Global warming estimates, media expectations, and the asymmetry of scientific challenge

Global Environmental Change

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 483-491

  Freudenburg, William R ^a   Muselli, Violetta ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate science; Global climate disruption; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC); Media bias; Social construction of science

Indexed keywords

ASYMMETRY; CLIMATE EFFECT; DATABASE; ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE; GLOBAL CLIMATE; GLOBAL WARMING; INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE; MASS MEDIA; SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 77954658385     PISSN: 09593780     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Bekelman J.E., Li Y., Gross C.P. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association 2003, 289(4):454-465.
2. Borenstein, S., 2008, Physicist is top contender for Obama science job. Salon.com, (accessed Dec. 22, 2008). http://www.salon.com/wires/ap/2008/12/19/D955VF8G5_obama_science/.
3. Boykoff M.T. Lost in translation? United States television news coverage of anthropogenic climate change, 1995-2004. Climatic Change 2008, 86:1-11.
4. Boykoff M.T., Boykoff J.M. Balance as bias: global warming and the U.S. prestige press. Global Environmental Change 2004, 14:125-136.
5. Busch L., Lacy W.B. Science, Agriculture, and the Politics of Research 1983, Westview, Boulder, CO.
6. Byrne, D., 2009. Beware the climate change alarmists. Chicago Tribune (Nov. 10). Also at (accessed Jan. 3, 2010). http://archives.chicagotribune.com/2009/nov/10/opinion/chi-oped1110byrnenov10.
7. Charlesworth M., Okereke C. Policy responses to rapid climate change: an epistemological critique of dominant approaches. Global Environmental Change 2010, 20:121-129.
8. Clarke L. Politics and bias in risk assessment. The Social Science Journal 1988, 25(2):155-165.
9. Cox R. Complexity, new media, and contested knowledge claims: climate change in 2009. Keynote Address, Conference on Media and Environment 2009.
10. Dietz T., Rycroft R.W. The Risk Professionals 1987, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
11. Dietz T., Stern P.C., Rycroft R.W. Definitions of conflict and the legitimation of resources: the case of environmental risk. Sociological Forum 1989, 4(1):47-70.
12. Dunlap, R., McCright, A., 2010. Climate change denial: sources, actors and strategies. In: Constance Lever-Tracy, Routledge Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Routledge, London.
13. Edwards P.N., Schneider S.H. Self governance and peer review in science-for-policy: the case of the IPCC second assessment report. Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance 2001, 219-246. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. C.A. Miller, P.N. Edwards (Eds.).
14. Fisher D.R. National Governance and the Global Climate Change Regime 2004, Rowman & Littlefield, New York.
15. Fisher D.R. Bringing the material back in: understanding the U.S. position on climate change. Sociological Forum 2006, 21(3):467-494.
16. Freudenburg W.R. Strange chemistry: environmental risk conflicts in a world of science, values, and blind spots. Handbook of Environmental Risk Decision Making: Values, Perceptions, and Ethics 1996, 11-36. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. C.R. Cothern (Ed.).
17. Freudenburg W.R., Frickel S., Dwyer R. Diversity and diversion: higher superstition and the dangers of insularity in science and technology studies. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 1998, 18(5/6):6-34.
18. Freudenburg W.R., Youn T. Institutional failure in environmental management: toward a fuller understanding of social problems and public policy. Research in Social Problems and Public Policy 1999, 7:3-18.
19. Freudenburg W.R., Gramling R., Davidson D.J. Scientific certainty argumentation methods (SCAMs): science and the politics of doubt. Sociological Inquiry 2008, 78(1):2-38.
20. Friedman S.M., Dunwoody S., Rogers C.L. Scientists and Journalists: Reporting Science as News 1986, Free Press, New York.
21. Gautier C. Oil, Water, and Climate: An Introduction 2008, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.
22. Gelbspan R. The Heat is On 1997, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
23. The Cigarette Papers 1996, University of California Press, Berkeley. S.A. Glantz, J. Slade, L.A. Bero, P. Hanauer, D.E. Barnes (Eds.).
24. Glanz J. Droughts linked to warming might speed climate change. New York Times 2001, (January 11):A1.
