Young adolescents' nutrition assessment on computer (YANA-C)

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Volumn 59, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 658-667

  Vereecken, Carine A ^a   Covents, M ^b   Matthys, C ^a   Maes, L ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Adolescents; Computer assisted querying; Food habits; Food recall; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CALORIC INTAKE; CHILD NUTRITION; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONSUMER; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EATING HABIT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVIEW; METHODOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; NUTRIENT CONTENT; NUTRIENT UPTAKE; NUTRITIONAL VALUE; SCHOOL CHILD; STANDARD; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT NUTRITION PHYSIOLOGY; BELGIUM; COMPUTERS; DIET RECORDS; DIET SURVEYS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NUTRITION ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE;

SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

EID: 19144365622     PISSN: 09543007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602124     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Baranowski T, Islam N, Baranowski J, Cullen KW, Myres D, Marsh T & de MC (2002): The food intake recording software system is valid among fourth-grade children. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 102, 380-385.
2. Baxter SD (2003): Accuracy of fourth-graders' dietary recalls of school breakfast and school lunch validated with observations: in-person versus telephone interviews. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 35, 124-134.
3. Baxter SD, Thompson WO, Davis HC & Johnson MH (1997): Impact of gender, ethnicity, meal component, and time interval between eating and reporting on accuracy of fourth-graders' self-reports of school lunch. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 97, 1293-1298.
4. Baxter SD, Thompson WO, litaker MS, Frye FH & Guinn CH (2002): Low accuracy and low consistency of fourth-graders' school breakfast and school lunch recalls. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 102, 386-395.
5. Baxter SD, Smith AF, litaker MS, Guinn CH, Shaffer NM, Baglio ML & Frye FH (2004): Recency affects reporting accuracy of children's dietary recalls. Ann. Epidemiol. 14, 385-390.
6. Bingham SA (1991): Assessment of food consumption and nutrient intake: Current intake. In Design Concepts in Nutritional Epidemiology eds BM Margetts & M Nelson, pp 154-167. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Bingham SA, Nelson M, Paul AA, Halaldsdottir J, Loken EB & Van Staveren WA (1988): Methods for data collection at an individual level. In Manual on Methodology for Food Consumption Studies eds ME Cameron & WA Van Staveren, pp 53-106. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Bland JM & Altman DG (1986): Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1, 307-310.
9. Buzzard IM, Faucett CL, Jeffery RW, McBane L, McGovern P, Baxter JS, Shapiro AC, Blackburn GL, Chlebowski RT, Elashoff RM & Wynder EL (1996): Monitoring dietary change in a low-fat diet intervention study: advantages of using 24-hour dietary recalls vs food records. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 96, 574-579.
10. Cade J, Thompson R, Burley V & Warm D (2002): Development, validation and utilisation of food-frequency questionnaires - a review. Public Health Nutr. 5, 567-587.
11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1997): Guidelines for school health programs to promote lifelong healthy eating. J. Sch. Health 67, 9-26.
12. Crawford PB, Obarzanek E, Morrison J & Sabry ZI (1994): Comparative advantage of 3-day food records over 24-hour recall and 5-day food frequency validated by observation of 9- and 10-year-old girls. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 94, 626-630.
13. Domel SB, Thompson WO, Baranowski T & Smith AF (1994): How children remember what they have eaten. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 94, 1267-1272.
14. Edmunds LD & Ziebland S (2002): Development and validation of the Day in the Life Questionnaire (DILQ) as a measure of fruit and vegetable questionnaire for 7-9 year olds. Health Educ. Res. 17, 211-220.
15. Health Council Belgium (1997): Household Weights and Measures; A Manual for a Standardised Quantification of Food Items in Belgium. Brussels, Ministry of Public Health.
16. Klaver W, Burema J, Van Staveren WA & Knuiman JT (1988): Definitions of terms. In Manual on Methodology for Food Consumption Studies eds ME Cameron & WA Van Staveren, pp 11-23. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Kramer MS & Feinstein AR (1981): Clinical biostatistics. LIV. The biostatistics of concordance [published erratum appears in Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989;46(3):309]. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 29, 111-123.
18. Livingstone MB & Robson PJ (2000): Measurement of dietary intake in children. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 59, 279-293.
19. Lytle LA, Nichaman MZ, Obarzanek E, Glovsky E, Montgomery D, Nicklas T, Zive M & Feldman H (1993): Validation of 24-hour recalls assisted by food records in third-grade children. The CATCH Collaborative Group. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 93, 1431-1436.
20. Lytle LA, Murray DM, Perry CL & Eldridge AL (1998): Validating fourth-grade students' self-report of dietary intake: results from the 5 A Day Power Plus program. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 98, 570-572.
21. Masson LF, McNeill G, Tomany JO, Simpson JA, Peace HS, Wei L, Grubb DA & Bolton-Smith C (2003): Statistical approaches for assessing the relative validity of a food-frequency questionnaire: use of correlation coefficients and the kappa statistic. Public Health Nutr. 6, 313-321.
22. Matthys C, De Henauw S, Devos C & De Backer G (2003): Estimated energy intake, macronutrient intake and meal pattern of Flemish adolescents. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 57, 366-375.
23. Mcpherson RS, Hoelscher DM, Alexander M, Scanlon KS & Serdula MK (2000): Dietary assessment methods among school-aged children: validity and reliability. Prev. Med. 31, s11-s33.
24. Mullenbach V, Kushi LH, Jacobson C, Gomez-Marin O, Prineas RJ, Roth-Yousey L & Sinaiko AR (1992): Comparison of 3-day food record and 24-hour recall by telephone for dietary evaluation in adolescents. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 92, 743-745.
25. NEVO (1996): NEVO Tabel. Nederlands voedingsstoffenbestand. The Netherlands: Velotekst, Den Haag.
26. NUBEL (1999): Belgische voedingsmiddelentabel 3rd edition. Brussels, Belgium, Ministry of Public Health.
27. Prochaska JJ & Sallis J (2004): Reliability and validity of a fruit and vegetable screening measure for adolescents. J. Adolesc. Health 34, 163-165.
28. Samuelson G (1970): An epidemiological study of child health and nutrition in a northern Swedish County. II. Methodological study of the recall technique. Nutr. Metab. 12, 321-340.
29. Spear BA (2002): Adolescent growth and development. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 102, S23-S29.
30. Thompson FE & Byers T (1994): Dietary assessment resource manual. J. Nutr. 124, 2245S-2317S.
31. Unilever Becel Nutrient Calculation Program 5.03 (1995): Hartog Union and Van den Bergh, the Netherlands.
32. Van Horn LV, Gernhofer N, Moag-Stahlberg A, Farris R, Hartmuller G, Lasser VI, Stumbo P, Craddick S & Ballew C (1990): Dietary assessment in children using electronic methods: telephones and tape recorders. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 90, 412-416.
33. Weber JL, Lytle L, Gittelsohn J, Cunningham-Sabo L, Heller K, Anliker JA, Stevens J, Hurley J & Ring K (2004): Validity of self-reported dietary intake at school meals by American Indian children: the Pathways Study. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 104, 746-752.