Is decentralization leading to "real" decision-making power for forest-dependent communities? Case studies from mexico and Brazil

Ecology and Society

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Hajjar, Reem F ^a   Kozak, Robert A ^a   Innes, John L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Brazil; Community forestry; Decentralization; Forest management authority; Forest dependent communities; Mexico

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION PLANNING; DECENTRALIZATION; DECISION MAKING; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FOREST RESOURCE; SMALLHOLDER;

BRAZIL; MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA];

EID: 84860905472     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-04570-170112     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Agrawal, A., A. Chhatre, and R. Hardin. 2008. Changing governance of the world's forests. Science 320:1460-1463.
2. Agrawal, A., and J. Ribot. 1999. Accountability in decentralization: a framework with South Asian and West African cases. The Journal of Developing Areas 33:473-502.
3. Amaral, P., and M. Amaral Neto. 2000. Manejo florestal comunitário na Amazônia Brasileira: Situação atual, desafios e perspectivas. Instituto Internacional de Educação do Brasil (IIEB), Belém, Brazil.
4. Arnstein, S. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association 35(4):216-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
5. Barsimantov, J., A. Racelis, K. Biedenweg, and M. Digiano. 2011. When collective action and tenure allocations collide: outcomes from community forests in Quintana Roo, Mexico and Petén, Guatemala. Land Use Policy 28:343-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.07.001
6. Bray, D., E. Duran, V. Ramos, J. Mas, A. Velazquez, R. McNab, D. Barry, and J. Radachowsky. 2008. Tropical deforestation, community forests, and protected areas in the Maya Forest. Ecology and Society 13:56. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art56/
7. Bray, D., L. Merino-Perez, P. Negreros-Castillo, G. Segura-Warnholtz, J. Torres-Rojo, and H. Vester. 2003. Mexico's community-managed forests as a global model for sustainable landscapes. Conservation Biology 17:672-677. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01639.x
8. Chapela, F. 2005. Indigenous community forest management in the Sierra Juárez, Oaxaca. Pages 91-110 in D. Bray, L. Merino-Pérez, and D. Barry, editors. The community forests of Mexico: managing for sustainable landscapes. University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas, USA.
9. Charnley, S., and M. Poe. 2007. Community forestry in theory and practice: where are we now? Annual Review of Anthropology 36:301-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123143
10. Chhatre, A., and A. Agrawal. 2009. Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106:17667-17670. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905308106
11. Colchester, M. 2008. Beyond tenure: rights-based approaches to peoples and forests - some lessons from the Forest Peoples Programme. Rights and Resources Initiative, Washington, D. C, USA.
12. Contreras-Hermosilla, A., H. Gregerson, and A. White. 2006. Forest governance in countries with federal systems of government: lessons for decentralization. Centre for International Forestry Research Bogor, Indonesia.
13. Edmunds, D., and E. Wollenberg. 2003a. Local forest management: the impacts of devolution policies. Earthscan, London, UK.
14. Edmunds, D., and E. Wollenberg. 2003b. Whose devolution is it anyway? Divergent constructs, interests and capacities between the poorest forest users and states. Pages 150-165 in D. Edmunds, and E. Wollenberg, editors. Local forest management: the impacts of devolution policies. Earthscan, London, UK.
15. Edmunds, D., E. Wollenberg, A. Contreras, L. Dachang, G. Kelkar, D. Nathan, M. Sarin, and N. Singh. 2003. Introduction. Pages 1-19 in D. Edmunds, and E. Wollenberg, editors. Local forest management: the impacts of devolution policies. Earthscan, London, UK.
16. Garnett, S., J. Sayer, and J. Du Toit. 2007. Improving the effectiveness of interventions to balance conservation and development: a conceptual framework. Ecology and Society 12(1):2. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art2/
17. Gibson, C. C, D. Dodds, and P. Turner. 2007. Explaining community-level forest outcomes: salience, scarcity and rules in Eastern Guatemala. Conservation and Society 5:361-381.
18. Hajjar, R. 2011. Community forests for forest communities: an examination of power imbalances, challenges and goals in Brazil and Mexico. Dissertation. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
19. Hajjar, R., D. McGrath, R. Kozak, and J. Innes. 2011. Framing community forestry challenges with a broader lens: case studies from the Brazilian Amazon. Journal of Environmental Management 92:2159-2169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.03.042
20. Herrero-Jauregui, C, B. Pokorny, M. Casado, and C. Garcia-Fernandez. 2009. When theory meets practice: some constraints in non timber forest products commercialization. Pages 1-9 in Proceedings from XII World Forestry Congress, Quebec, Canada.
21. Hutchcroft, P. 2001. Centralization and decentralization in administration and politics: assessing territorial dimensions of authority and power. Governance 14(1):23-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00150
