Public science, private interests: Culture and commerce in Canada’s networks of centres of excellence

Public Science, Private Interests: Culture and Commerce in Canada's Networks of Centres of Excellence

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 231-252

  Atkinson Grosjean, Janet ^a,b  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84967153274     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (299)

1. Agre, Philip E. (1999). ‘Visible colleges: infrastructure and institutional change in the networked university.’ Department of Information Studies, UCLA. Draft paper dated 12 May. Accessed at http://dlis.gseis.ucla.edu/pagre/.
2. Amin, Ash, and Nigel Thrift (1994). ‘Living in the global.’ In Ash Amin and Nigel Thrift, eds, Globalization, Institutions, and Regional Development in Europe, 1-22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Anderson, Benedict (1983). Imagined Communities. London: Verso.
4. Arendt, Hannah (1959). The Human Condition. New York: Doubleday/Anchor.
5. Arrow, Kenneth (1962). ‘Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention.’ In Richard R. Nelson, ed., The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activities, 609-25. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6. Atkinson-Grosjean, Janet (1997). ‘Science wars: beyond the social text hoax.’ In C21: The World of Research at Columbia University, Special Section: The Sciences and the Humanities. New York: Columbia University Press.
7. Atkinson-Grosjean, Janet (1999a). ‘Excellence, networks, and the pursuit of profit: academic science and public policy in Canada.’ Conference paper. San Diego (October): Society for the Social Studies of Science Conference.
8. Atkinson-Grosjean, Janet (1999b). ‘Mapping the commercialization of university research in Canada.’ Conference paper. Université de Sherbrooke (June): Congress of the Humanities and Social Sciences Federation of Canada.
9. Atkinson-Grosjean, Janet (1999c). ‘Profits and loss: collaborations and commercialization at the public/private divide.’ Conference paper. Reorganizing Knowledge: Transforming Institutions Knowing, Knowledge and the University in the XXI Century. University of Massachusetts at Amherst (September).
10. Atkinson-Grosjean, Janet (2000a). '"Adventures in the nature of trade": network science, Russian dolls, and a grand dichotomy.' Conference paper. Demarcation Socialized: Or, How Can We Recognize Science When We See It? Cardiff University, Wales, August 2000.
11. Atkinson-Grosjean, Janet (2000b). ‘CGDN and the NCE experiment: academic science at the public/private divide.’ Conference presentation and poster presented at the Annual Scientific Meeting, Canadian Genetic Diseases Network, Vancouver, March.
12. Atkinson-Grosjean, Janet (2001). ‘Adventures in the nature of trade: the quest for "relevance" and "excellence" in Canadian science.’ PhD diss., University of British Columbia. November.
13. Atkinson-Grosjean, Janet (2002). ‘Science and technology policy and university research: comparing Canada and the United States, 1979 to 1999.’ International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management 2 (2): 102-24.
14. Atkinson-Grosjean, Janet (2003a). ‘Canadian science at the public/private divide.’ Journal of Canadian Studies, Special issue: Science and politics in Canada, 37 (3).
15. Atkinson-Grosjean, Janet (2003b). ‘Politics, economics, ethics, and science: a study of Canadian genome scientists and funding organizations.’ Invited presentation. Genomics Forum: Celebrating 50 Years of DNA Research. University of British Columbia and Genome British Columbia. 26 March.
16. Atkinson-Grosjean, Janet, and Donald Fisher (1999). ‘Brokers on the boundary: academy/industry liaison in Canadian universities.’ Conference paper. Society for the Social Studies of Science. San Diego, October.
17. Atkinson-Grosjean, Janet, and Garnet Grosjean (2000). ‘The use of performance models in higher education: a comparative international review.’ Education Policy Analysis Archives 8 (30), June: Accessed at http://olam.ed.asu.edu/epaa/v8n30.html.
18. Atkinson-Grosjean, Janet, Dawn House, and Donald Fisher (2001). ‘Canadian science policy and public research organizations in the 20th century.’ Science Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal for Science and Technology Studies 14 (1): 3-25.
19. AUTM (Association of University Technology Managers) (1998). AUTM Licensing Survey, Fiscal Year 1997. Annual Survey of Member Institutions. Association of University Technology Managers, Inc. AUTM Licensing Survey.
20. Babbitt, J.D. (1965). ‘Introduction.’ In J.D. Babbitt, ed., Science in Canada. Selections from the Speeches of E.W.R. Steacie. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
21. Baird, Patricia A. (2000). ‘A genetic revolution in health and health care: policy challenges posed by new reproductive and genetic technologies.’ Plenary paper: Science, Truth and Justice. CIAJ/ICAJ (Canadian Institute for the Administraton of Justice), Victoria, BC. October.
22. Baird, Patricia A. (2003). ‘Getting it right: industry sponsorship and medical research.’ Canadian Medical Association Journal 168 (10): 1267-9. 13 May.
23. Barry, Andrew, Thomas Osborne, and Nikolas Rose, eds (1996). Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and Rationalities of Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Becker, Howard S. (1982). Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25. BIO (Biotechnology Industry Organization) (1989). What Is Biotechnology? Washington, DC: Biotechnology Industry Organization.
26. Birdsell, J., J. Atkinson-Grosjean, and R. Landry (2002). Knowledge Translation in Two New Programs: Achieving ‘the Pasteur Effect.’ Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
27. Blumenthal, D., N. Causino, E.G. Campbell, and K. Seashore Louis (1996). ‘Relationships between academic institutions and industry in the life sciences - an industry survey.’ New England Journal of Medicine 334: 368-73.
28. Blumenthal, D., E.G. Campbell, M.S. Anderson, et al. (1997). ‘Withholding research results in academic life science: evidence from a national survey of faculty.’ Journal of the American Medical Association 277 (16 April): 1224-8.
29. Bobbio, N. (1989). ‘The great dichotomy: public/private.’ In N. Bobbio, Democracy and Dictatorship: The Nature and Limit of State Power. Trans. Peter Kennedy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Bourdieu, P. (1975). ‘The specificity of the scientific field and the conditions of the progress of reason.’ Social Science Information 14 (6):19-47.
