECTION SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPHERICAL DETECTION SYSTEM; THERANOSTIC NANOMEDICINE; ANIMAL; PROCEDURES; TRENDS;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; MOLECULAR IMAGING; PHOTOACOUSTIC TECHNIQUES; THERANOSTIC NANOMEDICINE;

EID: 84975687988     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: 18793096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.02.001     Document Type: Review

References (97)

1. Wang L., et al. Ultrasonically encoded photoacoustic flowgraphy in biological tissue. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 111:204301.
2. Zharov V.P. Ultrasharp nonlinear photothermal and photoacoustic resonances and holes beyond the spectral limit. Nat. Photonics 2011, 5:110-116.
3. Wang L.V., Hu S. Photoacoustic tomography: in vivo imaging from organelles to organs. Science 2012, 335:1458-1462.
4. Mallidi S., et al. Photoacoustic imaging in cancer detection, diagnosis, and treatment guidance. Trends Biotechnol. 2011, 29:213-221.
5. Hu S., Wang L.V. Optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy: auscultation of biological systems at the cellular level. Biophys. J. 2013, 105:841-847.
6. Nie L., et al. Early-stage imaging of nanocarrier-enhanced chemotherapy response in living subjects by scalable photoacoustic microscopy. ACS Nano 2014, 8:12141-12150.
7. Yao J., et al. High-speed label-free functional photoacoustic microscopy of mouse brain in action. Nat. Methods 2015, 12:407-410.
8. Yang J.M., et al. Optical-resolution photoacoustic endomicroscopy in vivo. Biomed. Exp. 2015, 6:918-932.
9. Zhou Y., et al. Handheld photoacoustic microscopy to detect melanoma depth in vivo. Opt. Lett. 2014, 39:4731-4734.
10. Nie L., et al. Photoacoustic tomography through a whole adult human skull with a photon recycler. J. Biomed. Opt. 2012, 17:110506.
11. Kim J.Y., et al. Fast optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy using a 2-axis water-proofing MEMS scanner. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5:7932.
12. Yao J., et al. Multiscale functional and molecular photoacoustic tomography. Ultrasonic Imaging 2016, 38:44-62.
13. Lv X.X., et al. Time-reversed ultrasonically encoded optical focusing into scattering media. Nat. Photonics 2011, 5:154-157.
14. Tay J.W., et al. Ultrasonically encoded wavefront shaping for focusing into random media. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4:3918.
15. Judkewitz B., et al. Speckle-scale focusing in the diffusive regime with time-reversal of variance-encoded light (TROVE). Nat. Photonics 2013, 7:300-305.
16. Chaigne T., et al. Improving photoacoustic-guided optical focusing in scattering media by spectrally filtered detection. Opt. Lett. 2014, 39:6054-6057.
17. Chaigne T., et al. Controlling light in scattering media non-invasively using the photoacoustic transmission matrix. Nat. Photonics 2014, 8:59-65.
18. Conkey D.B., et al. Super-resolution photoacoustic imaging through a scattering wall. Nat. Comm. 2015, 6:7902.
19. Lai P., et al. Photoacoustically guided wavefront shaping for enhanced optical focusing in scattering media. Nat. Photonics 2015, 9:126-132.
20. Galanzha E.I., Zharov V.P. Photoacoustic flow cytometry. Methods 2012, 57:280-296.
21. Wang L.V., Gao L. Photoacoustic microscopy and computed tomography: from bench to bedside. Ann. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2014, 16:155-185.
22. DA N., et al. Ultra-fast photoacoustic flow cytometry with a 0.5 MHz pulse repetition rate nanosecond laser. Opt. Express 2010, 18:8605.
23. Nedosekin D.A., et al. In vivo ultra-fast photoacoustic flow cytometry of circulating human melanoma cells using near-infrared high-pulse rate lasers. Cytometry 2011, 79A:825-833.
