Beyond “Landscape” in REDD+: The Imperative for “Territory”

World Development

Volumn 85, Issue , 2016, Pages 58-72

  McCall, Michael K ^a  

^a INSTITUTO DE MATEMÁTICAS   (Mexico)

Author keywords

forest governance; indigenous local communities; landscape; Latin America; REDD+; territorialization

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DEFORESTATION; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; HOLISTIC APPROACH; INDIGENOUS POPULATION; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; SPATIAL PLANNING; TERRITORIALITY;

LATIN AMERICA;

EID: 84973636317     PISSN: 0305750X     EISSN: 18735991     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. Antrop, M., Background concepts for integrated landscape analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 77:1 (2000), 17–28.
2. Arhin, A.A., Safeguards and Dangerguards: A framework for unpacking the black box of safeguards for REDD+. Forest Policy and Economics 45 (2014), 24–41.
3. Bernard, F., What can climate-smart agricultural landscapes learn from the gestion de terroirs approach?. Minang, P.A., et al. (eds.) Climate-smart landscapes: Multifunctionality in practice, 2015, WAC/ICRAF, Nairobi, 51–60.
4. Beunen, R., Opdam, P., When landscape planning becomes landscape governance, what happens to the science?. Landscape and Urban Planning 100:4 (2011), 324–326.
5. Blaser, J., Zabel, A., Forest crime in the tropics. Tropical forestry handbook, 2015, Springer, Heidelberg < http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-642-41554-8_302-1>.
6. Blom, B., Sunderland, T., Murdiyarso, D., Getting REDD to work locally: Lessons learned from integrated conservation and development projects. Environmental Science and Policy 13:2 (2010), 164–172.
7. Blomquist, W., Schlager, E., Political pitfalls of integrated watershed management. Society and Natural Resources 18:2 (2005), 101–117.
8. Boas, H., No REDD papers, Vol. 1, 2011, Charles Overbeck/Eberhardt Press, Indigenous Environmental Network and Carbon Trade Watch, Portland, OR < http://www.ienearth.org/docs/No-Redd-Papers.pdf>.
9. Buizer, M., Humphreys, D., de Jong, W., Climate change and deforestation: The evolution of an intersecting policy domain. Environmental Science and Policy 35 (2014), 1–11 < http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901113001287>.
10. Cabello, J., Gilbertson, T., A colonial mechanism to enclose lands: A critical review of two REDD+-focused special issues. Ephemera 12:1/2 (2012), 162–180 < http://www.ephemerajournal.org/contribution/colonial-mechanism-enclose-lands-critical-review-two-redd-focused-special-issues>.
11. Carter, J., Displacing indigenous cultural landscapes: The naturalistic gaze at Fraser Island World Heritage Area. Geographical Research 48:4 (2010), 398–410.
12. Catacutan, D., Muller, C., Johnson, M., Garrity, D., Landcare – A landscape approach at scale. Minang, P.A., et al. (eds.) Climate-smart landscapes: Multifunctionality in practice, 2015, WAC/ICRAF, Nairobi, 151–160.
13. Cavanagh, C.J., Vedeld, P.O., Trædal, L.T., Securitizing REDD+? Problematizing the emerging illegal timber trade and forest carbon interface in East Africa. Geoforum 60 (2015), 72–82.
14. CIFOR, CIFOR DG Peter Holmgren asks: How do we measure the performance of our landscapes?. Retrieved from , 2013.
15. CIFOR, Landscapes for sustainable development. Retrieved from , 2013.
16. Clark, W.C., Tomich, T.P., van Noordwijk, M., Gustond, D., Catacutane, D., Dickson, N.M., et al. Boundary work for sustainable development: Natural resource management at the CGIAR. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011, 0900231108 < www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0900231108>.
17. Cohen, A., Rescaling environmental governance: Watersheds as boundary objects at the intersection of science, neoliberalism, and participation. Environment and Planning A 44 (2012), 2207–2224, 10.1068/a44265.
