An intrinsic stopping criterion for committee-based active learning

CoNLL 2009 - Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 138-146

  Olsson, Fredrik ^a   Tomanek, Katrin ^b  

^a SWEDISH INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER SCIENCE   (Sweden)

^b FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SUPERVISED LEARNING;

ACTIVE LEARNING; HIGH QUALITY; LANGUAGE TECHNOLOGY; NAMED ENTITIES; STOPPING CRITERIA; SUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING; ACTIVE-LEARNING PROCESS; MACHINE LEARNING METHODS; STOPPING CRITERION;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; SUPERVISED LEARNING;

EID: 84858752976     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1596374.1596398     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Markus Becker and Miles Osborne. 2005. A Two-Stage Method for Active Learning of Statistical Grammars. In Proc 19th IJCAI, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
2. Adam Berger, Stephen A. Della Pietra, and Vincent J. Della Pietra. 1996. A Maximum Entropy Approach to Natural Language Processing. Computational Linguistics, 22(1):39-71.
3. Sean P. Engelson and Ido Dagan. 1996. Minimizing Manual Annotation Cost In Supervised Training From Corpora. In Proc 34th ACL, Santa Cruz, California, USA.
4. Steven C. H. Hoi, Rong Jin, and Michael R. Lyu. 2006. Large-Scale Text Categorization by Batch Mode Active Learning. In Proc 15th WWW, Edinburgh, Scotland.
5. John Lafferty, Andrew McCallum, and Fernando Pereira. 2001. Conditional Random Fields: Probabilistic Models for Segmenting and Labeling Sequence Data. In Proc 18th ICML, Williamstown, Massachusetts, USA.
6. Florian Laws and Hinrich Schütze. 2008. Stopping Criteria for Active Learning of Named Entity Recognition. In Proc 22nd COLING, Manchester, England.
7. David D. Lewis and William A. Gale. 1994. A Sequential Algorithm for Training Text Classifiers. In Proc 17th ACM-SIGIR, Dublin, Ireland.
8. Linguistic Data Consortium. 2001. Message understanding conference (muc) 7. LDC2001T02. FTP FILE. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.
9. Fredrik Olsson. 2008. Bootstrapping Named Entity Annotation by means of Active Machine Learning - A Method for Creating Corpora. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Swedish, University of Gothenburg.
10. Lance A. Ramshaw and Mitchell P. Marcus. 1995. Text Chunking using Transformation Based Learning. In Proc 3rd VLC, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge,Massachusetts, USA.
11. Eric Ringger, Peter McClanahan, Robbie Haertel, George Busby, Marc Carmen, James Carroll, Kevin Seppi, and Deryle Lonsdale. 2007. Active Learning for Part-of-Speech Tagging: Accelerating Corpus Annotation. In Proc Linguistic Annotation Workshop, Prague, Czech Republic.
12. Greg Schohn and David Cohn. 2000. Less is More: Active Learning with Support Vector Machines. In Proc 17th ICML, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
13. Hinrich Schütze, Emre Velipasaoglu, and Jan O. Pedersen. 2006. Performance Thresholding in Practical Text Classification. In Proc 15th CIKM, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
14. Dan Shen, Jie Zhang, Jian Su, Guodong Zhou, and Chew-Lim Tan. 2004. Multi-Criteria-based Active Learning for Named Entity Recognition. In Proc 42nd ACL, Barcelona, Spain.
15. Pasi Tapanainen and Timo Järvinen. 1997. A Non- Projective Dependency Parser. In Proc 5th ANLP, Washington DC, USA.
16. Cynthia A. Thompson, Mary Elaine Califf, and Raymond J. Mooney. 1999. Active Learning for Natural Language Parsing and Information Extraction. In Proc 16th ICML, Bled, Slovenia.
17. Erik F. Tjong Kim Sang and Fien De Meulder. 2003. Introduction to the CoNLL-2003 Shared Task: Language Independent Named Entity Recognition. In Proc 7th CoNLL, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
18. Katrin Tomanek and Udo Hahn. 2008. Approximating Learning Curves for Active-Learning-Driven Annotation. In Proc 6th LREC, Marrakech, Morocco.
19. Katrin Tomanek, Joachim Wermter, and Udo Hahn. 2007. An Approach to Text Corpus Construction which Cuts Annotation Costs and Maintains Reusability of Annotated Data. In Proc Joint EMNLP-CoNLL, Prague, Czech Republic.
20. Andreas Vlachos. 2008. A Stopping Criterion for Active Learning. Computer, Speech and Language, 22(3):295-312, July.
21. Geoffrey I. Webb. 2000. Multi Boosting: A Technique for Combining Boosting and Wagging. Machine Learning, 40(2):159-196, August.
22. Ian H. Witten and Eibe Frank. 2005. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools with Java Implementations. 2nd Edition. Morgan Kaufmann, San Fransisco.
23. Jingbo Zhu and Eduard Hovy. 2007. Active Learning for Word Sense Disambiguation with Methods for Addressing the Class Imbalance Problem. In Proc Joint EMNLP-CoNLL, Prague, Czech Republic.
24. Jingbo Zhu, Huizhen Wang, and Eduard Hovy. 2008a. Learning a Stopping Criterion for Active Learning for Word Sense Disambiguation and Text Classification. In Proc 3rd IJCNLP, Hyderabad, India.
25. Jingbo Zhu, Huizhen Wang, and Eduard Hovy. 2008b. Multi-Criteria-based Strategy to Stop Active Learning for Data Annotation. In Proc 22nd COLING, Manchester, England.