Erratum: A novel procedure on next generation sequencing data analysis using text mining algorithm. [BMC Bioinformatics, 17, (2016), (213)], DOI: 10.1186/s12859-016-1075-9;A novel procedure on next generation sequencing data analysis using text mining algorithm

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Zhao, Weizhong ^a,b   Chen, James J ^a   Perkins, Roger ^a   Wang, Yuping ^a   Liu, Zhichao ^a   Hong, Huixiao ^a   Tong, Weida ^a   Zou, Wen ^a  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR TOXICOLOGICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

^b XIANGTAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Biomarker; Data mining; Genetic diversity; Next generation sequencing (NGS); Topic modeling

Indexed keywords

BIG DATA; BIODIVERSITY; BIOMARKERS; DATA HANDLING; GENES; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; SALMONELLA; STATISTICS;

CONVERGENCE EFFICIENCY; GENETIC DIVERSITY; GENETIC INFORMATION; HIER-ARCHICAL CLUSTERING; LARGE AMOUNTS OF DATA; LATENT DIRICHLET ALLOCATIONS; NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING; TOPIC MODELING;

DATA MINING;

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

ALGORITHM; CLASSIFICATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATA MINING; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; PROCEDURES; SALMONELLA; SEROTYPING; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; BIOMARKERS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATA MINING; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SALMONELLA; SEROTYPING;

EID: 84971281827     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-016-1156-9     Document Type: Erratum

References (50)