31. Bowe, Geoffrey S. (1999). ‘Nature and value - some historical and contemporary reflections.’ Paper published in Biopolitics International Organization conference proceedings, vol. 7, Biopolitics: The Bioenvironment, Budapest, 18-19 September 1998. Athens: Biopolitics International Organization.
32. Boyle, James (1996). Shamans, Software and Spleens: Law and the Construction of the Information Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Branscomb, Lewis, Gerald Holton, and Gerhard Sonnert (2000). ‘Science for society: cutting-edge basic research in the service of public objectives. A blueprint for an intellectually bold and socially beneficial science policy.’ Conference report and consensus document. Conference on Basic Research in the Service of Public Objectives, Washington, DC, November. New York: Columbia University, Center for Science, Policy and Outcomes.
34. Branscomb, Lewis M., Fumio Kodama, and Richard Florida, eds (1999). Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Buchbinder, H. (1993). ‘The market oriented university and the changing role of knowledge.’ Higher Education 26: 331-47.
36. Burchell, Graham, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller, eds (1991). The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. Bush, Vannevar (1945). Science: The Endless Frontier. Reprinted 1990. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
38. Callon, Michel (1986). ‘Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of San Brieuc bay.’ In John Law, ed., Power, Action, Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
39. Callon, Michel (1994). ‘Is science a public good?’ Science, Technology, and Human Values 19 (4) (Autumn): 395-424.
40. Callon, Michel (1997). ‘Actor-network theory: the market test.’ Paper presented in absentia. Actor-Network and After. Keele University, U.K., July.
41. Callon, Michel (1998). ‘An essay on framing and overflowing: economic externalities revisited by sociology.’ In Michel Callon, ed., The Laws of the Markets, 244-69. Oxford: Blackwell.
42. Callon, Michel (1999). ‘How concerned groups might be affected by their participation in scientific arenas: some lessons from the study of an association of patients.’ Presidential plenary: The Participation of Lay People in the Production and Dissemination of Knowledge. Society for the Social Studies of Science (4S). San Diego, 27 October - 2 November.
43. Callon, Michel (2002). ‘From science as an economic activity to socio-economics of scientific research: the dynamics of emergent and consolidated technoeconomic networks.’ In Philip Mirowski and Esther-Mirjam Sent, eds, Science Bought and Sold: The Need for a New Economics of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44. Callon, Michel, ed. (1998). The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell.
45. Callon, Michel, and Bruno Latour (1981). ‘Unscrewing the big Leviathan: how actors macrostructure reality and how sociologists help them to do so.’ In Karin D. Knorr-Cetina and Aaron V. Cicourel, eds, Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Towards an Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociologies. Boston: Routledge.
46. Cambrosio, Alberto, and Peter Keating (1998). ‘Monoclonal antibodies: from local to extended networks.’ In Arnold Thackray, ed., Private Science: Biotechnology and the Rise of the Molecular Sciences, 165-81. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
47. Cambrosio, Alberto, Camille Limoges, and Denyse Pronovost (1990). ‘Representing biotechnology: an ethnography of Quebec science policy.’ Social Studies of Science 20: 195-227.
48. Castells, Manuel (1996). The Rise of Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
49. CGDN-AR (1990-2001). Annual reports and financial statements of the Canadian Genetic Diseases Network. Vancouver: CGDN Archive.
50. CGDN-ASM (1991-2000). Annual scientific meetings: agendas and programs, Canadian Genetic Diseases Network. Vancouver: CGDN Archive.
51. CFDN-EP (1992). Report of the Expert Panel on the Canadian Genetic Diseases Network. Ottawa: Networks of Centres of Excellence Secretariat (accessed through CGDN Archive).
52. CGDN-EP (1993). Report of the Expert Panel on the Canadian Genetic Diseases Network. Ottawa: Networks of Centres of Excellence Secretariat (accessed through CGDN Archive).
53. CGDN-EP (1997). Report of the Expert Panel on the Canadian Genetic Diseases Network. Ottawa: Networks of Centres of Excellence Secretariat (accessed through CGDN Archive).
54. CGDN-FP (1988). Funding Proposal, Phase I, Canadian Genetic Diseases Network. Vancouver: CGDN Archive.
55. CGDN-FP (1993). Funding Proposal, Phase II, Canadian Genetic Diseases Network. Vancouver: CGDN Archive.
56. CGDN-FP (1997). Funding Proposal, Phase III, Canadian Genetic Diseases Network. Vancouver: CGDN Archive.
57. CGDN-FP (2001). Funding Proposal, Phase III, Mid-term Review, Canadian Genetic Diseases Network. Vancouver: CGDN Archive.
58. CGDN-NA (1994). Network Agreement, Phase II, Canadian Genetic Diseases Network. Vancouver: CGDN Archive.
59. CGDN-NA (1998). Network Agreement, Phase III, Canadian Genetic Diseases Network. Vancouver: CGDN Archive.
60. CGDN-SCAN (1990-2000). ‘Scan’ network newsletters, published sporadically. Canadian Genetic Diseases Network. Vancouver: CGDN Archive.
61. CGDN-SR (1994-2000). Annual statistical reports for Canadian Genetic Diseases Network, compiled for NCE Secretariat, Phases I and II. (No report prepared for 1996.) Vancouver: CGDN Archive.
62. CGDN-TR (1994). Transition Report: Phase I to Phase II, Canadian Genetic Diseases Network. Vancouver: CGDN Archive.
63. Childs, Barton (1999). ‘Personal reflections on the history of medical genetics in the U.S.’ Lecture in the series Human Genetics Past and Present, III. New York Academy of Medicine, 21 April.
64. Clark, Howard C. (1998). Formal Knowledge Networks: A Study of Canadian Experiences. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.
65. Cohen, M., J.G. March, and J. Olsen (1972). ‘A garbage can model of organizational choice.’ Administrative Science Quarterly 17: 1-25.
66. Cohen, Wesley M., R. Florida, L. Randazzesa, et al. (1998). ‘Industry and the academy: uneasy partners in the cause of technological advance.’ In Roger G. Noll, ed., Challenges to Research Universities, 171-99. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
67. Cohen, Wesley M., Richard R. Nelson, and John Walsh (1996). Links and Impacts: New Survey Results on the Impact of University Research on Industrial R&D. Pittsburgh: Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University.
