Systems thinking and environmental concern

Journal of Environmental Psychology

Volumn 46, Issue , 2016, Pages 143-153

  Lezak, Stephen B ^a   Thibodeau, Paul H ^a  

^a OBERLIN COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; Decision making; Environmental psychology; Reasoning; Science communication; Systems thinking

Indexed keywords

EID: 84966839129     PISSN: 02724944     EISSN: 15229610     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Adorno T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik E., Levinson D.J., Sanford R.N. The authoritarian personality 1950, Harper and Row, New York.
2. Akerlof K., Maibach E.W., Fitzgerald D., Cedeno A.Y., Neuman A. Do people "personally experience" global warming, and if so how, and does it matter?. Global Environmental Change 2013, 23(1):81-91.
3. Akerman M. What does 'natural capital' do? the role of metaphor in economic understanding of the environment. Environmental Values 2003, 12(4):431-448.
4. Allison E.H., Perry A.L., Badjeck M.C., Neil Adger W., Brown K., Conway D., et al. Vulnerability of national economies to the impacts of climate change on fisheries. Fish and Fisheries 2009, 10(2):173-196.
5. Anderegg W.R., Prall J.W., Harold J., Schneider S.H. Expert credibility in climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2010, 107(27):12107-12109.
6. Boykoff M.T. From convergence to contention: United States mass media representations of anthropogenic climate change science. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 2007, 32(4):477-489.
7. Buckle Henning P., Chen W.C. Systems thinking: common ground or untapped territory?. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 2012, 29:470-483.
8. Cacioppo J.T., Petty R.E., Kao C.F. The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment 1984, 48:306-307.
9. Checkland P. Four conditions for serious systems thinking and action. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 2012, 29(5):465-469.
10. Choi I., Koo M., Choi J.A. Individual differences in analytic versus holistic thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2007, 33:691-705.
11. Clifford S., Jewell R.M., Waggoner P.D. Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology?. Research and Politics 2015, 2:1-9.
12. Collomb J.D. The ideology of climate change denial in the United States. European Journal of American Studies 2014, 9(1):1-17.
13. Costanza R., de Groot R., Sutton P., van der Ploeg S., Anderson S.J., Kubiszewski I., et al. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 2014, 26:152-158.
14. Davis A.C., Stroink M.L. The relationship between systems thinking and the new ecological paradigm. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 2016, 10.1002/sres.2371.
15. Dawidowicz P. The person on the street's understanding of systems thinking. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 2012, 29(1):2-13.
16. Diethelm P., McKee M. Denialism: what is it and how should scientists respond?. The European Journal of Public Health 2009, 19(1):2-4.
17. Dunlap R.E., McCright A.M. A widening gap: Republican and Democratic views on climate change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 2008, 50(5):26-35.
18. EPA Wetlands: where water meets land. Website 2015, Retrieved January 4, 2015, from. https://owpubauthor.epa.gov/type/wetlands/.
19. Espejo R. What is systemic thinking?. System Dynamics Review 1994, 10(2):199-212.
20. Fazey I.R.A. Resilience and higher order thinking. Ecology and Society 2010, 15(3):9.
21. Feinberg M., Willer R. Apocalypse soon? Dire messages reduce belief in global warming by contradicting just-world beliefs. Psychological Science 2011, 22(1):34-38.
22. Flood R., Jackson M. Total systems intervention: a practical face to critical systems thinking. Systems Practice 1991, 4(3):197-213.
23. Freudenburg W.R., Muselli V. Global warming estimates, media expectations, and the asymmetry of scientific challenge. Global Environmental Change 2010, 20(3):483-491.
24. Gallup Most important problem 2015, Retrieved October 20, 2015, from. http://www.gallup.com/poll/1675/most-important-problem.aspx.
25. Gutro R. What's the difference between weather and climate. NASA 2005, Retrieved January 6, 2016, from. http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/noaa-n/climate/climate_weather.html.
26. Hamilton L.C. Education, politics and opinions about climate change evidence for interaction effects. Climatic Change 2011, 104(2):231-242.
27. Heath Y., Gifford R. Free-market ideology and environmental degradation the case of belief in global climate change. Environment and Behavior 2006, 38(1):48-71.
28. Hofer B.K. Dimensionality and disciplinary differ- ences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2000, 25:378-405.
