Correction to: Enhanced effective connectivity between primary motor cortex and intraparietal sulcus in well-recovered stroke patients (Stroke (2016) 47 (482-489) DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011641);Enhanced Effective Connectivity between Primary Motor Cortex and Intraparietal Sulcus in Well-Recovered Stroke Patients

Stroke

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 482-489

  Schulz, Robert ^a   Buchholz, Anika ^a   Frey, Benedikt M ^a   Bönstrup, Marlene ^a   Cheng, Bastian ^a   Thomalla, Götz ^a   Hummel, Friedhelm C ^a   Gerloff, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

DCM; Dynamic causal modeling; Fmri; PPC; Stroke recovery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BOLD SIGNAL; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; BRAIN LEVEL; BRAIN REGION; CAUSAL MODELING; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONNECTOME; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HAND GRIP; HUMAN; INTRAPARIETAL SULCUS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARESIS; PREMOTOR CORTEX; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STROKE PATIENT; SUPPLEMENTARY MOTOR AREA; TASK POSITIVE NETWORK; VERY ELDERLY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPLICATION; CONVALESCENCE; HAND STRENGTH; IMAGE PROCESSING; MOTOR CORTEX; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NERVE TRACT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARIETAL LOBE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

AGED; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTOR CORTEX; NEURAL PATHWAYS; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; PARESIS; PARIETAL LOBE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE;

EID: 84969389448     PISSN: 00392499     EISSN: 15244628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000141     Document Type: Erratum

References (34)