25. Goodell, J., 2010. As the world burns: how big oil and big coal mounted one of the most aggressive lobbying campaigns in history to block progress on global warming. Rolling Stone (Jan. 6); (accessed 13 Jan. 2010). http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/31633532/as_the_world_burns.
26. Harkinson, J., 2009, Climate change deniers without borders: how American oil money is pumping up climate change skeptics abroad-and how they could derail any progress made in Copenhagen. Mother Jones (Dec. 22). Also at (accessed 29 Jan. 2010). http://motherjones.com/environment/2009/12/climate-deniers-atlas-foundation.
27. Hattis D., Anderson E.L. What should be the implications of uncertainty, variability, and inherent 'biases'/'conservatism' for risk management decision-making?. Risk Analysis 1999, 19(1):95-107.
28. Hirt P.W. Conspiracy of Optimism: Management of the National Forests Since World War Two 1994, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE.
29. Hirt P.W. Institutional failure in the U.S. forest service: a historical perspective. Research in Social Problems and Public Policy 1999, 7:217-239.
30. Hotz R.L. Global warming real, panel says: experts find that surface temperatures on earth have risen in the last 20 years at a rate greater than the average for the last 100. Los Angeles Times 2000, (January):A3.
31. Hulme M. Why We Disagree About Climate Change 2009, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
32. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007, Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. IPCC Publication, (accessed 1 Dec. 2009). http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr.pdf.
33. Jaques P.J., Dunlap R.E., Freeman M. The organisation of denial: conservative think tanks and environmental skepticism. Environmental Politics 2008, 17(3):349-385.
34. Jasanoff S. Bridging the two cultures of risk analysis. Risk Analysis 1993, 13(2):123-129.
35. Kasperson R.E., Renn O., Slovic P., Brown H.S., Emel J., Goble R., Kasperson J.X., Ratick S. The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework. Risk Analysis 1988, 8(2):177-187.
36. Kleinman D.L. Politics on the Endless Frontier: Postwar Research Policy in the United States 1995, Duke Univ. Press, Durham, NC.
37. Kleinman D.L. Impure Cultures: University Biology and the World of Commerce 2003, Univ. Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
38. Kloppenburg J.R. First the Seed: The Political Economy of Biotechnology, 1492-2000 1988, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
39. Knorr-Centina K. The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science 1981, Pergamon, Oxford.
40. Kohut, A., Doherty, C., Wike, R., 2006. No Global Warming Alarm in the U.S., China: America's Image Slips, but Allies Share U.S. Concerns over Iran, Hamas, 15-Nation Pew Global Attitudes Survey. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C., (accessed 6 May 2009). http://pewglobal.org/reports/pdf/252.pdf.
41. Krimsky S. Hormonal Chaos: The Scientific and Social Origins of the Environmental Endocrine Hypothesis 2000, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore.
42. Krimsky S. Science in the Private Interest: Has the Lure of Profits Corrupted Biomedical Research? 2003, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham.
43. Latour B., Woolgar S. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts 1986, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
44. Leiserowitz, A., Maibachand, E., Roser-Renouf, C., 2010. Climate change in the American Mind: Americans' global warming beliefs and attitudes in January 2010. Yale Project on Climate Change, New Haven, CT, (accessed 30 Jan. 2010). http://environment.yale.edu/uploads/AmericansGlobalWarmingBeliefs2010.pdf.
45. Martin B. Suppression of dissent in science. Research in Social Problems and Public Policy 1999, 7:105-135.
46. Mazur, A., 1979). The mass media in environmental controversies. In: Augustine Brannin and Sheldon Goldberg (Eds.), Social Responses to Technological Change. Greenwood, Westport, CT, pp. 119-133.
47. Mazur A. The Dynamics of Technical Controversy 1981, Communications Press, Washington, D.C.
48. McCright A.M., Dunlap R.E. Challenging global warming as a social problem: an analysis of the conservative movement's counter-claims. Social Problems 2000, 47(4):499-522.
49. McCright A.M., Dunlap R.E. Defeating kyoto: the conservative movement's impact on U.S. climate-change policy. Social Problems 2003, 50(3):348-373.