18. Cohen, A., Bakker, K., The eco-scalar fix: Rescaling environmental governance and the politics of ecological boundaries in Alberta, Canada. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32:1 (2014), 128–146.
19. Cohen, A., Davidson, S., The watershed approach: Challenges, antecedents, and the transition from technical tool to governance unit. Water Alternatives 4:1 (2011), 1–14.
20. COICA, Posicion politica de COICA sobre REDD+. 2010, COICA, Quito Retrieved from < www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/fcp/sites/forestcarbonpartnership.org/files/Documents/PDF/Nov2010/Posicion%20Politico%20de%20COICA%20Sobre%20REDDplus.pdf>.
21. Corbera, E., Estrada, M., May, P., Navarro, G., Pacheco, P., Rights to land, forests and carbon in REDD+: Insights from Mexico, Brazil and Costa Rica. Forests 2 (2011), 301–342.
22. Corrigan, C., Hay-Edie, T., A toolkit to support conservation by indigenous peoples and local communities: Building capacity and sharing knowledge for indigenous peoples’ and community conserved territories and areas (ICCAS). 2013, UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
23. Cotula, L., Mayers, J., Tenure in REDD – Start-point or afterthought?. 2009, IIED, International Institute for Environment and Development, London Natural Resource Issues No. 15.
24. Council of Europe, European landscape convention: Florence, 20.X.2000. 2000 < http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/176.htm>.
25. de la Cadena, M., Indigenous cosmopolitics in the Andes: Conceptual reflections beyond “politics”. Cultural Anthropology 25:2 (2010), 334–370.
26. Denier, L., Scherr, S., Shanes, S., Chatterton, P., Hovani, L., Stam, N., The little sustainable landscapes book. 2015, Global Canopy Programme, Oxford < http://globalcanopy.org/sites/default/files/documents/resources/GCP_Little_Sustainable_LB_DEC15.pdf>.
27. Duchelle, A.E., Cromberg, M., Gebara, M.F., Guerra, R., Melo, T., Larson, A., et al. Linking forest tenure reform, environmental compliance, and incentives: Lessons from REDD+ initiatives in the Brazilian Amazon. World Development 55 (2014), 53–67.
28. Ellis, E., Porter-Bolland, L., Is community-based forest management more effective than Protected Areas? A comparison of land use/land cover change in two neighbouring study areas of the central Yucatan peninsula, Mexico. Forest Ecology and Management 25:6 (2008), 1971–1983.
29. Feiring, B., Indigenous peoples’ rights to lands, territories and resources. 2013, ILC (International Land Coalition), Rome < www.landcoalition.org/sites/default/files/publication/1615/IndigenousPeoplesRightsLandTerritoriesResources.pdf>.
30. Fontana, L.B., Grugel, J., The politics of indigenous participation through ‘‘Free Prior Informed Consent”: Reflections from the Bolivian case. World Development 77 (2016), 249–261.
31. Fortmann, L., Gendered knowledge: Rights and spaces in two Zimbabwe villages: Reflections on methods and findings. Rocheleau, D., et al. (eds.) Feminist political ecology, 1996, Routledge, London, 211–223.
32. Freeman, O.E., Duguma, L.A., Minang, P.A., Operationalizing the integrated landscape approach in practice. Ecology and Society, 20(1), 2015, 24, 10.5751/ES-07175-200124.
33. GLF, Global Landscapes Forum executive summary. Retrieved from , 2013.
34. GLF, 2014 Global Landscapes Forum outcome statement. Retrieved from , 2014.
35. GLF, Global Landscapes Forum background brief: Implementation of integrated landscape approaches. Retrieved from , 2014.
36. Hajjar, R.F., Kozak, R.A., Innes, J.L., Is decentralization leading to “real” decision-making power for forest-dependent communities? Case studies from Mexico and Brazil. Ecology and Society, 17(1), 2012, 10.5751/ES-04570-170112.
37. Harley, J.B., Maps, knowledge and power. Cosgrove, D., Daniels, S., (eds.) The iconography of landscape: Essays on the symbolic representation, design and use of past environment, 1988, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 277–312.