68. Collins, H.M. (1999). ‘Tantalus and the aliens.’ Social Studies of Science 29: 163-97.
69. Collins, H.M. (2000). ‘Certainty and expertise in public domain science.’ President’s Lecture, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC. 14 September.
70. Collins, H.M., and Robert Evans (2002). ‘The third wave of science studies.’ Social Studies of Science 32: 235-96.
71. Condit, C. (2001). ‘What is "public opinion" about genetics?’ Nature Reviews: Genetics 2001 2: 811-15.
72. Crane, Diane (1972). Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
73. Dalpé, Robert, Louis Bédard, and Marie-Pierre Ippersiel (2001). ‘Interaction between science and technology in biotechnology - the case of photodynamic therapy.’ Paper presented at Second Collaboration in Science and Technology (COLLNET) Conference. New Delhi, India. February.
74. Dalpé, Robert, and Marie-Pierre Ippersiel (2000). ‘Public research organizations in the knowledge infrastructure.’ In J. Adam Holbrook and David A. Wolfe, eds, Innovations, Institutions, and Territory: Regional Innovation Systems in Canada, 67-92. Innovation Systems Research Series. Kingston, ON: School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University.
75. Dasgupta, P., and P. David (1994). ‘Towards a new economics of science.’ Research Policy 23: 487-522.
76. David, Paul A. (1995). ‘Science reorganized? Postmodern visions and the curse of success.’ Revised text version of speech. International Symposium on Measuring the Impact of R&D. Ottawa, 13-15 September.
77. David, Paul A. (1998a). ‘Common agency contracting and the emergence of "open science" institutions.’ American Economic Review 88 (2): 15-21.
78. David, Paul A. (1998b). ‘Communication norms and the collective cognitive performance of "invisible colleges."’ In G. Barba Navaretti, P. Dasgupta, K.-G. Maler, and D. Siniscalco, eds, Creation and Transfer of Knowledge: Institutions and Incentives, 115-66. Berlin: Springer.
79. David, Paul A. (2000). ‘A tragedy of the public knowledge "commons"? Global science, intellectual property, and the digital technology boomerang.’ Electronic Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (Intellectual Property Research Centre, Oxford University). June.
80. Dufour, P., and J. de la Mothe (1993). ‘The historical conditioning of S&T.’ In P. Dufour and J. de la Mothe, eds, Science and Technology in Canada. London: Longman.
81. Eamon, William (1985). ‘From the secrets of nature to public knowledge: the origins of the concept of openness in science.’ Minerva: Review of Science, Learning, Policy 23 (3) (Autumn): 321-47.
82. Epstein, Steve (1999). ‘New social movements and trends in the politics of knowledge production.’ Presidential plenary: The Participation of Lay People in the Production and Dissemination of Knowledge. Society for the Social Studies of Science (4S). San Diego, CA, 27 October - 2 November.
83. Ericson, Richard V., and Kevin D. Haggerty (1997). Policing the Risk Society. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
84. Etzkowitz, Henry (1997). ‘The entrepreneurial university and the emergence of democratic corporatism.’ In H. Etzkowitz and L. Leydesdorff, eds, Universities in the Global Knowledge Economy, 141-52. London: Cassell.
85. Etzkowitz, Henry, and Loet Leydesdorff (1997). ‘Introduction.’ In H. Etzkowitz and L. Leydesdorff, eds, Universities in the Global Knowledge Economy, 3-8. London: Cassell.
86. Etzkowitz, Henry, Andrew Webster, and Peter Healey, eds (1998). Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia. New York: SUNY Press.
87. Etzkowitz, H., E. Schuler, and M. Gulbrandsen (2000). ‘The evolution of the entrepreneurial university.’ In M. Jacob and T. Hellstrom, eds, The Future of Knowledge Production in the Academy, 40-60. Buckingham: Open University Press.
88. Finnemore, Martha (1992). ‘Science, the state, and international society.’ PhD diss. Stanford University.
89. Finnemore, Martha (1993). ‘International organizations as teachers of norms: the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization and science policy.’ International Organization 47 (4) (Autumn): 565-97.
90. Fisher, Donald, and Janet Atkinson-Grosjean (2002). ‘Brokers on the boundary: academy-industry liaison in Canadian universities.’ Higher Education 44 (3-4): 449-67.
91. Fisher, Donald, Janet Atkinson-Grosjean, and Dawn House (2001). ‘Changes in academy/industry/state relations in Canada: the creation and development of the Networks of Centres of Excellence.’ Minerva: A Review of Science and Policy 39: 299-325.
92. Fleck, Ludwik (1979). Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Foreword by Thomas S. Kuhn; ed. Thaddeus J. Trenn and Robert K. Merton; trans. Fred Bradley and Thaddeus J. Trenn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
93. Florida, Richard, and Wesley Cohen (1999). ‘Engine or infrastructure? The university role in economic development.’ In Lewis M. Branscomb, Fumio Kodama, and Richard Florida, eds, Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
94. Foucault, Michel (1991 [1978]). ‘Governmentality.’ In Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller, eds, The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, 87-104. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
95. Fraser, N. (1997). ‘Rethinking the public sphere.’ In N. Fraser, Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the ‘Postsocialist’ Condition, 69-98. New York: Routledge.
96. Friedman, Robert S., and Renee C. Friedman (1990). ‘The Canadian universities and the promotion of economic development.’ Minerva 28 (3) (Autumn): 272-93.
97. Fujimura, J.H. (1987). ‘Constructing "do-able" problems in cancer research: articulating alignment.’ Social Studies of Science 17: 257-93.
98. Fujimura, J.H. (1992). ‘Crafting science: standardized packages, boundary objects and translation.’ In Andrew Pickering, ed., Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
99. Fuller, S. (1992). Social Epistemology. London: Routledge.
100. Fuller, S. (2000). ‘Foreword.’ In Merle Jacob and Tomas Hellstrom, eds, The Future of Knowledge Production in the Academy. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
101. Geiger, Roger L. (1988). ‘Milking the sacred cow: research and the quest for useful knowledge in the American university since 1920.’ Science, Technology, and Human Values 13 (3 and 4) (Summer and Autumn): 332-48.
