Testing the potential of a ribosomal 16S marker for DNA metabarcoding of insects

PeerJ

Volumn 2016, Issue 4, 2016, Pages

  Elbrecht, Vasco ^a,b   Taberlet, Pierre ^c,d   Dejean, Tony ^e   Valentini, Alice ^e   Usseglio Polatera, Philippe ^f   Beisel, Jean Nicolas ^g,h   Coissac, Eric ^c,d   Boyer, Frederic ^c,d   Leese, Florian ^b  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

^c CNRS   (France)

^d UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^e SPYGEN   (France)

^f UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

^g UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^h UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

Author keywords

Biodiversity assessment; DNA metabarcoding; Freshwater invertebrates; High throughput sequencing; Illumina sequencing; Method testing; Primer bias; Small ribosomal subunit; Stream ecosystems; Stream monitoring

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE; DNA 16S;

ARTICLE; DIPTERA; DNA BARCODING; DNA EXTRACTION; EPHEMEROPTERA; GENE; GENE SEQUENCE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INSECT; NONHUMAN; PLECOPTERA; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; TAXONOMY; TRICHOPTERA;

EID: 84966340330     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21678359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1966     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. 2009. BLASTC: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421 DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421
2. Carew ME, Pettigrove VJ, Metzeling L, Hoffmann AA. 2013. Environmental monitoring using next generation sequencing: rapid identification of macroinvertebrate bioindicator species. Frontiers in Zoology 10:1-1 DOI 10.1186/1742-9994-10-1
3. Clarke LJ, Soubrier J, Weyrich LS, Cooper A. 2014. Environmental metabarcodes for insects: in silicoPCR reveals potential for taxonomic bias. Molecular Ecology Resources 14:1160-1170 DOI 10.1111/1755-0998.12265
4. Coissac E, Hollingsworth PM, Lavergne S, Taberlet P. 2016. From barcodes to genomes: extending the concept of DNA barcoding. Molecular Ecology 25:1423-1428 DOI 10.1111/mec.13549
5. Deagle BE, Jarman SN, Coissac E, Pompanon F, Taberlet P. 2014. DNA metabarcoding and the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I marker: not a perfect match. Biology Letters 10:20140562-20140562 DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0562
6. Dowle EJ, Pochon X, Banks J, Shearer K, Wood SA. 2015. Targeted gene enrichment and high throughput sequencing for environmental biomonitoring: a case study using freshwater macroinvertebrates. Molecular Ecology Resources 1-15 Epub ahead of print Nov 19 2015 DOI 10.1111/1755-0998.12488
7. Edgar RC. 2013. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nature Methods 10:996-998 DOI 10.1038/nmeth.2604
8. Edgar RC, Flyvbjerg H. 2015. Error filtering, pair assembly and error correction for next-generation sequencing reads. Bioinformatics 31:3476-3482 DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv401
9. Elbrecht V, Feld CK, Gies M, Hering D, Sondermann M. 2014. Genetic diversity and dispersal potential of the stonefly Dinocras cephalotes in a central European low mountain range. Freshwater Science 33:181-192 DOI 10.1086/674536
10. Elbrecht V, Leese F. 2015. Can DNA-based ecosystem assessments quantify species abundance? Testing primer bias and biomass-sequence relationships with an innovative metabarcoding protocol. PLoS ONE 10:e0130324 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0130324
11. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3:294-299
12. Gibson J, Shokralla S, Porter TM, King I, Van Konynenburg S, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Hajibabaei M. 2014. Simultaneous assessment of the macrobiome and microbiome in a bulk sample of tropical arthropods through DNA metasystematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111:8007-8012 DOI 10.1073/pnas.1406468111
13. Gómez-Rodríguez C, Crampton-Platt A, Timmermans MJTN, Baselga A, Vogler AP. 2015. Validating the power of mitochondrial metagenomics for community ecology and phylogenetics of complex assemblages. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6:883-894 DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.12376
