Land Tenure and Tropical Forest Carbon Management

World Development

Volumn 55, Issue , 2014, Pages 1-6

  Naughton Treves, Lisa ^a   Wendland, Kelly ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon; Deforestation; Land tenure; Property rights; Tropical forest

Indexed keywords

CARBON; DEFORESTATION; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; LAND TENURE; PROPERTY RIGHTS; THEORETICAL STUDY; TROPICAL FOREST;

EID: 84890860600     PISSN: 0305750X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.010     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Agrawal A., Chhatre A., Hardin R. Changing governance of the world's forests. Science 2008, 320:1460-1462.
2. Andersson K., Gibson C., Lehoucq F. Municipal politics and forest governance: Comparative analysis of decentralization in Bolivia and Guatemala. World Development 2006, 34(3):576-595.
3. Realising REDD+: National strategy and policy options 2009, CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia. A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, M. Kanninen, E. Sills, W.D. Sunderlin, S. Wertz-Kanounnikoff (Eds.).
4. Angelsen A., Kaimowitz D. Rethinking the causes of deforestation: Lessons from economic models. The World Bank Research Observer 1999, 14(1):73-98.
5. Arnot C.D., Luckert M.K., Boxall P.C. What is tenure security? Conceptual implications for empirical analysis. Land Economics 2011, 87(2):297-311.
6. Blom B., Sunderland T., Murdiyarso D. Getting REDD to work locally: Lessons learned from integrated conservation and development projects. Environmental Science & Policy 2010, 13(2):16-172.
7. Bond, I., Grieg-Gran, M., Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., Hazlewood, P., Wunder, S., & Angelsen, A. (2009). Incentives to sustain forest ecosystem services: A review and lessons for REDD. Natural Resource Issues No. 16. London, UK: International Institute for Environment and Development.
8. Broegaard R. Land tenure insecurity and inequality in Nicaragua. Development and Change 2005, 36(5):845-864.
9. Bromley D.W. Property relations and economic development: The other land reform. World Development 1989, 17(6):867-877.
10. Bromley D.W. Sufficient reason: Volitional pragmatism and the meaning of economic institutions 2006, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
11. Bruce J. Identifying and working with beneficiaries when rights are unclear: Insights for REDD+ initiatives 2012, Program on Forests (PROFOR), Washington, DC.
12. Bruce, J. W., Wendland, K., & Naughton-Treves, L. (2010). Whom to pay? Key concepts and terms regarding tenure and property rights in payment-based forest ecosystem conservation. Land Tenure Center Brief 15, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
13. Bruce J.W., Knox A. Structures and stratagems: Making decentralization of authority over land in Africa cost-effective. World Development 2009, 37(8):1360-1369.
14. Cerbu G.A., Swallow B.M., Thompson D.Y. Locating REDD+: A global survey and analysis of REDD readiness and demonstration activities. Environmental Science & Policy 2011, 14:168-180.
15. Clements T. Reduced expectations: The political and institutional challenges of REDD+. Oryx 2010, 44(3):309-310.
16. Clements T., John A., Neilsen K., An D., Tan S., Milner-Gulland E.J. Payments for biodiversity conservation in the context of weak institutions: Comparison of three programs from Cambodia. Ecological Economics 2010, 69(6):1283-1291.
17. Colby M. Preface. Lessons about Land Tenure, Forest Governance and REDD+ 2012, (pp. iv-v), UW-Madison Land Tenure Center, Madison, Wisconsin, Available from:. http://www.rmportal.net/landtenureforestsworkshop, L. Naughton-Treves, C. Day (Eds.).
18. Cotula, L., & Mayers, J. (2009). Tenure in REDD-Start-point or afterthought? Natural Resource Issues No. 15. London, UK: International Institute for Environment and Development.
19. Deininger K., Ali D.A., Holden S., Zevenbergen J. Rural land certification in Ethiopia: Process, initial impact, and implications for other African countries. World Development 2008, 36(10):1786-1812.