102. Geiger, Roger L. (1990). ‘The American university and research.’ In The Academic Research Enterprise within the Industrialized Nations: Comparative Perspectives. Report of a Symposium of the Government-University-Industry Roundtable. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 15-35.
103. Gibbons, M. (1998). ‘Higher education relevance in the 21st century.’ Paper prepared for UNESCO World Conference on Higher Education, Paris, 5-9 October 1998. Published by Secretary General, Association of Commonwealth Universities, supported by the World Bank.
104. Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott, and Martin Trow (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. San Francisco: Sage.
105. Gieryn, Thomas F. (1995). ‘Boundaries of science.’ In S. Jasanoff, G.E. Markle, J.C. Peterson, and T. Pinch, eds, Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. London: Sage.
106. Gieryn, Thomas F. (1999a). Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
107. Gieryn, Thomas F. (1999b). ‘Truth-spots: the architectural emplacements of diverse verities.’ Presentation in a lecture series. Scientific Ethos: Authority, Authorship and Trust in the Sciences. St John’s College, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 18 November.
108. Gilbert, Nigel, and Michael Mulkay (1984). Opening Pandora’s Box. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
109. Glaser, B. (1963). ‘The local-cosmopolitan scientist.’ American Journal of Sociology 69: 249-59.
110. Glasner, P. (2000). ‘Policy issues in genome research.’ Conference paper presented at Demarcation Socialised: Or, How Can We Recognize Science When We See It? Cardiff, U.K., 24-8 August.
111. Glasner, P., and H. Rothman (1999). ‘Does familiarity breed concern? Bench scientists and the human genome mapping project.’ Science and Public Policy 26: 313-24.
112. Glassco Commission (1962-3). Report of the Royal Commission on Government Organization. 5 vols. Ottawa: Queen’s Printer.
113. Godin, Benoit (2000-1). Outline for a History of Science Measurement. Paper № 1. Project on the history and sociology of science and technology statistics. Montreal: Observatoire des sciences et des technologies, UQAM, 33 pages.
114. Godin, Benoit (2000-3). Measuring Science: Is There ‘Basic Research’ Without Statistics? Paper № 3. Project on the history and sociology of science and technology statistics. Montreal: Observatoire des sciences et des technologies, UQAM, 29 pages.
115. Godin, Benoit (2001-6). The Disappearance of Statistics on Basic Research in Canada: A Note. Paper № 6. Project on the history and sociology of science and technology statistics. Montreal: Observatoire des sciences et des technologies, UQAM, 30 pages.
116. Godin, Benoit (2001-7). Defining R&D: Is Research Always Systematic? Paper № 7. Project on the history and sociology of science and technology statistics. Montreal: Observatoire des sciences et des technologies, UQAM, 17 pages.
117. Goldman, Alan H. (1989). ‘Ethical issues in proprietary restrictions on research results.’ In Vivian Weil and John W. Snapper, eds, Owning Scientific and Technical Information: Value and Ethical Issues, 69-82. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
118. Goldstein, Judith, and Robert O. Keohane (1994). ‘Ideas and foreign policy: an analytical framework.’ In Judith Goldstein and Robert O. Keohane, eds, Ideas and Foreign Policy, 3-30. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
119. Goodman, Dena (1992). ‘Public sphere and private life: towards a synthesis of current historiographical approaches to the old regime.’ History and Theory 31 (1): 1-20.
120. Gordon, C. (1991). ‘Governmental rationality: an introduction.’ In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, eds, The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, 1-52. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
121. Gouldner, A. (1957-8). ‘Cosmopolitans and locals: toward an analysis of latent social roles.’ Administrative Science Quarterly Part I (3): 1957; Part 2 (4): 1958.
122. Granovetter, Mark (1973). ‘The strength of weak ties.’ American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360-80.
123. Granovetter, Mark (1985). ‘Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness.’ American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481-510.
124. Grosjean, G., J. Atkinson-Grosjean, K. Rubenson, and D. Fisher (2000). ‘Measuring the unmeasurable: paradoxes of accountability and the impacts of performance indicators on liberal education in Canada.’ Second in a series of four studies prepared for the Humanities and Social Sciences Federation of Canada. June. Accessed at http://www.hssfc.ca/ResearchProj/PerfInd/FinalReportEng.html.
125. Guston, David H. (2000a). Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
126. Guston, David H. (2000b). ‘Retiring the social contract for science.’ Science, Technology, and Human Values 16 (4) (Summer): 32-7.
127. Guston, David H., and Kenneth Kenniston (1994). ‘Introduction: the social contract for science.’ In David H. Guston and Kenneth Kenniston, eds, The Fragile Contract: University Science and the Federal Government, 1-41. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
128. Haas, Peter (1992). ‘Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination.’ International Organization 46 (1) (Winter): 1-35.
129. Habermas, Jurgen (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Trans. Thomas Burger with Frederick Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
130. Hackett, E.J. (1990). ‘Science as a vocation in the 1990s: the organizational culture of academic science.’ Journal of Higher Education (May-June): 241-79.
131. Hacking, Ian (1983). Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
132. Hacking, Ian (1990). The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
133. Haraway, Donna (1999). ‘For the love of a good dog.’ Presidential plenary: The Participation of Lay People in the Production and Dissemination of Knowledge. Society for the Social Studies of Science (4S). San Diego, 27 October -2 November.
134. Harris, J. (1998). ‘Performance models.’ Public Productivity and Management Review 22 (2) (December): 135-40.
135. Hayes, R. (1973). The Chaining of Prometheus: Evolution of a Power Structure for Canadian Science. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
136. Heller, Michael A., and Rebecca S. Eisenberg (1998). ‘Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research.’ Science 280 (5364) (1 May): 698-701.
137. Henderson, Mark (2001). ‘Life sciences commercialization initiative seeks to capture benefits of Canada’s growing research base.’ Re$earch Money 4 April.
138. Hertzman, Clyde (1999). ‘Population health.’ Seminar presentation. Interdisciplinary Studies Graduate Program. Green College, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 3 March.
139. Holbrook, J. Adam, and David A. Wolfe, eds (2000). Innovations, Institutions, and Territory: Regional Innovation Systems in Canada. The Innovation Systems Research Series. Kingston, ON: School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University.