24. Galanzha E.I., Zharov V.P. Circulating tumor cell detection and capture by photoacoustic flow cytometry in vivo and ex vivo. Cancers 2013, 5:1691-1738.
25. Yao J., et al. Label-free oxygen-metabolic photoacoustic microscopy in vivo. J. Biomed. Opt. 2011, 16:076003.
26. Lidai W., et al. Single-cell label-free photoacoustic flowoxigraphy in vivo. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:5759-5764.
27. Wang L., et al. Fast voice-coil scanning optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy. Opt. Lett. 2011, 36:139-141.
28. Qin H., et al. Fluorescence quenching nanoprobes dedicated to in vivo photoacoustic imaging and high-efficient tumor therapy in deep-seated tissue. Small 2015, 11:2675-2686.
29. Wang Y., Wang L.V. Forster resonance energy transfer photoacoustic microscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 2012, 17:086007.
30. Yamashita H., et al. Oligomerization-function relationship of EGFR on living cells detected by the coiled-coil labeling and FRET microscopy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1848:1359-1366.
31. Meng J., Song L. Biomedical photoacoustics in China. Photoacoustics 2013, 1:43-48.
32. Zackrisson S., et al. Light in and sound out: emerging translational strategies for photoacoustic imaging. Cancer Res. 2014, 74:979-1004.
33. Yoon T.J., Cho Y.S. Recent advances in photoacoustic endoscopy. World J. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2013, 5:534-539.
34. Kim J., et al. Photoacoustic imaging platforms for multimodal imaging. Ultrasonography 2015, 34:88-97.
35. Yang J.M., et al. Three-dimensional photoacoustic endoscopic imaging of the rabbit esophagus. PLoS ONE 2015, 10:e0120269.
36. Yang J.M., et al. Simultaneous functional photoacoustic and ultrasonic endoscopy of internal organs in vivo. Nat. Med. 2012, 18:1297-1302.
37. Huang C., et al. Aberration correction for transcranial photoacoustic tomography of primates employing adjunct image data. J. Biomed. Opt. 2012, 17:066016.
38. Huang C., et al. Photoacoustic computed tomography correcting for heterogeneity and attenuation. J. Biomed. Opt. 2012, 17:061211.
39. Razansky D., et al. Volumetric real-time multispectral optoacoustic tomography of biomarkers. Nat. Protoc. 2011, 6:1121-1129.
40. de Boer E., et al. Optical innovations in surgery. Br. J. Surg. 2015, 102:e56-e72.
41. Taruttis A., et al. Multispectral optoacoustic tomography of myocardial infarction. Photoacoustics 2013, 1:3-8.
42. Burton N.C., et al. Multispectral opto-acoustic tomography (MSOT) of the brain and glioblastoma characterization. NeuroImage 2013, 65:522-528.
43. Yao J., et al. Noninvasive photoacoustic computed tomography of mouse brain metabolism in vivo. SPIE BiOS 2013, 257-266.
44. Taruttis A., et al. Mesoscopic and macroscopic optoacoustic imaging of cancer. Cancer Res. 2015, 75:1548-1559.
45. Taruttis A., Ntziachristos V. Advances in real-time multispectral optoacoustic imaging and its applications. Nat. Photonics 2015, 9:219-227.
46. Xia J., Wang L.V. Small-animal whole-body photoacoustic tomography: a review. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2014, 61:1380-1389.
47. Cremet L., et al. Pathogenic potential of Escherichia coli clinical strains from orthopedic implant infections towards human osteoblastic cells. Pathog. Dis. 2015, 73:ftv065.
48. Nie L., et al. In vivo volumetric photoacoustic molecular angiography and therapeutic monitoring with targeted plasmonic nanostars. Small 2014, 10:1585-1593. 1441.
49. Xia J., et al. Photoacoustic tomography: principles and advances. Electromagn. Waves 2014, 147:1-22.
50. Kruger R.A., et al. Photoacoustic angiography of the breast. Med. Phys. 2010, 37:6096-6100.
51. Wang Y., et al. In vivo three-dimensional photoacoustic imaging based on a clinical matrix array ultrasound probe. J. Biomed. Opt. 2012, 17:061208.
