Communication disorders associated with right-hemisphere damage

Language Intervention Strategies in Aphasia and Related Neurogenic Communication Disorders: Fifth Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 963-987

  Myers, Penelope S ^a   Blake, Margaret Lehman ^b  

^a University of Houston ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84971228980     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (218)

1. Adamovich, B. L., & Brooks, R. L. (1981). A diagnostic protocol to assess the communication deficits of patients with right hemisphere damage. In R. H. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology: Conference proceedings (pp. 244-253). Minneapolis: BRK.
2. Adolphs, R., Damasio, H., & Tranel, D. (2002). Neural systems for recognition of emotional prosody: A 3-D lesion study. Emotion, 2, 23-51.
3. Albert, M. L. (1973). A simple test of visual neglect. Neurology, 23, 658-664.
4. Andersen, G., Vestergaard, K., Riis, J. O., & Lauritzen, L. (1994). Incidence of post-stroke depression during the first year in a large unselected stroke population determined using a valid standardized rating scale. Acta Psychiatrcia Scandinavica, 90, 190-195.
5. Appelros, P., Nydevik, I., Karlsson, G. M., Throwalls, A., & Seiger, A. (2004). Recovery from unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke Disability & Rehabilitation, 26, 471-477.
6. Archibald, T. M., & Wepman, J. M. (1968). Language disturbances and nonverbal cognitive performance in eight patients following injury to the right hemisphere. Brain, 91, 117-130.
7. Arruda, J. E., Walker, K. A., Weiler, M. D., & Valentino, D. A. (1999). Validation of a right hemisphere vigilance system as measured by principal component and factor analyzed quantitative electroencephalogram. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 32, 119-128.
8. Audet, T., Mercier, L., Collard, S., Rochette, A., & Hebert, R. (2000). Attention deficits: Is there a right hemisphere specialization for simple reaction time, sustained attention, and phasic alertness? Brain and Cognition, 43, 17-21.
9. Baron, C., Goldsmith, T., & Beatty, P. W. (1999). Family and clinician perceptions of pragmatic communication skills following right hemisphere stroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 5, 55-63.
10. Bartels-Tobin, L. R., & Hinckley, J. J. (2005). Cognition and discourse production in right hemisphere disorder. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 18, 461-477.
11. Bartolomeo, P., & Chokron, S. (1999). Left unilateral neglect or right hyperattention? Neurology, 53, 2023-2027.
12. Bartolomeo, P., Sieroff, E., Chokron, S., & Decaix, C. (2001). Variability of response times as a marker of diverted attention. Neuropsychologia, 39, 358-363.
13. Baum, S. R., & Pell, M. D. (1999). The neural bases of prosody: Insights from lesion studies and neuroimaging. Aphasiology, 13, 581-608.
14. Bear, D. M. (1983). Hemispheric specialization and the neurology of emotion. Archives of Neurology, 40, 195-202.
15. Beeman, M. (1993). Semantic processing in the right hemisphere may contribute to drawing inferences from discourse. Brain and Language, 44, 80-120.
16. Behrens, S. J. (1988). The role of the right hemisphere in the production of linguistic stress. Brain and Language, 33, 104-127.
17. Beis, J. M., Keller, C., Morin, N., Bartolomeo, P., Bernati, T., Chokron, S., et al. (2004). Right spatial neglect after left hemisphere stroke: Qualitative and quantitative study. Neurology, 63, 1600-1605.
18. Bench, C. J., Frith, C. D., Grasby, P. M., Friston, K. J., Paulesu, E., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & et al. (1993). Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the Stroop Test. Neuropsychologia, 31, 907-922.
19. Benowitz, L. I., Bear, D. M., Rosenthal, R., Mesulam, M. M., Zaidel, E., & Sperry, R. W. (1983). Hemispheric specialization in nonverbal communication. Cortex, 19, 5-11.
20. Benowitz, L. I., Moya, K. L., & Levine, D. N. (1990). Impaired verbal reasoning and constructional apraxia in subjects with right hemisphere damage. Neuropsychologia, 28, 231.
21. Blake, M. L., Duffy, J. R., Myers, P. S., & Tompkins, C. A. (2002). Prevalence and patterns of right hemisphere cognitive/communicative deficits: Retrospective data from an inpatient rehabilitation unit. Aphasiology, 16, 537-548.
22. Blake, M. L., & Lesniewicz, K. (2005). Contextual bias and predictive inferencing in adults with and without right hemisphere brain damage. Aphasiology, 19, 423-434.
23. Bloise, C. G. R., & Tompkins, C. A. (1993). Right brain damage and inference revision revisited. Clinical Aphasiology, 21, 145-155.
24. Blonder, L. X., Bowers, D., & Heilman, K. M. (1991). The role of the right hemisphere in emotional communication. Brain, 114, 1115-1127.
25. Blonder, L. X., Heilman, K. M., Ketterson, T., Rosenbek, J., Raymer, A., Crosson, B., et al. (2005). Affective facial and lexical expression in aprosodic versus aphasic stroke patients. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 11, 677-685.