20. Deininger K., Augustinus C., Enemark S., Munro-Faure P. Innovations in land rights recognition, administration, and governance 2010, World Bank.
21. Deininger K., Feder G. Land registration, governance and development: Evidence and implications for policy. The World Bank Research Observer 2009, 24(2):233-266.
22. Duchelle, A. E., Cromberg, M., Gebara, M. F., Guerra, R., Melo, T., Larson, A., et al. (2014). Linking forest tenure reform, environmental compliance and incentives: Lessons from REDD+ initiatives in the Brazilian Amazon. In: L. Naughton-Treves, J. Alex-Garcia, I. Baird, M. Turner, & K. Wendland (Eds.), Land Tenure and Forest Carbon Management. Special Section. World Development, 55, 53-67.
23. Engel S., Pagiola S., Wunder S. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues. Ecological Economics 2008, 65:663-674.
24. Engel S., Palmer C. Payments for environmental services as an alternative to logging under weak property rights: The case of Indonesia. Ecological Economics 2009, 65(4):799-809.
25. FAO Reforming forest tenure: Issues, principles and process 2011, FAO, Rome.
26. Ferraro P.J., Kiss A. Direct payments to conserve biodiversity. Science 2002, 29:1718-1719.
27. Geist H.J., Lambin E.F. Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. BioScience 2002, 52(2):143.
28. Hatcher, J. (2009). Securing tenure rights and reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD): Costs and lessons learned. Paper No. 120. Washington, DC: Social Development Department, The World Bank.
29. Holland, M. B., Koning, F. D., Morales, M., Naughton-Treves, L., Robinson, B., & Suárez, L. (2014). Complex tenure and deforestation: implications for conservation incentives in the Ecuadorian Amazon. In: L. Naughton-Treves, J. Alex-Garcia, I. Baird, M. Turner, & K. Wendland (Eds.), Land Tenure and Forest Carbon Management. Special Section. World Development, 55, 21-36.
30. Joppa L., Pfaff A. High and far: Biases in the location of protected areas. PLoS One 2009, 4(12):e8273.
31. Larson A. Forest tenure in the age of climate change: Lessons for REDD+. Global Environmental Change 2011, 21:540-549.
32. Marino E., Ribot J. Special Issue Introduction: Adding insult to injury: Climate change and the inequities of climate intervention. Global Environmental Change 2012, 22(2):323-328.
33. Meinzen-Dick, R., Pradhan, R., & Di Gregorio, M. (2004). Understanding property rights. Brief 3. In: R. Meinzen-Dick, & M. Di Gregorio (Eds.). Collective action and property rights for sustainable development. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
34. Naughton-Treves, L., Alvarez-Berrios, N., Brandon, K., Bruner, A., Holland, M. B., Ponce, C., et al. (2006). Expanding protected areas & incorporating human resource use: A study of 15 parks in Ecuador and Peru. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 2, 13. Available from:. http://ejournal.nbii.org/.
35. Pfaff, A., Robalino, J., Lima, E., Sandoval, C., & Herrera, L.D. (2014). Governance, location & avoided deforestation from protected areas: greater restrictions can have lower impact, due to differences in location. In: L. Naughton-Treves, J. Alex-Garcia, I. Baird, M. Turner, & K. Wendland (Eds.), Land Tenure and Forest Carbon Management. World Development, 55, 7-20.
36. Pfaff, A., Sills, E. O., Amacher, G. S., Coren, M. J., Lawlor, K., & Streck, C. (2010). Policy impacts on deforestation: Lessons learned from past experiences to inform new initiatives. NIR 10-02, Durham, North Carolina.
37. Phelps J., Webb E.L., Agrawal A. Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance?. Science 2010, 328:312-313.
38. Platteau J.P. Allocating and enforcing property rights in land: Informal versus formal mechanisms in Subsaharan Africa. Nordic Journal of Political Economy 2000, 26(1):55-81.
