Photoacoustic imaging in cancer detection, diagnosis, and treatment guidance

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 213-221

  Mallidi, Srivalleesha ^a   Luke, Geoffrey P ^a   Emelianov, Stanislav ^a  

^a The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER DETECTION; CLINICAL MANAGEMENT; FUNCTIONAL INFORMATION; IMAGING MODALITY; IN-VIVO; MOLECULAR IMAGING; NONINVASIVE TECHNIQUE; OPTICAL ABSORPTION PROPERTIES; PHOTO-ACOUSTIC IMAGING; PHOTOACOUSTICS; RESEARCH EFFORTS; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; TARGETED CONTRAST AGENTS; THERAPY MONITORING; TREATMENT PLANNING;

DIAGNOSIS; DISEASES; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; OPTICAL PROPERTIES; PHOTOACOUSTIC EFFECT; PLANNING; TISSUE; ULTRASONICS;

ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GOLD NANOPARTICLE;

CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER THERAPY; CIRCULATING TUMOR CELL; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; METASTASIS; NEOPLASM; NONHUMAN; PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGING; PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY; PHOTOTHERMAL THERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; ULTRASOUND;

HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; NEOPLASMS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 79954972034     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.01.006     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. Jemal A., et al. Cancer Statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2010, 60:277-300.
2. Fass L. Imaging and cancer: a review. Mol. Oncol. 2008, 2:115-152.
3. Frangioni J.V. New technologies for human cancer imaging. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008, 26:4012-4021.
4. Zhang H.F., et al. Functional photoacoustic microscopy for high-resolution and noninvasive in vivo imaging. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006, 24:848-851.
5. Siphanto R.I., et al. Serial noninvasive photoacoustic imaging of neovascularization in tumor angiogenesis. Opt. Express 2005, 13:89-95.
6. Emelianov S.Y., et al. Synergy and applications of combined ultrasound, elasticity, and photoacoustic imaging. IEEE Int. Ultrason. Symp. 2006, 10.1109/ULTSYM.2006.114.
7. Jose J., et al. Imaging of tumor vasculature using Twente photoacoustic systems. J. Biophotonics 2009, 2:701-717.
8. Bell A.G. Upon the production of sound by radiant energy. Am. J. Sci. 1880, 20:305-324.
9. Wang L. Multiscale photoacoustic microscopy and computed tomography. Nat. Photonics 2009, 3:503-509.
10. Oraevsky A., Karabutov A. Optoacoustic tomography. Biomedical Photonics Handbook 2003, 34/31-34/34. CRC Press. T. Vo-Dinh (Ed.).
11. Xu M., Lihong V.W. Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2006, 77:041101.
12. Emelianov S.Y., et al. Photoacoustics for molecular imaging and therapy. Phys. Today 2009, 62:34-39.
13. Staley J., et al. Growth of melanoma brain tumors monitored by photoacoustic microscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 2010, 15:40510-40513.
14. Oh J.-T., et al. Three-dimensional imaging of skin melanoma in vivo by dual-wavelength photoacoustic microscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 2006, 11:34032-34034.
15. Manohar S., et al. Initial results of in vivo non-invasive cancer imaging in the human breast using near-infrared photoacoustics. Opt. Express 2007, 15:12277-12285.
16. Manohar S., et al. The Twente Photoacoustic Mammoscope: system overview and performance. Phys. Med. Biol. 2005, 50:2543.
17. Lao Y., et al. Noninvasive photoacoustic imaging of the developing vasculature during early tumor growth. Phys. Med. Biol. 2008, 53:4203.
18. Kolkman R.G.M., et al. Photoacoustic imaging of tumor angiogenesis. Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2008: The Ninth Conference on Biomedical Thermoacoustics, Optoacoustics, and Acousto-optics 2008, 685602-685606. SPIE. A.A. Oraevsky, L.V. Wang (Eds.).
19. Ku G., et al. Imaging of tumor angiogenesis in rat brains in vivo by photoacoustic tomography. Appl. Opt. 2005, 44:770-775.
20. Turkbey B., et al. Imaging of tumor angiogenesis: functional or targeted?. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2009, 193:304-313.
21. Lungu, et al. In vivo imaging and characterization of hypoxia-induced neovascularization and tumor invasion. Int. J. Oncol. 2007, 30:45-54.
22. Li M., et al. Simultaneous molecular and hypoxia imaging of brain tumors in vivo using spectroscopic photoacoustic tomography. IEEE Int. Ultrason. Symp. 2008, 96:481-489.