38. Hart, A.K., Milder, J.C., Estrada-Carmona, N., DeClerck, F.A.J., Harvey, C.A., Dobie, P., Integrated landscape initiatives in practice: Assessing experiences from 191 landscapes in Africa and Latin America. Minang, P.A., et al. (eds.) Climate-smart landscapes: Multifunctionality in practice, 2015, WAC/ICRAF, Nairobi, 89–101.
39. Holland, M.B., De Koning, F., Morales, M., Naughton-Treves, L., Robinson, B.E., Suárez, L., Complex tenure and deforestation: Implications for conservation incentives in the Ecuadorian Amazon. World Development 55 (2014), 21–36.
40. Hoppe, R., Wesselink, A., Cairns, R., Lost in the problem: The role of boundary organizations in the governance of climate change. WIREs Climate Change 4 (2013), 283–300, 10.1002/wcc.225.
41. ILO, ILO convention no. 169. Indigenous and tribal peoples. 1989, ILO, Geneva < http://www.ilo.int/indigenous/Conventions/no169/lang-en/index.htm>.
42. IPACC, Indigenous Peoples of Africa Co-ordinating Committee. Website , 2010.
43. IPCCA (Indigenous Peoples’ Biocultural Climate Change Assessment), Declaration of members of the Indigenous Peoples’ Biocultural Climate Change Assessment Initiative. Durban, November 26th 2011. Retrieved from, 2011 < http://ipcca.info/docs/2011-declaration-of-the-members-of-ipcca-on-the-un-redd-program.pdf>.
44. IWGIA (international Work Group for Indigenous Peoples Affairs), Serious concerns over revision of World Bank Safeguard Policies. Retrieved from , 2014.
45. Kalibo, H.W., Medley, K.E., Participatory resource mapping for adaptive collaborative management at Mt. Kasigau, Kenya. Landscape and Urban Planning 82:3 (2007), 145–158.
46. Krause, T., Nielsen, T.D., The legitimacy of incentive-based conservation and a critical account of social safeguards. Environmental Science & Policy 41 (2014), 44–51.
47. Kusters, K., Climate-smart landscapes and the landscape approach – An exploration of the concepts and their practical implications. 2015, Tropenbos International, Wageningen.
48. Larson, A.M., Brockhaus, M., Sunderlin, W.D., Tenure matters in REDD+: Lessons from the field. Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Sunderlin, W.D., Verchot, L.V., (eds.) Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices, 2012, CIFOR, Bogor, 153–175.
49. Larson, A.M., Brockhaus, M., Sunderlin, W.D., Duchelle, A., Babon, A., Dokken, T.,.. Huyn, T.-B., Land tenure and REDD+: The good, the bad and the ugly. Global Environmental Change 23 (2013), 678–689.
50. Larson, A.M., Cronkleton, P.J., Pulhin, J.M., Formalizing indigenous commons: The role of ‘authority’ in the formation of territories in Nicaragua, Bolivia, and the Philippines. World Development 70 (2015), 228–238.
51. LCT (Lawyers for Community Tenure), Community tenure, climate change, and the World Bank safeguards, Joint Opinion Brief. Retrieved from, 2014 < http://www.rightsandresources.org/wp-content/uploads/LCT-Joint-Opinion-PDF.pdf>.
52. Louman, B., Campos-Arce, J.J., Mercado, L., Imbach, P., Bouroncle, C., Finegan, B.,.. Padilla, D., Climate Smart Territories (CST): An integrated approach to food security, ecosystem services, and climate change in rural areas. Minang, P.A., et al. (eds.) Climate-smart landscapes: Multifunctionality in practice, 2015, WAC/ICRAF, Nairobi, 75–86.
53. Mahanty, S., Milne, S., Dressler, W., Filer, C., The social life of forest carbon: Property and politics in the production of a new commodity. Human Ecology 40 (2012), 661–664.
54. Marshall, G., Nesting, subsidiarity, and community-based environmental governance beyond the local scale. International Journal of the Commons 2:1 (2007), 75–97.