39. Resosudarmo, I. A. P., Atmadja, S., Ekaputri, A. D., Intarini, D. Y., Indriatmoko, Y., & Astri, P. (2014). Does tenure security lead to REDD+ project effectiveness? Reflections from five emerging sites in Indonesia. In: L. Naughton-Treves, J. Alex-Garcia, I. Baird, M. Turner, & K. Wendland (Eds.), Land Tenure and Forest Carbon Management Special Section.. World Development, 55, 68-83.
40. Ribot J.C., Agrawal A., Larson A.M. Recentralizing while decentralizing: How national governments reappropriate forest resources. World Development 2006, 34(11):1864-1886.
41. Robinson, B. E., Holland, M., & Naughton-Treves, L. (2011). Does secure land tenure save forests? A review of the relationship between land tenure and tropical deforestation. CCAFS Working Paper No. 7. Copenhagen, Denmark: CGIAR.
42. RRI. (2012). What rights? A comparative analysis of developing countries' national legislation on community and indigenous peoples' forest tenure rights. Washington, DC: Rights and Resources Initiative.
43. Sandbrook C.F., Nelson W.Adams., Agrawal A. Carbon, forests and the REDD paradox. Oryx 2010, 44:330-334.
44. Schlager E., Ostrom E. Property-rights regimes and natural resources: A conceptual analysis. Land Economics 1992, 68(3):249-262.
45. Sikor T., Muller D. The limits of state-led land reform: An introduction. World Development 2009, 37(8):1307-1316.
46. Sikor T., Stahl J., Enters T., Ribot J., Singh N., Sunderlin W., et al. REDD-plus, forest people's rights and nested climate governance. Global Environmental Change 2010, 20:423-425.
47. Sjaastad E., Bromley D.W. The prejudices of property rights: On individualism, specificity, and security in property regimes. Development Policy Review 2000, 18(4):365-389.
48. Sunderlin, W., Larson, A. M., Duchelle, A. E., Resosudarmo, I. A. B., Huynh, T. B., Awono, A., et al. (2014). How are REDD+ proponents addressing tenure problems? Evidence from Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam. In: L. Naughton-Treves, J. Alex-Garcia, I. Baird, M. Turner, & K. Wendland (Eds.), Land Tenure and Forest Carbon Management. World Development, 55, 37-52.
49. Sunderlin, W. D., & Sills, E. O. (2012). REDD+ projects as a hybrid of old and new forest conservation approaches. In: A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, W. D. Sunderlin, & L. Verchot (Eds.), Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices. Indonesia: CIFOR.
50. Sunderlin, W. D., Larson, A., & Cronkleton, P. (2009). Forest tenure rights and REDD+. In: A. Angelsen (Ed.), Realising REDD+ national strategy and policy options. Indonesia: CIFOR.
51. Sunderlin W.D., Hatcher J., Liddle M. From exclusion to ownership? Challenges and opportunities in advancing forest tenure reform 2008, Rights and Resources Initiative, Washington, DC.
52. Unruh J.D. Carbon sequestration in Africa: The land tenure problem. Global Environmental Change 2008, 18:700-707.
53. USAID. (2008). Land tenure and property rights: Tools for transformational development. Washington, DC; USAID.
54. van den Brink R., Binswanger H., Bruce J.W., Byamugisha F., Thomas G. Consensus, confusion, and controversy: Selected land reforms issues in Saharan Africa 2006, World Bank, Washington, DC.
55. Wendland K., Honzak M., Portela R., Vitale B., Rubinoff S., Randrianarisoa J. Targeting and implementing payments for ecosystem services: Opportunities for bundling biodiversity conservation with carbon and water services in Madagascar. Ecological Economics 2010, 69(11):2093-2107.
56. Wendland K., Naughton L., Suarez L., Suyanto S. Rewards for environmental services and collective land tenure: Lessons from Ecuador and Indonesia 2010, Mountain Forum Bulletin.
57. Westholm, L. R., Biddulph, R., Hellmark, I., & Ekbom, A. (2011). REDD+ and tenure: A review of the latest developments in research, implementation and debate. Focali Report 2011:02, Gothenburg.
58. White A., Martin A. Who owns the world's forests? Forest tenure and public forests in transition 2002, Forest Trends, Washington, DC.
59. Wunscher T., Engel S. International payments for biodiversity services: Review and evaluation of conservation targeting approaches. Biological Conservation 2012, 152:222-230.