140. Holton, Gerald, and Gerhard Sonnert (1999). ‘A vision of Jeffersonian science.’ Issues in Science and Technology 16 (1). www.issues.org/issues/16.1/holton.htm.
141. Hood, C. (1991). ‘A public management for all seasons?’ Public Administration 69 (Spring): 3-19.
142. Hood, C. (1995). ‘The "new public management" in the 1980s: variations on a theme.’ Accounting, Organizations and Society 20 (2/3): 93-109.
143. Hoskin, K.W. (1993). ‘Accounting as discipline: the overlooked supplement.’ In E. Messer-Davidov, D.R. Shumway, and D.J. Sylvan, eds, Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity, 25-53. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
144. House Committee on Science (1998). Unlocking Our Future: Toward a New National Science Policy, A Report to Congress, September 24. Washington, DC: U.S. Government.
145. Huff, Toby (1997). ‘Science and the public sphere: comparative institutional development in Islam and the west.’ Social Epistemology 11 (1): 25-37.
146. Huxley, Julian (1934). Scientific Research and Social Needs. London: Watts.
147. Industry Canada (1996). Science and Technology for the New Century: A Federal Strategy. Ottawa: Government of Canada.
148. Irwin, Alan (2001). ‘Constructing the scientific citizen: science and democracy in the biosciences.’ Public Understanding of Science 10: 1-18.
149. Jackson, Myles W. (2000). Spectrum of Belief: Joseph von Fraunhofer and the Craft of Precision Optics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
150. Jacob, Merle (2000). '"Mode 2" in context: the contract researcher, the university and the knowledge society.' In Merle Jacob and Tomas Hellstrom, eds, The Future of Knowledge Production in the Academy, 11-27. Buckingham: Open University Press.
151. Jacob, Merle, and Tomas Hellstrom, eds (2000). The Future of Knowledge Production in the Academy. Buckingham: Open University Press.
152. Kaghan, William N. (1998). ‘Court and spark: studies in professional university technology transfer management.’ PhD diss., University of Washington, Seattle.
153. Keating, Peter, and Alberto Cambrosio (2000). ‘Biomedical platforms.’ Configurations 8: 337-87.
154. Keating, Peter, and Alberto Cambrosio (2003). Biomedical Platforms: Reproducing the Normal and the Pathological in Late 20th Century Medicine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
155. Keller, Evelyn Fox (1995). Refiguring Life: Metaphors of Twentieth-Century Biology. New York: Columbia University Press.
156. Keller, Evelyn Fox (2000). ‘Theory and practice in contemporary biology: epistemological cultures in science.’ St John’s College Speakers Series, University of British Columbia, Vancouver. Scientific Ethos: Authority, Authorship, and Trust in the Sciences, 16 March.
157. Kerr, A., S. Cunningham-Burley, and A. Amos (1997). ‘The new genetics: professionals’ discursive boundaries.’ Public Understanding of Science 4: 243-53.
158. Kerr, A., S. Cunningham-Burley, and A. Amos (1998a). ‘Eugenics and the new genetics in Britain: examining contemporary professionals’ accounts.’ Science, Technology, and Human Values 23 (3) (Summer): 175-98.
159. Kerr, A., S. Cunningam-Burley, and A. Amos (1998b). ‘The new genetics and health: mobilizing lay expertise.’ Public Understanding of Science 7: 41-60.
160. Kleinman, Daniel Lee (1991). ‘Conceptualizing the politics of science: a response to Cambrosio, Limoges, and Pronovost.’ Social Studies of Science 21: 769-74.
161. Kleinman, Daniel Lee (1998). ‘Untangling context: understanding a university laboratory in the commercial world.’ Science, Technology, and Human Values 23 (3) (Summer): 285-314.
162. Kline, Ronald (1995). ‘Construing "technology" as "applied science." Public rhetoric of scientists and engineers in the United States, 1880-1945.’ Isis 86: 194-221.
163. Knorr-Cetina, Karin (1995). ‘Laboratory studies: the cultural approach.’ In S. Jasanoff, G.E. Markle, J.C. Peterson, and T. Pinch, eds, Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 140-65. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
164. Knorr-Cetina, Karin (1999). Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
165. Knorr-Cetina, Karin, and Michael Mulkay (1983). ‘Introduction: emerging principles in social studies of science.’ In Karin D. Knorr-Cetina and Michael Mulkay, eds, Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science, 1-17. London: Sage.
166. Koertge, N. (1998). Houses Built on Sand: Flaws in the Cultural Studies Account of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
167. Kohler, Robert E. (1998). ‘Moral economy, material culture and community in drosophila genetics.’ In Mario Biagioli, ed., The Science Studies Reader, 243-57. New York: Routledge.
168. Lamontagne Committee (1968-77). A Science Policy for Canada. Report of the Senate Special Committee on Science Policy. 3 vols. Ottawa: Queen’s Printer.
169. Lanzara, Giovan Francesco (1983). ‘Ephemeral organizations in extreme environments: emergence, strategy, extinction.’ Journal of Management Studies 20 (1) (January): 71-95.
170. Lash, S., and J. Urry (1994). Economies of Signs and Spaces. London: Sage.
171. Latour, Bruno (1986). ‘The powers of association.’ In John Law, ed., Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, 264-80. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
172. Latour, Bruno (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
173. Latour, Bruno (1988). The Pasteurization of France, with ‘Irreductions.’ Trans. Alan Sheridan and John Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
174. Latour, Bruno (1992). ‘Where are the missing masses? Sociology of a few mundane artefacts.’ In W. Bijker and J. Law, eds, Shaping Technology, Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, 225-58. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
175. Latour, Bruno (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
176. Latour, Bruno (1998). ‘From the world of science to the world of research?’ Science 280 (5361) (10 April): 208-9.
177. Latour, Bruno, and S. Woolgar (1986). Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Reprint of 1979 edition, Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, with a new introduction and postscript, and retitled to exclude ‘social.’ Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
178. Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
179. Law, John (1992). ‘Notes on the theory of the actor-network: ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity.’ Systems Practice 5 (4): 379-93.
180. Law, John, and J. Hassard, eds (1999). Actor Network Theory and After. Sociological Review Monographs. Oxford: Blackwell.
