Evaluation of a mobile projector-based indoor navigation interface

Interacting with Computers

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 596-613

  Li, Ming ^a   Arning, Katrin ^a   Sack, Oliver ^a   Park, Jiyoung ^b   Kim, Myoung Hee ^b   Ziefle, Martina ^a   Kobbelt, Leif ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

distortion correction; evaluation; indoor navigation; mobile projector; navigation information; spatial ability

Indexed keywords

NAVIGATION;

DISTORTION CORRECTION; EVALUATION; IN-DOOR NAVIGATIONS; MOBILE PROJECTORS; NAVIGATION IN FORMATION; SPATIAL ABILITIES;

INDOOR POSITIONING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84928312196     PISSN: 09535438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/iwc/iwt053     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Adams, D.A., Nelson, R.R. and Todd, P.A. (1992) Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication. MIS Quart., 16, 227-247.
2. Arikawa, M., Konomi, S. and Ohnishi, K. (2007) Navitime: supporting pedestrian navigation in the real world. IEEE Pervasive Comput., 6, 21-29. http://www.computer.org/csdl/mags/pc/2007/03/b3021-abs.html.
3. Arning, K. and Ziefle, M. (2007) Understanding differences in PDA acceptance and performance. Comput. Hum. Behav., 23, 2904-2927.
4. Arning, K. and Ziefle, M. (2009) Effects of age, cognitive, and personal factors on PDA menu navigation performance. Behav. Inf. Technol., 28, 251-268. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01449290701679395.
5. Arning, K., Gaul, S and Ziefle, M. (2010) 'Same Same But Different': How Service Contexts of Mobile Technologies Shape Usage Motives and Barriers. Proc. 6th Int. Conf. HCI in Work and Learning, Life and Leisure: USAB'10, pp. 34-54. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1947789.1947793.
6. Arning, K., Ziefle, M., Li, M. and Kobbelt, L. (2012) Insights into User Experiences and Acceptance of Mobile Indoor Navigation Devices. 11th Int. Conf. Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. ACM, New York. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2406417.
7. Bay, S. and Ziefle, M. (2003) Design for All: User Characteristics to be Considered for the Design of Devices with Hierarchical Menu Structures. In Luczak, H. and Zink, K.J. (eds), Human Factors in Organizational Design and Management, pp. 503-508. IEA, Santa Monica.
8. Bousbia-salah, M. and Fezari, M. (2006) The development of a pedestrian navigation aid for the blind, 1-5, doi:10.1109/IEEEGCC.2006.5686241.
9. Davis, F.D. (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart., 13, 319-340.
10. Dee-Lucas, D. (1996) Effects of Overview Structure on Study Strategies and Text Representations for Instructional Hypertext. In Rouet, J.-F., Levonen, J., Dillon, A. and Spiro, R. (eds), Hypertext and Cognition, pp. 73-107.Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
11. Dillon, A. and Morris, M.G. (1996) User acceptance of new information technology: theories and models. Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol., 31, 3-32. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/10558.
12. Dillon, A. and Watson, C. (1996) User analysis in HCI the historical lessons from individual differences research. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., 45, 619-637.
13. Downs, R.M. and Stea D. (2011) Cognitive Maps and Spatial Behaviour: Process and Products. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK.
14. Ekstrom, R., French, J., Harman, H. and Dermen, D. (1976) Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests. Educational Testing Service.
15. Evans, H. and Simkin, M. (1989) What best predicts computer proficiency? Commun. ACM, 32, 1322-1327.
16. Fox, J.E. (1996) The Effects of InformationAccuracy on UserTrust and Compliance. Conf. Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Common Ground, CHI '96, pp. 35-36.ACM, NewYork, doi:10.1145/257089.257119.
17. Fujii, K., Grossberg, M. and Nayar, S. (2005) A Projector-Camera System with Real-Time Photometric Adaptation for Dynamic Environments. ComputerVision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2005. IEEE Computer Society Conf., Vol. 2, p. 1180, doi:10.1109/CVPR.2005.42.