26. Bloom, R. L., Borod, J. C., Obler, L. K., & Gerstman, L. J. (1992). Impact of emotional content on discourse production in patients with unilateral brain damage. Brain and Language, 42, 153-164.
27. Bloom, R. L., Borod, J. C., Obler, L. K., & Koff, E. (1990). A preliminary characterization of lexical emotional expression in right and left brain-damaged patients. International Journal of Neuroscience, 55, 71-80.
28. Borod, J. (1992). Interhemispheric and intrahemispheric control of emotion: A focus on unilateral brain damage. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 339-348.
29. Borod, J. C., Koff, E., Lorch, M. P., & Nicholas, M. (1985). Channels of emotional expression in patients with unilateral brain damage. Archives of Neurology, 42, 245-348.
30. Borod, J. C., Koff, E., Lorch, M. P., & Nicholas, M. (1986). The expression and perception of facial emotion in brain-damaged patients. Neuropsychologia, 24, 169-180.
31. Bowen, A., McKenna, K., & Tallis, R. C. (1999). Reasons for variability in the reported rate of occurrence of unilateral spatial neglect after stroke. Stroke, 30, 1196-1202.
32. Bowers, D., Bauer, R. M., Coslett, H. B., & Heilman, K. M. (1985). Processing of faces by patients with unilateral hemisphere lesions. Brain and Cognition, 4, 258-272.
33. Brooks, J. L., Wong, Y., & Robertson, L. C. (2005). Crossing the midline: Reducing attentional deficits via interhemispheric interactions. Neuropsychologia, 43, 572-582.
34. Brownell, H. H. (1988). The neuropsychology of narrative comprehension. Aphasiology, 2, 247-250.
35. Brownell, H. H., Pincus, D., Blum, A., Rehak, A., & Winner, E. (1997). The effects of right-hemisphere brain damage on patients' use of terms of personal reference. Brain and Language, 57, 60-79.
36. Brownell, H. H., Potter, H. H., Bihrle, A. M., & Gardner, H. (1986). Inference deficits in right brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 27, 310-321.
37. Brownell, H. H., Potter, H. H., Michelow, D., & Gardner, H. (1984). Sensitivity to lexical denotation and connotation in brain damaged patients: A double dissociation? Brain and Language, 22, 253-265.
38. Brownell, H. H., Simpson, T. L., Bihrle, A. M., Potter, H. H., & Gardner, H. (1990). Appreciation of metaphoric alternative word meanings by left and right brain-damaged patients. Neuropsychologia, 28, 375-383.
39. Brownell, H. H., & Stringfellow, A. (1999). Making requests: Illustrations of how right-hemisphere brain damage can affect discourse production. Brain and Language, 68, 442-465.
40. Bub, D., Audet, T., & Lecours, A. R. (1990). Re-evaluating the effect of unilateral brain damage on simple reaction time to auditory stimulation. Cortex, 26, 227-237.
41. Buck, R., & Duffy, R. J. (1981). Nonverbal communication of affect in brain-damaged patients. Cortex, 6, 351-362.
42. Burgess, C., & Simpson, G. B. (1988). Cerebral hemispheric mechanisms in the retrieval of ambiguous word meanings. Brain and Language, 33, 86-103.
43. Buxbaum, L. J., Ferraro, M. K., Veramonti, T., Farne, A., Whyte, J., Ladavas, E., et al. (2004). Hemispatial neglect: Subtypes, neu-roanatomy, and disability. Neurology, 62, 749-756.
44. Calvanio, R., Levine, D., & Petrone, P. (1993). Elements of cognitive rehabilitation after right hemisphere stroke. Behavioral Neurology, 11, 25-57.
45. Cancelliere, A. E. B., & Kertesz, A. (1990). Lesion localization in acquired deficits of emotional expression and comprehension. Brain and Cognition, 13, 133-147.
46. Caplan, B. (1987). Assessment of unilateral neglect: A new reading test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 9, 359-364.
47. Cappa, S. F., Benke, T., Clarke, S., Rossi, B., Stemmer, B., & van Heugten, C. M. (2005). EFNS guidelines on cognitive rehabilitation: Report of an EFNS task force. European Journal of Neurology, 12, 665-680.
48. Cherney, L. R. (2002). Unilateral neglect: A disorder of attention. Seminars in Speech and Language, 23, 117-128.
49. Cherney, L. R., & Canter, G. J. (1993). Informational content in the discourse of patients with probable Alzheimer's disease and patients with right brain damage. Clinical Aphasiology, 21, 123-133.
50. Cherry, B. J., & Hellige, J. B. (1999). Hemispheric asymmetries in vigilance and cerebral arousal mechanisms in younger and older adults. Neuropsychology, 13, 111-120.
51. Chiarello, C., Burgess, C., Richards, L., & Pollock, A. (1990). Semantic and associative priming in the cerebral hemispheres: Some words do, some words don't...sometimes, in some places. Brain and Language, 38, 75-104.
52. Chobor, K. L., & Brown, J. W. (1987). Phoneme and timbre monitoring in left and right cerebrovascular accident patients. Brain and Language, 30, 278-284.
