An evaluation of the performance of applied general equilibrium models on the impact of NAFTA

Frontiers in Applied General Equilibrium Modeling: In Honor of Herbert Scarf

Volumn 9780521825252, Issue , 2005, Pages 378-401

  Kehoe, Timothy J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERNATIONAL TRADE;

ECONOMIC EQUILIBRIUM; GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM; GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM MODELS; NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS; PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS; PRODUCT CATEGORIES; RELATIVE IMPACT; SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINE;

COMPUTATION THEORY;

EID: 84926124814     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511614330.014     Document Type: Chapter

References (51)

1. P. Adams, P. Dixon, D. McDonald, G. Meagher, and B. Parmenter (1994), “Forecasts for the Australian Economy Using theMONASH Model,” International Journal of Forecasting 10: 557–71.
2. K. J. Arrow and G. Debreu (1954), “Existence of Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy,” Econometrica 22: 265–90.
3. R. Bergoeing and T. J. Kehoe (1999), “Trade Theory and Trade Facts,” Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
4. R. Bergoeing, P. J. Kehoe, T. J. Kehoe, and R. Soto (2002), “A Decade Lost and Found: Mexico and Chile in the 1980s,” Review of Economic Dynamics 5: 166–205.
5. D. K. Brown (1992), “Properties of Computable General Equilibrium Trade Models with Monopolistic Competition and Foreign Direct Investment,” in United States International Trade Commission, Economy-Wide Modeling of the Economic Implications of a FTA with Mexico and a NAFTA with Canada and Mexico. Washington, DC: United States International Trade Commission, pp. 95–125.
6. D. K. Brown (1994), “Properties of Computable General Equilibrium Trade Models with Monopolistic Competition and Foreign Direct Investment,” in J. F. Francois and C. R. Shiells (Eds.), Modeling Trade Policy: Applied General Equilibrium Assessments of North American Free Trade. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 124–50.
7. D. K. Brown, A. V. Deardorff, and R. M. Stern (1992), “A North American Free Trade Agreement: Analytical Issues and a Computational Assessment,” The World Economy 15: 11–30.
8. D. K. Brown, A. V. Deardorff, and R. M. Stern (1995), “Estimates of a North American Free Trade Agreement,” in P. J. Kehoe and T. J. Kehoe (Eds.), Modeling North American Economic Integration. Boston: Kluwer Academic, pp. 59–74.
9. D. K. Brown and R. M. Stern (1989), “Computable General Equilibrium Estimates of the Gains from U.S.-Canadian Trade Liberalization,” in R. C. Feenstra (Ed.), Trade Policies for International Competitiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 217–245.
10. M. E. Burfisher, S. Robinson, and K. Thierfelder (2001), “The Impact of NAFTA on the United States,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 15: 125–44.
11. D. J. Cox (1994), “Some Applied General Equilibrium Estimates of the Impact of a North American Free Trade Agreement on Canada,” in J. F. Francois and C. R. Shiells (Eds.), Modeling Trade Policy: Applied General Equilibrium Assessments of North AmericanFree Trade. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 100–23.
12. D. J. Cox (1995), “An Applied General Equilibrium Analysis of NAFTA’s Impact on Canada,” in P. J. Kehoe and T. J. Kehoe (Eds.), Modeling North American Economic Integration. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 75–90.
13. D. J. Cox and R. G. Harris (1985), “Trade Liberalization and Industrial Organization: Some Estimates for Canada,” Journal of Political Economy 93: 115–45.
14. D. J. Cox and R. G. Harris (1992a), “North American Free Trade and its Implications for Canada,” in United States International Trade Commission, Economy-Wide Modeling of the Economic Implications of a FTA with Mexico and a NAFTA with Canada and Mexico. Washington, DC: United States International Trade Commission, pp. 139–65.
15. D. J. Cox and R. G. Harris (1992b), “North American Free Trade and its Implications for Canada: Results from a CGE Model of North American Trade,” The World Economy 15: 31–44.
16. K. Dervis, J. de Melo, and S. Robinson (1982), General Equilibrium Models for Development Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. A. K. Dixit and J. E. Stiglitz (1977), “Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity,” American Economic Review 67: 297–308.
18. R. Dornbusch, S. Fischer, and P. Samuelson (1977), Kehoe “Comparative Advantage, Trade and Payments in a Ricardian Model with a Continuum of Goods,” American EconomicReview 67: 823–29.
19. G. Fern´andez de C´ordoba and T. J. Kehoe (2000), “Capital Flows and Real Exchange RateMovements Following Spain’s Entry into the European Community,” Journal of International Economics 51: 49–78.
20. A. K. Fox (1999), “Evaluating the Success of a CGE Model of the Canada–U.S. Free Trade Agreement,” University of Michigan.
21. J. F. Francois and C. R. Shiells (Eds.) (1994), Modeling Trade Policy: Applied General Equilibrium Assessments of North American Free Trade. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. A. C. Harberger (1962), “The Incidence of the Corporate Income Tax,” Journal of Political Economy 70: 215–40.
23. R. Harris (1984),“Applied General Equilibrium Analysis of Small Open Economieswith Scale Economies and Imperfect Competition,” American Economic Review 74: 1016–32.