18. Goldin, S.E. and Thorndyke, P.W. (1981) U.A. R. I. for the Behavioral, S. Sciences, Spatial Learning and Reasoning Skill. R (Rand Corporation), Rand. http://books.google.de/books?id=k-pTAAAACAAJ.
19. Goodman, J., Gray, P., Khammampad, K. and Brewster, S. (2004a) Using Land-Marks to Support Older People in Navigation. In Brewster, S. (ed.), Proc. Mobile HCI 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3160, Glasgow, UK, September 13-16, pp. 38-48. Springer, Berlin.
20. Goodman, J., Brewster, S and Gray, P (2004b) Using Field Experiments to Evaluate Mobile Guides. Proc. HCI in Mobile Guides, Mobile HCI 2004. September 13-16, Glasgow, UK.
21. Goodman, J., Brewster, S. and Gray S. (2005) How can we best use landmarks to support older people in navigation? Behav. Inf. Technol., 24. 3-20.
22. Greaves, A., Akerman, P., Rukzio, E., Cheverst, K. and Hakkila, J. (2009) Explo-ring User Reaction to Personal Projection When used in Shared Public Places: A Formative Study. Context-Aware Mobile Media and Mobile Social Networks. http://comp.eprints. lancs.ac.uk/2264/1/cam3sn2009-greaves.pdf.
23. Hart, S. and Staveland, L. (1988) Development of nasa-tlx (task load index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. In Hancock, P.A. and Meshkati, N. (eds), Human Mental Workload, pp. 139-183. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
24. Hegarty, M., Kriz, S. and Cate, C. (2003) The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems. Cogn. Instr., 21, 325-360.
25. Hegarty, M., Montello, D.R., Richardson, A.E., Ishikawa, T. and Lovelace, K. (2006) Spatial abilities at different scales: individual differences in aptitude test performance and spatial-layout learning. Intelligence, 34, 151-176. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289605000905.
26. Hunt, E. andWaller, D. (1999) Orientation and wayfinding: a review. Technical Report.
27. Kim, H. and Hirtle, S. (1995) Spatial metaphors and disorientation in hypertext browsing. Behav. Inf. Technol., 14, 239-250.
28. Kirasic, K. (2000) Age differences in adults' spatial abilities, learning environmental layout, and wayfinding behavior. Spat. Cogn. Comput., 2, 117-134.
29. Kuniavsky, M. (2010) Smart Things: Ubiquitous Computing User Experience Design. Morgan Kaufmann. http://www.lavoisier.fr/livre/notice.asp?id=OR3W2LAKS66OWR.
30. Link, J.B., Smith, P., Viol, N. and Wehrle, K. (2013) Accurate mapbased indoor navigation on the mobile. J. Locat. Based Serv., 7, 23-43.
31. Lynch, K. (1960) The Image of the City. The MIT Press.
32. May, A.J., Ross, T., Bayer, S.H. and Tarkiainen, M.J. (2003) Pedestrian navigation aids: information requirements and design implications. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput., 7, 331-338.
33. McGee, M. (1979) Human spatial abilities: psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychol. Bull., 86, 889-918.
34. Millonig, A. and Schechtner, K. (2007) Developing landmark-based pedestrian-navigation systems. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 8, 43-49.
35. Mulloni, A., Seichter, H. and Schmalstieg, D. (2011) Handheld Augmented Reality Indoor Navigation with Activity-Based Instructions. Proc. 13th Int. Conf. Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, Mobile HCI'11, Stockholm, August 30-September 2, pp. 211-220. ACM, NewYork.
36. Nayar, S.K., Peri, H., Grossberg, M.D. and Belhumeur, P.N. (2003) A Projection System with Radiometric Compensation for Screen Imperfections. Proc. ICCV Int. Workshop on Projector Camera Systems. October 11-12, Nice, France.
37. Nokia (2010) Nokia indoor navigation. http://research.nokia.com/research.
38. Pak, R., Czaja, S.J., Sharit, J., Rogers, W.A. and Fisk, A.D. (2008) The role of spatial abilities and age in performance in an auditory computer navigation task. Comput. Hum. Behav., 24, 3045-3051. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074756320800 1088.