53. Cicero, B. A., Borod, J. C., Santschi. C., Erhan, H. M., Obler, L. K., Agosti, R. M., et al. (1999). Emotional versus nonemotional lexical perception in patients with right and left brain damage. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology, 12, 255-264.
54. Cicerone, K. D., Dahlberg, C., Kalmar, K., Langenbahn, D. M., Malec, J. F., Bergquist, T. F., et al. (2000). Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81, 1596-1615.
55. Cicerone, K. D., Dahlberg, C., Malec, J. F., Langenbahn, D. M., Felicetti, T., & Kneipp, S., et al. (2005). Evidence based cognitive rehabilitation: Updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 1681-1692.
56. Cicone, M., Wapner, W., & Gardner, H. (1980). Sensitivity to emotional expressions and situations in organic patients. Cortex, 16, 145-158.
57. Cimino, C. R., Verfaellie, M., Bowers, D., & Heilman, K. M. (1991). Autobiographical memory: Influence of right hemisphere damage on emotionality and specificity. Brain and Cognition, 15, 106-118.
58. Cohen, R. M., Semple, W. E., Gross, M., Holcomb, H. J., Dowling, S. M., & Nordahl, S. (1988). Functional localization of sustained attention. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology, 1, 3-20.
59. Colsher, P. L., Cooper, W. E., & Graff-Radford, N. (1987). Intonational variability in the speech of right-hemisphere damaged patients. Brain and Language, 32, 379-383.
60. Corbetta, M. J., Kincade, M., & Shulman, G. (2002). Neural systems for visual orienting and their relationships to spatial working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 508-523.
61. Coslett, H. B., Bowers, D., & Heilman, K. M. (1987). Reduction in cerebral activation after right hemisphere stroke. Neurology, 37, 957-962.
62. Coull, J. T., Frith, C. D., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Grasby, P. M. (1996). A fronto-parietal network for rapid visual information processing: A PET study of sustained attention and working memory. Neuropsychologia, 34, 1085-1095.
63. Cummings, J. L. (1994). Depression in neurological disease. Psychiatric Annals, 24, 525-531.
64. Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Chui, H. C. (1980). Neglect following damage to frontal lobe or basal ganglia. Neuropsychologia, 18, 128-132.
65. Davidson, R. A., Fedio, P., Smith, B. D., Aureille, E., & Martin, A. (1992). Lateralized mediation of arousal and habituation: Differential bilateral electrodermal activity in unilateral temporal lobectomy patients. Neuropsychologia, 30, 1053-1063.
66. Deal, J., Deal, L., Wertz, R. W., Kitselman, K., & Dwyer, C. (1979). Right hemisphere PICA percentiles: Some speculations about aphasia. In R. H. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology: Conference proceedings (pp. 30-37). Minneapolis: BRK.
67. Denes, G., Caldognetto, E. M., Semenza, C., Vagges, K., & Zettin, M. (1984). Discrimination and identification of emotions in human voice by brain-damaged subjects. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 69, 154-162.
68. DeKosky, S. T., Heilman, K. M., Bowers, D., & Valenstein, E. (1980). Recognition and discrimination of emotional faces and pictures. Brain and Language, 9, 206-214.
69. Delis, D., Wapner, W., Gardner, H., & Moses, J. (1983). The contribution of the right hemisphere to the organization of paragraphs. Cortex, 19, 43-50.
70. Deutsch, G., Papanicolaou, A. C., Bourbon, T., & Eisenberg, H. M. (1987). Cerebral blood flow evidence of right cerebral activation in attention demanding tasks. International Journal of Neuroscience, 36, 23-28.
71. Diggs, C., & Basili, A. G. (1987). Verbal expression of right cere-brovascular accident patients: Convergent and divergent language. Brain and Language, 30, 130-146.
72. DiPellegrino, G., & DeRenzi, E. (1995). An experimental investigation on the nature of extinction. Neuropsychologia, 33, 153-170.
73. Duncan, J., Bundesen, C., Olson, A., Humphreys, G., Chavada, S., & Shibuya, H. (1999). Systematic analysis of deficits in visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 450-478.
74. Eisenson, J. (1962). Language and intellectual modifications associated with right cerebral damage. Language and Speech, 5, 49-53.
75. Farah, M. J., Wong, A. B., Monheit, M. A., & Morrow, L. A. (1989). Parietal lobe mechanisms of spatial attention: Modality-specific or supramodal? Neuropsychologia, 27, 461-470.
76. Foldi, N. S. (1987). Appreciation of pragmatic interpretation of indirect commands: Comparison of right and left hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 31, 88-108.
77. Folstein, M. R., Maiberger, R., & McHugh, P. R. (1977). Mood disorder as a specific complication of stroke. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 40, 1018-1020.
78. Gainotti, G., D'Erme, P., Monteleone, D., & Silveri, M. C. (1986). Mechanisms of unilateral spatial neglect in relation to laterality of cerebral lesions. Brain, 109, 599-612.
