Knowledge of scripts reflected in discourse of aphasics and right-brain-damaged patients

Brain and Language

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 58-80

  ŁOjek Usiejuk, Emilia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; APHASIA; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MENTAL TASK; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; APHASIA; BRAIN DAMAGE, CHRONIC; COGNITION; COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; READING; SEMANTICS;

EID: 0029914811     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/brln.1996.0037     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Abbott, V., Black, J. B., & Smith, E. E. 1985. The representation of scripts in memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 179-199.
2. Abelson, R. P. 1980. Common sense knowledge representations. De Psycholog, XV, 431-449.
3. Abelson, R. P. 1981. Psychological status of the script concept. American Psychologist, 36, 715-729.
4. Adams, M. J., & Collins, A. 1979. A schema-theoretic view of reading. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5. Armus, S. R., Brookshire, R. H., & Nicholas, L. E. 1989. Aphasic and non-brain-damaged adults' knowledge of scripts for common situations. Brain and Language, 36, 518-528.
6. Barsalou, L. W., & Sewell, D. R. 1985. Contrasting the representation of scripts and categories. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 646-665.
7. Beeman, M. 1993. Semantic processing in the right hemisphere may contribute to drawing inferences from discourse. Brain and Language, 44, 80-120.
8. Bellezza, F. S. 1988. Reliability of retrieving information from knowledge structures in memory: Scripts. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 11-14.
9. Bellezza, F. S., & Bowell, G. H. 1981. The representations and processing characteristics of scripts. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 1-4.
10. Berko-Gleason, J. B., Goodglass, H., Obler, L., Green, E., Hyde, M. R., & Weintraub, S. 1980. Narrative strategies of aphasic and normal-speaking subjects. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 23, 370-382.
11. Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., & Turner, T. J. 1979. Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 177-220.
12. Brewer, W. F., & Nakamura, G. V. 1984. The nature and functions of schemas. In R. S. J. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Vol. 1.
13. Brookshire, R. H., & Nicholas, L. E. 1984. Comprehension of directly and indirectly stated main ideas and details in discourse by brain-damaged and non-brain-damaged listeners. Brain and Language, 21, 21-36.
14. Brown, G., & Yule., G. 1983. Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
15. Bryan, K. L. 1988. Assessment of language disorders after right hemisphere damage. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 23, 111-125.
16. Cannito, M. P., Jarecki, J., & Pierce, R. S. 1986. Effects of thematic structure on syntactic comprehension in aphasia. Brain and Language, 27, 38-49.
17. Delis, D. C., Wapner, W., Gardner, H., & Moses, J. A. 1983. The contribution of the right hemisphere to the organization of paragraphs. Cortex, 19, 43-50.
18. Dennis, M., & Lovett, M. W. 1990. Discourse ability in children after brain damage. In Y. Joanette, H. H. Brownell (Eds.). Discourse ability and brain damage: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. New York: Springer-Verlag.
19. Frederiksen, C. H. 1986. Cognitive models and discourse analysis. In C. R. Cooper, S. Greenbaum (Eds.), Written communication annual: An international survey of research and theory. Vol. 1. Beverly Hills: The Publishers of Professional Social Science.
20. Fredriksen, C. H., Bracewell, R. J., Breuleux, A., & Renaud, A. 1990. The cognitive presentation and processing of discourse: function and dysfunction. In Y. Joanette & H. H. Brownell, (Eds.), Discourse ability and brain damage: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. New York: Springer-Verlag.
21. Gardner, H., Brownell, H. H., Wapner, W., & Michelow, D. 1983. Missing the point: The role of the right hemisphere in the processing of complex linguistic materials. In E. Perecman (Ed.), Cognitive processing in the right hemisphere. New York: Academic Press.
22. Germani, M. J., & Pierce, R. S. 1992. Contextual influences in reading comprehension in aphasia. Brain and Language, 42, 308-319.
23. Gibbs, R., & Tenney, Y. J. 1980. The concept of scripts in understanding stories. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 9, 275-284.
24. Glosser, G., & Deser, T. 1991. Patterns of discourse production among neurological patients with fluent language disorders. Brain and Language, 40, 67-88.
25. Gross, R. D. 1992. Psychology: The science of mind and behaviour, 2nd ed. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
26. Hough, M. S. 1990. Narrative comprehension in adults with right and left hemisphere brain-damage: Theme organization. Brain and Language, 38, 253-277.
27. Hough, M. S., & Wilcox, M. J. 1989. The effects of theme presentation on the comprehension and interpretation of narrative discourse in adults with brain damage. In T. E. Prescott (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology. Boston: College-Hill. Vol. 18.
28. Hough, M. S., Pierce, R. S., & Cannito, M. P. 1989. Contextual influences in aphasia: Effects of predictive versus nonpredictive narratives. Brain and Language, 36, 325-334.