23. Höckel M., Vaupel P. Tumor hypoxia: definitions and current clinical, biologic, and molecular aspects. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2001, 93:266-276.
24. Zharov V.P., et al. In vivo photoacoustic flow cytometry for monitoring of circulating single cancer cells and contrast agents. Opt. Lett. 2006, 31:3623-3625.
25. Galanzha E., et al. In vivo, noninvasive, label-free detection and eradication of circulating metastatic melanoma cells using two-color photoacoustic flow cytometry with a diode laser. Cancer Res. 2009, 69:7926-7934.
26. Weight R.M., et al. Photoacoustic detection of metastatic melanoma cells in the human circulatory system. Opt. Lett. 2006, 31:2998-3000.
27. Stantz K.M., et al. Molecular imaging of neutropilin-1 receptor using photoacoustic spectroscopy in breast tumors. Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2010 2010, SPIE, pp. O1-7. A.A. Oraevsky, L.V. Wang (Eds.).
28. Razansky D., et al. Multispectral photoacoustic imaging of fluorochromes in small animals. Opt. Lett. 2007, 32:2891-2893.
29. Kim G., et al. Indocyanine-green-embedded PEBBLEs as a contrast agent for photoacoustic imaging. J. Biomed. Opt. 2007, 12:044020.
30. Kim C., et al. In vivo molecular photoacoustic tomography of melanomas targeted by bioconjugated gold nanocages. ACS Nano 2010, 4:4559-4564.
31. Kim C., et al. In vivo photoacoustic tomography of chemicals: high-resolution functional and molecular optical imaging at new depths. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110:2756-2782.
32. Li P., et al. In vivo photoacoustic molecular imaging with simultaneous multiple selective targeting using antibody-conjugated gold nanorods. Opt. Express 2008, 16:18605-18615.
33. Agarwal A., et al. Targeted gold nanorod contrast agent for prostate cancer detection by photoacoustic imaging. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 102:64701-64704.
34. Li M., et al. In-vivo photoacoustic microscopy of nanoshell extravasation from solid tumor vasculature. J. Biomed. Opt. 2009, 14:105071-105073.
35. Mallidi S., et al. Molecular specific optoacoustic imaging with plasmonic nanoparticles. Opt. Express 2007, 15:6583-6588.
36. Zhang Q., et al. Gold nanoparticles as a contrast agent for in-vivo tumor imaging with photoacoustic tomography. Nanotechnology 2009, 20:395102.
37. Pan D., et al. Molecular photoacoustic tomography with colloidal nanobeacons. Angew. Chem. 2009, 121:4234-4237.
38. Lewinski N., et al. Cytotoxicity of nanoparticles. Small 2008, 4:26-49.
39. Shashkov E., et al. Quantum dots as multimodal photoacoustic and photothermal contrast agents. Nano Lett. 2008, 8:3953-3958.
40. Mallidi S., et al. Multiwavelength photoacoustic imaging and plasmon resonance coupling of gold nanoparticles for selective detection of cancer. Nano Lett. 2009, 9:2825-2831.
41. Yoon S.J., et al. Utility of biodegradable plasmonic nanoclusters in photoacoustic imaging. Opt. Lett. 2010, 35:3751-3753.
42. Tam J.M., et al. Controlled assembly of biodegradable plasmonic nanoclusters for near-infrared imaging and therapeutic applications. ACS Nano 2010, 4:2178-2184.
43. Levi J., et al. Design, synthesis, and imaging of an activatable photoacoustic probe. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132:11264-11269.
44. Kim C., et al. Multifunctional microbubbles and nanobubbles for photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging. J. Biomed. Opt. 2010, 15:010510.
45. Wilson, K. et al. (2010) Photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging contrast enhancement using a dual contrast agent. In Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing (Oraevsky, A.A. and Wang, L.V., eds), pp. M1-5, SPIE.
46. Bouchard L.S., et al. Picomolar sensitivity MRI and photoacoustic imaging of cobalt nanoparticles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:4085-4089.
47. Kim C., et al. Deeply penetrating in vivo photoacoustic imaging using a clinical ultrasound array system. Biomed. Opt. Express 2009, 1:278-284.
48. Kolkman R., et al. Real-time in vivo photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging. J. Biomed. Opt. 2008, 13:050510.
49. Niederhauser J.J., et al. Combined ultrasound and optoacoustic system for real-time high-contrast vascular imaging in vivo. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2005, 24:436-440.
50. Zemp R.J., et al. Photoacoustic imaging of the microvasculature with a high-frequency ultrasound array transducer. J. Biomed. Opt. 2007, 12:10501-10503.
51. Zhang E.Z., et al. Multimodal simultaneous photoacoustic tomography, optical resolution microscopy, and OCT system. Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2010, 75640-75647. SPIE. A.A. Oraevsky, L.V. Wang (Eds.).
