Pigs that are divergent in feed efficiency, differ in intestinal enzyme and nutrient transporter gene expression, nutrient digestibility and microbial activity

Animal

Volumn 10, Issue 11, 2016, Pages 1848-1855

  Vigors, S ^a   Sweeney, T ^a   O'Shea, C J ^b   Kelly, A K ^a   O'Doherty, J V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

nutrient digestibility; nutrient transporter gene expression; pigs; residual feed intake; volatile fatty acids

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID; CARRIER PROTEIN; FATTY ACID BINDING PROTEIN; GLUCOSE TRANSPORTER 2; SODIUM GLUCOSE COTRANSPORTER 1;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; CECUM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIET; DIGESTION; ENZYMOLOGY; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; ILEUM; INTESTINE; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; JEJUNUM; LACTOBACILLUS; MALE; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PIG; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; VETERINARY;

ACETIC ACID; ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; CARRIER PROTEINS; CECUM; DIET; DIGESTION; FATTY ACID-BINDING PROTEINS; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GLUCOSE TRANSPORTER TYPE 2; ILEUM; INTESTINES; JEJUNUM; LACTOBACILLUS; MALE; SODIUM-GLUCOSE TRANSPORTER 1; SWINE;

EID: 84966648810     PISSN: 17517311     EISSN: 1751732X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1751731116000847     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) 1995. Official methods of analysis, 16th edition. AOAC, Washington, DC, USA.
2. Barea R, Dubois S, Gilbert H, Sellier P, van Milgen J and Noblet J 2010. Energy utilization in pigs selected for high and low residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science 88, 2062-2072.
3. Bergman E 1990. Energy contributions of volatile fatty acids from the gastrointestinal tract in various species. Physiological Reviews 70, 567-590.
4. Chomczynski P and Sacchi N 2006. The single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction: twenty-something years on. Nature Protocols 1, 581-585.
5. den Besten G, van Eunen K, Groen AK, Venema K, Reijngoud D-J and Bakker BM 2013. The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and host energy metabolism. Journal of Lipid Research 54, 2325-2340.
6. Do DN, Ostersen T, Strathe AB, Mark T, Jensen J and Kadarmideen HN 2014. Genome-wide association and systems genetic analyses of residual feed intake, daily feed consumption, backfat and weight gain in pigs. BMC Genetics 15, 27-27.
7. Dyer J, Vayro S, King TP and Shirazi-Beechey SP 2003. Glucose sensing in the intestinal epithelium. European Journal of Biochemistry 270, 3377-3388.
8. Egan ÁM, Sweeney T, Hayes M and O'Doherty JV 2015. Prawn shell chitosan has anti-obesogenic properties, influencing both nutrient digestibility and microbial populations in a pig model. PLoS One 10, e0144127.
9. Gilliland SE 1990. Health and nutritional benefits from lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 87, 175-188.
10. Harris AJ, Patience JF, Lonergan SM, Dekkers JCM and Gabler NK 2012. Improved nutrient digestibility and retention partially explains feed efficiency gains in pigs selected for low residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science 90, 164-166.
11. Hellemans J, Mortier G, De Paepe A, Speleman F and Vandesompele J 2007. qBase relative quantification framework and software for management and automated analysis of real-time quantitative PCR data. Genome Biology 8, R19.
12. Herd RM and Arthur PF 2009. Physiological basis for residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science 87, E64-E71.
13. Kellett GL and Brot-Laroche E 2005. Apical GLUT2 a major pathway of intestinal sugar absorption. Diabetes 54, 3056-3062.
14. Kelly AK, McGee M, Crews DH, Fahey AG, Wylie AR and Kenny DA 2010. Effect of divergence in residual feed intake on feeding behavior, blood metabolic variables, and body composition traits in growing beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science 88, 109-123.
15. Kil DY, Kim BG and Stein HH 2013. Feed energy evaluation for growing pigs. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 26, 1205-1217.
16. Koch RM, Swiger LA, Chambers D and Gregory KE 1963. Efficiency of feed use in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 22, 486-494.
