Computable general equilibrium models for the analysis of economy–environment interactions

Research Tools in Natural Resource and Environmental Economics

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 255-306

  Wing, Ian Sue ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84970939997     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1142/9789814289238_0009     Document Type: Chapter

References (140)

1. Abdelgalil, EA and SI Cohen (2001). Policy modelling of the trade-off between agricultural development and land degradation — the Sudan case. Journal of Policy Modeling, 23, 847–874.
2. Abler, DG, AG Rodriguez and JS Shortle (1998). Labor force growth and the environment in Costa Rica. Economic Modelling, 15, 477–499.
3. Abler, DG, AG Rodriguez and JS Shortle (1999). Trade liberalization and the environment in Costa Rica. Environment and Development Economics, 4, 357–373.
4. Alarcon, J, J Van Heemst and N De Jong (2000). Extending the SAM with social and environmental indicators: An application to Bolivia. Economic Systems Research, 12, 473–496.
5. Allan, G, N Hanley and P McGregor (2007). The impact of increased efficiency in the industrial use of energy: A computable general equilibrium analysis for the United Kingdom. Energy Economics, 29, 779–798.
6. Andre, FJ, MA Cardenete and E Velazquez (2005). Performing an environmental tax reform in a regional economy: A computable general equilibrium approach. Annals of Regional Science, 39, 375–392.
7. Arndt, C, S Robinson and F Tarp (2002). Parameter estimation for a computable general equilibrium model: A maximum entropy approach. Economic Modelling, 19(3), 375–398.
8. Aunan, K, T Berntsen and D O’Connor (2007). Benefits and costs to China of a climate policy. Environment and Development Economics, 12, 471–497.
9. Babiker, MH (2001). The CO2 abatement game: Costs, incentives, and the enforceability of a sub-global coalition. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 25, 1–34.
10. Babiker, MH (2005). Climate change policy, market structure, and carbon leakage. Journal of International Economics, 65, 421–445.
11. Babiker, MH and TF Rutherford (2005). The economic effects of border measures in subglobal climate agreements. Energy Journal, 26, 99–125.
12. Babiker, MH, GE Metcalf and J Reilly (2003). Tax distortions and global climate policy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46, 269–287.
13. Babiker, M, A Gurgel and S Paltsev (2009). Forward-looking versus recursivedynamic modeling in climate policy analysis: A comparison. Economic Modelling, 26(6), 1341–1354.
14. Bailey, RW and R Clarke (2000). Global macroeconomic sustainability: A dynamic general equilibrium approach. Environment and Development Economics, 5(01), 177–194.
15. Balistreri, EJ (2002). Operationalizing equilibrium unemployment: A general equilibrium external economies approach. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 26(3), 347–374.
16. Ballard, CL (2000). How many hours are in a simulated day? The effects of time endowment on the results of tax-policy simulation models. Working Paper, Michigan State University Economics Department.
17. Ballard, CL, D Fullerton and JB Shoven (1985). General Equilibrium Analysis of U.S. Tax Policies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
18. Bashaasha, B, DS Kraybill and DD Southgate (2001). Land use impacts of agricultural intensification and fuelwood taxation in Uganda. Land Economics, 77, 241–249.
19. Berck, P and S Hoffmann (2002). Assessing the employment impacts of environmental and natural resource policy. Environmental and Resource Economics, 22, 133–156.
20. Berg, C (2007). Household transport demand in a CGE-framework. Environmental and Resource Economics, 37, 573–597.
21. Bergman, L (2005). CGE modeling of environmental policy and resource management. In Handbook of Environmental Economics, Vol. 3, K-G M¨aler and JR Vincent (eds.), pp. 1273–1306. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
22. Bohringer, C (2002). Climate politics from Kyoto to Bonn: From little to nothing? Energy Journal, 23, 51–71.
23. Bohringer, C and C Helm (2008). On the fair division of greenhouse gas abatement cost. Resource and Energy Economics, 30, 260–276.
24. Bohringer, C and A Loschel (2006). Computable general equilibrium models for sustainability impact assessment: Status quo and prospects. Ecological Economics, 60, 49–64.
