Comparison of INTAKE24 (an Online 24-h dietary recall tool) with interviewer-led 24-h recall in 11–24 year-old

Nutrients

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2016, Pages

  Bradley, Jennifer ^a   Simpson, Emma ^a   Poliakov, Ivan ^b   Matthews, John N S ^b   Olivier, Patrick ^b   Adamson, Ashley J ^a   Foster, Emma ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

24 h dietary recall; AMPM; Automated multiple pass method; Dietary assessment methods; INTAKE24; Interviewer led 24 h dietary recall; Online dietary assessment tools

Indexed keywords

TRACE ELEMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; CALORIC INTAKE; CHILD; DATA BASE; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTAKE24; INTERVIEW; MACRONUTRIENT; MALE; NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT; ONLINE SYSTEM; BODY MASS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FACTUAL DATABASE; MEDICAL RECORD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECALL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIOECONOMICS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; BODY MASS INDEX; CHILD; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DIET RECORDS; ENERGY INTAKE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MICRONUTRIENTS; NUTRITION ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84973617954     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20726643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/nu8060358     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Livingstone, M. B.; Prentice, A. M.; Strain, J. J.; Coward, W. A.; Black, A. E.; Barker, M. E.; McKenna, P. G.; Whitehead, R. G. Accuracy of weighed dietary records in studies of diet and health. BMJ 1990, 300, 708-712. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. Stephen, A. M.; Mak, T. N.; Fitt, E.; Nicholson, S.; Roberts, C.; Sommerville, J. Innovations in national nutrition surveys. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2013, 72, 77-88. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Carvalho, M. A.; Baranowski, T.; Foster, E.; Santos, O.; Cardoso, B.; Rito, A.; Pereira Miguel, J. Validation of the Portuguese self-administered computerised 24-h dietary recall among second-, third-and fourth-grade children. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2015, 28, 666-674. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. Vereecken, C. A.; Covents, M.; Sichert-Hellert, W.; Alvira, J. M.; Le Donne, C.; De Henauw, S.; De Vriendt, T.; Phillipp, M. K.; Beghin, L.; Manios, Y.; et al. Development and evaluation of a self-administered computerized 24-h dietary recall method for adolescents in Europe. Int. J. Obes. 2008, 32, 26-34. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Foster, E.; Delve, J.; Simpson, E.; Panagio Breininger, S. Comparison study: INTAKE24 vs. Interviewer Led Recall. Final Report. Available online: https: //www. food. gov. uk/sites/default/files/INTAKE24% 20Comparison%20study%20final%20report. pdf (accessed on 3 May 2016).
6. Rogers, Y.; Sharp, H.; Preece, J. Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction, 3rd ed.; Wiley: West Sussex, UK, 2011.
7. Carter, M. C.; Albar, S. A.; Morris, M. A.; Mulla, U. Z.; Hancock, N.; Evans, C. E.; Alwan, N. A.; Greenwood, D. C.; Hardie, L. J.; Frost, G. S. Development of a UK online 24-h dietary assessment tool: Myfood24. Nutrients 2015, 7, 4016-4032. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8. Touvier, M.; Kesse-Guyot, E.; Méjean, C.; Pollet, C.; Malon, A.; Castetbon, K.; Hercberg, S. Comparison between an interactive web-based self-administered 24 h dietary record and an interview by a dietitian for large-scale epidemiological studies. Br. J. Nutr. 2011, 105, 1055-1064. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9. Subar, A. F.; Kirkpatrick, S. I.; Mittl, B.; Zimmerman, T. P.; Thompson, F. E.; Bingley, C.; Willis, G.; Islam, N. G.; Baranowski, T.; McNutt, S.; et al. The Automated Self-Administered 24-h Dietary Recall (ASA24): A resource for researchers, clinicians, and educators from the National Cancer Institute. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2012, 112, 1134-1137. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10. Raper, N.; Perloff, B.; Ingwersen, L.; Steinfeldt, L.; Anand, J. An overview of USDA's dietary intake data system. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2004, 17, 545-555. [CrossRef]
