Morphology and rheology of cellulose nanofibrils derived from mixtures of pulp fibres and papermaking fines

Cellulose

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 2439-2448

  Colson, Jérôme ^a   Bauer, Wolfgang ^b   Mayr, Melanie ^b   Fischer, Wolfgang ^b   Gindl Altmutter, Wolfgang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

^b GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Cellulose nanofibrils; Fibre length; Fines; Homogenisation; Pulp; Rheology

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CELLULOSE; ELASTICITY; HOMOGENIZATION METHOD; MIXTURES; NANOFIBERS; PULP; RHEOLOGY; VISCOSITY;

CELLULOSE NANOFIBRILS; FIBRE LENGTH; FINES; NANOMETRES; PRE-TREATMENT; REDUCED VISCOSITY; RHEOLOGICAL BEHAVIOUR; SIMILAR NUMBERS;

FIBERS;

EID: 84975132641     PISSN: 09690239     EISSN: 1572882X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-016-0987-x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Agoda-Tandjawa G, Durand S, Berot S et al (2010) Rheological characterization of microfibrillated cellulose suspensions after freezing. Carbohydr Polym 80:677–686. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.11.045
2. Derakhshandeh B, Kerekes RJ, Hatzikiriakos SG, Bennington CPJ (2011) Rheology of pulp fibre suspensions: a critical review. Chem Eng Sci 66:3460–3470. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2011.04.017
3. Djalili-Moghaddam M, Toll S (2006) Fibre suspension rheology: effect of concentration, aspect ratio and fibre size. Rheol Acta 45:315–320. doi:10.1007/s00397-005-0021-y
4. Doi M, Edwards SF (1986) The theory of polymer dynamics. Oxford University Press, Oxford
5. Ferreira AGM, Silveira MT, Lobo LQ (2003) The viscosity of aqueous suspensions of cellulose fibres part 2. Influence of temperature and mix fibres. Silva Lusit 11:61–66
6. Gharehkhani S, Sadeghinezhad E, Kazi SN et al (2015) Basic effects of pulp refining on fiber properties—a review. Carbohydr Polym 115:785–803. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.08.047
7. Gindl-Altmutter W, Obersriebnig M, Veigel S, Liebner F (2015) Compatibility between cellulose and hydrophobic polymer provided by microfibrillated lignocellulose. ChemSusChem 8:87–91. doi:10.1002/cssc.201402742
8. Henniges U, Veigel S, Lems E-M et al (2014) Microfibrillated cellulose and cellulose nanopaper from Miscanthus biogas production residue. Cellulose 21:1601–1610. doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0232-4
9. Henriksson M, Henriksson G, Berglund LA, Lindström T (2007) An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibers. Eur Polym J 43:3434–3441. doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.038
10. Iotti M, Gregersen ØW, Moe S, Lenes M (2011) Rheological studies of microfibrillar cellulose water dispersions. J Polym Environ 19:137–145. doi:10.1007/s10924-010-0248-2
11. ISO (2012) ISO 10376, Pulps—Determination of mass fraction of fines
12. ISO (2014) ISO 16065-2, Pulps—Determination of fibre length by automated optical analysis–Part 2: Unpolarized light method
13. Iwamoto S, Lee S-H, Endo T (2013) Relationship between aspect ratio and suspension viscosity of wood cellulose nanofibers. Polym J 46:73–76. doi:10.1038/pj.2013.64
14. Jonoobi M, Oladi R, Davoudpour Y et al (2015) Different preparation methods and properties of nanostructured cellulose from various natural resources and residues: a review. Cellulose 22:935–969. doi:10.1007/s10570-015-0551-0
15. Lasseuguette E, Roux D, Nishiyama Y (2008) Rheological properties of microfibrillar suspension of TEMPO-oxidized pulp. Cellulose 15:425–433. doi:10.1007/s10570-007-9184-2
16. Leitner J, Hinterstoisser B, Wastyn M et al (2007) Sugar beet cellulose nanofibril-reinforced composites. Cellulose 14:419–425. doi:10.1007/s10570-007-9131-2
17. Li M-C, Wu Q, Song K et al (2015) Cellulose nanoparticles: structure–morphology–rheology relationships. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 3:821–832. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00144
18. Lindström T, Naderi A, Wiberg A (2015) Large scale applications of nanocellulosic materials—a Comprehensive review. J Korea TAPPI 47:5–21. doi:10.7584/ktappi.2015.47.6.005
19. Mallick PK (2008) Fiber-reinforced composites: materials, manufacturing, and design, 3rd Edition. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL
20. Naderi A, Lindström T (2015) Rheological measurements on nanofibrillated cellulose systems: a science in progress. In: Mondal MIH (ed) Cellulose and cellulose derivatives: synthesis, modification and applications. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 187–204
21. Naderi A, Lindström T, Sundström J (2014) Carboxymethylated nanofibrillated cellulose: rheological studies. Cellulose 21:1561–1571. doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0192-8
22. Pääkko M, Ankerfors M, Kosonen H et al (2007) Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromolecules 8:1934–1941. doi:10.1021/bm061215p
23. Parkinson C, Matsumoto S, Sherman P (1970) The influence of particle-size distribution on the apparent viscosity of non-newtonian dispersed systems. J Colloid Interface Sci 33:150–160. doi:10.1016/0021-9797(70)90082-2
24. Powell RL (1991) Rheology of suspensions of rodlike particles. J Stat Phys 62:1073–1094. doi:10.1007/BF01128178
25. Puisto A, Illa X, Mohtaschemi M, Alava M (2012) Modeling the rheology of nanocellulose suspensions. Nord Pulp Pap Res 27:277–281. doi:10.3183/NPPRJ-2012-27-02-p277-281
26. Rezayati Charani P, Dehghani-Firouzabadi M, Afra E, Shakeri A (2013) Rheological characterization of high concentrated MFC gel from kenaf unbleached pulp. Cellulose 20:727–740. doi:10.1007/s10570-013-9862-1
27. Silveira MT, Ferreira AGM, Lobo LQ (2002) The viscosity of aqueous suspensions of cellulose fibers part 1. Influence of consistency and fiber length. Silva Lusit 10:171–178
28. Silveira MT, Ferreira AGM, Lobo LQ (2003) The viscosity of aqueous suspensions of cellulose fibres. Part 3. Influence of pH. Silva Lusit 11:201–206
29. Syverud K, Chinga-Carrasco G, Toledo J, Toledo PG (2011) A comparative study of Eucalyptus and Pinus radiata pulp fibres as raw materials for production of cellulose nanofibrils. Carbohydr Polym 84:1033–1038. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.12.066
30. Tanaka R, Saito T, Ishii D, Isogai A (2014) Determination of nanocellulose fibril length by shear viscosity measurement. Cellulose 21:1581–1589. doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0196-4
31. TAPPI (1994) T261 cm-94, Fines fraction of paper stock by wet screening
32. Turbak A, Snyder F, Sandberg K (1983) Microfibrillated cellulose. US Pat. 4,374,702
33. Veigel S, Rathke J, Weigl M, Gindl-Altmutter W (2012) Particle board and oriented strand board prepared with nanocellulose-reinforced adhesive. J Nanomater 2012:1–8. doi:10.1155/2012/158503
34. Zimmermann T, Bordeanu N, Strub E (2010) Properties of nanofibrillated cellulose from different raw materials and its reinforcement potential. Carbohydr Polym 79:1086–1093. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.10.045