25. Bohringer, C and TF Rutherford (2002). Carbon abatement and international spillovers: A decomposition of general equilibrium effects. Environmental and Resource Economics, 22, 391–417.
26. Bohringer, C and TF Rutherford (2004). Who should pay how much? Compensation for international spillovers from carbon abatement policies to developing countries — a global CGE assessment. Computational Economics, 23, 71–103.
27. Bohringer, C and TF Rutherford (2008). Combining bottom-up and top-down. Energy Economics, 30, 574–596.
28. Bohringer, C, K Conrad and A Loschel (2003). Carbon taxes and joint implementation: An applied general equilibrium analysis for Germany and India. Environmental and Resource Economics, 24(1), 49–76.
29. Bohringer, C, A L¨oschel and TF Rutherford (2007a). Decomposing the integrated assessment of climate change. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31(2), 683–702.
30. Bohringer, C, U Moslener and B Sturm (2007b). Hot air for sale: A quantitative assessment of Russia’s near-term climate policy options. Environmental and Resource Economics, 38, 545–572.
31. Bohringer, C and H Welsch (2004). Contraction and convergence of carbon emissions: An intertemporal multi-region CGE analysis. Journal of Policy Modeling, 26, 21–39.
32. Bosello, F, R Roson and RSJ Tol (2006). Economy-wide estimates of the implications of climate change: Human health. Ecological Economics, 58(3), 579–591.
33. Bosello, F, R Roson and RSJ Tol (2007). Economy-wide estimates of the implications of climate change: Sea level rise. Environmental and Resource Economics, 37, 574–591.
34. Bovenberg, AL and LH Goulder (2001). Neutralizing the adverse industry impacts of CO2 abatement policies: What does it cost? In Behavioral and Distributional Effects of Environmental Policy, C Carraro and GE Metcalf (eds.), pp. 45–90. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35. Bovenberg, AL, LH Goulder and DJ Gurney (2005). Efficiency costs of meeting industry-distributional constraints under environmental permits and taxes. RAND Journal of Economics, 36, 950–970.
36. Bovenberg, AL, LH Goulder and MR Jacobsen (2008). Costs of alternative environmental policy instruments in the presence of industry compensation requirements. Journal of Public Economics, 92(5–6), 1236–1253.
37. Boyd, R and ME Ibarraran (2009). Extreme climate events and adaptation: An exploratory analysis of drought in Mexico. Environment and Development Economics, 14, 371–395.
38. Brooke, A, D Kendrick and A Meeraus (1998). GAMS: A User’s Guide. Washington DC: GAMS Development Corp.
39. Brouwer, R, M Hofkes and V Linderhof (2008). General equilibrium modelling of the direct and indirect economic impacts of water quality improvements in the Netherlands at national and river basin scale. Ecological Economics, 66, 127–140.
40. Bye, B (2000). Environmental tax reform and producer foresight: An intertemporal computable general equilibrium analysis. Journal of Policy Modeling, 22, 719–752.
41. Cao, J, R Garbaccio and MS Ho (2009). China’s 11th Five-Year Plan and the Environment: Reducing SO2 Emissions. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 3, 231–250.
42. Carbone, JC and VK Smith (2008). Evaluating policy interventions with general equilibrium externalities. Journal of Public Economics, 92(5–6), 1254–1274.
43. Carbone, JC, C Helm and TF Rutherford (2009). The case for international emission trade in the absence of cooperative climate policy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 58, 266–280.
44. Cattaneo, A (2001). Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: Comparing the impacts of macroeconomic shocks, land tenure, and technological change. Land Economics, 77, 219–240.
45. Cattaneo, A (2005). Inter-regional innovation in Brazilian agriculture and deforestation in the Amazon: Income and environment in the balance. Environment and Development Economics, 10, 485–511.
46. Conrad, K (2002). Computable general equilibrium models in environmental and resource economics. In The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 2002/2003, T Tietenberg and H Folmer (eds.), pp. 66–114. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
47. Conrad, K and A Loschel (2005). Recycling of eco-taxes, labor market effects and the true cost of labor — a CGE analysis. Journal of Applied Economics, 8, 259–278.