29. Hulme M. Why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity 2009, Cambridge University Press.
30. Imai K., Keele L., Tingley D., Yamamoto T. Causal mediation analysis using R. Advances in social science research using R 2009, Springer, New York. H.D. Vinod (Ed.).
31. Jacques P.J., Dunlap R.E., Freeman M. The organization of denial: conservative think tanks and environmental skepticism. Environmental Politics 2008, 17(3):349-385.
32. Jones N., Clark J., Tripidaki G. Social risk assessment and social capital: a significant parameter for the formation of climate change policies. The Social Science Journal 2012, 49(1):33-41.
33. Jost J.T., Banaji M.R., Nosek B.A. A decade of system justification theory: accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political psychology 2004, 25(6):881-919.
34. Kahan D.M., Jenkins-Smith H., Braman D. Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research 2011, 14(2):147-174.
35. Kay A., Jimenez M.C., Jost J.T. Sour grapes, sweet lemons, and the anticipatory rationalization of the status quo. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2002, 28:1300-1312.
36. Kellstedt P.M., Zahran S., Vedlitz A. Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the united states. Risk Analysis 2008, 28(1):113-126.
37. Kim Y.A., Akbar H., Tzokas N., Al-Dajani H. Systems thinking and absorptive capacity in high-tech small and medium-sized enterprises from South Korea. International Small Business Journal 2014, 32(8):876-896.
38. Klöckner C.A. A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour-a meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change 2013, 23(5):1028-1038.
39. Leiserowitz A. Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change 2006, 77(1-2):45-72.
40. Leiserowitz A., Maibach E., Roser-Renouf C., Feinberg G., Rosenthal S. Climate change in the american mind: October, 2015. Yale university and george Mason university 2015, Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, New Haven, CT.
41. Leiserowitz A., Maibach E.W., Roser-Renouf C., Smith N., Dawson E. Climategate, public opinion, and the loss of trust. American Behavioral Scientist 2013, 57(6):818-837.
42. Lewandowsky S., Oberauer K., Gignac G.E. NASA faked the moon landing-therefore,(climate) science is a hoax an anatomy of the motivated rejection of science. Psychological Science 2013, 24(5):622-633.
43. van der Linden S.L. The conspiracy-effect: exposure to conspiracy theories (about global warming) decreases pro-social behavior and science acceptance. Personality and Individual Differences 2015, 87:171-173.
44. van der Linden S.L., Leiserowitz A.A., Feinberg G.D., Maibach E.W. How to communicate the scientific consensus on climate change: plain facts, pie charts or metaphors?. Climactic Change 2014, 126:255-262.
45. van der Linden S.L., Leiserowitz A.A., Feinberg G.D., Maibach E.W. The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: experimental evidence. PloS One 2015, 10(2):e0118489.
46. Little T.D., Cunningham W.A., Shahar G., Widaman K.F. To parcel or not to parcel: exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural equation modeling 2002, 9(2):151-173.
47. Maani K.E., Maharaj V. Links between systems thinking and complex decision making. System Dynamics Review 2004, 20(1):21.
48. Mason W., Suri S. Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods 2012, 44(1):1-23.
49. Mayer F.S., Frantz C.M. The connectedness to nature scale: a measure of individuals' feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2004, 24(4):503-515.
50. McCrae R.R. Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin 1996, 120(3):323.
51. McCright A.M., Dunlap R.E. The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's views of global warming, 2001-2010. The Sociological Quarterly 2011, 52(2):155-194.
52. Meadows D.H., Wright D. Thinking in systems: A primer 2008, Chelsea Green Publishing.
53. Nisbett R.E., Peng K.P., Choi I., Norenzayan A. Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review 2001, 108:291-310.
54. Norgaard R.B. Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecological Economics 2010, 69(6):1219-1227.
55. Oreskes N., Conway E.M. Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming 2011, Bloomsbury Publishing, USA.
56. Pachauri R.K., Meyer L.A., Core Writing Team Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change 2014.
57. Paolacci G., Chandler J., Ipeirotis P.G. Running experiments on Amazon mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making 2010, 5(5):411-419.
58. Plautz J. Watch Jim Inhofe throw a snowball on the senate floor 2015, Retrieved August 26, 2015, from. http://www.nationaljournal.com/energy/watch-jim-inhofe-throw-a-snowball-on-the-senate-floor-20150226.