55. McCall, M.K., Dunn, C.E., Geo-information tools for participatory spatial planning: Fulfilling the criteria for ‘good’ governance?. Geoforum 43:1 (2012), 81–94.
56. McCall, M.K., Skutsch, M., van Laake, P., Community forest monitoring. GOFC-GOLD, (eds.) A sourcebook of methods and procedures for monitoring and reporting anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions and removals, 2014, Wageningen University, Wageningen, 216–233 GOFC-GOLD Report version COP 20. < http://www.gofcgold.wur.nl/redd/>.
57. Medema, W., McIntosh, B.S., Jeffrey, P.J., From premise to practice: A critical assessment of integrated water resources management and adaptive management approaches in the water sector. Ecology and Society 13:2 (2008), 29–47 < http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art2>.
58. Milne, S., Grounding forest carbon: Property relations and avoided deforestation in Cambodia. Human Ecology 40 (2012), 693–706.
59. Milne, E., Neufeldt, H., Rosenstock, T., Smalligan, M., Cerri, C.E., Malin, D.,.. Pearson, T., Methods for the quantification of GHG emissions at the landscape level for developing countries in smallholder contexts. Environmental Research Letters 8:1 (2013), 15–19.
60. Minang, P.A., Duguma, L.A., Alegami, D., van Noordwijk, M., Scale considerations on landscape approaches. Minang, P.A., et al. (eds.) Climate-smart landscapes: Multifunctionality in practice, 2015, WAC/ICRAF, Nairobi, 121–133.
61. Minang, P.A., Duguma, L.A., van Noordwijk, M., Prabhu, R., Freeman, O.E., Enhancing multifunctionality through system improvement and landscape democracy processes: A synthesis. Minang, P.A., et al. (eds.) Climate-smart landscapes: Multifunctionality in practice, 2015, WAC/ICRAF, Nairobi, 389–404.
62. Minang, P.A., van Noordwijk, M., Freeman, O.E., Mbow, C., de Leeuw, J., Catacutan, D., (eds.) Climate-smart landscapes: Multifunctionality in practice, 2015, WAC/ICRAF, Nairobi.
63. Nagendra, H., Ostrom, E., Polycentric governance of multifunctional forested landscapes. International Journal of the Commons 6:2 (2012), 104–133 < http://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.321>.
64. Naughton-Treves, L., Wendland, K., Land tenure and tropical forest carbon management. World Development 55 (2014), 1–6.
65. Nelson, L.S., Weschler, L.F., The watershed as a focus for public administration: Conventional and bioregional approaches. Administrative Theory and Praxis 23:1 (2001), 10–24.
66. Neumann, R.P., Political ecology III: Theorizing landscape. Progress in Human Geography 35:6 (2011), 843–850.
67. Nietschmann, B., Defending the Miskito reefs with maps and GPS. Mapping with sail, scuba, and satellite. Cultural Survival Quarterly 18:4 (1995), 34–37.
68. Nightingale, A., A feminist in the forest: Situated knowledges and mixing methods in natural resource management. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 2:1 (2003), 77–90.
69. Offen, K.H., The territorial turn: Making Black territories in Pacific Colombia. Journal of Latin American Geography 2:2 (2011), 43–73.
70. Peskett, L., Todd, K., Putting REDD+ safeguards and safeguard information systems into practice. 2013, UN-REDD Programme, Geneva Policy Brief No.3. < http://theredddesk.org/resources/putting-redd-safeguards-and-safeguard-information-systems-practice>.
71. Pfund, J.-L., Watts, J.D., Boissiere, M., Boucard, A., Bullock, R.M., Ekadinata, A.,.. Sunderland, T.C.H, Understanding and integrating local perceptions of trees and forests into incentives for sustainable landscape management. Environmental Management 48:2 (2011), 334–349.
72. Reed, J., Deakin, L., Sunderland, T., What are ‘Integrated Landscape Approaches’ and how effectively have they been implemented in the tropics: A systematic map protocol. Environmental Evidence, 4, 2015, 2, 10.1186/2047-2382-4-2 < http://www.environmentalevidencejournal.org/content/4/1/2>.
