Development of a UK online 24-h dietary assessment tool: Myfood24

Nutrients

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 4016-4032

  Carter, Michelle C ^a   Albar, Salwa A ^a,b   Morris, Michelle A ^a   Mulla, Umme Z ^c   Hancock, Neil ^a   Evans, Charlotte E ^a   Alwan, Nisreen A ^a,d   Greenwood, Darren C ^e   Hardie, Laura J ^e   Frost, Gary S ^f   Wark, Petra A ^c   Cade, Janet E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b KING ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^c IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^f HAMMERSMITH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

24 h dietary recall; Dietary assessment; Nutrition assessment

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; CALORIC INTAKE; CHILD; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DEMOGRAPHY; DIETARY ASSESSMENT TOOL; FEMALE; GROUPS BY AGE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT; PUBLIC HEALTH; SYSTEM USABILITY SCALE; UNITED KINGDOM; INTERNET; MEDICAL RECORD; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECALL; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHILD; DIET RECORDS; ENERGY INTAKE; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; NUTRITION ASSESSMENT; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED KINGDOM; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84930959107     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20726643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/nu7064016     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Schatzkin, A.; Subar, A.F.; Moore, S.; Park, Y.; Potischman, N.; Thompson, F.E.; Leitzmann, M.; Hollenbeck, A.; Morrissey, K.G.; Kipnis, V. Observational Epidemiologic Studies of Nutrition and Cancer: The Next Generation (with Better Observation). Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2009, 18, 1026–1032.
2. Bingham, S.A.; Luben, R.; Welch, A.; Wareham, N.; Khaw, K.T.; Day, N. Are imprecise methods obscuring a relation between fat and breast cancer? Lancet 2003, 362, 212–214.
3. Subar, A.F.; Kipnis, V.; Troiano, R.P.; Midthune, D.; Schoeller, D.A.; Bingham, S.; Sharbaugh, C.O.; Trabulsi, J.; Runswick, S.; Ballard-Barbash, R.; et al. Using intake biomarkers to evaluate the extent of dietary misreporting in a large sample of adults: The OPEN study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2003, 158, 1–13.
4. Arab, L.; Tseng, C.H.; Ang, A.; Jardack, P. Validity of a multipass, web-based, 24-h self-administered recall for assessment of total energy intake in blacks and whites. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2011, 174, 1256–1265.
5. Subar, A.F.; Kirkpatrick, S.I.; Mittl, B.; Zimmerman, T.P.; Thompson, F.E.; Bingley, C.; Willis, G.; Islam, N.G.; Baranowski, T.; McNutt, S.; et al. The Automated Self-Administered 24-h dietary recall (ASA24): A resource for researchers, clinicians, and educators from the National Cancer Institute. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet 2012, 112, 1134–1137.
6. Touvier, M.; Kesse-Guyot, E.; Mejean, C.; Pollet, C.; Malon, A.; Castetbon, K.; Hercberg, S. Comparison between an interactive web-based self-administered 24 h dietary record and an interview by a dietitian for large-scale epidemiological studies. Br. J. Nutr. 2011, 105, 1055–1064.
7. Foster, E.; Hawkins, A.; Delve, J.; Adamson, A.J. Reducing the cost of dietary assessment: Self-completed recall and analysis of nutrition for use with children (SCRAN24). J. Hum. Nutr. Diet 2014, 27 (Suppl. 1), 26–35.
8. UK Biobank. 24-hour Dietary Recall Questionnaire. Available online: http://biobank.ctsu.ox.ac.uk/ crystal/docs/DietWebQ.pdf (accessed on 18 December 2014).
9. Liu, B.; Young, H.; Crowe, F.L.; Benson, V.S.; Spencer, E.A.; Key, T.J.; Appleby, P.N.; Beral, V. Development and evaluation of the Oxford WebQ, a low-cost, web-based method for assessment of previous 24 h dietary intakes in large-scale prospective studies. Public Health Nutr. 2011, 14, 1998–2005.
10. Subar, A.F.; Crafts, J.; Zimmerman, T.P.; Wilson, M.; Mittl, B.; Islam, N.G.; McNutt, S.; Potischman, N.; Buday, R.; Hull, S.G.; et al. Assessment of the accuracy of portion size reports using computer-based food photographs aids in the development of an automated self-administered 24-h recall. J. Am. Diet Assoc. 2010, 110, 55–64.
11. Conway, J.M.; Ingwersen, L.A.; Vinyard, B.T.; Moshfegh, A.J. Effectiveness of the US Department of Agriculture 5-step multiple-pass method in assessing food intake in obese and nonobese women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003, 77, 1171–1178.
12. Moshfegh, A.J.; Rhodes, D.G.; Baer, D.J.; Murayi, T.; Clemens, J.C.; Rumpler, W.V.; Paul, D.R.; Sebastian, R.S.; Kuczynski, K.J.; Ingwersen, L.A.; et al. The US Department of Agriculture Automated Multiple-Pass Method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakes. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 88, 324–332.
