Using Active Learning for Speeding up Calibration in Simulation Models

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 581-593

  Cevik, Mucahit ^a,b   Ergun, Mehmet Ali ^a   Stout, Natasha K ^c   Trentham Dietz, Amy ^d   Craven, Mark ^a   Alagoz, Oguzhan ^d  

^a University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

active learning; artificial neural networks; calibration; cancer simulation; machine learning

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CALIBRATION; HUMAN; LEARNING; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; CALIBRATION; HUMANS; LEARNING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER);

EID: 84971255148     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: 1552681X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X15611359     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Stout NK, Knudsen AB, Kong CY, McMahon PM, Gazelle GS,. Calibration methods used in cancer simulation models and suggested reporting guidelines. Pharmaeconomics. 2009; 27 (7): 533-45
2. Eisemann N, Waldmann A, Garbe C, Katalinic A,. Development of a microsimulation of melanoma mortality for evaluating the effectiveness of population-based skin cancer screening. Med Decis Making. 2015; 35 (2): 243-54
3. van Karnebeek CDM, Mohammadi T, Tsao N, et al. Health economic evaluation of plasma oxysterol screening in the diagnosis of Niemann-Pick Type C disease among intellectually disabled using discrete event simulation. Mol Genet Metab. 2015; 114 (2): 226-32
4. Villanti AC, Jiang Y, Abrams DB, Pyenson BS,. A cost-utility analysis of lung cancer screening and the additional benefits of incorporating smoking cessation interventions. PLoS One. 2013; 8 (8): e71379
5. Dinh T, Ladabaum U, Alperin P, Caldwell C, Smith R, Levin TR,. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 11 (9): 1158-66
6. Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Gulati R, Mariotto AB, et al. Personalizing age of cancer screening cessation based on comorbid conditions: model estimates of harms and benefits. Ann Intern Med. 2014; 161 (2): 104-12
7. Meza R, ten Haaf K, Kong CY, et al. Comparative analysis of 5 lung cancer natural history and screening models that reproduce outcomes of the NLST and PLCO trials. Cancer. 2014; 120 (11) 1713-24
8. Wever EM, Draisma G, Heijnsdijk EAM, de Koning HJ,. How does early detection by screening affect disease progression? Modeling estimated benefits in prostate cancer screening. Med Decis Making. 2011; 31 (4): 550-8
9. Knudsen AB, Hur C, Gazelle GS, Schrag D, McFarland EG, Kuntz KM,. Rescreening of persons with a negative colonoscopy result: results from a microsimulation model. Ann Intern Med. 2012; 157 (9): 611-20
10. Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353 (17) 1784-92
11. Taylor D, Pawar V, Kruzikas D, Gilmore K, Sanon M, Weinstein M,. Incorporating calibrated model parameters into sensitivity analyses. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012; 30 (2) 119-26
12. Rose J, Augestad KM, Kong CY, et al. A simulation model of colorectal cancer surveillance and recurrence [online]. BMC Med Inform Decis Making. 2014; 14 (29
13. Erenay FS, Alagoz O, Banerjee R, Cima RR,. Estimating the unknown parameters of the natural history of metachronous colorectal cancer using discrete-event simulation. Med Decis Making. 2011; 31 (4): 611-24
14. Kong CY, McMahon PM, Gazelle GS,. Calibration of disease simulation model using an engineering approach. Value Health. 2009; 12 (4): 521-9
15. Clarke LD, Plevritis SK, Boer R, Cronin KA, Feuer EJ,. A comparative review of CISNET breast models used to analyze U.S. breast cancer incidence and mortality trends. JNCI Monogr. 2006; 36: 96-105
16. Goldie SJ, Weinstein MC, Kuntz KM, Freedberg KA,. The costs, clinical benefits, and cost-effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer in HIV-infected women. Ann Intern Med. 1969; 130 (2): 97-107
17. Mandelblatt J, Schechter CB, Lawrence W, Yi B, Cullen J,. The SPECTRUM population model of the impact of screening and treatment on U.S. breast cancer trends from 1975 to 2000: principles and practice of the model methods. JNCI Monogr. 2006; 36: 47-55
18. Fryback DG, Stout NK, Rosenberg MA, Trentham-Dietz A, Kuruchittam V, Remington PL,. The Wisconsin Breast Cancer Epidemiology Simulation Model. JNCI Monogr. 2006; 36: 37-47
19. Batina NG, Trentham-Dietz A, Gangnon RE, Sprague BL, Rosenberg MA, Stout NK, Fryback DG, Alagoz O,. Variation in tumor natural history contributes to racial disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013; 138 (2): 519-28
20. Russell S, Norvig P,. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1995
21. Dietterich TG,. Ensemble methods in machine learning. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Multiple Classifier Systems; New York; 2000
22. Wegkamp M,. Model selection in nonparametric regression. Ann Stat. 2003; 31 (1) 252-73
23. Tsybakov AB,. Optimal aggregation of classifiers in statistical learning. Ann Stat. 2004; 32 (1): 135-66
24. Rose S,. Mortality risk score prediction in an elderly population using machine learning. Am J Epidemiol. 2013; 177 (5): 443-52
25. Pirracchio R, Petersen ML, Carone M, Rigon MR, Chevret S, van der Laan MJ,. Mortality prediction in intensive care units with the Super ICU Learner Algorithm (SICULA): A population-based study. Lancet Respir Med. 2015; 3 (1): 42-52
26. Granitto PM, Verdes PF, Ceccatto AH,. Neural network ensembles: evaluation of aggregation algorithms. Artif Intell. 2005; 163 (2) 139-62
27. Breiman L,. Bagging predictors. Machine Learn. 1996; 24 (2): 123-40
28. Settles B,. Active learning. Synth Lectures Artif Intell Machine Learn. 2012; 6 (1): 1-114
29. Bloodgood M, Vijay-Shanker K,. A method for stopping active learning based on stabilizing predictions and the need for user-Adjustable stopping. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning; Boulder, CO; 2009
30. Olsson F, Tomanek K,. An intrinsic stopping criterion for committee-based active learning. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning; Stroudsburg, PA; 2009
31. Vlachos A,. A stopping criterion for active learning. Comput Speech Lang. 2008; 22 (3): 295-312
32. Maslove DM, Podchiyska T, Lowe HJ,. Discretization of continuous features in clinical datasets. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013; 20 (3): 544-53
33. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP,. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science. 1983; 220 (4598): 671-80
34. Goldberg DE,. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1989.