79. Gardner, H., Brownell, H. H., Wapner, W., & Michelow, D. (1983). Missing the point: The role of the right hemisphere in the processing of complex linguistic materials. In E. Perecman (Ed.), Cognitive processing in the right hemisphere (pp. 169-191). New York: Academic.
80. Gardner, H., & Denes, G. (1973). Connotative judgments by aphasic patients on a pictorial adaptation of the semantic differential. Cortex, 9, 183-196.
81. Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Barresi (2001). The Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Lippinott Williams & Wilkins.
82. Halligan, P. W., Manning, L., & Marshall, J. C. (1990). Individual variation in line bisection: A study of four patients with right hemisphere damage and normal controls. Neuropsychologia, 28, 1043-1051.
83. Halligan, P. W., & Marshall, J. C. (1988). How long is a piece of string? A study of line bisection in a case of visual neglect. Cortex, 24, 321-328.
84. Halper, A. S., & Cherney, L. R. (1998). Cognitive-communication problems after right hemisphere stroke: A review of intervention studies. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 5, 1-10.
85. Heilman, K. M., Bowers, D., Coslett, H. B., Whelan, H., & Watson, R. T. (1985). Directional hypokinesia: Prolonged reaction times for leftward movements in patients with right hemisphere lesions and neglect. Neurology, 35, 855-859.
86. Heilman, K. M., Bowers, D., Speedie, L., & Coslett, H. B. (1984). Comprehension of affective and nonaffective prosody. Neurology, 34, 917-921.
87. Heilman, K. M., Scholes, R., & Watson, R. T. (1975). Auditory affective agnosia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 38, 69-72.
88. Heilman, K. M., Schwartz, H. D., & Watson, R. T. (1978). Hypo-arousal in patients with the neglect syndrome and emotional indifference. Neurology, 28, 229-232.
89. Heilman, K. M., Valenstein, E., & Watson, R. T. (1984). Neglect and related disorders. Seminars in Neurology, 4, 209-219.
90. Heilman, K. M., Watson, R. T., Valenstein, E., & Damasio, A. (1983). Localization of lesions in neglect. In A. Kertesz (Ed.), Localization in neuropsychology (pp. 471-492). New York: Academic.
91. Hillis, A. E., Newhart, M., Heidler, J., Barker, P. B., Herskovits, E. H., & Degaonkar, M. (2005). Anatomy of spatial attention: Insights from perfusion imaging and hemispatial neglect in acute stroke. The Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 3161-3167.
92. Hirst, W., LeDoux, J., & Stein, S. (1984). Constraints on the processing of indirect speech acts: Evidence from aphasiology. Brain and Language, 23, 26-33.
93. Hough, M. (1990). Narrative comprehension in adults with right and left hemisphere brain-damage: Theme organization. Brain and Language, 38, 253-277.
94. Horner, J., Massey, E. W., Woodruff, W. W., Chase, K. N., & Dawson, D. V. (1989). Task-dependent neglect: Computed tomography size and locus correlations. Journal of Neurological Rehabilitation, 3, 7-13.
95. Husain, M., & Rorden, C. (2003). Non-spatially lateralized mechanisms in hemispatial neglect. Nature, 4, 26-36.
96. Iacoboni, M., Padovani, A., DiPiero, V., & Lenzi, G. L. (1995). Post-stroke depression: Relationships with morphological damage and cognition over time. International Journal of Neurological Science, 16, 209-216.
97. Jehkonen, M., Ahonen, J. P., Dastidar, P., Koivisto, A. M., Laippala, P., Vilkki, J., et al. (2001). Predictors of discharge to home during the first year after right hemisphere stroke. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 104, 136-141.
98. Joanette, Y., & Ansaldo, A. (1999). Acquired pragmatic impairments and aphasia. Brain and Language, 68, 529-534.
99. Joanette, Y., & Goulet, P. (1994). Right hemisphere and verbal communication: Conceptual, methodological, and clinical issues. Clinical Aphasiology, 22, 1-23.
100. Joanette, Y., Goulet, P., Ska, B., & Nespoulous, J.-L. (1986). Informative content of narrative discourse in right-brain-damaged right-handers. Brain and Language, 29, 81-105.
101. Kaplan, J., Brownell, H. H., Jacobs, J. R., & Gardner, H. (1990). The effects of right hemisphere damage on the pragmatic interpretation of conversational remarks. Brain and Language, 38, 315-333.
102. Kaplan, R. F., Verfaillie, M., Meadows, M. E., Caplan, L. R., Peasin, M. S., & de Witt, D. (1991). Changing attentional demands in left hemispatial neglect. Archives of Neurology, 48, 1263-1266.
103. Karow, C. M., Marquardt, T. P., & Marshall, R. C. (2001). Affective processing in left and right hemisphere brain-damaged subjects with and without subcortical involvement. Aphasiology, 15, 715-729.
104. Kent, R. D., & Rosenbek, J. C. (1982). Prosodic disturbance and neurologic lesion. Brain and Language, 15, 259-291.
105. Koski, L., & Petrides, M. (2001). Time-related changes in task performance after lesions restricted to the frontal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 39, 268-281.