13. Vereecken, C.A.; Covents, M.; Matthys, C.; Maes, L. Young adolescents’ nutrition assessment on computer (YANA-C). Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005, 59, 658–667.
14. Moore, H.J.; Hillier, F.C.; Batterham, A.M.; Ells, L.J.; Summerbell, C.D. Technology-based dietary assessment: Development of the Synchronised Nutrition and Activity Program (SNAP). J. Hum. Nutr. Diet 2014, 27 (Suppl. 1), 36–42.
15. Jackson, D.; Craig, L.; Creaton, M. Evaluation and relative validation of a web based 24-h dietary recall in children aged 9–11 years. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Diet and Activity Methods, Rome, Italy, 14–17 May 2012.
16. Carter, M.C.; Burley, V.J.; Nykjaer, C.; Cade, J.E. “My Meal Mate” (MMM): Validation of the diet measures captured on a smartphone application to facilitate weight loss. Br. J. Nutr. 2013, 109, 539–546.
17. McCance, R.A.; Widdowson, E.M. McCance and Widdowson’s The Composition of Foods, 6th ed.; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2002.
18. Foster, E.; Hawkins, A.; Adamson, A. Young Person’s Food Altas-Secondary; Food Standards Agency Publications: London, UK, 2010.
19. Gregory, J.; Lowe, S.; Bates, C.J.; Prentice, A.; Jackson, L.V.; Smithers, G.; Wenlock, R.; Farron, M. National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Young People Aged 4 to 18 Years; TSO: London, UK, 2000.
20. Cade, J.; Hancock, N.; Carter, M.; McLoughlin, C.; Wark, P.; Hatherley, A.; Steen, E.; Ryecroft, C.; Alwan, N.; Morris, M. PP38 Development of a new UK food composition database. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2014, 68, A62–A63.
21. Yan, Z. What influences children’s and adolescents’ understanding of the complexity of the Internet? Dev. Psychol. 2006, 42, 418–428.
22. Nielsen, J. Usability of Websites for Teenagers. Available online: http://www.nngroup.com/articles /usability-of-websites-for-teenagers/ (accessed on 18 December 2014).
23. Nielsen, J. Ten Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design. Available online: http://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/ (accessed on 18 December 2014)
24. Norman, D. Emotion & design: Attractive things work better. Interactions 2002, 9, 36–42.
25. Courage, C.; Baxter, K. Understanding Your Users: A Practical Guide to User Requirements Methods, Tools, and Techniques; Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.: San Fransisco, CA, USA, 2005.
26. Holzwarth, M.; Janiszewski, C.; Neumann, M. The Influence of Avatars on Online Consumer Shopping Behavior. J. Mark. 2006, 70, 19–36.
27. Virzi, R.A. Streamlining the Design Process: Running Fewer Subjects. Proceed. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Ann. Meet. 1990, 34, 291–294.
28. Nielsen, J.; Landauer, T.K. A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. In Proceedings of the INTERACT '93 and CHI '93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 24–29 April 1993; pp. 206–213.
29. Brooke, J. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind. 1996, 189, 194.
30. Bangor, A.; Kortum, P.T.; Miller, J.T. An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2008, 24, 574–594.
31. Krebs, P.; Burkhalter, J.E.; Snow, B.; Fiske, J.; Ostroff, J.S. Development and Alpha Testing of QuitIT: An Interactive Video Game to Enhance Skills for Coping With Smoking Urges. JMIR Res. Protoc. 2013, 2, e35.
32. Bossen, D.; Veenhof, C.; Dekker, J.; de Bakker, D. The usability and preliminary effectiveness of a web-based physical activity intervention in patients with knee and/or hip osteoarthritis. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2013, 13, doi:10.1186/1472-6947-1113-1161.
33. Lynch, K.R.; Schwerha, D.J.; Johanson, G.A. Development of a Weighted Heuristic for Website Evaluation for Older Adults. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2012, 29, 404–418.
34. Bangor, A.; Kortum, P.; Miller, J. Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. J. Usability Stud. 2009, 4, 114–123.
35. Buday, R.; Tapia, R.; Maze, G.R., Technology-driven dietary assessment: A software developer’s perspective. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet 2014, 27 (Suppl. 1), 10–17.
36. Cade, J.E.; Burley, V.J.; Greenwood, D.C. The UK Women’s Cohort Study: Comparison of vegetarians, fish-eaters and meat-eaters. Public Health Nutr. 2004, 7, 871–878.
37. Elliott, P.; Vergnaud, A.C.; Singh, D.; Neasham, D.; Spear, J.; Heard, A. The Airwave Health Monitoring Study of police officers and staff in Great Britain: Rationale, design and methods. Environ. Res. 2014, 134, doi:10.1016/j.envres.2014.1007.1025.