73. Resosudarmo, I.A.P., Atmadja, S., Desita, A.E., Intarini, D., Indriatmoko, Y., Astri, P., Does tenure security lead to REDD+ project effectiveness? Reflections from five emerging sites in Indonesia. World Development 55 (2014), 68–83.
74. Resosudarmo, I.A.P., Duchelle, A.E., Ekaputri, A.D., Sunderlin, W.D., Local hopes and worries about REDD+ projects. Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Sunderlin, W.D., Verchot, L.V., (eds.) Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices, 2012, CIFOR, Bogor, 193–208.
75. Ribot, J.C., Chhatre, A., Lankina, T., Introduction: Institutional choice and recognition in the formation and consolidation of local democracy. Conservation and Society, 6(1), 2008, 1.
76. Rocheleau, D., Edmunds, D., Women, men and trees: Gender, power and property in forest and agrarian landscapes. World Development 25:8 (1997), 1351–1371.
77. RRI (Rights and Resources Initiative), Lots of words, little action: Will the private sector tip the scales for community land rights?. 2014, Rights and Resources Initiative, Washington, DC.
78. Rundstrom, R.A., Mapping, the white man's burden. The Common Property Resource Digest 45 (1998), 1–9.
79. Sack, R.D., Human territoriality: Its theory and history. 1986, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
80. Sayer, J., Margules, C., Boedhihartono, A.K., Dale, A., Sunderland, T., Supriatna, J., et al. Landscape approaches; what are the pre-conditions for success?. Sustainability Science 10:2 (2015), 345–355.
81. Sayer, J., Sunderland, T., Ghazoul, J., Pfund, J.-L., Sheil, D., Meijaard, E.,.. Buck, L.E., Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110:21 (2013), 8349–8356.
82. Scherr, S.J., Shames, S., Friedman, R., Defining integrated landscape management for policy makers. 2013, Ecoagriculture, Washington, DC, 10 Policy focus no. 10.
83. Schlager, E., Ostrom, E., Property-rights regimes and natural resources: A conceptual analysis. Land Economics 68:3 (1992), 249–262 < http://www.jstor.org/stable/3146375?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.
84. Sedogo, L.G., Groten, S.M.E., Definition of land management units for GIS support to participatory planning: A case study on participatory land management in Burkina Faso. Canadian Journal of Development Studies 21 (2000), 523–542.
85. Sheil, D., Puri, R.K., Basuki, I., van Heist, M., Wan, M., Liswanti, N.,.. Wijaya, A., Exploring biological diversity, environment and local people's perspective in forest landscapes. Methods for a multidisciplinary landscape assessment. 2003, CIFOR, Bogor 979-8764-88-9.
86. Sills, E.O., Atmadja, S.S., de Sassi, C., Duchelle, A.E., Kweka, D.L., Resosudarmo, I.A.P., Sunderlin, W.D., (eds.) REDD+ on the ground: A case book of subnational initiatives across the globe, 2014, CIFOR, Bogor.
87. Sletto, B.I., Bryan, J., Torrado, M., Hale, C., Barry, D., Territorialidad, mapeo participativo y política sobre los recursos naturales: la experiencia de América Latina. Cuadernos de Geografía - Revista Colombiana de Geografía 22:2 (2013), 193–209.
88. Stevens, C., Winterbottom, R., Springer, J., Reytar, K., Securing rights, combatting climate change: How strengthening community forest rights mitigates climate change. 2014, World Resources Institute/Rights and Resources, Washington, DC.
89. Stoffle, R.W., Toupal, R.S., Nieves Zedeño, M., Landscape, nature, and culture: A diachronic model of human-nature adaptations. Selin, H., (eds.) Nature across cultures: Views of nature and the environment in non-western cultures, 2003, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 97–114.
90. Sunderland, T.C., Ehringhaus, H.C., Campbell, B.M., Conservation and development in tropical forest landscapes: A time to face the trade-offs. Environmental Conservation 34 (2008), 276–279.