48. Coxhead, I and S Jayasuriya (2004). Development strategy and trade liberalization: Implications for poverty and environment in the Philippines. Environment and Development Economics, 9, 613–644.
49. Dawkins, C, TN Srinivasan and J Whalley (2001). Calibration. In Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 5, JJ Heckman and E Leamer (eds.), pp. 3653–3703. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
50. Dellink, R, M Hofkes and E van Ierland (2004). Dynamic modelling of pollution abatement in a CGE framework. Economic Modelling, 21, 965–989.
51. Dessus, S and M Bussolo (1998). Is there a trade-off between trade liberalization and pollution abatement? A computable general equilibrium assessment applied to Costa Rica. Journal of Policy Modeling, 20, 11–31.
52. Dessus, S and D O’Connor (2003). Climate policy without tears: CGE-based ancillary benefits estimates for Chile. Environmental and Resource Economics, 25, 287–317.
53. Devarajan, S, DS Go and JD Lewis (1997). Simple general equilibrium modeling. In Applied Methods for Trade Policy Analysis, JF Francois and KA Reinert (eds.), pp. 156–185. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Diao, X, T Roe and R Doukkali (2005). Economy-wide gains from decentralized water allocation in a spatially heterogenous agricultural economy. Environment and Development Economics, 10, 249–269.
55. Diao, X, A Dinar and T Roe (2008). A general equilibrium analysis of conjunctive ground and surface water use with an application to Morocco. Agricultural Economics, 38, 117–135.
56. Dirkse, SP and MC Ferris (1995). The PATH solver: A non-monotone stabilization scheme for mixed complementarity problems. Optimization Methods and Software, 5, 123–156.
57. Espinosa, JA and VK Smith (1995). Measuring the environmental consequences of trade policy: A nonmarket CGE analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77(3), 772–777.
58. Faehn, T and E Holmoy (2003). Trade liberalisation and effects on pollutive emissions to air and deposits of solid waste: A general equilibrium assessment for Norway. Economic Modelling, 20, 703–727.
59. Ferris, MC and C Kanzow (2002). Complementarity and related problems. In Handbook of Applied Optimization, PM Pardalos and MGC Resende (eds.), pp. 514–530. New York: Oxford University Press.
60. Ferris, MC and TS Munson (2000). Complementarity problems in GAMS and the PATH solver. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 24, 165–188.
61. Ferris, MC and JS Pang (1997). Engineering and economic applications of complementarity problems. SIAM Review, 39(4), 669–713.
62. Ferris, MC, TS Munson and D Ralph (2000). A homotopy method for mixed complementarity problems based on the PATH solver. In Numerical Analysis 1999, DF Griffiths and GA Watson (eds.), pp. 143–167. London: Chapman and Hall.
63. Finnoff, D and J Tschirhart (2008). Linking dynamic economic and ecological general equilibrium models. Resource and Energy Economics, 30(2), 91–114.
64. Fisher-Vanden, K and MS Ho (2007). How do market reforms affect China’s responsiveness to environmental policy? Journal of Development Economics, 82, 200–233.
65. Fisher-Vanden, K and I Sue Wing (2008). Accounting for quality: Issues with modeling the impact of R&D on economic growth and carbon emissions in developing economies. Energy Economics, 30, 2771–2784.
66. Fraser, L and R Waschik (2005). Agricultural land retirement and slippage: Lessons from an Australian case study. Land Economics, 81, 206–226.
67. Garbaccio, RF, MS Ho and DW Jorgenson (1999). Controlling carbon emissions in China. Environment and Development Economics, 4, 493–518.
68. Ginsburgh, V and M Keyzer (1997). The Structure of Applied General Equilibrium Models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
69. Goulder, LH, IW Parry and RC Williams (1999). The cost-effectiveness of alternative instruments for environmental protection in a second-best setting. Journal of Public Economics, 72, 329–360.
70. Hagem, C, S Kallbekken and O Maestad (2006). Market power with interdependent demand: Sale of emission permits and natural gas from Russia. Environmental and Resource Economics, 34, 211–227.