50. Michaels D. Doubt is Their Product: How Industry's Assault on Science Threatens Your Health 2008, Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
51. Morone J.G., Woodhouse E.J. The Demise of Nuclear Energy? Lessons for Democratic Control of Technology 1989, Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT.
52. National Research Council Climate Change Science 2001, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
53. National Research Council Surface Temperature Reconstructions for the Last 2,000 Years 2006, National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
54. Oreskes N. The scientific consensus on climate change. Science 2004, 306:1686.
55. Pew Research Center for the People & The Press, 2009. Survey Reports: Fewer Americans See Solid Evidence of Global Warming. Pew Publication, (accessed 20 Nov. 2009). http://people-press.org/report/556/global-warming.
56. Pan P.P. Scientists issue dire prediction on warming; faster climate shift portends global calamity this century. Washington Post 2001, (January):A1.
57. Pickering A. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science 1995, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
58. The Social Amplification of Risk 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. N. Pidgeon, R.E. Kasperson, P. Slovic (Eds.).
59. Pulver S. Making sense of corporate environmentalism: an environmental contestation approach to analyzing the causes and consequences of the climate change policy split in the oil industry. Organization and Environment 2007, 20(1):44-83.
60. Revkin A.C. Skeptics on human climate impact seize on cold spell. New York Times 2008, (March).
61. Rosner D., Markowitz G. A " gift of god'?: the public health controversy over leaded gasoline during the 1920s. American Journal of Public Health 1985, 75(4):344-352.
62. Royal Society Climate Change Controversies: A Simple Guide 2007, The Royal Society, London, England.
63. Sampei Y., Aoyagi-Usui M. Mass-media coverage, its influence on public awareness of climate-change issues, and implications for Japan's national campaign to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Global Environmental Change 2009, 19:203-212.
64. Sample, I., 2007. Scientists offered cash to dispute climate study. The Guardian (February), (accessed 20 Sept. 2009). http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2007/feb/02/frontpagenews.climatechange.
65. Shanahan, J., Trumbo, C.W., 1998. Voices and messages in global climate change coverage. Paper Presented at 4th International Symposium on Society and Resource Management, Columbia, MO, May.
66. Sheppard, M., 2009. UN Climate Reports: They Lie. American Thinker Blog, (accessed 26 Oct. 2009). http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/10/un_climate_reports_they_lie.html.
67. Trumbo, C.W., 1996, Constructing climate change: claims and frames in US news coverage of an environmental issue. Public Understanding of Science 5 (3), 269-83, also at (accessed 9 Apr. 1998). http://www.iop.org/EJ/S/3/301.
68. Trumbo C.W., Shanahan J. Social research on climate change: where we have been, where we are, and where we might go. Public Understanding of Science 2000, 9(3):199-204.
69. Union of Concerned Scientists. Global Warming Skeptic Organizations. (accessed 28 Oct. 2009). http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science_and_impacts/global_warming_contrarians/global-warming-skeptic.html.
70. United Nations, 2002, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. United Nations, New York. Also at (accessed 12 June 2001). http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf.
71. United Nations Environment Programme, 2009, Climate Change Science Compendium 2009 New York: United Nations Environment Programme. (accessed 20 Jan 2010). http://www.unep.org/pdf/ccScienceCompendium2009/cc_ScienceCompendium2009_full_highres_en.pdf.
72. von Storch H., Bray D. Perspectives of climate scientists on global climate change. Climate Change Policy in Germany and the United States 1999, 33-48. German-American Academic Council Foundation, Bonn. R. Coppock, E. McGarraugh, S. Rushton, R.D. Tuch (Eds.).
73. Webb E.J., Campbell D.T., Schwartz R.D., Sechrest L. Unobtrusive Methods: Nonreactive Research in the Social Sciences 1966, Rand McNally, Chicago.
74. Weingart P., Engels A., Pansegrau P. Risks of communication: discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public Understanding of Science 2000, 9(3):261-283.
75. Zehr S. Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change. Public Understanding of Science 2000, 9:85-103.