39. Pinhanez, C.S. (2001) The Everywhere Displays Projector: A Device to Create Ubiquitous Graphical Interfaces. Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Ubiquitous Computing, UbiComp '01, pp. 315-331. Springer, London. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=647987.741324.
40. Rau, P.-L. andWang,Y.-J. (2003)A Study of Navigation Support Tools for Mobile Devices. Proc. HCI Int., Crete, Greece, June 22-27.
41. Rogers, E.M. (2003) Diffusion of Innovations. 5. Auflage, Free Press, NewYork, NY.
42. Rogers,W.A. and Fisk,A. D. (2010)Toward a psychological science of advanced technology design for older adults. J. Gerontol. Psychol. Sci., doi:10.1093/geronb/gbq065.
43. Rukzio, E., Schmidt, A. and Krüger,A. (2005) The Rotating Compass: A Novel Interaction Technique for Mobile Navigation. CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA '05, Portland, OR, USA, April 2-7, pp. 1761-1764. ACM, NewYork.
44. Rukzio, E., Holleis, P. and Gellersen, H. (2011) Personal projectors for pervasive computing. IEEE Pervasive Comput., 99, doi:10.1109/MPRV.2011.17.
45. Serra, A., Carboni, S and Marotto, V. (2010) Indoor Pedestrian Navigation System Using a Modern Smartphone. Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, MobileHCI '10, pp. 397-398. ACM, New York. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1851600.1851683.
46. Tajimi, K., Uemura, K., Sakata, N. and Nishida, S. (2010) Stabilization Method for Floor Projection with a Hip-Mounted Projector. Proc. 20th Int. Conf. on Artificial Reality and Telexistence (ICAT2010), Aadelade, Australia, pp. 77-83.
47. Taylor, L. H., and Sucov, E.W. (1974) The movement of people toward lights. J. Illum. Eng. Soc., 3, 237-241.
48. Thorndyke, P.W. and Hayes-Roth, B. (1982) Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cogn. Psychol., 14, 560-589. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0010028582900196.
49. Tolman, E.C. (1948) Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol. Rev., 55, 189-208.
50. Vilar, E., Rebelo, F., Noriega, P., Teles, J. and Mayhorn, C. (2013) The influence of environmental features on route selection in an emergency situation. Appl. Ergon., 44, 618-627.
51. Wecker, A.J., Lanir, J., Kuik, T. and Stock, O. (2011) Pathlight: Supporting Navigation of Small Groups in the Museum Context. Proc. 13th Int. Conf. Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, Mobile HCI '11, Stockholm, August 30-September 2, pp. 569-574. ACM, NewYork.
52. Werner, S., Krieg-Brückner, B., Mallot, H., Schweizer, K. and Freksa, C. (1997) Spatial Cognition: The Role of Landmark, Route, and Survey Knowledge in Human and Robot Navigation. In Jarke, M., Pasedach, K. and Pohl, K. (eds), Informatik '97, Aachen, Germany, September 24-26, pp. 41-50. Springer, Berlin.
53. Wilkowska, W. and Ziefle, M. (2012) Privacy and Data Security in E-health: Requirements from Users' Perspective. Health Inf. J., 18, 191-201. http://jhi.sagepub.com/content/18/3.toc.
54. Winkler, C., Broscheit, M. and Rukzio, E. (2011) NaviBeam: Indoor Assistance and Navigation for Shopping Malls Through Projector Phones. CHI 2011, Workshop on Mobile and Personal Projection, Vancouver, BC, May 7-12.
55. Ziefle, M. (2010) Information presentation in small screen devices: the trade-off between visual density and menu foresight. Appl. Ergon., 41, 719-730. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687010000463.
56. Ziefle, M. and Bay, S. (2006) How to overcome disorientation in mobile phone menus: a comparison of two different types of navigation aids. Hum.-Comput.-Interact., 21, 393-432. http://www. tandfonline.com/toc/hhci20/21/4#.UdkTGxZfRW8.
57. Ziefle, M., Schroeder, U., Michel, T. and Strenk, J. (2007) How Young and Older Users Master the Use of Hyperlinks in Small Screen Devices. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 307-316.ACM, New York, doi:10.1145/1240624.1240676.
58. Ziefle, M., Röcker, C. and Holzinger A. (2011) Medical Technology in Smart Homes: Exploring the User's Perspective on Privacy, Intimacy and Trust. The 3rd IEEE Int. Workshop on Security Aspects of Process and Services Engineering (SAPSE'11). 35th Annual IEEE Computer Software and Applications Conf., July 18-22, Munich, Germany, pp. 410-415, doi:10.1109/COMPSACW. 2011.75.