22. Klooster, D. 2003. Campesinos and Mexican forest policy during the twentieth century. Latin American Research Review 38:94-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lar.2003.0018
23. Knight, P. 2002. Small-scale research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
24. Larson, A. 2003. Decentralization and forest management in Latin America: towards a working model. Public Administration and Development 23:211-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pad.271
25. Larson, A. 2005. Democratic decentralization in the forestry sector: lessons learned from Africa, Asia and Latin America. Pages 32-62 in C. Colfer, and D. Capistrano, editors. The politics of decentralization: forests, power and people. Earthscan, London, UK.
26. Larson, A. M., P. Cronkleton, D. Barry, and P. Pacheco. 2008. Tenure rights and beyond: community access to forest resources in Latin America. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia.
27. Larson, A., and F. Soto. 2008. Decentralization of natural resource governance regimes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33:213-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.33.020607.095522
28. Leach, M., and R. Mearns. 1991. Poverty and environment in developing countries: an overview study. Report to the Economic and Social Research Council and the Global Environmental Change Programme. IDS, Brighton, UK.
29. Lincoln, Y., and E. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
30. Medina, G, and B. Pokorny. 2008. Avaliação financeira do manejo florestal comunitário. Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis (IBAMA), Belém, Brazil.
31. Medina, G, B. Pokorny, and J. Weigelt. 2009. The power of discourse: hard lessons for traditional forest communities in the Amazon. Forest Policy and Economics 11:392-397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2008.11.004
32. Miyasaka Porro, N, and S. Stone. 2005. Diversity in living gender: two cases from the Brazilian Amazon. Pages 242-255 in C. Colfer, editor. The equitable forest: diversity, community and resource management. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C., USA.
33. Molnar, A., M. Liddle, C. Bracer, A. Khare, A. White, and J. Bull. 2007. Community-based forest enterprises in tropical forest countries: status and potential. International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO), Rights and Resources Initiative (RRI) and Forest Trends, Washington, D.C., USA.
34. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
35. Pagdee, A., Y.-S. Kim, and P. J. Daugherty. 2006. What makes community forest management successful: a meta-study from community forests throughout the world. Society & Natural Resources 19:33-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920500323260
36. Pokorny, B. 2009. The role of families and forests in the Amazon: a critical analysis of current approaches for local development. Pages 1-11 in Proceedings of the XIII World Forestry Congress, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
37. Pokorny, B., C. Sabogal, W. de Jong, P. Pacheco, N. Porro, B. Louman, and D. Stoian. 2010. Challenges of community forestry in tropical America. Bois et Forêts des Tropiques 303:54-66.
38. Ribot, J. 2004. Waiting for democracy: the politics of choice in natural resource decentralization. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C, USA.
39. Ribot, J., A. Agrawal, and A. Larson. 2006. Recentralizing while decentralizing: how national governments reappropriate forest resources. World Development 34:1864-1886. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.11.020
40. Rights and Resources Initiative and the International Tropical Timber Organization. 2009. Key data from RRI-ITTO Tropical Tenure Assessment. Rights and Resources Initiative and the International Tropical Timber Organization, Washington, D. C, USA, and Yokohama, Japan.
41. Sayer, J., J. McNeely, S. Maginnis, I. Boedhihartono, G Shepherd, and B. Fisher. 2008. Local rights and tenure for forests: opportunity or threat for conservation? Rights and Resources Initiative and International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Washington, D.C, USA.
42. Scherr, S., A. White, and D. Kaimowitz. 2003. A new agenda for forest conservation and poverty reduction: making markets work for low-income producers. Forest Trends and Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Washington, D.C, USA.
43. Schlager, E., and E. Ostrom. 1992. Property-rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis. Land Economics 68:249-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3146375
44. Tacconi, L. 2007. Decentralization, forests and livelihoods: theory and narrative. Global Environmental Change 17 (3-4):338-348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.002
45. Uphoff, N. 1989. Distinguishing power, authority and legitimacy: taking Max Weber at his word by using resources-exchange analysis. Polity 22(2):295-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3234836
46. Vester, H., and M. A. Navarro-Martinez. 2005. Ecological issues in community tropical forest management in Quintana Roo, Mexico. Pages 183-214 in D. Bray, L. Merino-Pérez, and D. Barry, editors. The community forests of Mexico: managing for sustainable landscapes. University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas, USA.
47. Wittman, H., and C. Geisler. 2005. Negotiating locality: decentralization and communal forest management in the Guatemalan highlands. Human Organization 64:62-74.