181. Lawrence, Peter A., and Michael Locke (1997). ‘Editorial.’ Nature (24 April): 757-8.
182. Lee, N., and S. Brown (1994). ‘Otherness and the actor-network.’ American Behavioral Scientist 37: 772-90.
183. Lenoir, Timothy (1998). ‘Revolution from above: the role of the state in creating the German research system, 1810-1910.’ American Economic Review 88 (2).
184. Lewontin, Richard (1991). Biology as Ideology: The Doctrine of DNA. Toronto: Anansi.
185. Lewontin, Richard (1999). ‘In the blood: biologizing the social.’ St John’s College Speakers Series, University of British Columbia, Vancouver. Scientific Ethos: Authority, Authorship, and Trust in the Sciences. 21 October.
186. Lindblom, Charles E. (1959). ‘The science of muddling through.’ Public Administration Review 19: 79-99.
187. Mackenzie, Michael, Peter Keating, and Alberto Cambrosio (1990). ‘Patents and free scientific information in biotechnology: making monoclonal antibodies proprietary.’ Science, Technology, and Human Values 15 (1) (Winter): 65-83.
188. Marginson, Simon (1997). Markets in Education. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
189. Massey Commission (1951). Report of the Royal Commission on National Development in the Arts, Letters, and Sciences, 1949-51. Ottawa: Government of Canada.
190. Mazzoleni, Roberto, and Richard R. Nelson (1998). ‘Economic theories about the benefits and costs of patents.’ Journal of Economic Issues 32 (4) (December): 1031-52.
191. Merges, Robert P. (1996). ‘Property rights theory and the commons: the case of scientific research.’ In Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred D. Miller Jr, and Jeffrey Paul, eds, Scientific Innovation, Philosophy and Public Policy, 145-67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
192. Merriam, Sharon B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
193. Merton, Robert K. (1957). Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe: Free Press.
194. Merton, Robert K. (1973 [1942]). ‘The normative structure of science.’ In Norman W. Storer, ed., The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, 267-78. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
195. Merton, Robert K. (1973 [1957]). ‘Priorities in scientific discovery.’ In Norman W. Storer, ed., The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, 286-324. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
196. Merton, Robert K. (1973 [1968]). ‘Behavior patterns of scientists.’ In Norman W. Storer, ed., The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, 325-42. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
197. Michael, Mike, and Lynda Birke (1994). ‘Enrolling the core-set: the case of the animal experimentation controversy.’ Social Studies of Science 24 (1) (February): 81-95.
198. Miles, Matthew B., and A. Michael Huberman (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
199. Miller, P. (1994). ‘Accounting as a Social and Institutional Practice: An Introduction.’ In A.G. Hopwood and P. Miller, eds, Accounting as a Social and Institutional Practice, 1-39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
200. Mills, C. Wright (1956). The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
201. Milton, Giles (1999). Nathaniel’s Nutmeg: Or, the True and Incredible Adventures of the Spice Trader Who Changed the Course of History. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
202. Molas-Gallart, Jordi, and Ammon J. Salter (2001). Living with Mediocrity: A Comment on Research Excellence and Patented Innovation. Science Policy Research Unit Working Paper. University of Sussex: Science Policy Research Unit.
203. Mowery, David, Richard R. Nelson, Bhaven N. Sampat, and Arvids A. Ziedonis (1999). ‘The effects of the Bayh-Dole Act on U.S. university research and technology transfer.’ In Lewis M. Branscomb, Fumio Kodama, and Richard Florida, eds, Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States, 269-306. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
204. Murdoch, Jonathan (1995). ‘Actor-networks and the evolution of economic forms: combining description and explanation in theories of regulation, flexible specialization, and networks.’ Environment and Planning A 27: 731-57.
205. NCE (2002). Evaluation of the Networks of Centres of Excellence: Final Report. 26 June: 15.
206. NCE-AR (1990-2001). Annual Reports for the NCE Program. Ottawa: Networks of Centres of Excellence Secretariat.
207. NCE-SC (1997). Selection Committee Report, NCE Program, Phase III. Ottawa: Networks of Centres of Excellence Secretariat.
208. Nelson, Richard R. (1959). ‘The simple economics of basic scientific research.’ Journal of Political Economy 67: 297-306.
209. Nelson, Richard R. (1996). The Sources of Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
210. Nelson, Richard R. (1998). ‘Technology transfer, in theory and practice.’ C21: The World of Research at Columbia University 3 (1) (Spring).
211. Nelson, Richard R., and Paul M. Romer (1998). ‘Science, economic growth, and public policy.’ In Dale Neef, Anthony Siesfeld, and Jaqueline Cefola, eds, The Economic Impact of Knowledge, 43-60. Resources for the knowledge-based economy. Boston, MA: Butterworth Heinemann.
212. Nelson, Richard R., and Bhaven N. Sampat (2001). ‘Making sense of institutions as a factor shaping economic performance.’ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 44: 31-54.
213. Nelson, Richard R., and S. Winter (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
214. Newson, Janice A. (1994). ‘Subordinating democracy: the effects of fiscal retrenchment and university-business partnerships on knowledge creation and knowledge dissemination in universities.’ Higher Education 27: 141-61.
215. Newson, Janice A. (1998). ‘The corporate-linked university: from social project to market force.’ Canadian Journal of Communication 23 (1) (Winter): 107-24.
216. NIH (National Institutes of Health) (2003). ‘NIH roadmap: accelerating medical discovery to improve health.’ http://nihroadmap.nih.gov.
217. Niosi, Jorge (1995). Flexible Innovation: Technological Alliances in Canadian Industry. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
218. Niosi, Jorge (2000). Canada’s National System of Innovation. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
219. Noble, David (1977). America by Design: Science, Technology, and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism. New York: Alfred A Knopf.
220. Noble, David (1997). ‘Digital diploma mills: the automation of higher education.’ Accessed at http://www.journet.com/twu/deplomamills.html.
221. Nowotny, Helga, Peter Scott, and Michael Gibbons (2001). Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press in association with Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
222. OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1969). Reviews of National Science Policy: Canada. Paris: OECD.
223. OECD (1998). Science, Technology, and Industry Outlook 1998. Paris: OECD.
224. OECD (2002-2). Science, Technology, and Industry Outlook 2002. Paris: OECD.
225. Packer, Kathryn, and Andrew Webster (1995). ‘Inventing boundaries: the prior art of the social world.’ Social Studies of Science 25: 107-17.