11. Kirkpatrick, S. I.; Subar, A. F.; Douglass, D.; Zimmerman, T. P.; Thompson, F. E.; Kahle, L. L.; George, S. M.; Dodd, K. W.; Potischman, N. Performance of the Automated Self-Administered 24-h Recall relative to a measure of true intakes and to an interviewer-administered 24-h recall. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 100, 233-240. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12. Diep, C. S.; Hingle, M.; Chen, T. A.; Dadabhoy, H. R.; Beltran, A.; Baranowski, J.; Subar, A. F.; Baranowski, T. The automated self-administered 24-h dietary recall for children, 2012 version, for youth aged 9 to 11 years: A validation study. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2015, 115, 1591-1598. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13. National Cancer Institute. Automated Self-Administered 24-h Recall (ASA24). Available online: https: //asa24. nci. nih. gov/demo/ (accessed on 2 June 2016).
14. Albar, S. A.; Alwan, N. A.; Evans, C. E.; Greenwood, D. C.; Cade, J. E. Agreement between an online dietary assessment tool (myfood24) and an interviewer-administered 24-h dietary recall in British adolescents aged 11-18 years. Br. J. Nutr. 2016, 115, 1-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15. Nelson, M.; Erens, B.; Bates, B.; Church, S.; Boshier, T. Low Income Diet and Nutrition Survey; TSO: London, UK, 2007; Volume 1.
16. Adamson, A. J.; Collerton, J.; Davies, K.; Foster, E.; Jagger, C.; Stamp, E.; Mathers, J. C.; Kirkwood, T. Nutrition in advanced age: Dietary assessment in the Newcastle 85 plus; study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 63, 6-18. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17. Conway, J. M.; Ingwersen, L. A.; Moshfegh, A. J. Accuracy of dietary recall using the USDA five-step multiple-pass method in men: An observational validation study. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2004, 104, 595-603. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
18. Moshfegh, A. J.; Rhodes, D. G.; Baer, D. J.; Murayi, T.; Clemens, J. C.; Rumpler, W. V.; Paul, D. R.; Sebastian, R. S.; Kuczynski, K. J.; Ingwersen, L. A. The US Department of Agriculture Automated Multiple-Pass Method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakes. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 88, 324-332. [PubMed]
19. Holmes, B.; Dick, K.; Nelson, M. A comparison of four dietary assessment methods in materially deprived households in England. Public Health Nutr. 2008, 11, 444-456. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
20. Rutherford, L.; Hinchliffe, S.; Sharp, C. The Scottish Health Survey Volume 1: Main Report. Available online: http: //www. gov. scot/Resource/0046/00464858. pdf (accessed on 30 March 2014).
21. Foster, E.; Matthews, J. N.; Lloyd, J.; Marshall, L.; Mathers, J. C.; Nelson, M.; Barton, K. L.; Wrieden, W. L.; Cornelissen, P.; Harris, J.; et al. Children's estimates of food portion size: The development and evaluation of three portion size assessment tools for use with children. Br. J. Nutr. 2008, 99, 175-184. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
22. Food Standards Scotland; Newcastle University. INTAKE24. Available online: https: //intake24. co. uk (accessed on 2 June 2016).
23. Foster, E.; Hawkins, A.; Adamson, A. J. Young Person's Food Atlas-Secondary; Food Standards Agency: London, UK, 2010.
24. Nelson, M.; Dick, K.; Holmes, B.; Thomas, R.; Dowler, E. A. Low Income Diet Methods Study; Food Standards Agency: London, UK, 2002.
25. Bland, J. M.; Altman, D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986, 1, 307-310. [CrossRef]
26. Vereecken, C. A.; Covents, M.; Matthys, C.; Maes, L. Young Adolescents' Nutrition Assessment on Computer (YANA-C). Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005, 59, 658-667. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
27. Ofcom. The Communications Market Report. Available online: http: //stakeholders. ofcom. org. uk/binaries/ research/cmr/cmr15/CMR_UK_2015. pdf (accessed on 30 March 2016).