106. Kosslyn, S. M. (1987). Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: A computational approach. Psychological Review, 94, 148-175.
107. Kosslyn, S. M. (1988). Aspects of a cognitive neuroscience of mental imagery. Science, 240, 1621-1626.
108. Ladavas, E., Del Pesce, M., & Provinciali, L. (1989). Unilateral attention deficits and hemispheric asymmetries in the control of visual attention. Neuropsychologia, 27, 353-366.
109. Lehman, M. T., & Tompkins, C. A. (2000). Inferencing in adults with right hemisphere brain damage: An analysis of conflicting results. Aphasiology, 14, 485-499.
110. Lehman-Blake, M. T., & Tompkins, C. A. (2001). Predictive infer-encing in adults with right hemisphere brain damage. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 44, 639-654.
111. Leon, S. A., Rosenbek, J. C., Crucian, G. P., Hieber, B., Holiway, B., Rodriguez, A. D., et al. (2005). Active treatments for aproso-dia secondary to right hemisphere stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 42, 93-102.
112. Leonard, C. L., Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (1997a). The use of contextual information by right-brain damaged individuals in the resolution of ambiguous pronouns. Brain and Language, 57, 309-342.
113. Leonard, C. L., Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (1997b). The use of contextual information related to general world knowledge by right-brain damaged individuals in pronoun resolution. Brain and Language, 57, 343-359.
114. Lojek-Osiejuk, E. (1996). Knowledge of scripts reflected in discourse of aphasics and right-brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 53, 58-80.
115. Mackisack, E. L., Myers, P. S., & Duffy, J. R. (1987). Verbosity and labeling behavior: The performance of right hemisphere and non-brain-damaged adults on an inferential picture description task. In R. H. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology (Vol. 17, pp. 143-151). Minneapolis: BRK.
116. Mammucari, A., Caltagrione, C., Ekman, P., Friesen, W., Gianotti, G., Pizzamiglio, L., et al. (1988). Spontaneous facial expression of emotions in brain-damaged patients. Cortex, 24, 521-533.
117. Manly, T. (2002). Cognitive rehabilitation for unilateral neglect: Review. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 12, 289-310.
118. Mark, V. W., Kooistra, C. A., & Heilman, K. M. (1988). Hemispatial neglect affected by non-neglected stimuli. Neurology, 38, 1207-1211.
119. Marshall, J. C., & Halligan, P. W. (1989). When right goes left: An investigation of line bisection in a case of visual neglect. Cortex, 25, 503-515.
120. McDonald, S., & Wales, R. (1986). An investigation of the ability to process inferences in language following right hemisphere brain damage. Brain and Language, 29, 68-80.
121. McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1989). Semantic associations and elab-orative inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 326-338.
122. Mesulam, M.-M. (1981). A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Annals of Neurology, 10, 307-325.
123. Mesulam, M.-M. (1985). Attention, confusional states, and neglect. In M. Mesulam (Ed.), Principles of behavioral neurology (pp. 125-168). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
124. Moya, K. L., Benowitz, L. I., Levine, D. N., & Finklestein, S. P. (1986). Covariant deficits in visuospatial abilities and recall of verbal narrative after right hemisphere stroke. Cortex, 22, 381-397.
125. Myers, P. S. (1979). Profiles of communication deficits in patients with right cerebral hemisphere damage. In R. H. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology: Conference proceedings (pp. 38-46). Minneapolis: BRK.
126. Myers, P. S. (1992). The effect of visual and inferential complexity on the verbal expression of non-brain-damaged and right-hemisphere-damaged adults. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
127. Myers, P. S. (1999a). Right hemisphere damage: Disorders of communication and cognition. San Diego: Singular.
128. Myers, P. S. (1999b). Process-oriented treatment of right hemisphere communication disorders. Seminars in Speech and Language, 20, 319-334.
129. Myers P. S. (2001). Toward a definition of RHD Syndrome. Aphasiology, 15, 913-918.
130. Myers, P. S. (2005). Profiles of communication deficits in patients with right cerebral hemisphere damage: Implications for diagnosis and treatment. CAC CLASSICS. Aphasiology, 19, 1147-1160.
131. Myers, P. S., & Brookshire, R. H. (1995). Effects of noun type on naming performance of right-hemisphere-damaged and non-braindamaged adults. Clinical Aphasiology, 23, 195-206.
132. Myers, P. S., & Brookshire, R. H. (1996). Effect of visual and inferential variables on scene descriptions by right-hemisphere-damaged and non-brain-damaged adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 870-880.
133. Myers, P. S., & Linebaugh, C. W. (1980, November). The perception of contextually conveyed relationships by right brain-damaged patients. Paper presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Convention, Detroit, MI.
134. Myers, P. S., & Linebaugh, C. W. (1981). Comprehension of idiomatic expressions by right-hemisphere-damaged adults. In R. H. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology: Conference proceed-ings (pp. 254-261). Minneapolis: BRK.