71. He, J (2005). Estimating the economic cost of China’s new desulfur policy during her gradual accession to WTO: The case of industrial SO2 emission. China Economic Review, 16, 364–402.
72. Hubler, M, G Klepper and S Peterson (2008). Costs of climate change: The effects of rising temperatures on health and productivity in Germany. Ecological Economics, 68, 381–393.
73. Hyman, R, J Reilly and M Babiker (2003). Modeling non-CO2 greenhouse gas abatement. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 8, 175–186.
74. Ianchovichina, E, R Darwin and R Shoemaker (2001). Resource use and technological progress in agriculture: A dynamic general equilibrium analysis. Ecological Economics, 38, 275–291.
75. Jacoby, HD, JM Reilly and JR McFarland (2006). Technology and technical change in the MIT EPPA model. Energy Economics, 28, 610–631.
76. Jansen, H (2001). Induced institutional change in the trade and environment debate: A computable general equilibrium application to NAFTA with endogenous regulation setting. Environmental and Resource Economics, 18, 149–172.
77. Jorgenson, DW (1984). Econometric methods for applied general equilibrium analysis. In Applied General Equilibrium Analysis, H Scarf and JB Shoven (eds.), pp. 139–207. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
78. Kallbekken, S and H Westskog (2005). Should developing countries take on binding commitments in a climate agreement? An assessment of gains and uncertainty. Energy Journal, 26, 41–60.
79. Kamat, R, A Rose and D Abler (1999). The impact of a carbon tax on the Susquehanna River Basin economy. Energy Economics, 21(4), 363–384.
80. Kehoe, TJ (1998). Social accounting matrices and applied general equilibrium models. In Applied Economics and Public Policy, I Begg and S Henry (eds.), pp. 59–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
81. Kehoe, TJ (2005). An evaluation of the performance of applied general equilibrium models of the impact of NAFTA. In Frontiers in Applied General Equilibrium Modeling: Essays in Honor of Herbert Scarf, TJ Kehoe, TN Srinivasan and J Whalley (eds.), pp. 341–377. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82. King, B (1985). What is a SAM? In Social Accounting Matrices: A Basis for Planning, JG Pyatt and JI Round (eds.), pp. 1–15. Washington DC: World Bank.
83. Klepper, G and S Peterson (2005). Trading hot-air: The influence of permit allocation rules, market power and the US withdrawal from the Kyoto Protocol. Environmental and Resource Economics, 32, 205–227.
84. Klepper, G and S Peterson (2006). Emissions trading, CDM, JI, and more: The climate strategy of the EU. Energy Journal, 27, 1–26.
85. Lau, M, A Pahlke and TF Rutherford (2002). Approximating infinite-horizon models in a complementarity format: A primer in dynamic general equilibrium analysis. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 26, 577–609.
86. Lenzen, M and R Schaeffer (2004). Environmental and social accounting for Brazil. Environmental and Resource Economics, 27, 201–226.
87. Li, JC (2005). Is there a trade-off between trade liberalization and environmental quality? A CGE assessment on Thailand. Journal of Environment and Development, 14, 252–277.
88. Lofgren, H, RL Harris and S Robinson (2002). A standard computable general equilibrium (CGE) model in GAMS. Microcomputers in Policy Research Working Paper No. 5, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC.
89. Mart´inez de Anguita, P and JE Wagner (2010). Environmental Social Accounting Matrices. New York, NY: Routledge.
90. Mathiesen, L (1985a). Computation of economic equilibria by a sequence of linear complementarity problems. Mathematical Programming Study, 23, 144–162.
91. Mathiesen, L (1985b). Computational experience in solving equilibrium models by a sequence of linear complementarity problems. Operations Research, 33, 1225–1250.
92. Matus, K, T Yang and S Paltsev (2008). Toward integrated assessment of environmental change: Air pollution health effects in the USA. Climatic Change, 88, 59–92.
93. Mayeres, I and D Van Regemorter (2008). Modelling the health related benefits of environmental policies and their feedback effects: A CGE analysis for the EU countries with GEM-E3. Energy Journal, 29, 135–150.