29. Huber, W. 1990. Text comprehension and production in aphasia: Analysis in terms of micro- and macroprocessing. In Y. Joanette & H. H. Brownell (Eds.), Discourse ability and brain damage: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. New York: Springer-Verlag.
30. Huber, W., & Gleber, J. 1982. Linguistic and nonlinguistic processing of narratives in aphasia. Brain and Language, 16, 1-18.
31. Instrukcja do skali inteligencji D. Wechslera dla młodzieźy i doroslych, 1972. Wydawnictwo Polskiego Towarzystwa Higieny Psychicznej, Warszawa.
32. Joanette, Y., Goulet, P., Ska, B., & Nespoulous, J. L. 1986. Informative content of narrative discourse in right-brain-damaged right-handers. Brain and Language, 29, 81-105.
33. Johnson, M. K., & Haser, L. 1987. Human learning and memory. Annual Reviev of Psychology, 38, 631-668.
34. Juncos-Rabadan, O. 1992. The processing of negative sentences in fluent aphasics: Semantic and pragmatic aspects. Brain and Language, 43, 96-106.
35. Kaplan, J. A., Brownell, H. H., Jacobs, J. R., & Gardner, H. 1990. The effects of right hemisphere damage on the pragmatic interpretation of conversational remarks. Brain and Language, 38, 315-333.
36. Light, L. L., & Anderson, P. A. 1983. Memory for scripts in young and older adults. Memory and Cognition, 11, 435-444.
37. Mandler, J. M. 1984. Stories, scripts, and scenes: Aspects of schema theory. Hillsdale: LEA.
38. Molloy, R., Brownell, H. H., & Gardner, H. 1990. Discourse comprehension by right-hemisphere stroke patients: Deficit of prediction and revision. In H. H. Brownell (Eds.), Discourse Ability and Brain Damage. Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. New York: Springer-Verlag.
39. Osiejuk, E. 1989. Discourse analysis in aphasics and right-brain-damaged patients. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 20, 139-146.
40. Osiejuk, E. 1991. Discourse exercises in aphasia therapy: A case study. Aphasiology, 5, 443-446.
41. Ostrove, J. M., Simpson, T., & Gardner, H. 1990. Beyond scripts: A note on the capacity of right hemisphere-damaged patients to process social and emotional content. Brain and Cognition, 12, 144-154.
42. Polska wersja Bostońskiego testu do diagnozy afazji 1986. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego. Warszawa. [Manuscript]
43. Rehak, A., Kaplan, J. A., Weylman, S. T., Kelly, B., Brownell, H. H., & Gardner, H. 1992. Story processing in right-hemisphere brain-damage patients. Brain and Language, 42, 320-336.
44. Roman, M., Brownell, H. H., Potter, H. H., Seibold, M. S., & Gardner, H. 1987. Script knowledge in right hemisphere-damaged and in normal elderly adults. Brain and Language, 31, 151-170.
45. Ross, B. L., & Berg, C. A. 1990. Individual differences in script reports: Implications for language assessment. Topics in Language Disorders, 10, 30-44.
46. Schank, R. C. 1982. Depths of knowledge. In B. de Gelder (Ed.), Knowledge and representation. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
47. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. 1977. Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale: LEA.
48. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. 1980. Scripts, plans, and knowledge. In P. N. Johnson-Laird & P. C. Wason (Eds.), Thinking: Reading in cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
49. Schneiderman, E. I., Murasugi, K. G., & Douglas Saddy, J. 1992. Story arrangement ability in right brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 43, 107-120.
50. Sharkey, N. E., & Mitchell, D. C. 1985. Word recognition in a functional context: The use of scripts in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 253-270.
51. Sherratt, S. M., & Penn, C. 1990. Discourse in a right-hemisphere brain-damaged subjects. Aphasiology, 4, 539-560.
52. Stachowiak, E. J., Huber, W., Poeck, K., & Kerschensteiner, M. 1977. Text Comprehension in Aphasia. Brain and Language, 4, 177-195.
53. Ulatowska, H.K., Freedman-Stern, R., Weiss Doyel, A., Macaluso-Haynes, & S., North, A. J. 1983. Production of procedural discourse in aphasia. Brain and Language, 18, 315-341.
54. Ulatowska, H. K., Allard, L., & Bond Chapman, S. 1990. Narrative and procedural discourse in aphasia. In Y. Joanette & H. H. Brownell (Eds.), Discourse ability and brain damage: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. New York: Springer-Verlag.
55. Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. 1983. Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
56. Walker, C. H., & Yekovich, F. R. 1984. Script-based inferences: Effects of text and knowledge variables on recognition memory. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behaviour, 23, 357-370.
57. Wapner, W., Hamby, S., & Gardner, H. 1981. The role of the right hemisphere in the apprehension of complex linguistic materials. Brain and Language, 14, 15-33.
58. Weylman, S. T., Brownell, H. H., Roman, M., & Gardner, H. 1989. Appreciation of indirect requests by left and right brain-damaged patients: The effects of verbal context and conventionality of wording. Brain and Language, 36, 580-591.
59. Wilcox, M. J., Davis, G. A., & Leonard, L. B. 1978. Aphasics Comprehension of contextually conveyed meaning. Brain and Language, 6, 362-377.
60. Yekovich, F. R., & Walker, C. H. 1986. Retrieval of scripted concepts. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 627-644.