Toward centres for responsible innovation in the commercialized university

Public Science in Liberal Democracy

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 295-312

  Guston, David H ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84966747117     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). 2000. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. Baltimore: ABET. http://www.abet.org/images/Criteria/eac_criteria_b.pdf (accessed 5 July 2007).
2. Agrawala, S., K. Broad, and D.H. Guston. 2001. Integrating Climate Forecasts and Societal Decision Making: Challenges to an Emergent Boundary Organization. Science, Technology, and Human Values 26, no. 4: 454-77.
3. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 2002. AAAS Report XXVII: Research and Development, FY 2003. Washington, DC: AAAS.
4. Andersen, I.E., and B. Jaeger. 1999. Scenario Workshops and Consensus Conferences: Towards More Democratic Decision-Making. Science and Public Policy 26, no. 5: 331-40.
5. Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM). 2001. AUTM Licensing Survey, FY 2000. Northbrook, IL: AUTM.
6. Bok, D. 1982. Beyond the Ivory Tower: Social Responsibilities of the Modern University. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
7. Bok, D. 2004. The Benefits and Costs of Commercialization of the Academy. In Buying In or Selling Out? The Commercialization of the American Research University, edited by D.G. Stein, 32-47. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
8. Brainard, J. 2001. Ethics-Training Rule Is Suspended. The Chronicle of Higher Education (2 March): A27.
9. Brooks, H., and L.P. Randazzese. 1998. University-Industry Relations: The Next Four Years and Beyond. In Investing in Innovation, edited by L.B. Branscomb and J.H. Keller, 361-99. Cambridge: MIT Press.
10. Cash, D. 2001. In Order to Aid in Diffusing Useful and Practical Information: Agricultural Extension and Boundary Organizations. Science, Technology, and Human Values 26, no. 4: 431-53.
11. Chopyak, J., and P. Levesque. 2002. Public Participation in Science and Technology Decision Making: Trends for the Future. Technology in Society 25: 155-66.
12. Chubin, D. 1994. How Large an R&D Enterprise? In The Fragile Contract: University Science and the Federal Government, edited by D. Guston and K. Keniston, 118-44. Cambridge: MIT Press.
13. Crow, M.M., and C. Tucker. 2001. The American Research University as America's de facto Technology Policy. Science and Public Policy 28, no. 1: 1-10.
14. Dürenberger, G., H. Kastenholz, and J. Behringe. 1999. Integrated Assessment Focus Groups: Bridging the Gap between Science and Policy. Science and Public Policy 26, no. 5: 341-9.
15. Etzkowitz, H. 2002. MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science. New York: Routledge.
16. Etzkowitz, H., and L. Ledesdorff. 2000. The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and 'Mode 2' to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Research Policy 29: 109-23.
17. Feller, I., C.P. Ailes, and J.D. Roessner. 2002. Impacts of Research Universities on Technological Innovation in Industry: Evidence from Engineering Research Centers. Research Policy 31: 457-74.
18. Fischer, F. 2000. Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
19. Guston, D.H. 1999a. Evaluating the First U.S. Consensus Conference: The Impact of the Citizens' Panel on Telecommunications and the Future of Democracy. Science, Technology, and Human Values 24, no. 4: 451-82.
20. Guston, D.H. 1999b. Stabilizing the Boundary between U.S. Politics and Science: The Role of the Office of Technology Transfer as a Boundary Organization. Social Studies of Science 29, no. 1: 87-112.
21. Guston, D.H. 2000. Between Politics and Science New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Guston, D.H. 2001. Special Issue: Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science. Science, Technology, and Human Values 26, no. 4: 399-408.
23. Guston, D.H., and D. Sarewitz. 2002. Real-Time Technology Assessment. Technology in Society 24: 93-109.
24. Hisschemoller, M., R. Hoppe, W.H. Dunn, and J.R. Ravetz. 2001. Knowledge, Power, and Participation in Environmental Policy and Risk Assessment. New Brunwick, NJ: Transaction Press.
25. Hörnig, S. 1999. Citizens' Panels as a Form of Deliberative Technology Assessment. Science and Public Policy 26, no. 5: 351-9.
26. Institute of Medicine. 2002. Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment That Encourages Responsible Conduct. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
27. Jones, M., D.H. Guston, and L.M. Branscomb. 1996. Informed Legislatures: Coping with Science in a Democracy. Lanham, MD: University Press of America/CSIA.
28. Joss, S. 1999. Special Issue: Public Participation in Science and Technology. Science and Public Policy 26, no. 5: 290-3.
29. Joss, S., and J. Durant. 1995. Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe. London: The Science Museum.
30. Keating, T. 2001. Lessons from the Recent History of the Health Effects Institute. Science, Technology, and Human Values 26, no. 4: 409-30.
31. Kitcher, P. 2001. Science, Truth, and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Krimsky, S. 2004. Reforming Research Ethics in an Age of Multivested Science. In Buying In or Selling Out? The Commercialization of the American Research University, edited by D. G. Stein, 133-52. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
33. McCain, L. 2002. Informing Technology Policy Decisions: The U.S. Human Genome Project's Ethical, Legal, and Societal Implications Programs as a Critical Case. Technology in Society 24: 111-32.
34. Mervis, J. 2001. NSF Scores Low on Using Its Own Criteria. Science, 30 March.
35. Mervis, J. 2002. Science with an Agenda: NSF Expands Centers Program. Science, 26 July.
36. Miller, C. 2001. Hybrid Management: Boundary Organizations, Science Policy, and Environmental Governance in the Climate Regime. Science, Technology, and Human Values 26, no. 4: 478-500.
37. Mowery, D.C., R.R. Nelson, B.N. Sampat, and A.A. Ziedonis. 2001. The Growth of Patenting and Licensing by U.S. Universities: An Assessment of the Effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980. Research Policy 30: 99-119.
38. Office of Research Integrity (ORI). 2000. PHS Policy on Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research. http://ori.dhhs.gov/html/programs/rcrcontents.asp.
39. Price, D.K. 1965. The Scientific Estate. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University.
40. Primack, J., and F. Von Hippel. 1974. Advice and Dissent: Scientists in the Political Arena. New York: New American Library.
41. Sarewitz, D. 1996. Frontiers of Illusion: Science, Technology, and the Politics of Progress. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
42. Sacks, S.M. 2000. The Case of the University of Pennsylvania Health System. SciPolicy: The Journal of Science and Health Policy (Fall): 122-53.
43. Sclove, R.E. 1999. The Democratic Politics of Technology: The Missing Half, The Loka Institute. http://www.loka.org/idt/intro.htm.
44. Slaughter, S. 2001. Professional Values and the Allure of the Market. Academe (September/October): 22-6.
45. Slaughter, S., and L.L Leslie. 1997. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
46. Sonnert, G., with the assistance of G. Holton. 2002. Ivory Bridges: Connecting Science and Society. Cambridge: MIT Press.
47. Study and Conference on Improving Public Access to Science (SCIPAS). 2001. Living Knowledge: The International Science Shop Network, Project Technical Reports Compendium, vols. I.A, I.B, and II. Amherst, MA: Loka Institute. http://www.livingknowledge.org.
48. Wilson, W.J. 2002. Expanding the Domain of Policy-Relevant Scholarship in the Social Sciences. PS: Political Science and Politics 35, no. 1: 1-4.
49. Winner, L. 1977. Autonomous Technology: Technics-Out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought. Cambridge: MIT Press.