Phylogenetic systematics

Mathematics and Archaeology

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 225-239

  O’Brien, Michael J ^a   Boulanger, Matthew T ^a   Lee Lyman, R ^a   Buchanan, Briggs ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TULSA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

STRATIGRAPHY;

EID: 84971235423     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/b18530     Document Type: Chapter

References (62)

1. Archibald, J.K., M.E. Mort and D.J. Crawford. 2003. Bayesian inference of phylogeny: A non-technical primer. Taxon 52: 187-191.
2. Brady, R.H. 1985. On the independence of systematics. Cladistics 1: 113-126.
3. Brooks, D.R. and D.A. McLennan. 1991. Phylogeny, Ecology, and Behavior: A Research Program in Comparative Biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
4. Brown, J.H. and M.V. Lomolino. 1998. Biogeography (2nd ed.). Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
5. Buchanan, B. and M. Collard. 2007. Investigating the peopling of North America through cladistic analyses of early Paleoindian projectile points. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 26: 366-393.
6. Buchanan, B. and M. Collard. 2008. Phenetics, cladistics, and the search for the Alaskan ancestors of the Paleoindians: A reassessment of relationships among the Clovis, Nenana, and Denali archaeological complexes. J. Archaeol. Sci. 35: 1683-1694.
7. Buchanan, B., M. Collard, M.J. Hamilton and M.J. O’Brien. 2011. Points and prey: A quantitative test of the hypothesis that prey size infl uences early Paleoindian projectile point form. J. Archaeol Sci. 38: 852-864.
8. Buchanan, B. and M.J. Hamilton. 2009. A formal test of the origin of variation in North American Early Paleoindian projectile points. Am. Antiquity 74: 279-298.
9. Buchanan, B., J.D. Kilby, B.B. Huckell, M.J. O’Brien and M. Collard. 2012. A morphometric assessment of the intended function of cached Clovis points. PLoS ONE 7(2): e30530.
10. Buchanan, B., M.J. O’Brien and M. Collard. 2014. Continent-wide or region-specifi c? A geometric morphometrics-based assessment of variation in Clovis point shape. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. 6: 145-162.
11. Buchanan, B., M.J. O’Brien, J.D. Kilby, B.B. Huckell and M. Collard. 2012. An assessment of the impact of hafting on Paleoindian projectile-point variability. PLoS ONE 7(5): e36364.
12. Cannon, M.D. and D.J. Meltzer. 2004. Early Paleoindian foraging: Examining the faunal evidence for large mammal specialization and regional variability in prey choice. Quaternary Sci. Rev. 23: 1955-1987.
13. Catto, N.R. 1996. Richardson Mountains, Yukon-Northwest Territories: The northern portal of the postulated “ice-free corridor”. Quaternary Int. 32: 21-32.
14. Collard, M., B. Buchanan, M.J. Hamilton and M.J. O’Brien. 2010. Spatiotemporal dynamics of the Clovis-Folsom transition. J. Archaeol. Sci. 37: 2513-2519.
15. Cracraft, J. 1981. The use of functional and adaptive criteria in phylogenetic systematics. Am. Zool 21: 21-36.
16. Currie, T.E. and R. Mace. 2011. Mode and tempo in the evolution of socio-political organization: reconciling ‘Darwinian’ and ‘Spencerian’ approaches in anthropology. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 366: 1108-1117.
17. Dunnell, R.C. 1971. Systematics in Prehistory. Free Press, New York.
18. Dunnell, R.C. 1986. Methodological issues in Americanist artifact classifi cation. Advances Archaeol.Method Theory 9: 149-207.
19. Eldredge, N. 1989. Punctuated equilibria, rates of change, and large-scale entities in evolutionary systems. J. Biol. Soc. Struc. 12: 173-184.
20. Eren, M.I., R.J. Patten, M.J. O’Brien and D.J. Meltzer. 2013. Refuting the technological cornerstone of the North Atlantic Ice-Edge Hypothesis. J. Archaeol. Sci. 40: 2934-2941.
21. Farris, J.S. 1989a. The retention index and homoplasy excess. Syst. Zool. 38: 406-407.
22. Farris, J.S. 1989b. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5: 417-419.
23. Faught, M.K. 2008. Archaeological roots of human diversity in the New World: A compilation of accurate and precise radiocarbon ages from earliest sites. Am. Antiquity 73: 670-698.
24. Fiedel, S.J. 2000. The peopling of the New World: Present evidence, new theories, and future directions. J. Archaeol. Res. 39-103.
25. García Rivero, D. and M.J. O’Brien. 2014. Phylogenetic analysis shows that Neolithic slate plaques from the southwestern Iberian Peninsula are not genealogical recording systems. PLoS One 9(2): e88296.
26. Goloboff, P.A. 1991. Homoplasy and the choice among cladograms. Cladistics 7: 215-232.
27. Goloboff, P. and D. Pol. 2005. Parsimony and Bayesian phylogenetics. pp. 148-159. In: V.A. Albert (ed.). Parsimony, Phylogeny, and Genomics. Oxford University Press, New York.
28. Gray, R.D., A.J. Drummond and S.J. Greenhill. 2009. Language phylogenies reveal expansion pulses and pauses in Pacifi c settlement. Science 323: 479-483.
29. Hamilton, M.J. and B. Buchanan. 2007. Spatial gradients in Clovis-age radiocarbon dates across North America suggest rapid colonization from the north. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 104: 15625-15630.
30. Hamilton, M.J. and B. Buchanan. 2009. The accumulation of stochastic copying errors causes drift in culturally transmitted technologies: Quantifying Clovis evolutionary dynamics J. Anthropol.Archaeol. 28: 55-69.
