Understanding the Role of Learners With Low English Language Proficiency in Peer Feedback of Second Language Writing

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 483-494

  Yu, Shulin ^a   Lee, Icy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MACAU   (Macao)

^b CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84968830609     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tesq.301     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Allen, D., & Mills, A. (2014). The impact of second language proficiency in dyadic peer feedback. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1362168814561902
2. Hu, G. (2005). Using peer review with Chinese ESL student writers. Language Teaching Research, 9, 321-342. doi:10.1191/1362168805lr169oa
3. Hu, G., & Lam, S. T. E. (2010). Issues of cultural appropriateness and pedagogical efficacy: Exploring peer review in a second language writing class. Instructional Science, 38, 371-394. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9086-1
4. Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (Eds.). (2006). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
5. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1994). New circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom and school. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
6. Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 30-43. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002
7. McGroarty, M., & Zhu, W. (1997). Triangulation in classroom research: A study of peer revision. Language Learning, 47(1), 1-43. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.11997001
8. Mendonça, C., & Johnson, K. (1994). Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 745-769. doi:10.2307/3587558
9. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
10. Min, H. T. (2006). The effects of training peer review on EFL students' revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 118-141. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003
11. Rahimi, M. (2013). Is training students reviewers worth its while? A study of how training influences the quality of students' feedback and writing. Language Teaching Research, 17, 67-89. doi:10.1177/1362168812459151
12. Suzuki, M. (2008). Japanese learners' self-revisions and peer revisions of their written compositions in English. TESOL Quarterly, 2, 209-233. doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00116.x
13. Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179-200. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004
14. Yu, S. (2015). What factors shape the collaborative pattern of group interaction during peer feedback in the L2 writing classroom? Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28, 618-640. doi:10.1075/resla.28.2.10yu
15. Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2014). An analysis of EFL students' use of first language in peer feedback of L2 writing. System, 47, 28-38. doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.08.007
16. Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2015). Understanding EFL students' participation in group peer feedback of L2 writing: A case study from an activity theory perspective. Language Teaching Research, 19, 572-593. doi:10.1177/1362168814541714
17. Zhao, H. (2010). Investigating learners' use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom. Assessing Writing, 15, 3-17. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.002
18. Zhao, H. (2014). Investigating teacher-supported peer assessment for EFL writing. ELT Journal, 68, 155-168. doi:10.1093/elt/cct068