52. Erpelding T.N., et al. Sentinel lymph nodes in the rat: noninvasive photoacoustic and US imaging with a clinical US system. Radiology 2010, 256:102-110.
53. Gateau J., et al. Three-dimensional optoacoustic tomography using a conventional ultrasound linear detector array: whole-body tomographic system for small animals. Med. Phys. 2013, 40:013302.
54. Li G., et al. Multiview Hilbert transformation for full-view photoacoustic computed tomography using a linear array. J. Biomed. Opt. 2015, 20:066010.
55. Wang L., et al. Ultrasonic-heating-encoded photoacoustic tomography with virtually augmented detection view. Optica 2015, 2:307-312.
56. Bohndiek S.E., et al. Photoacoustic tomography detects early vessel regression and normalization during ovarian tumor response to the antiangiogenic therapy trebananib. J. Nucl. Med. 2015, 56:1942-1947.
57. Luke G.P., Emelianov S.Y. Optimization of in vivo spectroscopic photoacoustic imaging by smart optical wavelength selection. Opt. Lett. 2014, 39:2214-2217.
58. Guggenheim J.A., et al. Photoacoustic imaging of human lymph nodes with endogenous lipid and hemoglobin contrast. J. Biomed. Opt. 2015, 20:50504.
59. Strohm E.M., et al. High frequency label-free photoacoustic microscopy of single cells. Photoacoustics 2013, 1:49-53.
60. Cao R., et al. Multispectral photoacoustic microscopy based on an optical-acoustic objective. Photoacoustics 2015, 3:55-59.
61. Xu Z., et al. Photoacoustic tomography of water in phantoms and tissue. J. Biomed. Opt. 2010, 15:036019.
62. Brunker J., Beard P. Pulsed photoacoustic Doppler flowmetry using time-domain cross-correlation: accuracy, resolution and scalability. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2012, 132:1780-1791.
63. Kircher M.F., et al. A brain tumor molecular imaging strategy using a new triple-modality MRI-photoacoustic-Raman nanoparticle. Nat. Med. 2012, 18:829-834.
64. Kim C., et al. Performance benchmarks of an array-based hand-held photoacoustic probe adapted from a clinical ultrasound system for non-invasive sentinel lymph node imaging. Philos. Trans. A Math Phys. Eng. Sci. 2011, 369:4644-4650.
65. Chen D., et al. Theranostic applications of carbon nanomaterials in cancer: Focus on imaging and cargo delivery. J. Control. Release 2015, 210:230-245.
66. Jathoul A.P., et al. Deep in vivo photoacoustic imaging of mammalian tissues using a tyrosinase-based genetic reporter. Nat. Photonics 2015, 9:239-246.
67. Zhang Y., et al. Non-invasive multimodal functional imaging of the intestine with frozen micellar naphthalocyanines. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9:631-638.
68. Tang Y., et al. An aptamer-targeting photoresponsive drug delivery system using 'off-on' graphene oxide wrapped mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Nanoscale 2015, 7:6304-6310.
69. Bai L.Y., et al. Multifunctional magnetic-hollow gold nanospheres for bimodal cancer cell imaging and photothermal therapy. Nanotechnology 2015, 26:315701.
70. Krumholz A., et al. Multicontrast photoacoustic in vivo imaging using near-infrared fluorescent proteins. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4:3939.
71. Akers W.J., et al. Multimodal sentinel lymph node mapping with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) and photoacoustic tomography. Transl. Res. 2012, 159:175-181.
72. Song J., et al. Ultrasmall gold nanorod vesicles with enhanced tumor accumulation and fast excretion from the body for cancer therapy. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27:4910-4917.
73. Hembury M., Chiappini C. Gold-silica quantum rattles for multimodal imaging and therapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2015, 112:1959-1964.