31. Haynes, C.V. Jr. 2005. Clovis, pre-Clovis, climate change, and extinction. pp. 113-132. In: Bonnichsen, B.T. Lepper, D. Stanford and M.R. Waters (eds.). Paleoamerican Origins: Beyond Clovis. Texas A&M Press, College Station.
32. Haynes, G. 2002. The Early Settlement of North America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
33. Hoelzer, G.A. and D.J. Melnick. 1994. Patterns of speciation and limits to phylogenetic resolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 104-107.
34. Kitching, I.J., P.L. Forey, C.J. Humphries and D.M. Williams. 1998. Cladistics: The Theory and Practice of Parsimony Analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
35. Kolaczkowski, B. and J.W. Thornton. 2004. Performance of maximum parsimony and likelihood phylogenetics when evolution is heterogeneous. Nature 431: 980-984.
36. Linder, C.R. and L.H. Rieseberg. 2004. Reconstructing patterns of reticulate evolution in plants. Am.J. Bot. 91: 1700-1708.
37. Lipscomb, D. 1998. Basics of Cladistic Analysis. http://www.gwu.edu/~clade/faculty/lipscomb/Cladistics.pdf.
38. Lyman, R.L. 2001. Culture historical and biological approaches to identifying homologous traits. pp. 69-89. In: T.D. Hurt and G.F.M. Rakita (eds.). Style and Function: Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Archaeology. Bergin and Garvey, Westport, CT.
39. Lyman, R.L. and M.J. O’Brien. 2000. Measuring and explaining change in artifact variation with cladediversity diagrams. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 19: 39-74.
40. Lyman, R.L. and M.J. O’Brien. 2002. Classifi cation. pp. 69-88. In: J. Hart and J.E. Terrell (eds.). Darwin and Archaeology: A Handbook of Key Concepts. Bergin and Garvey, Westport, CT.
41. Lyman, R.L. and M.J. O’Brien. 2006. Measuring Time with Artifacts: A History of Methods in American Archaeology. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
42. Maddison, W.P., M.J. Donoghue and D.R. Maddison. 1984. Outgroup analysis and parsimony. Syst.Zool. 33: 83-103.
43. McKitrick, M.C. 1994. On homology and the ontological relationship of parts. Syst. Biol. 43: 1-10.
44. Meltzer, D.J. 1993. Is there a Clovis adaptation? pp. 293-310. In: O. Soffer and N.D. Praslov (eds.).From Kostenki to Clovis: Upper Paleolithic-Paleo Indian adaptations. Plenum, New York.
45. O’Brien, M.J., M.T. Boulanger, B. Buchanan, M. Collard, R.L. Lyman and J. Darwent. 2014. Innovation and cultural transmission in the American Paleolithic: Phylogenetic analysis of eastern Paleoindian projectile-point classes. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 34: 100-119.
46. O’Brien, M.J., M.T. Boulanger, M. Collard, B. Buchanan, L. Tarle, L.G. Straus and M.I. Eren. 2014. On thin ice: Problems with Stanford and Bradley’s proposed Solutrean colonization of North America. Antiquity 88: 606-624.
47. O’Brien, M.J., B. Buchanan, M. Collard and M.T. Boulanger. 2012. Cultural cladistics and the early prehistory of North America. pp. 23-42. In: P. Pontarotti (ed.). Evolutionary Biology: Mechanisms and Trends. Springer, New York.
48. O’Brien, M.J., J. Darwent and R.L. Lyman. 2001. Cladistics is useful for reconstructing archaeological phylogenies: Palaeoindian points from the southeastern United States. J. Archaeol. Sci. 28: 1115-1136.
49. O’Brien, M.J. and R.L. Lyman. 2002. The epistemological nature of archaeological units. Anthropol. Theory 2: 37-57.
50. O’Brien, M.J. and R.L. Lyman. 2003. Cladistics and Archaeology. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
51. O’Brien, M.J., R.L. Lyman, Y. Saab, E. Saab, J. Darwent and D.S. Glover. 2002. Two issues in archaeological phylogenetics: Taxon construction and outgroup selection. J. Theor. Biol. 215: 133-150.
52. Patterson, C. 1988. Homology in classical and molecular biology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5: 603-625.
53. Pol, D. and M.E. Siddall. 2001. Biases in maximum likelihood and parsimony: A simulation approach to a ten-taxon case. Cladistics 17: 266-281.
54. Robinson, B.S., J.C. Ort, W.A. Eldridge, A.L. Burke and B.G. Pelletier. 2009. Paleoindian aggregation and social context at Bull Brook. Am. Antiquity 74: 423-447.
55. Sober, E. 1983. Parsimony methods in systematics. pp. 37-47. In: N.I. Platnick and V.A. Funk (eds.). Advances in Cladistics (Vol. 2). Columbia University Press, New York.
56. Sober, E. 1988. Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution, and Inference. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
57. Sober, E. 2004. The contest between parsimony and likelihood. Syst. Biol. 53: 644-653.
58. Surovell, T.A. and N.M. Waguespack. 2009. Human prey choice in the Late Pleistocene and its relation to megafaunal extinction. pp. 77-105. In: G. Haynes (ed.). American Megafaunal Extinctions at the End of the Pleistocene. Springer, New York.
59. Swofford, D.L. 1991. When are phylogeny estimates from morphological and molecular data incongruent? pp. 295-333. In: M.M. Miyamoto and J. Cracraft (eds.). Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences. Oxford University Press, New York.
60. Swofford, D. 1998. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods) (version 4). Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
61. Tehrani, J. and M. Collard. 2002. Investigating cultural evolution through biological phylogenetic analyses of Turkmen textiles. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 21: 443-463.
62. Williams, D.M. and S. Knapp (eds.). 2010. Beyond Cladistics: The Branching of a Paradigm. University of California Press, Berkeley.