17. Lee C, Kim J, Shin SG and Hwang S 2006. Absolute and relative QPCR quantification of plasmid copy number in Escherichia coli. Journal of Biotechnology 123, 273-280.
18. Littman DR and Pamer EG 2011. Role of the commensal microbiota in normal and pathogenic host immune responses. Cell Host &Microbe 10, 311-323.
19. Lynch MB, O'Shea CJ, Sweeney T, Callan JJ and O'Doherty JV 2008. Effect of crude protein concentration and sugar-beet pulp on nutrient digestibility, nitrogen excretion, intestinal fermentation and manure ammonia and odour emissions from finisher pigs. Animal 2, 425-434.
20. Macfarlane S and Macfarlane GT 2003. Regulation of short-chain fatty acid production. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 62, 67-72.
21. Mani V, Harris AJ, Keating AF, Weber TE, Dekkers JCM and Gabler NK 2013. Intestinal integrity, endotoxin transport and detoxification in pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science 91, 2141-2150.
22. McBride BW and Kelly JM 1990. Energy cost of absorption and metabolism in the ruminant gastrointestinal tract and liver: a review. Journal of Animal Science 68, 2997-3010.
23. McCarthy JF, Bowland JP and Aherne FX 1977. Influence of method upon the determination of apparent digestibility in the pig. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 57, 131-135.
24. Montagne L, Loisel F, Le Naou T, Gondret F, Gilbert H and Le Gall M 2014. Difference in short-term responses to a high-fiber diet in pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science 92, 1512-1523.
25. Nkrumah JD, Okine EK, Mathison GW, Schmid K, Li C, Basarab JA, Price MA, Wang Z and Moore SS 2006. Relationships of feedlot feed efficiency, performance, and feeding behavior with metabolic rate, methane production, and energy partitioning in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 84, 145-153.
26. Noblet J, Karege C, Dubois S and van Milgen J 1999. Metabolic utilization of energy and maintenance requirements in growing pigs: effects of sex and genotype. Journal of Animal Science 77, 1208-1216.
27. NRC 2012. Nutrient requirements of Swine. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
28. O'Shea CJ, Sweeney T, Bahar B, Ryan MT, Thornton K and O'Doherty JV 2012. Indices of gastrointestinal fermentation and manure emissions of growingfinishing pigs as influenced through singular or combined consumption of Lactobacillus plantarum and inulin. Journal of Animal Science 90, 3848-3857.
29. Peng L, He Z, Chen W, Holzman IR and Lin J 2007. Effects of butyrate on intestinal barrier function in a Caco-2 cell monolayer model of intestinal barrier. Pediatric Research 61, 37-41.
30. Rakhshandeh A, Dekkers JC, Kerr BJ, Weber TE, English J and Gabler NK 2012. Effect of immune system stimulation and divergent selection for residual feed intake on digestive capacity of the small intestine in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 90 (suppl. ), 233-235.
31. Richardson E, Herd R, Archer J and Arthur P 2004. Metabolic differences in Angus steers divergently selected for residual feed intake. Animal Production Science 44, 441-452.
32. Saintilan R, Mérour I, Brossard L, Tribout T, Dourmad JY, Sellier P, Bidanel J, van Milgen J and Gilbert H 2013. Genetics of residual feed intake in growing pigs: relationships with production traits, and nitrogen and phosphorus excretion traits. Journal of Animal Science 91, 2542-2554.
33. Stewart CS 1997. Microorganisms in hindgut fermentors. Gastrointestinal Microbiology 2, 142-186.
34. Varley PF, Flynn B, Callan JJ and O'Doherty JV 2011. Effect of phytase level in a low phosphorus diet on performance and bone development in weaner pigs and the subsequent effect on finisher pig bone development. Livestock Science 138, 152-158.
35. Walsh A, Sweeney T, O'Shea C, Doyle D and O'Doherty J 2013. Effect of dietary laminarin and fucoidan on selected microbiota, intestinal morphology and immune status of the newly weaned pig. British Journal of Nutrition 110, 1630-1638.
36. Young JM, Cai W and Dekkers JCM 2011. Effect of selection for residual feed intake on feeding behavior and daily feed intake patterns in Yorkshire swine. Journal of Animal Science 89, 639-647.
37. Young JMand Dekkers JCM2012. The genetic and biological basis of residual feed intake as a measure of feed efficiency. In Feed efficiency in swine (ed. J Patience), pp. 153-166. Wageningen Academic Publishers, the Netherlands.