135. Myers, P. S., & Mackisack, E. L. (1990). Right hemisphere syndrome. In L. L. LaPointe (Ed.). Aphasia and related neurogenic language disorders (pp. l77-195). New York: Thieme.
136. Nebel, K., Wiese, H., Stude, P., deGreiff, A., Deiner, H.-C., & Keidel, M. (2005). On the neural basis of focused and divided attention. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 760-776.
137. Ng, K. C., Chan, K. L., & Straughan, P. T. (1995). A study of post-stroke depression in a rehabilitative center. Acta Psychiatrica Scandanavica, 92, 75-79.
138. Nicholas, L. E., & Brookshire, R. H. (1993). A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 338-350.
139. Nicholas, L. E., & Brookshire, R. H. (1995). Presence, completeness, and accuracy of main concepts in the connected speech of non-brain-damaged adults and adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 145-157.
140. Odell, K. H., Wollack, J. A., & Flynn, M. (2005). Functional outcomes in patients with right hemisphere brain damage. Aphasiology, 19, 807-830.
141. Ogden, J. A. (1985). Anterior-posterior interhemispheric differences in the loci of lesions producing visual hemineglect. Brain and Cognition, 4, 59-75.
142. Oke, A., Keller, R., Medford, I., & Adams, R. (1978). Lateralization of norepinephrine in human thalamus. Science, 200, 1411-1413.
143. Oke, A., Lewis, R., & Adams, R. N. (1980). Hemispheric asymmetry of norepinephrine distribution in rat thalamus. Brain Research, 188, 269-272.
144. Ostrove, J. M., Simpson, T., & Gardner, H. (1990). Beyond scripts: A note on the capacity of right hemisphere-damaged patients to process social and emotional content. Brain and Cognition, 12, 144-154.
145. Pardo, J. V., Fox, P. T., & Raichle, M. E. (1991). Localization of a human system for sustained attention by positron emission tomography. Nature, 349, 61-64.
146. Pardo, J. V., Pardo, P. J., Janer, K. W., & Raichle, M. E. (1990). The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA, 87, 256-259.
147. Pell, M. D. (2006). Cerebral mechanisms for understanding emotional prosody in speech. Brain and Language, 96, 221-234.
148. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
149. Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25-42.
150. Posner, M. I., Walker, J. A., Friedrich, F. J., & Raphal, R. D. (1984). Effects of parietal lobe injury on convert orienting of visual attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 4, 1863-1864.
151. Rafal, R. D., & Posner, M. E. (1987). Deficits in human visual spatial attention following thalamic lesions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA, 84, 7349-7353.
152. Ramasubbu, R., & Kennedy, S. H. (1994). Factors complicating the diagnosis of depression in cerebrovascular disease. Part I: Phenomenological and nosological issues. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 39, 596-607.
153. Rapcsak, S. Z., Verfaellie, M., Fleet, W. S., & Heilman, K. M. (1989). Selective attention in hemispatial neglect. Archives of Neurology, 46, 178-182.
154. Rehak, A., Kaplan, J. A., & Gardner, H. (1992). Sensitivity to conversational deviance in right-hemisphere-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 42, 203-217.
155. Rehak, A., Kaplan, J. A., Weylman, S. T., Kelly, B., Brownell, H. H. (1992). Story processing in right-hemisphere-brain damaged patients. Brain and Language, 42, 320-336.
156. Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1987). Perceptual action systems in unilateral neglect. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect (pp. 151-181). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
157. Rivers, D. L., & Love, R. J. (1980). Language performance on visual processing tasks in right hemisphere lesion cases. Brain and Language, 10, 348-366.
158. Robertson, I. H., Tegner, R., Tham, K., Lo, A., & Nimmo-Smith, I. (1995). Sustained attention training for unilateral neglect: Theoretical and rehabilitation implications. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17, 416-430.
159. Robin, D. A., & Rizzo, M. (1989). The effect of focal cerebral lesions on intramodal and cross modal orienting of attention. In T. Prescott (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology (Vol. 18, pp. 61-74). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
160. Robin, D. A., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (1990). Auditory perception of temporal and spectral events in patients with focal left and right cerebral lesions. Brain and Language, 39, 539-555.
161. Robinson, R. G. (1985). Lateralized behavioral and neurochemical consequences of unilateral brain injury in rats. In S. G. Glick (Ed.), Cerebral lateralization in nonhuman species (pp. 135-156). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
162. Robinson, R. G., Kubos, K. L., Starr, L. B., Rao, K., & Price, T. R. (1984). Mood disorders in stroke patients: Importance of location of lesion. Brain, 107, 81-93.
163. Robinson, R. G., Starr, L. B., Lipsey, J. R., Rao, K., & Price, T. R. (1984). A two-year longitudinal study of post-stroke mood disorders: Dynamic changes in associated variables over the first six months of follow-up. Stroke, 15, 510-517.
164. Roman, M., Brownell, H. H., Potter, H. H., Seibold, M. S., & Gardner, H. (1987). Script knowledge in right hemisphere-damaged and normal elderly adults. Brain and Language, 31, 151-170.