226. Packer, Kathryn, and Andrew Webster (1996). ‘Patenting culture in science: reinventing the scientific wheel of credibility.’ Science, Technology, and Human Values 21 (4) (Fall): 427-53.
227. Parry, Bronwyn (1998). ‘Hunting the gene-hunters: the role of hybrid networks, status, and chance in conceptualizing and accessing "corporate elites."’ Environment and Planning A 30 (12) (December): 2147-62.
228. Pavitt, Keith (2000). Public Policies to Support Basic Research: What Can the Rest of the World Learn from US Practice? (And What They Should Not Learn). Science Policy Research Unit Working Paper 53. University of Sussex: Science Policy Research Unit, 25 pages.
229. Pels, Dick (1997). ‘Mixing metaphors: a politics or economics of knowledge?’ Conference paper. Actor-Network and After. Keele University, U.K., July.
230. PENCE-AR (2000). Protein Engineering Network of Centres of Excellence Annual Report. Ottawa: NCE Secretariat.
231. Phillips, Susan D., and Michael Orsini (2002). Mapping the Links: Citizen Involvement in Policy Processes. Canadian Policy Research Network. Discussion Paper № F21 (April).
232. Phillipson, Donald (1983). ‘Steacie myth and the institutions of industrial research.’ Scientia Canadensis 7 (25).
233. Phillipson, Donald (1991). ‘Building Canadian science.’ Scientia Canadensis (special issue).
234. Pickering, Andrew (1993). ‘The mangle of practice: agency and emergence in the sociology of science.’ American Journal of Sociology 9: 559-89. Reprinted 1999 in Mario Biagioli, ed., The Science Studies Reader, 372-93. New York: Routledge.
235. Polanyi, Michael (1940). ‘The rights and duties of science.’ In Michael Polanyi, The Contempt of Freedom: The Russian Experiment and After, 116 pages. London: Watts; reprinted 1975, New York: Arno.
236. Polanyi, Michael (1962). ‘The republic of science: its political and economic theory.’ Minerva 1 (1): 54-73.
237. Polster, Claire (1993). ‘Compromising positions: the federal government and the reorganization of the social relations of Canadian academic research.’ PhD diss., York University, Toronto.
238. Polster, Claire (1998). ‘From public resource to industry’s instrument: reshaping the production of knowledge in Canada’s universities.’ Canadian Journal of Communication 23: 91-106.
239. Porter, John (1965). The Vertical Mosaic: An Analysis of Social Class and Power in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
240. Porter, Theodore M. (1995). Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
241. Power, M. (1995). The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
242. Prater, Michael, and Shawn Newlands (1999). ‘Molecular genetics and otolaryngology.’ Grand rounds presentation; series editor Francis B. Quinn Jr. UTMB Dept of Otolaryngology. University of Texas, Medical Branch, Galveston. Accessed at www2.utmb.edu/otoref/Grnds/Mol-genetics-9910/Mol-gen-9910.htm, 13 October.
243. Prelli, L.J. (1997). ‘The rhetorical construction of scientific ethos.’ In Randy Allan Harris, ed., Landmark Essays on Rhetoric of Science, 87-104. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
244. Price, Derek J. de Solla (1963). Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.
245. Pullen, J.W. (1990). Centres of Excellence. Report prepared by the Canadian Centre for Management Development. Government catalogue no. SC93-2/2-1990E. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services.
246. Rahm, Dianne (1994). ‘University-firm linkages for industrial innovation.’ Paper prepared for the Center for Economic Policy Research/American Association for the Advancement of Science conference. University Goals, Institutional Mechanisms, and the ‘Industrial Transferability of Research.'
247. Rappert, Brian, and Andrew Webster (1997). ‘Regimes of ordering: the commercialization of intellectual property in industrial-academic collaborations.’ Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 9 (2): 115-30.
248. Reid, John R. (2000). Annual Report, 1999-2000. Report of the Information Commissioner of Canada. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Service.
249. Reid, John R. (2001). Annual Report, 2000-2001. Report of the Information Commissioner of Canada. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Service.
250. Rip, Arie (1990). ‘Implementation and evaluation of science and technology programs and priorities.’ In Susan E. Cozzens, Peter Healey, Arie Rip, and John Ziman, eds, The Research System in Transition 57: 263-80. NATO ASI Series D: Behavioral and Social Sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, in cooperation with NATO Scientific Affairs Division.
251. Rip, Arie (1997). ‘A cognitive approach to relevance of science.’ Social Science Information 36 (4): 95-110.
252. Rip, Arie (2000). ‘Fashions, lock-ins, and the heterogeneity of knowledge production.’ In Merle Jacob and Tomas Hellstrom, eds, The Future of Knowledge Production in the Academy, 28-39. Buckingham: Open University Press.
253. Rip, Arie (2001). ‘Regional innovation systems and the advent of strategic science.’ Journal of Technology Transfer, special issue on regional innovation systems.
254. Rose, N. (1996). ‘Governing "advanced" liberal democracies.’ In A. Barry, T. Osborne, and N. Rose, eds, Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and the Rationalities of Government, 37-64. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
255. Rosenberg, Nathan (1998). ‘Uncertainty and technological change.’ In Dale Neef, Anthony Siesfeld, and Jaqueline Cefola, eds, The Economic Impact of Knowledge, 17-34. Resources for the knowledge-based economy. Boston, MA: Butterworth Heinemann.
256. Rubenson, Kjell, and Hans G. Schuetze (2000). Transition to the Knowledge Society: Policies and Strategies for Individual Participation and Learning. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press for Human Resources Development Canada (HRDC) and Institute for European Studies, UBC.
257. Ruggie, John Gerard (1975). ‘International responses to technology: concepts and trends.’ International Organization 29 (3) (Summer): 557-83.
258. Ruivo, Beatriz (1994). '"Phases" or "paradigms" of science policy?' Science and Public Policy 21 (3): 157-64.
259. Sabatier, P.A. (1988). ‘An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein.’ Policy Sciences 29: 129-68.
260. Savoie, Donald J. (1995). ‘What is wrong with the new public management?’ Canadian Public Administration 38 (1) (Spring): 112-21.