94. McFarland, JR and HJ Herzog (2006). Incorporating carbon capture and storage technologies in integrated assessment models. Energy Economics, 28, 632–652.
95. McKibbin, W and PJ Wilcoxen (1998). The theoretical and empirical structure of the G-Cubed model. Economic Modelling, 16, 123.
96. McKitrick, RR (1998). The econometric critique of applied general equilibrium modelling: The role of functional forms. Economic Modelling, 15, 543–573.
97. Morris, GE (1999). Integrating environmental taxes on local air pollutants with fiscal reform in Hungary: Simulations with a computable general equilibrium model. Environment and Development Economics, 4, 537–564.
98. Nijkamp, P, S Wang and H Kremers (2005). Modeling the impacts of international climate change policies in a CGE context: The use of the GTAP-E model. Economic Modelling, 22(6), 955–974.
99. Nordhaus, WD (1994). Managing the Global Commons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
100. Nugent, JB and CVSK Sarma (2002). The three E’s —efficiency, equity, and environmental protection — in search of ‘win-win-win’ policies: A CGE analysis of India. Journal of Policy Modeling, 24, 19–50.
101. Nwaobi, GC (2004). Emission policies and the Nigerian economy: Simulations from a dynamic applied general equilibrium model. Energy Economics, 26(5), 921–936.
102. Ojha, VP (2009). Carbon emissions reduction strategies and poverty alleviation in India. Environment and Development Economics, 14, 323–348.
103. Oladosu, G and A Rose (2007). Income distribution impacts of climate change mitigation policy in the Susquehanna River Basin economy. Energy Economics, 29(3), 520–544.
104. O’Ryan, R, S Miller and CJ de Miguel (2003). A CGE framework to evaluate policy options for reducing air pollution emissions in Chile. Environment and Development Economics, 8, 285–309.
105. O’Ryan, R, CJ de Miguel and S Miller (2005). Computable general equilibrium model analysis of economywide cross effects of social and environmental policies in Chile. Ecological Economics, 54, 447–472.
106. Otto, VM, A Loschel and R Dellink (2007). Energy biased technical change: A CGE analysis. Resource and Energy Economics, 29, 137–158.
107. Paltsev, S (2004). Moving from static to dynamic general equilibrium economic models (notes for a beginner in MPSGE). Technical Note No. 4, MIT Joint Program on the Science & Policy of Global Change.
108. Panagariya, A and R Duttagupta (2001). The ‘gains’ from preferential trade liberalization in the CGE models: Where do they come from? In Regionalism and Globalization: Theory and Practice, S Lahiri (ed.), pp. 39–60. London: Routledge.
109. Parry, IWH, RC Williams and LH Goulder (1999). When can carbon abatement policies increase welfare? The fundamental role of distorted factor markets. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 37, 52–84.
110. Reinert, KA and DW Roland-Holst (1997). Social accounting matrices. In Applied Methods for Trade Policy Analysis, JF Francois and KA Reinert (eds.), pp. 94–121. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
111. Robinson, S (2006). Macro models and multipliers: Leontief, Stone, Keynes, and CGE models. In Poverty, Inequality and Development: Essays in Honor of Erik Thorbecke, A de Janvry and R Kanbur (eds.), pp. 205–232. New York: Springer.
112. Roe, T, A Dinar and Y Tsur (2005). Feedback links between economy-wide and farm-level policies: With application to irrigation water management in Morocco. Journal of Policy Modeling, 27, 905–928.
113. Rose, A and S Liao (2005). Modeling regional economic resilience to disasters: A computable general equilibrium analysis of water service disruptions. Journal of Regional Science, 45, 75–112.
114. Rose, A and G Oladosu (2002). Greenhouse gas reduction policy in the United States: Identifying winners and losers in an expanded permit trading system. Energy Journal, 23, 1–18.
115. Roson, R (2006). Introducing imperfect competition in CGE models: Technical aspects and implications. Computational Economics, 28, 29–49.
116. Rutherford, TF (1995). Extensions of GAMS for complementarity problems arising in applied economic analysis. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 19, 1299–1324.