59. Preacher K.J., Kelley K. Effect size measures for mediation models: quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods 2011, 16(2):93.
60. R Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing 2013, Available. http://www.R-project.org.
61. Randle J.M. The systems thinking paradigm and higher-order cognitive processes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) 2014, Lakehead University.
62. Raymond C.M., Singh G.G., Benessaiah K., Bernhardt J.R., Levine J., Nelson H., et al. Ecosystem services and beyond: using multiple metaphors to understand human-environment relationships. BioScience 2013, 63(7):536-546.
63. Richmond B. Systems thinking-critical thinking skills for the 1990s and beyond. System Dynamics Review 1993, 9:113-133.
64. Ripley B., Venables B., Bates D., Homik K., Gebhardt A., Firth D. Package "MASS": Support functions and datasets for Venables and Ripley's MASS 2014, Available. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MASS/MASS.pdf.
65. Rittel H.W., Webber M.M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 1973, 4(2):155-169.
66. Rottman B.M., Gentner D., Goldwater M.B. Causal systems categories: differences in novice and expert categorization of causal phenomena. Cognitive Science 2012, 36(5):919-932.
67. Rozenblit L., Keil F. The misunderstood limits of folk science: an illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science 2002, 26(5):521-562.
68. Rutherford E. The scattering of α and β particles by matter and the structure of the atom. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 1911, 21:669-688.
69. Schwartz B., Sharpe K. Practical wisdom: The right way to do the right thing 2010, Penguin.
70. Shaw C., Nerlich B. Metaphor as a mechanism of global climate change governance: a study of international policies, 1992-2012. Ecological Economics 2015, 109:34-40.
71. Skitka L.J., Tetlock P.E. Providing public assistance: cognitive and motivational processes underlying liberal and conservative policy preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1993, 65(6):1205.
72. Spangenberg J.H., Settele J. Precisely incorrect? monetising the value of ecosystem services. Ecological Complexity 2010, 7(3):327-337.
73. Spence A., Poortinga W., Pidgeon N. The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis 2012, 32(6):957-972.
74. Staudinger U., Gluck J. Psychological wisdom research: commonalities and differences in a growing field. Annual Review of Psychology 2011, 62:215-241.
75. Sterman J.D. Does formal system dynamics training improve people's understanding of accumulation?. System Dynamics Review 2010, 26:316-334.
76. Sterman J.D., Sweeney L.B. Understanding public complacency about climate change: adults' mental models of climate change violate conservation of matter. Climatic Change 2007, 80:213-238.
77. Sternberg R.J. Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development 1990, Cambridge University Press.
78. Sunstein C.R., Vermeule A. Conspiracy theories: causes and cures. Journal of Political Philosophy 2009, 17(2):202-227.
79. Sweeney L.B., Sterman J.D. Thinking about systems: student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems. Systems Dynamics Review 2007, 23:285-312.
80. Thibodeau P.H., Boroditsky L. Metaphors we think with: the role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS One 2011, 6(2):e16782.
81. Thibodeau P.H., Boroditsky L. Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning. PloS One 2013, 8(1):e52961.
82. Thibodeau P.H., Frantz C., Stroink M.L. Situating a measure of systems thinking in a landscape of psychological constructs. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 2016, 10.1002/sres.2388.
83. Thibodeau P.H., Winneg A., Frantz C.M., Flusberg S.J. The mind is an ecosystem: systemic metaphors promote systems thinking. Metaphor and the Social World 2016, (accepted).
84. Tobler C., Visschers V.H., Siegrist M. Addressing climate change: determinants of consumers' willingness to act and to support policy measures. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2012, 32(3):197-207.
85. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 1974, 185(4157):1124-1131.
86. Van der Linden S. The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: towards a comprehensive model. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2014, 41:112-124.
87. Venables W., Ripley B. Modern applied statistics with S 2002, Springer.
88. Vendetti M.S., Wu A., Holyoak K.J. Far-out thinking: generating solutions to distant analogies promotes relational thinking. Psychological Science 2014, 25(4):928-933.
89. Williams D.R., Patterson M.E., Roggenbuck J.W., Watson A.E. Beyond the commodity metaphor: examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leisure Sciences 1992, 14(1):29-46.