165. Rosenbek, J. C., Crucian, G. P., & Leon, S. A., Hieber, B., Rodriguez, A. D., Holiway, B., et al. (2004). Novel treatments for expressive aprosodia: A phase I investigation of cognitive linguistic and imitative interventions. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (Vol 10, pp. 786-793).
166. Ross, E. D. (1981). The aprosodias. Archivesof Neurology, 38, 561-569.
167. Ross, E. D., Edmondson, J. A., Seibert, G. B., & Homan, R. W. (1988). Acoustic analysis of affective measures of prosody during right-sided Wada test: A within-subjects verification of the right hemisphere's role in language. Brain and Language, 33, 128-145.
168. Ross, E. D., & Mesulam, M.-M. (1979). Dominant language functions of the right hemisphere? Prosody and emotional gesturing. Archives of Neurology, 36, 561-569.
169. Ruff, R. M., Nieman, H., Allen, C. C., Farrow, C. E., & Wylie, T. (1992). The Ruff 2 and 7 Selective Attention Test: A neuropsy-chological application. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 1311-1319.
170. Ryalls, R. (1986). What constitutes a primary disturbance of speech prosody? A reply to Shapiro and Danly. Brain and Language, 29, 183-187.
171. Ryalls, R., Joanette, Y., & Feldman, L. (1987). An acoustic comparison of normal and right-hemisphere-damaged speech prosody. Cortex, 23, 685-694.
172. Schlanger, B. B., Schlanger, P., & Gerstman, L. J. (1976). The perception of emotionally toned sentences by right hemisphere-damaged and aphasic subjects. Brain and Language, 3, 396-403.
173. Schneiderman, E. I., & Saddy, J. D. (1988). A linguistic deficit resulting from right-hemisphere damage. Brain and Language, 34, 38-53.
174. Shah, A. P., Baum, S. R., & Dwivedi, V. D. (2006). Neural substrates of linguistic prosody: Evidence from syntactic disambiguation in the productions of brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 96, 78-89.
175. Shapiro, B. E., & Danly, M. (1985). The role of the right hemisphere in the control of speech prosody in propositional and affective contexts. Brain and Language, 25, 19-36.
176. Sherratt, S. M., & Penn, C. (1990). Discourse in a right-hemisphere brain-damaged subject. Aphasiology, 4, 539-560.
177. Sidtis, J. J., & Van Lanker-Sidtis, D. (2003). A neurobehavioral approach to dysprosody. Seminars in Speech and Language, 24, 93-105.
178. Silberman, E. K., & Weingartner, H. (1986). Hemispheric lateral-ization of functions related to emotion. Brain and Cognition, 5, 322-353.
179. Sinyor, D., Jacques, P., Kaloupek, D. G., Becker, R., Goldenberg, M., & Coopersmith, H. (1986). Poststroke depression and lesion location: An attempted replication. Brain, l 09, 537-546.
180. Sohlberg, M. M., Avery, J., Kennedy, M., Ylvisaker, M., Coelho, C., Turkstra, L., et al. (2003). Practice guidelines for direct attention training. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 11, xix-xxxix.
181. Stringer, A. Y. (1996). Treatment of motor aprosodia with pitch biofeedback and expression modeling. Brain Injury, 10, 583-590.
182. Sturm, W., Longoni, F., Fimm, B., Dietrich, T., Weis, S., Kemna, S., et al., (2004). Network for auditory intrinsic alertness: A PET study. Neuropsychologia, 42, 563-568.
183. Sturm, W., Longoni, F., Weis, S., Specht, K., Herzog, H., & Vohn, R. (2004). Functional reorganisation in patients with right hemisphere stroke after training of alertness: A longitudinal PET and fMRI study in eight cases. Neuropsychologia, 42, 434-450.
184. Sturm, W., & Willmes, K. (1991). Efficacy of a reaction training on various attentional and cognitive functions in stroke patients. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 1, 259-280.
185. Stuss, D. T., Toth, J. P., Franchi, D., Alexander, M. P., Tipper, S., Craik, F. I. M. (1999). Dissociation of attentional processes in patients with focal frontal and posterior lesions. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1005-1027.
186. Swisher, L. P., & Sarno, M. T. (1969). Token test scores of three matched patient groups: Left brain-damaged, right brain-damaged without aphasia, and non-brain-damaged. Cortex, 5, 264-273.
187. Tegner, R., Levander, M., & Caneman, G. (1990). Apparent right neglect in patients with left visual neglect. Cortex, 26, 455-458.
188. Tompkins, C. A. (1991a). Automatic and effortful processing of emotional intonation after right or left hemisphere brain damage. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 820-830.
189. Tompkins, C. A. (1991b). Redundancy enhances emotional infer-encing by right-and left-hemisphere-damaged adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 1142-1149.
190. Tompkins, C. A. (1995). Right hemisphere communication disorders: Theory and management. San Diego, CA: Singular.
191. Tompkins, C. A., Baumgaertner, A., & Lehman, M. T. (2000). Mechanisms of discourse comprehension impairment after right hemisphere brain damage: Suppression in lexical ambiguity resolution. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 62-78.