91. Sunderlin, W.D., Larson, A.M., Duchelle, A.E., Resosudarmo, I.A.P., Huynh, T.B., Awono, A., et al. How are REDD+ proponents addressing tenure problems? Evidence from Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam. World Development 55 (2014), 37–52.
92. Ulloa, A., Políticas globales del cambio climático: nuevas geopolíticas del conocimiento y sus efectos en territorios indígenas. Ulloa, A., (eds.) Perspectivas culturales del clima, 2011, UNC and Instituto Latinoamericano para una Sociedad y un Derecho Alternativos (ILSA), Bogota, 477–494.
93. UNDRIP, United Nations declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples. 2007, UN, New York, NY < http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf>. Adopted by UN, 13 September 2007.
94. UN-REDD, REDD+ beyond carbon: Supporting decisions on safeguards and multiple benefits. 2012, UN-REDD Programme, Geneva Policy brief no. 2. < http://www.un-redd.org/aboutunreddprogramme/globalactivities/new_multiple_benefits/tabid/1016/default.aspx#Updates>.
95. UN-REDD, Guidelines on free, prior and informed consent. 2012, UN-REDD Programme, Geneva < http://www.un-redd.org/Launch_of_FPIC_Guidlines/tabid/105976/Default.aspx>.
96. van Dam, C., Indigenous territories and REDD in Latin America: opportunity or threat?. Forests 2 (2011), 394–414.
97. van Noordwijk, M., Leimona, B., Xing, M., Tanika, L., Namirembe, S., Suprayogo, D., Water-focused landscape management. Minang, P.A., et al. (eds.) Climate-smart landscapes: Multifunctionality in practice, 2015, WAC/ICRAF, Nairobi, 179–192.
98. Venter, O., Koh, L.P., Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+): Game changer or just another quick fix?. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1249:1 (2011), 137–150, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06306.x.
99. Vergara-Asenjo, G., Potvin, C., Forest protection and tenure status: The key role of indigenous peoples and protected areas in Panama. Global Environmental Change 28 (2014), 205–215 < www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378014001289>.
100. Villamor, G.B., Dah-gbeto, P.A., Bell, A., Pradhan, U., van Noordwijk, M., Gender-specific spatial perspectives and scenario building approaches for understanding gender equity and sustainability in climate-smart landscapes. Minang, P.A., et al. (eds.) Climate-smart landscapes: Multifunctionality in practice, 2015, WAC/ICRAF, Nairobi, 211–224.
101. Wilshusen, P.R., Brechin, S.R., Fortwangler, C.L., West, P.C., Reinventing a square wheel: Critique of a resurgent “protection paradigm” in international biodiversity conservation. Society and Natural Resources 5:1 (2002), 17–40.
102. World Bank, Environmental and Social Framework setting standards for sustainable development First draft for consultation July 30, 2014. (The content of the draft is for consultation purposes and has not been endorsed by the Board of Executive Directors of IBRD/IDA). 2014, World Bank, Washington, DC < http://consultations.worldbank.org/Data/hub/files/consultation-template/review-and-update-world-bank-safeguard-policies/en/materials/first_draft_framework_july_30_2014_0.pdf>.
103. World Bank, Review and update of the World Bank safeguard policies. 2014-15, World Bank, Washington, DC < http://consultations.worldbank.org/consultation/review-and-update-world-bank-safeguard-policies>.
104. Wu, J., Integrating nature and culture in landscape ecology. Hong, S.-K., Kim, J.-E., Wu, J., Nakagoshi, N., (eds.) Landscape ecology in Asian cultures, 2011, Springer, Ecological Research Monographs, 301–321.
105. Zaffaroni, R., La pachamama y el humano. 2012, Editorial Colihue, Buenos Aires.
106. Zimmerer, K.S., Cultural ecology: At the interface with political ecology – The new geographies of environmental conservation and globalization. Progress in Human Geography 30:1 (2006), 63–78.
107. Zwick, S., Unpacking Warsaw, Part Two: Recognizing the landscape reality. 2013, Ecosystem Marketplace, Katoomba < http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/pages/dynamic/article.page.php?page_id=10089§ion=news_articles&eod=1>.