Modelling the health related benefits of environmental policies and their feedback effects: A CGE analysis for the EU countries with GEM-E3

Energy Journal

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 135-150

  Mayeres, Inge ^a   Van Regemorter, Denise ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38149085892     PISSN: 01956574     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol29-No1-6     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Bergman, L. and M. Hill (2000). "Productivity and Growth Effects of Acidification: A Dynamic CGE Modelling Study of Sweden." In T. Schmidt, ed., GEM-E3-ELITE, European Emission Mitigation Policy and Technological Evolution: Economic Evaluation with the GEM-E3-EG Model. Final report for DG RES.
2. Bosello, F., R. Roson and R.S.J. Tol (2006). "Economy-wide Estimates of the Implications of Climate Change: Human Health." Ecological Economics 58: 579-591.
3. Chung-Li, J. (2002). "Including the Feedback of Local Health Improvement in Assessing Costs and Benefits of GHG Reduction." Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, 14: 282-304.
4. de Mooij, R.A. (1999). Environmental Taxation and the Double Dividend. Ph.D. dissertation, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
5. ECOFYS Energy and Environment, AEA Technology Environment and National Technical University Athens (2001). "Economic Evaluation of Sectoral Emission Reduction Objectives for Climate Change." ECOFYS Energy and Environment, The Netherlands, AEA Technology Environment, U.K., National Technical University Athens, Greece.
6. ExternE (1996, 1998, 2000). "Externalities of Energy." 1996, 1998 update and 2000 update, European Commission, DG RES.
7. Freeman, A.M. (2003). The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values, Theory and Methods. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.
8. Friedrich, R. and P. Bickel (eds.)(2001). Environmental External Costs of Transport. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
9. Mayeres, I. and S. Proost (1997). "Optimal Tax and Public Investment Rules for Congestion Type of Externalities." Scandinavian Journal of Economics 99: 261-279.
10. Mayeres, I. and S. Proost (2001). "Tax Reform, Externalities and Income Distribution." Journal of Public Economics 79: 343-363.
11. Proost, S. and D. Van Regemorter (1998). "Equitable and Efficient Allocation of Air Pollution in a Federation - Confronting Partial and General Equilibrium Analysis of a Pigouvian Tax." Paper presented at the NBER workshop on Public Policy and the Environment, Boston.
12. Schwartz, J. and R. Repetto (2000). "Nonseparable Utility and the Double Dividend Debate: Reconsidering the Tax Interaction Effect." Environmental and Resource Economics 15: 149-157.
13. Williams, R.C. III (2002). "Environmental Tax Interactions when Pollution Affects Health or Productivity." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44: 261-270.
14. Williams, R.C. III (2003). "Health Effects and Optimal Environmental Taxes." Journal of Public Economics 87: 323-335.