1. Metzker ML. Sequencing technologies - the next generation. Nature reviews Genetics. 2010;11(1):31-46.
2. Didelot X, Bowden R, Wilson DJ, Peto TE, Crook DW. Transforming clinical microbiology with bacterial genome sequencing. Nature reviews Genetics. 2012;13(9):601-12.
3. Koser CU, Holden MT, Ellington MJ, Cartwright EJ, Brown NM, Ogilvy-Stuart AL, Hsu LY, Chewapreecha C, Croucher NJ, Harris SR, et al. Rapid whole-genome sequencing for investigation of a neonatal MRSA outbreak. The New England journal of medicine. 2012;366(24):2267-75.
4. Lienau EK, Strain E, Wang C, Zheng J, Ottesen AR, Keys CE, Hammack TS, Musser SM, Brown EW, Allard MW, et al. Identification of a salmonellosis outbreak by means of molecular sequencing. The New England journal of medicine. 2011;364(10):981-2.
5. Petrosino JF, Highlander S, Luna RA, Gibbs RA, Versalovic J. Metagenomic pyrosequencing and microbial identification. Clinical chemistry. 2009;55(5):856-66.
6. Radford AD, Chapman D, Dixon L, Chantrey J, Darby AC, Hall N. Application of next-generation sequencing technologies in virology. The Journal of general virology. 2012;93(Pt 9):1853-68.
7. Koboldt DC, Steinberg KM, Larson DE, Wilson RK, Mardis ER. The next-generation sequencing revolution and its impact on genomics. Cell. 2013;155(1):27-38.
8. Zhang J, Chiodini R, Badr A, Zhang G. The impact of next-generation sequencing on genomics. Journal of genetics and genomics = Yi chuan xue bao. 2011;38(3):95-109.
9. Hofmann T. Unsupervised learning by probabilistic latent semantic analysis. Machine Learning. 2001;42:177-96.
10. Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI. Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2003;3:993-1022.
11. Griffiths TL, Steyvers M. Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101(suppl. 1):5228-35.
12. Blei DM, Jordan MI. Modeling annotated data. In: The Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Informaion Retrieval. 2003. p. 127-34.
13. Datta R, Joshi D, Li J, Wang JZ. Image retrieval: Ideas, influences, and trends of the new age. ACM Computing Surveys. 2008;40(2):5.
14. Hofmann T. Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. In: annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. 1999. p. 50-7.
15. Papadimitriou CH, Tamaki H, Raghavan P, Vempala S. Latent semantic indexing: A probabilistic analysis. In: ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems. 1998. p. 159-68.
16. Jordan MI. Learning in Graphical Models. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1999.
17. Shivashankar S, Srivathsan S, Ravindran B, Tendulkar AV. Multi-view methods for protein structure comparison using latent dirichlet allocation. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(13):i61-68.
18. Bisgin H, Liu Z, Kelly R, Fang H, Xu X, Tong W. Investigating drug repositioning opportunities in FDA drug labels through topic modeling. BMC bioinformatics. 2012;13 Suppl 15:S6.
19. Zhang R, Cheng Z, Guan J, Zhou S. Exploiting topic modeling to boost metagenomic reads binning. BMC bioinformatics. 2015;16(5):S2.
20. Macnab RM. The bacterial flagellum: reversible rotary propellor and type III export apparatus. Journal of bacteriology. 1999;181(23):7149-53.
21. Hamming RW. Error Detecting and Error Correcting Codes. At&T Tech J. 1950;29(2):147-60.
22. Grimont PA, Weill FX. Antigenic formulae of the Salmonella serovars. 9th ed. WHO Collaborting Centre for Reference and Research on Salmonella: Paris; 2007.
23. Allard MW, Luo Y, Strain E, Li C, Keys CE, Son I, Stones R, Musser SM, Brown EW. High resolution clustering of Salmonella enterica serovar Montevideo strains using a next-generation sequencing approach. BMC genomics. 2012;13:32.
24. Zhao W, Chen JJ, Foley S, Wang Y, Zhao S, Basinger J, Zou W. Biomarker identification from next-generation sequencing data for pathogen bacteria characterization and surveillance. Biomark Med. 2015;9(11):1253-64.
25. Zhang Z, Schwartz S, Wagner L, Miller W. A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. Journal of computational biology: A journal of computational molecular cell biology. 2000;7(1-2):203-14.
26. Allard MW, Luo Y, Strain E, Pettengill J, Timme R, Wang C, Li C, Keys CE, Zheng J, Stones R, et al. 2013. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e55254.
27. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic acids research. 2004;32(5):1792-7.
28. Higgins DG, Sharp PM. CLUSTAL: a package for performing multiple sequence alignment on a microcomputer. Gene. 1988;73(1):237-44.
29. McCallun AK: MALLET: A Machine Learning for Language Toolkit. 2002. http://mallet.cs.umass.edu. 11 May 2016.
30. Warnes GR, Bolker B, Bonebakker L, Gentleman R, et al. gplots: Various R programming tools for plotting data. R package version 2.12.1
31. Mardia KV, Kent JT, Bibby JM. Multivariate Analysis: Academic Press. 1979.
32. Salton G, Wong A, Yang CS. Vector-Space Model for Automatic Indexing. Communications of the Acm. 1975;18(11):613-20.
33. Zhao W, Zou W, Chen JJ. Topic modeling for cluster analysis of large biological and medical datasets. BMC bioinformatics. 2014;15(11):S11.
34. Danon L, Diaz-Guilera A, Duch J, Arenas A. Comparing community structure identification. J Stat Mech Theory and Experiment. 2005;2005(09):P09008.
35. Hubert L, Arabie P. Comparing Partitions. J Classif. 1985;2(2-3):193-218.
36. Vapnik V. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. New York: Springer; 1995.
37. Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learning. 2001;45(1):5-32.
38. CDC. National Salmonella Surveillance Annual Data Summary, 2009. In: US Department of Health and Human Services CDC Atlanta, Georgia. 2009.
39. Blei DM. Probabilistic Topic Models. Communications of the ACM. 2012;55(4):77-84.
40. Kauffmann F, Edwards PR. Classification and nomenclature of Enterobacteriaceae. Int Bull Bacteriol Nomencl Taxon. 1952;2:2-8.
41. Grimont PA, Weill F-X. Antigenic formulae of the Salmonella serovars. 9th Edition. Paris, France: WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Salmonella; 2007. http://www.pasteur.fr/sante/clre/cadrecnr/salmoms/WKLM_2007.pdf.
42. Liebana E, Guns D, Garcia-Migura L, Woodward MJ, Clifton-Hadley FA, Davies RH. Molecular typing of Salmonella serotypes prevalent in animals in England: assessment of methodology. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39(10):3609-16.
43. Gaul SB, Wedel S, Erdman MM, Harris DL, Harris IT, Ferris KE, Hoffman L. Use of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of conserved XbaI fragments for identification of swine Salmonella serotypes. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(2):472-6.
44. Zou W, Lin WJ, Foley SL, Chen CH, Nayak R, Chen JJ. Evaluation of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profiles for identification of Salmonella serotypes. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(9):3122-6.
45. Zou W, Lin WJ, Hise KB, Chen HC, Keys C, Chen JJ. Prediction system for rapid identification of Salmonella serotypes based on pulsed-field gel electrophoresis fingerprints. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2012;50(5):1524-32.
46. Guard J, Sanchez-Ingunza R, Morales C, Stewart T, Liljebjelke K, Van Kessel J, Ingram K, Jones D, Jackson C, Fedorka-Cray P, et al. Comparison of dkgB-linked intergenic sequence ribotyping to DNA microarray hybridization for assigning serotype to Salmonella enterica. FEMS microbiology letters. 2012;337(1):61-72.
47. Achtman M, Wain J, Weill FX, Nair S, Zhou Z, Sangal V, Krauland MG, Hale JL, Harbottle H, Uesbeck A, et al. Multilocus sequence typing as a replacement for serotyping in Salmonella enterica. PLoS pathogens. 2012;8(6):e1002776.
48. Ranieri ML, Shi C, Moreno Switt AI, den Bakker HC, Wiedmann M. Comparison of typing methods with a new procedure based on sequence characterization for Salmonella serovar prediction. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2013;51(6):1786-97.
49. Naccache SN, Federman S, Veeraraghavan N, Zaharia M, Lee D, Samayoa E, Bouquet J, Greninger AL, Luk KC, Enge B, et al. A cloud-compatible bioinformatics pipeline for ultrarapid pathogen identification from next-generation sequencing of clinical samples. Genome research. 2014;24(7):1180-92.
50. Pettengill JB, Timme RE, Barrangou R, Toro M, Allard MW, Strain E. Musser SM. Brown EW: The evolutionary history and diagnostic utility of the CRISPR-Cas system within Salmonella enterica ssp enterica PeerJ. 2014;2:e340.