74. Chen P.J., et al. Multitheragnostic multi-GNRs crystal-seeded magnetic nanoseaurchin for enhanced in vivo mesenchymal-stem-cell homing, multimodal imaging, and stroke therapy. Adv. Mater. 2015, Published online September 25, 2015. 10.1002/adma.201502784.
75. Pu K., et al. Diketopyrrolopyrrole-based semiconducting polymer nanoparticles for in vivo photoacoustic imaging. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27:5184-5190.
76. Pu K., et al. Semiconducting polymer nanoparticles as photoacoustic molecular imaging probes in living mice. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9:233-239.
77. Nie L., et al. Palladium nanosheets as highly stable and effective contrast agents for in vivo photoacoustic molecular imaging. Nanoscale 2014, 6:1271-1276.
78. Menke J. Photoacoustic breast tomography prototypes with reported human applications. Eur. Radiol. 2015, 25:2205-2213.
79. Luke G.P., et al. Silica-coated gold nanoplates as stable photoacoustic contrast agents for sentinel lymph node imaging. Nanotechnology 2013, 24:455101.
80. Rajian J.R., et al. Photoacoustic tomography to identify inflammatory arthritis. J. Biomed. Opt. 2012, 17. 96013-96011.
81. Li W., et al. In vivo quantitative photoacoustic microscopy of gold nanostar kinetics in mouse organs. Biomed. Exp. 2014, 5:2679-2685.
82. Kelkar S.S., Reineke T.M. Theranostics: combining imaging and therapy. Bioconjug. Chem. 2011, 22:1879-1903.
83. Nie L., Chen X. Structural and functional photoacoustic molecular tomography aided by emerging contrast agents. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43:7132-7170.
84. Heijblom M., et al. Appearance of breast cysts in planar geometry photoacoustic mammography using 1064-nm excitation. J. Biomed. Opt. 2013, 18:126009.
85. Danielli A., et al. Label-free photoacoustic nanoscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 2014, 19:086006.
86. Wang X., et al. Noninvasive laser-induced photoacoustic tomography for structural and functional in vivo imaging of the brain. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21:803-806.
87. Jeon M., et al. Multiplane spectroscopic whole-body photoacoustic imaging of small animals in vivo. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2014, Published online August 12, 2014. 10.1007/s11517-014-1182-6.
88. Wang L., et al. Single-cell label-free photoacoustic flowoxigraphy in vivo. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:5759-5764.
89. Zhang J., et al. Characterization of lipid-rich aortic plaques by intravascular photoacoustic tomography: ex vivo and in vivo validation in a rabbit atherosclerosis model with histologic correlation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014, 64:385-390.
90. Yuan K., et al. In vivo photoacoustic imaging of model of port wine stains. J. Xray Sci. Technol. 2012, 20:249-254.
91. Hu S., et al. Label-free photoacoustic ophthalmic angiography. Opt. Lett. 2010, 35:1-3.
92. Jiao S., et al. Photoacoustic ophthalmoscopy for in vivo retinal imaging. Opt. Exp. 2010, 18:3967-3972.
93. He G., et al. In vivo cell characteristic extraction and identification by photoacoustic flow cytography. Biomed. Exp. 2015, 6:3748-3756.
94. Wang B., et al. In vivo intravascular ultrasound-guided photoacoustic imaging of lipid in plaques using an animal model of atherosclerosis. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2012, 38:2098-2103.
95. Sussman C.B., et al. Photoacoustic tomography can detect cerebral hemodynamic alterations in a neonatal rodent model of hypoxia-ischemia. Acta. Neurobiol. Exp. 2012, 72:253-263.
96. Salehi H.S., et al. Design of miniaturized illumination for transvaginal co-registered photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging. Biomed. Exp. 2014, 5:3074-3079.
97. Izumi T., et al. Ultrasonic and photoacoustic imaging of knee joints in normal and osteoarthritis rats. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2013, 2013:1116-1119.