24. L. Johansen, (1960), AMulti-Sectoral Study of Economic Growth. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
25. T. J. Kehoe, (1992), “Modeling the Dynamic Impact of North American Free Trade,” in United States International Trade Commission, Economy-Wide Modeling of the Economic Implications of an FTA with Mexico and a NAFTA with Canada and the United States.Washington, DC: United States International Trade Commission, pp. 249–76.
26. P. J. Kehoe and T. J. Kehoe, (Eds.) (1995), Modeling North American Economic Integration. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
27. T. J. Kehoe, A. Manresa, P. J. Noyola, C. Polo, and F. Sancho (1988), “A General Equilibrium Analysis of the 1986 Tax Reform in Spain,” European Economic Review 32: 334–42.
28. T. J. Kehoe, A. Manresa, P. J. Noyola, C. Polo, F. Sancho, and J. Serra-Puche (1985), Modelosde equilibrio general aplicado (MEGA): Un an´alisis del impacto del impuesto sobre el valor a˜nadido (IVA) sobre la econom´ıa espa˜nola. Madrid: Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.
29. T. J. Kehoe, A. Manresa, P. J. Noyola, C. Polo, F. Sancho, and J. Serra-Puche (1986a), “A General Equilibrium Analysis of the Indirect Tax Reform in Spain,” Working Paper 66.86, Departament d’Economia i d’Història Econ`omica, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
30. T. J. Kehoe, A. Manresa, P. J. Noyola, C. Polo, F. Sancho, and J. Serra-Puche (1986b), “A Social Accounting System for Spain: 1980,” Working Paper 63.86, Departament d’Economia i d’Història Econòmica, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
31. T. J. Kehoe, A. Manresa, P. J. Noyola, C. Polo, F. Sancho, and J. Serra-Puche (1986c), “Pol´ıtica Econòmica i Equilibri General. Quins s´on els Efectes de l’IVA?” Revista Econòmica de Catalunya 2: 76–81.
32. T. J. Kehoe, A. Manresa, C. Polo, and F. Sancho (1988), “Una Matriz de Contabilidad Social de la Econom´ıa Espa˜nola,” Estad´ıstica Espa˜nola 30: 5–33.
33. T. J. Kehoe, A. Manresa, C. Polo, and F. Sancho (1989), “Un An´alisis de Equilibrio General de la Reforma Fiscal de 1986 en Espa˜na,” Investigaciones Econ´omicas 13: 337–85.
34. T. J. Kehoe, C. Polo, F. Sancho (1995), “An Evaluation of the Performance of an Applied General Equilibrium Model of the Spanish Economy,” Economic Theory 6: 115–41.
35. T. J. Kehoe and E. C. Prescott (2002), “Great Depressions of the 20th Century,” special issueof Review of Economic Dynamics
36. T. J. Kehoe and K. J. Ruhl (2002), “How Important is the New Goods Margin in InternationalTrade?” Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
37. P. Krugman (1979), “Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade,” Journal of International Economics 9: 469–79.
38. W. W.Leontief (1941), Input–Output Economics. New York: Oxford University Press.
39. L. McKenzie (1959), “On the Existence of General Equilibrium for a Competitive Market,” Econometrica 27: 54–71.
40. A. Nicita and M. Olarreaga (2001), “Trade and Production, 1976–1999,” The World Bank, available at www.worldbank.org/research/trade.
41. J. Romalis (2002), “NAFTA’s and CUSFTA’s Impact on North American Trade,” University of Chicago.
42. H. E. Scarf (1967), “On the Computation of Equilibrium Prices,” in W. J. Feller (Ed.), Ten Economic Studies in the Tradition of Irving Fisher. New York: Wiley, pp. 207–30.
43. C. R. Shiells and R. C. Shelburne (1992), “A Summary of ‘Industrial Effects of a Free Trade Agreement Between Mexico and the United States,’” in United States International Trade Commission, Economy-Wide Modeling of the Economic Implications of a FTAwith Mexico and a NAFTA with Canada and Mexico. Washington, DC: United StatesInternational Trade Commission, pp. 5–19.
44. J. B. Shoven and J. Whalley (1973), “General Equilibrium with Taxes: A Computational Procedure and an Existence Proof,” Review of Economic Studies 40: 475–89.
45. H. Sobarzo (1992a), “AGeneral Equilibrium Analysis of the Gains fromTrade for theMexican Economy of a North American Free Trade Agreement,” in United States InternationalTrade Commission, Economy-Wide Modeling of the Economic Implications of a FTA with Mexico and a NAFTA with Canada and Mexico. Washington, DC: United States International Trade Commission, pp. 599–653.
46. H. Sobarzo (1992b), “A General Equilibrium Analysis of the Gains from Trade for the Mexican Economy of a North American Free Trade Agreement,” The World Economy 15: 83–100.
47. H. Sobarzo (1994), “The Gains from Trade for the Mexican Economy of a North American Free Trade Agreement – An Applied General Equilibrium Assessment,” in J. F. Francois and C. R. Shiells (Eds.), Modeling Trade Policy: Applied General Equilibrium Assessments of North American Free Trade. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 83–99.
48. H. Sobarzo (1995), “A General Equilibrium Analysis of the Gains from NAFTA for the Mexican Economy,” in P. J. Kehoe and T. J. Kehoe (Eds.), Modeling North American Economic Integration. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 91–116.
49. D. Trefler (2001), “The Long and Short of the Canada–U.S. Free Trade Agreement,” University of Toronto.
50. United States International Trade Commission (1992), Economy-Wide Modeling of the Economic Implications of a FTA with Mexico and a NAFTA with Canada and Mexico. Washington, DC: United States International Trade Commission.
51. K.-M. Yi (2003), “Can Vertical Specialization Explain the Growth ofWorld Trade?” Journal of Political Economy 111: 52–102.