1. Rehme AK, Eickhoff SB, Rottschy C, Fink GR, Grefkes C. Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of motor-related neural activity after stroke. Neuroimage. 2012;59:2771-2782. doi: 10.1016/j. neuroimage.2011.10.023.
2. Rehme AK, Grefkes C. Cerebral network disorders after stroke: evidence from imaging-based connectivity analyses of active and resting brain states in humans. J Physiol. 2013;591(pt 1):17-31. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.243469.
3. Gerloff C, Bushara K, Sailer A, Wassermann EM, Chen R, Matsuoka T, et al. Multimodal imaging of brain reorganization in motor areas of the contralesional hemisphere of well recovered patients after capsular stroke. Brain. 2006;129(pt 3):791-808. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh713.
4. Sharma N, Baron JC, Rowe JB. Motor imagery after stroke: relating outcome to motor network connectivity. Ann Neurol. 2009;66:604-616. doi: 10.1002/ana.21810.
5. Grefkes C, Nowak DA, Eickhoff SB, Dafotakis M, Küst J, Karbe H, et al. Cortical connectivity after subcortical stroke assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol. 2008;63:236-246. doi: 10.1002/ana.21228.
6. Rehme AK, Eickhoff SB, Wang LE, Fink GR, Grefkes C. Dynamic causal modeling of cortical activity from the acute to the chronic stage after stroke. Neuroimage. 2011;55:1147-1158. doi: 10.1016/j. neuroimage.2011.01.014.
7. Vingerhoets G. Contribution of the posterior parietal cortex in reaching, grasping, and using objects and tools. Front Psychol. 2014;5:151. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00151.
8. Schulz R, Koch P, Zimerman M, Wessel M, Bönstrup M, Thomalla G, et al. Parietofrontal motor pathways and their association with motor function after stroke. Brain. 2015;138(pt 7):1949-1960. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv100.
9. Inman CS, James GA, Hamann S, Rajendra JK, Pagnoni G, Butler AJ. Altered resting-state effective connectivity of fronto-parietal motor control systems on the primary motor network following stroke. Neuroimage. 2012;59:227-237. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.083.
10. Park CH, Chang WH, Ohn SH, Kim ST, Bang OY, Pascual-Leone A, et al. Longitudinal changes of resting-state functional connectivity during motor recovery after stroke. Stroke. 2011;42:1357-1362. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.596155.
11. Wang L, Yu C, Chen H, Qin W, He Y, Fan F, et al. Dynamic functional reorganization of the motor execution network after stroke. Brain. 2010;133(pt 4):1224-1238. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq043.
12. Friston KJ, Fletcher P, Josephs O, Holmes A, Rugg MD, Turner R. Event-related fMRI: characterizing differential responses. Neuroimage. 1998;7:30-40. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1997.0306.
13. Bönstrup M, Schulz R, Feldheim J, Hummel FC, Gerloff C. Dynamic causal modelling of EEG and fMRI to characterize network architectures in a simple motor task. Neuroimage. 2016;124(pt A):498-508. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.052.
14. Friston KJ, Harrison L, Penny W. Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage. 2003;19:1273-1302.
15. Solodkin A, Hlustik P, Chen EE, Small SL. Fine modulation in network activation during motor execution and motor imagery. Cereb Cortex. 2004;14:1246-1255. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhh086.
16. Boudrias MH, Goncąlves CS, Penny WD, Park CH, Rossiter HE, Talelli P, et al. Age-related changes in causal interactions between cortical motor regions during hand grip. Neuroimage. 2012;59:3398-3405. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.025.
17. Penny WD, Stephan KE, Daunizeau J, Rosa MJ, Friston KJ, Schofield TM, et al. Comparing families of dynamic causal models. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010;6:e1000709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000709.
18. Penny WD, Stephan KE, Mechelli A, Friston KJ. Comparing dynamic causal models. Neuroimage. 2004;22:1157-1172. doi: 10.1016/j. neuroimage.2004.03.026.
19. Stephan KE, Penny WD, Daunizeau J, Moran RJ, Friston KJ. Bayesian model selection for group studies. Neuroimage. 2009;46:1004-1017. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.025.
20. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1995;57:289-300.
21. Ward NS, Brown MM, Thompson AJ, Frackowiak RS. Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study. Brain. 2003;126(pt 11):2476-2496. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg245.
22. Davare M, Kraskov A, Rothwell JC, Lemon RN. Interactions between areas of the cortical grasping network. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011;21:565-570. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2011.05.021.
23. Davare M, Andres M, Clerget E, Thonnard JL, Olivier E. Temporal dissociation between hand shaping and grip force scaling in the anterior intraparietal area. J Neurosci. 2007;27:3974-3980. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0426-07.2007.
24. Konen CS, Mruczek RE, Montoya JL, Kastner S. Functional organization of human posterior parietal cortex: grasping-and reaching-related activations relative to topographically organized cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2013;109:2897-2908. doi: 10.1152/jn.00657.2012.
25. Grefkes C, Ritzl A, Zilles K, Fink GR. Human medial intraparietal cortex subserves visuomotor coordinate transformation. Neuroimage. 2004;23:1494-1506. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.08.031.
26. Simon O, Mangin JF, Cohen L, Le Bihan D, Dehaene S. Topographical layout of hand, eye, calculation, and language-related areas in the human parietal lobe. Neuron. 2002;33:475-487.
27. Dafotakis M, Sparing R, Eickhoff SB, Fink GR, Nowak DA. On the role of the ventral premotor cortex and anterior intraparietal area for predictive and reactive scaling of grip force. Brain Res. 2008;1228:73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.06.027.
28. Haller S, Chapuis D, Gassert R, Burdet E, Klarhöfer M. Supplementary motor area and anterior intraparietal area integrate fine-graded timing and force control during precision grip. Eur J Neurosci. 2009;30:2401-2406. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.07003.x.
29. Keisker B, Hepp-Reymond MC, Blickenstorfer A, Meyer M, Kollias SS. Differential force scaling of fine-graded power grip force in the sensorimotor network. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009;30:2453-2465. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20676.
30. Noble JW, Eng JJ, Boyd LA. Effect of visual feedback on brain activation during motor tasks: an FMRI study. Motor Control. 2013;17:298-312.
31. Ward NS, Newton JM, Swayne OB, Lee L, Thompson AJ, Greenwood RJ, et al. Motor system activation after subcortical stroke depends on corticospinal system integrity. Brain. 2006;129(pt 3):809-819. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl002.
32. Lotze M. The role of multiple contralesional motor areas for complex hand movements after internal capsular lesion. J Neurosci. 2006;26:6096-6102.
33. Grefkes C, Fink GR. The functional organization of the intraparietal sulcus in humans and monkeys. J Anat. 2005;207:3-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00426.x.
34. Corbetta M, Shulman GL. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:201-215. doi: 10.1038/nrn755.