261. Segerstrale, Ullica, ed. (2000). Beyond the Science Wars: The Missing Discourse about Science and Society. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
262. Shapin, Steven (1994). A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in 17th-Century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
263. Shapin, Steven (1995a). ‘Cordelia’s love: credibility and the social studies of science.’ Perspectives on Science 3: 255-75.
264. Shapin, Steven (1995b). ‘Here and everywhere: sociology of scientific knowledge.’ Annual Review of Sociology 21: 289-321.
265. Sheehan, Helena (1993). Marxism and the Philosophy of Science: A Critical History. London: Humanities Press International.
266. Simmel, G. (1950). The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
267. Slaughter, Sheila (1998). ‘Federal policy and supply-side institutional resource allocation at public research universities.’ Review of Higher Education 21 (3): 209-44.
268. Slaughter, Sheila, and Larry L. Leslie (1997). Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
269. Slaughter, Sheila, and Gary Rhoades (1990). ‘Renorming the social relations of academic science: technology transfer.’ Educational Policy 4 (4): 341-61.
270. Sonnert, Gerhard, and Harvey Brooks (2000). ‘The basic-applied dichotomy in science policy: lessons from the past.’ In Lewis Branscomb, Gerald Holton, and Gerhard Sonnert, eds, Science for Society: Cutting-Edge Basic Research in the Service of Public Objectives. A Blueprint for an Intellectually Bold and Socially Beneficial Science Policy, Appendix A, 50-76. Conference report and consensus document. Conference on Basic Research in the Service of Public Objectives, Washington, DC, November. New York: Columbia University, Center for Science, Policy and Outcomes.
271. Star, Susan Leigh, and James R. Griesemer (1989). ‘Institutional ecology, "translations" and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39.’ Social Studies of Science 19: 387-420.
272. Starr, Paul (1988). ‘The meaning of privatization.’ Yale Law and Policy Review 6: 6-41.
273. Statistics Canada (1999). Survey of Intellectual Property Commercialization in the Higher Education Sector, 1998 by Michael Bordt and Cathy Read, 88F0006XPB № 01; ST-00-01 Cong.
274. Statistics Canada (2003a). 2001 Survey of Intellectual Property Commercialization in the Higher Education Sector. Preliminary Distribution 1. 6 November 2002.
275. Statistics Canada (2003b). 2001 Survey of Intellectual Property Commercialization in the Higher Education Sector. Preliminary Distribution 2. 4 April 2003.
276. Steacie, E.W.R. (1965). Science in Canada. Selections from the Speeches of E.W.R. Steacie. Ed. J.D. Babbitt. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
277. Stephan, P.E. (1996). ‘The economics of science.’ Journal of Economic Literature 34 (September): 1199-235.
278. Stokes, Donald E. (1995). '"Science: the endless frontier" as a treatise.' Conference paper. Science, the Endless Frontier 1945-1995. Learning from the Past, Designing for the Future. Columbia University, Part I - 9 December 1994.
279. Stokes, Donald E. (1997). Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
280. Strauss, Anselm L. (1982). ‘Social worlds and legitimation processes.’ Studies in Symbolic Interaction 4: 171-90.
281. Thistle, Mel W. (1966). The Inner Ring: The Early History of the National Research Council of Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
282. Toulmin, Stephen (1990). Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
283. Toulmin, Stephen (2001). Return to Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
284. Urry, John (1998). Locating HE in the global landscape. Working paper, December. Society for Research in Higher Education. Lancaster University: Department of Sociology.
285. van der Meulen, B., and A. Rip (1996). ‘The postmodern research system.’ Science and Public Policy 23 (6): 343-52.
286. Veblen, Thorstein (1918). The Higher Learning in America: A Memorandum on the Conduct of Universities by Business Men. New York: Kelley, 1965.
287. Webster, Andrew, and Kathryn Packer (1995). ‘Patents and technology transfer in public sector research: the tension between policy and practice.’ Accessed at http://spsg.com/papers/web2.htm#1, in Science Policy Support Group Working Papers, 24 September 1997.
288. Webster, Andrew, and Kathryn Packer (1996). ‘When worlds collide: patents in public sector research.’ In H. Etzkowitz and L. Leydesdorff, eds, Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy, 47-59. London: Cassell.
289. Webster, Andrew, and Kathryn Packer, eds (1996). Innovation and the Intellectual Property System. London: Kluwer Law.
290. Weiner, Charles (1986). ‘Universities, professors, and patents: a continuing controversy.’ Technology Review 35 (February/March): 33-43.
291. Weiner, Charles (1989). ‘Patenting and academic research: historical case studies.’ In Vivian Weil and John W. Snapper, eds, Owning Scientific and Technical Information: Value and Ethical Issues, 87-105. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
292. Weintraub, Jeff (1997). ‘The theory and politics of the public/private distinction.’ In Jeff Weintraub and Krishan Kumar, eds, Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy, 1-42. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
293. Whyte, Anne (1997). '"In the national interest": science, geography, and public policy in Canada.' Canadian Geographer 41 (4): 338-49.
294. Winner, Langdon (1993). ‘Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: social constructivism and the philosophy of technology.’ Science, Technology, and Human Values 18 (3) (Summer): 362-78.
295. Wolfe, David (2000). ‘Globalization, information and communication technologies and local and regional systems of innovation.’ In Kjell Rubenson and Hans G. Schuetze, eds, Transition to the Knowledge Society: Policies and Strategies for Individual Participation and Learning. Vancouver: UBC Press for Human Resources Development Canada (HRDC) and Institute for European Studies, UBC.
296. Wulf, William A. (1993). ‘The collaboratory opportunity.’ Science (13 August): 854-5.
297. Wynne, Brian (1999). ‘Expert construction of lay epistemics.’ Presidential plenary: The Participation of Lay People in the Production and Dissemination of Knowledge. Society for the Social Studies of Science (4S). San Diego, 27 October - 2 November.
298. Yearley, S. (2000). ‘Making systematic sense of public discontents with expert knowledge: two analytical approaches and a case study.’ Public Understanding of Science 9: 105-22.
299. Zucker, Lynne G., and Michael R. Darby (1997). ‘Individual action and the demand for institutions.’ American Behavioral Scientist 40 (4) (February): 502-14.