52. Li L., et al. Three-dimensional combined photoacoustic and optical coherence microscopy for in vivo microcirculation studies. Opt. Express 2009, 17:16450-16455.
53. Zhi H., et al. Comparison of ultrasound elastography, mammography, and sonography in the diagnosis of solid breast lesions. J. Ultrasound Med. 2007, 26:807-815.
54. Min Q., et al. Combined photoacoustic and magneto-acoustic imaging. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2009, 4763-4766.
55. Mehrmohammadi M., et al. Pulsed magnetomotive ultrasound imaging using ultrasmall magnetic nanoprobes. Mol. Imaging 2010, 22:1-11.
56. Xiang L., et al. Real-time optoacoustic monitoring of vascular damage during photodynamic therapy treatment of tumor. J. Biomed. Opt. 2007, 12:014001.
57. Kim J., et al. Golden carbon nanotubes as multimodal photoacoustic and photothermal high-contrast molecular agents. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4:688-694.
58. Cui H., Yang X. In vivo imaging and treatment of solid tumor using integrated photoacoustic imaging and high intensity focused ultrasound system. Med. Phys. 2010, 37:4777-4781.
59. Homan K., et al. Silver nanosystems for photoacoustic imaging and image-guided therapy. J. Biomed. Opt. 2010, 15:021316.
60. You J., et al. Near-infrared light triggers release of Paclitaxel from biodegradable microspheres: photothermal effect and enhanced antitumor activity. Small 2010, 6:1022-1031.
61. Spirou G.M., et al. Development and testing of an optoacoustic imaging system for monitoring and guiding prostate cancer therapies. Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2004, 44-56. SPIE. A.A. Oraevsky, L.V. Wang (Eds.).
62. Larin K., et al. Monitoring of tissue coagulation during thermotherapy using optoacoustic technique. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2005, 38:2645.
63. Shah J., et al. Photoacoustic imaging and temperature measurement for photothermal cancer therapy. J. Biomed. Opt. 2008, 13:034024.
64. Su J., et al. Photoacoustic imaging of clinical metal needles in tissue. J. Biomed. Opt. 2010, 15:21306-21309.
65. Oraevsky A.A., et al. Measurement of tissue optical properties by time-resolved detection of laser-induced transient stress. Appl. Opt. 1997, 36:402-415.
66. Oraevsky A.A., et al. Lateral and z-axial resolution in laser optoacoustic imaging with ultrasonic transducers. Proc. SPIE 1995, 2389:198-208.
67. Esenaliev R.O., et al. Sensitivity of laser opto-acoustic imaging in detection of small deeply embedded tumors. IEEE J. Selected Top. Quantum Electron. 1999, 5:981-988.
68. Ku G., Wang L.V. Deeply penetrating photoacoustic tomography in biological tissues enhanced with an optical contrast agent. Opt. Lett. 2005, 30:507-509.
69. American National Standards Institute American National Standard for the Safe Use of Lasers: ANSI Z136. 1-2000 2000, American National Standards Institute.
70. Maslov K., et al. Optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy for in vivo imaging of single capillaries. Opt. Lett. 2008, 33:929-931.
71. Mallidi, S. et al. (2006) Functional and morphological ultrasonic biomicroscopy for tissue engineers. Medical Imaging 2006: Ultrasonic Imaging and Signal Processing (Emelianov, S. and William F. Walker, W.F., eds), pp. 61470Y-1-61470Y-7, Proceedings of the SPIE.
72. De la Zerda A., et al. Ultrahigh sensitivity carbon nanotube agents for photoacoustic molecular imaging in living mice. Nano Lett. 2010, 10:2168-2172.
73. Homan K., et al. Prospects of molecular photoacoustic imaging at 1064nm wavelength. Opt. Lett. 2010, 35:2663-2665.
74. Xiang L., et al. Photoacoustic molecular imaging with antibody-functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes for early diagnosis of tumor. J. Biomed. Opt. 2009, 14:021008.
75. De La Zerda A., et al. Carbon nanotubes as photoacoustic molecular imaging agents in living mice. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3:557-562.
76. Kim, S. et al. Ultrasound and photoacoustic image-guided photothermal therapy using silica-coated gold nanorods: in-vivo study. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.(in press).
77. Wang L., et al. Combined photoacoustic and molecular fluorescence imaging in vivo. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2006, 190-192.
78. Mallidi, S. et al. (2009) Ultrasound-based imaging of nanoparticles: from molecular and cellular imaging to therapy guidance. IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium doi:10.1109/ULTSYM.2009.5441484.