Individual differences in saccharin acceptance predict rats' food intake

Physiology and Behavior

Volumn 164, Issue , 2016, Pages 151-156

  Boakes, Robert A ^a   Martire, Sarah I ^a   Rooney, Kieron B ^a   Kendig, Michael D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Fat mass; Fat pads; Food intake; Individual differences; Rats; Saccharin; Weight gain; Wheel running

Indexed keywords

SACCHARIN; SWEETENING AGENT;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; ELEVATED PLUS MAZE TEST; FAT MASS; FOOD INTAKE; MALE; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; WEIGHT GAIN; ANIMAL; BODY WEIGHT; EATING; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; INDIVIDUALITY; MAZE TEST; METABOLISM; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PHYSIOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT;

ANIMALS; ANXIETY; BODY WEIGHT; EATING; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; MAZE LEARNING; MOTOR ACTIVITY; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SACCHARIN; SWEETENING AGENTS;

EID: 84973109277     PISSN: 00319384     EISSN: 1873507X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.05.050     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Miller P.E., Perez V. Low calorie sweeteners and body weight and composition: a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 100:765-777.
2. Rogers P.J., Hogenkamp P.S., de Graaf C., Higgs S., Lluch A., Penfold C., et al. Does low energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies. Int. J. Obes. 2016, 40:381-394.
3. Davidson T.L., Tracy A., Schier L.A., Swithers S.E. A view of obesity as a learning and memory disorder. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Learn. Cogn. 2014, 40:261-279.
4. Davidson T.L., Sample C.H., Swithers S.E. An application of Pavlovian principles to the problems of obesity and cognitive decline. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 2014, 108:172-184.
5. Swithers S.E. Artificial sweeteners produce the counter intuitive effect of inducing metabolic derangements. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 24:432-441.
6. Swithers S.E. Not so sweet revenge: Unanticipated consequences of high-intensity sweeteners. Behav. Anal. 2015, 38:1-17.
7. Swithers S.E., Davidson T.L. A role for sweet taste: calorie predictive relations in energy regulation by rats. Behav. Neurosci. 2008, 122:161-173.
8. Boakes R.A., Kendig M.D., Martire S.I., Rooney K.B. Sweetening yoghurt with glucose, but not with saccharin, promotes weight gain and increased fat pad mass in rats. Appetite 2016, (in press).
9. Nachman M. The influence of diet and age on saccharine preference in rats. Am. Psychol. 1957, 12:461. (Abstract).
10. Nachman M. The inheritance of saccharin preference. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 1959, 52:451-457.
11. Dess N.K., Minor T.R. Taste and emotionality in rats selectively bred for high versus low saccharin intake. Anim. Learn. Behav. 1996, 24:105-115.
12. Sclafani A., Clare R.A. Female rats show a bimodal preference response to the artificial sweetener sucralose. Chem. Senses 2004, 29:523-528.
13. Kendig M.D., Boakes R.A., Rooney K.B., Corbit L.H. Chronic restricted access to 10% sucrose solution in adolescent and young adult rats impairs spatial memory and alters sensitivity to outcome devaluation. Physiol. Behav. 2013, 120:164-172.
14. Hogg S. A review of the validity and variability of the elevated plus-maze as an animal model of anxiety. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 1996, 54:21-30.
15. Pellow S., Chopin P., File S.E., Briley M. Validation of open: closed arm entries in an elevated plus-maze as a measure of anxiety in the rat. J. Neurosci. Methods 1985, 14:149-167.
16. Afonso V.M., Eikelboom R. Relationship between wheel running, feeding, drinking and body weight in male rats. Physiol. Behav. 2003, 80:19-26.
17. Kendig M.D., Ekayanti W., Stewart H., Boakes R.A., Rooney K. Metabolic effects of access to sucrose drink in female rats and transmission of some effects to their offspring. Plos One 2014, 10.1371/journal.pone.0131107.
18. Bartoshuk L.M. Bitter taste of saccharin related to the genetic ability to taste the bitter substance 6-n-propylthiouracil. Science 1979, 205:934-935.
19. Carroll M.E., Morgan A.D., Anker J.J., Perry J.L., Dess N.K. Selective breeding for differential saccharin intake as an animal model of drug abuse. Behav. Pharmacol. 2008, 19:435-460.
20. Dess N.K., Arnal J., Chapman C.D., Siebel S., VanderWeele D.A., Green K.F. Exploring adaptations to famine: rats selectively bred for differential intake of saccharin differ on deprivation-induced hyperactivity and emotionality. Int. J. Comp. Psychol. 2000, 13:34-52.
21. Carroll M.E., Morgan A.D., Lynch W.J., Campbell U.C., Dess N.K. Intravenous cocaine and heroin self-administration in rats selectively bred for differential saccharin intake: phenotype and sex differences. Psychopharmacology 2002, 161:304-313.
22. Dess N.K., Chapman C.D., Monroe D. Consumption of SC45647 and sucralose by rats selectively bred for high and low saccharin intake. Chem. Senses 2009, 34:211-220.
23. Dess N.K., Chapman C.D., Cousins L.A., Monroe D.C., Nguyen P. Refeeding after acute food restriction: differential reduction in preference for ethanol and ethanol-paired flavors in selectively bred rats. Physiol. Behav. 2013, 109:80-87.
24. Dess N.K., Madkins C.D., Geary B.A., Chapman C.D. "Jello shots" and cocktails as ethanol vehicles: parametric studies with high- and low-saccharin-consuming rats. Nutrients 2013, 5:4685-4714. 10.3390/nu5114685.
25. Dess N.K. Responses to basic taste qualities in rats selectively bred for high versus low saccharin intake. Physiol. Behav. 2000, 69:247-257.
26. Clegg D.J., Benoit S.C., Reed J.A., Woods S.C., Dunn-Meynell A., Levin B.E. Reduced anorexic effects in obesity-prone rats fed a moderate fat diet. Am. J. Physiol. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2005, 288:R981-R986.
27. Cottone P., Sabino V., Nagy T.R., Coscina D.V., Zorilla E.P. Feeding microstructure in diet-induced obesity-susceptible versus resistant rats: central effects of urocortin 2. J. Physiol. 2007, 583(Part 2):487-504.
28. Robinson M.J.F., Burghardt P.R., Patterson C.M., Nobile C.W., Akil H., Watson S.J., et al. Individual differences in cue-induced motivation and striatal systems in rats susceptible to diet-induced obesity. Neuropsychopharmacology 2015, 40:2113-2123.