117. Rutherford, TF (1999). Applied general equilibrium modeling with MPSGE as a GAMS subsystem: An overview of the modeling framework and syntax. Computational Economics, 14, 1–46.
118. Schafer, A and HD Jacoby (2005). Technology detail in a multisector CGE model: Transport under climate policy. Energy Economics, 27, 1–24.
119. Seung, CK, TR Harris and J Englin (2000). Impacts of water reallocations: A combined computable general equilibrium and recreation demand model approach. Annals of Regional Science, 34, 473–487.
120. Sokolov, A, C Schlosser and S Dutkiewicz (2005). The MIT Integrated Global System Model (IGSM) version 2: Model description and baseline evaluation. Technical Report Report No. 124, MIT Joint Program on the Science & Policy of Global Change.
121. Strzepek, KM, GW Yohe and RSJ Tol (2008). The value of the High Aswan Dam to the Egyptian economy. Ecological Economics, 66, 117–126.
122. Sue Wing, I (2006). The synthesis of bottom-up and top-down approaches to climate policy modeling: Electric power technologies and the cost of limiting US CO2 emissions. Energy Policy, 34(18), 3847–3869.
123. Sue Wing, I (2008). The synthesis of bottom-up and top-down approaches to climate policy modeling: Electric power technology detail in a social accounting framework. Energy Economics, 30, 547–573.
124. Sue Wing, I (2009). Computable general equilibrium models for the analysis of energy and climate policies. In International Handbook on The Economics of Energy, J Evans and LC Hunt (eds.), 332–336. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Sverre Grepperud and Ingeborg
125. Rasmussen, N. (2004). A general equilibrium assessment of rebound effects. Energy Economics, 26, 261–282.
126. Taylor, JE, J Hardner and M Stewart (2009). Ecotourism and economic growth in the Galapagos: An island economy-wide analysis. Environment and Development Economics, 14, 139–162.
127. Telli, C, E Voyvoda and E Yeldan (2008). Economics of environmental policy in Turkey: A general equilibrium investigation of the economic evaluation of sectoral emission reduction policies for climate change. Journal of Policy Modeling, 30, 321–340.
128. Tschirhart, J (2000). General equilibrium of an ecosystem. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 203(1), 13–32.
129. Tschirhart, J (2002). Resource competition among plants: From maximizing individuals to community structure. Ecological Modelling, 148(2), 191–212.
130. Tschirhart, J (2003). Ecological transfers in non-human communities parallel economic markets in a general equilibrium ecosystem model. Journal of Bioeconomics, 5(2), 193–214.
131. Valenzuela, E, TW Hertel and R Keeney (2007). Assessing global computable general equilibrium model validity using agricultural price volatility. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89, 383–397.
132. van Heerden, J, R Gerlagh and J Blignaut (2006). Searching for triple dividends in South Africa: Fighting CO2 pollution and poverty while promoting growth. Energy Journal, 27, 113–141.
133. van Heerden, JH, J Blignaut and M Horridge (2008). Integrated water and economic modelling of the impacts of water market instruments on the South African economy. Ecological Economics, 66, 105–116.
134. Vennemo, H, K Aunan and J He (2008). Environmental impacts of China’s WTO-accession. Ecological Economics, 64, 893–911.
135. Wiig, H, JB Aune and S Glomsrod (2001). Structural adjustment and soil degradation in Tanzania: A CGE model approach with endogenous soil productivity. Agricultural Economics, 24, 263–287.
136. Williams, RC (2002). Environmental tax interactions when pollution affects health or productivity. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44, 261–270.
137. Williams, RC (2003). Health effects and optimal environmental taxes. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 323–335.
138. Winters, P, R Murgai and E Sadoulet (1998). Economic and welfare impacts of climate change on developing countries. Environmental and Resource Economics, 12, 1–24.
139. Xie, J (2000). An environmentally extended social accounting matrix. Environmental and Resource Economics, 16, 391–406.
140. Xie, J and S Saltzman (2000). Environmental policy analysis: An environmental computable general-equilibrium approach for developing countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, 22, 453–489.