192. Tompkins, C. A., & Baumgaertner, A. (1998). Clinical value of online measures for adults with right hemisphere brain damage. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 7, 68-74.
193. Tompkins, C. A., Bloise, C. G. R., Timko, M. L., & Baumgaertner, A. (1994). Working memory and inference revision in braindamaged and normally aging adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 896-912.
194. Tompkins, C. A., & Flowers, C. R. (1985). Perception of emotional intonation by brain-damaged adults: The influence of task processing levels. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 527-538.
195. Tompkins, C. A., & Lehman, M. T. (1998). Interpreting intended meanings after right hemisphere brain damage: An analysis of evidence, potential accounts, and clinical implications. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 5, 29-47.
196. Tompkins, C. A., Lehman-Blake, M. T., Baumgaertner, A., & Fassbinder, W. (2001) Mechanisms of discourse comprehension impairment after right hemisphere brain damage: Suppression in inferential ambiguity resolution. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 44, 400-415.
197. Trupe, E. H., & Hillis, A. (1985). Paucity vs. verbosity: Another analysis of right hemisphere communication deficits. In R. H. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology (Vol. 15, pp. 83-96). Minneapolis, MN: BRK.
198. Tucker, D. M. (1981). Lateral brain function, emotion, and conceptualization. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 19-46.
199. Tucker, D. M., Watson, R. T., & Heilman, K. M. (1977). Discrimination and evocation of affectively intoned speech in patients with right parietal disease. Neurology, 27, 947-950.
200. Tucker, D. M., & Williamson, P. A. (1984). Asymmetric neuronal control systems in human self-regulation. Psychological Review, 91, 185-215.
201. Turkstra, L. S., Ylvisaker, M., Coelho, C., Kennedy, M., Sohlberg, M. M., Avery, J., et al. (2005). Practice guidelines for standardized assessment for persons with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 13, ix-xxxviii.
202. Urayse, D., Duffy, R. J., & Liles, B. Z. (1991). Analysis and description of narrative discourse in right-hemisphere-damaged adults: A comparison with neurologically normal and left-hemisphere-damaged aphasic adults. In T. Prescott (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology (Vol. 19, pp. 125-138). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
203. Vallar, G. (1993). The anatomical basis of spatial hemi-neglect in humans. In I. H. Robertson & J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Unilateral neglect: Clinical and experimental studies. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
204. Vallar, G., & Perani, D. (1986). The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke lesions: A clinical/CT-scan correlation study in man. Neuropsychologia, 24, 609-622.
205. Van Lancker, D. (1980). Cerebral lateralization of pitch cues in the linguistic signal. International Journal of Human Communication, 13, 201-227.
206. Van Lancker, D. R., & Kempler, D. (1987). Comprehension of familiar phrases by left-but not by right hemisphere damaged patients. Brain and Language, 32, 265-277.
207. Van Lancker, D. R., & Sidtis, J. J. (1992). The identification of affective prosodic stimuli by left and right-hemisphere damaged subjects: All errors are not created equal. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 963-970.
208. Walker, J. P., Daigle, T., & Buzzard, M. (2002). Hemispheric specialisation in processing prosodic structures: Revisited. Aphasiology, 16, 1155-1172.
209. Walker, J. P., Pelletier, R., & Reif, L. (2004). The production of linguistic prosodic structures in subjects with right hemisphere brain damage. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 18, 85-106.
210. Wapner, W., Hamby, S., & Gardner, H. (1981). The role of the right hemisphere in the appreciation of complex linguistic materials. Brain and Language, 14, 15-33.
211. Weintraub, S., Mesulam, M. M., & Kramer, L. (1981). Disturbances in prosody: A right-hemisphere contribution to language. Archives of Neurology, 38, 742-744.
212. Weylman, S. T., Brownell, H. H., Roman, M., & Gardner, H. (1989). Appreciation of indirect requests by left-and right-brain-damaged patients: The effects of verbal context and conventionality of wording. Brain and Language, 36, 580-591.
213. Wilkins, A. M., Shallice, T., & McCarthy, R. (1987). Frontal lesions and sustained attention. Neuropsychologia, 25, 359-365.
214. Winner, E., Brownell, H., Happe, F., Blum, A., & Pincus, D. (1998). Distinguishing lies from jokes: Theory of mind deficits and discourse interpretation in right hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 62, 89-106.
215. Winner, E., & Gardner, H. (1977). The comprehension of metaphor in brain damaged patients. Brain, 100, 719-727.
216. Wunderlich, A., Ziegler, W., & Geigenberger, A. (2003). Implicit processing of prosodic information in patients with left and right hemisphere stroke. Aphasiology, 17, 861-879.
217. Yokoyama, K., Jennings, R., Ackles, P., Hood, B. S., & Boller, F. (1987). Lack of heart rate changes during an attention-demanding task after right hemisphere lesions. Neurology, 37, 624-630.
218. Zahn, T. P., Grafman, J., & Tranel, D. (1999). Frontal lobe lesions and electrodermal activity: Effects of significance. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1227-1241.