14. Hajibabaei M, Shokralla S, Zhou X, Singer G, Baird DJ. 2011. Environmental barcoding: a next-generation sequencing approach for biomonitoring applications using river benthos. PLoS ONE 6(4):e17497 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0017497
15. Illumina. 2016. Illumina two-channel SBS sequencing technology. Pub. No. 770-2013-054. Available at http://www.illumina.com/content/dam/illumina-marketing/documents/products/techspotlights/techspotlight_two-channel_sbs.pdf
16. Leray M, Knowlton N. 2015. DNA barcoding and metabarcoding of standardized samples reveal patterns of marine benthic diversity. PNAS 112(7):2076-2081 DOI 10.1073/pnas.1424997112
17. Leray M, Yang JY, Meyer CP, Mills SC, Agudelo N, Ranwez V, Boehm JT, Machida RJ. 2013. A new versatile primer set targeting a short fragment of the mitochondrial COI region for metabarcoding metazoan diversity: application for characterizing coral reef fish gut contents. Frontiers in Zoology 10:1-1 DOI 10.1186/1742-9994-10-1
18. Liu S, Wang X, Xie L, Tan M, Li Z, Su X, Zhang H, Misof B, Kjer KM, Tang M, Niehuis O, Jiang H, Zhou X. 2015. Mitochondrial capture enriches mito-DNA 100 fold, enabling PCR-free mitogenomics biodiversity analysis. Molecular Ecology Resources 16(2):470-479 DOI 10.1111/1755-0998.12472
19. Lundberg DS, Yourstone S, Mieczkowski P, Jones CD, Dangl JL. 2013. Practical innovations for high-throughput amplicon sequencing. Nature Methods 10:999-1002 DOI 10.1038/nmeth.2634
20. Martin M. 2011. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet Journal 17:10-12
21. Pfrender ME, Hawkins CP, Bagley M, Courtney GW, Creutzburg BR, Epler JH, Fend S, Schindel D, Ferrington LC, Hartzell PL, Jackson S, Larsen DP, Lévesque A, Morse JC, Petersen MJ, Ruiter D, Whiting M. 2010. Assessing macroinvertebrate biodiversity in freshwater ecosystems: advances and challenges in DNA-based approaches. The Quarterly Review of Biology 85:319-340 DOI 10.1086/655118
22. Piñol J, Mir G, Gomez-Polo P, Agustí N. 2014. Universal and blocking primer mismatches limit the use of high-throughput DNA sequencing for the quantitative metabarcoding of arthropods. Molecular Ecology Resources 15(4):819-830 DOI 10.1111/1755-0998.12355
23. Porter TM, Gibson JF, Shokralla S, Baird DJ, Golding GB, Hajibabaei M. 2014. Rapid and accurate taxonomic classification of insect (class Insecta) cytochrome coxidase subunit 1 (COI) DNA barcode sequences using a naïve Bayesian classifier. Molecular Ecology Resources 14:929-942 DOI 10.1111/1755-0998.12240
24. Ratnasingham S, Hebert P. 2007. BOLD: the barcode of life data system. Molecular Ecology Notes 7:355-364 DOI 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01678.x
25. Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN. 2013. A DNA-based registry for all animal species: the barcode index number (BIN) system. PLoS ONE 8:e66213 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0066213
26. Riaz T, Shehzad W, Viari A, Pompanon F, Taberlet P, Coissac E. 2011. ecoPrimers: inference of new DNA barcode markers from whole genome sequence analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 39:e145-e145 DOI 10.1093/nar/gkr732
27. Sweeney BW, Battle JM, Jackson JK, Dapkey T. 2011. Can DNA barcodes of stream macroinvertebrates improve descriptions of community structure and water quality? Journal of the North American Benthological Society 30:195-216 DOI 10.1899/10-016.1
28. Taberlet P, Coissac E, Hajibabaei M, Rieseberg LH. 2012. Environmental DNA. Molecular Ecology 21:1789-1793 DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05542.x
29. Tang M, Hardman CJ, Ji Y, Meng G, Liu S, Tan M, Yang S, Moss ED, Wang J, Yang C, Bruce C, Nevard T, Potts SG, Zhou X, Yu DW. 2015. High-throughput monitoring of wild bee diversity and abundance via mitogenomics. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6:1034-1043 DOI 10.1111/2041-210X.12416
30. Tang M, Tan M, Meng G, Yang S, Su X, Liu S, Song W, Li Y, Wu Q, Zhang A, Zhou X. 2014. Multiplex sequencing of pooled mitochondrial genomes-a crucial step toward biodiversity analysis using mito-metagenomics. Nucleic Acids Research 42:gku917-e166 DOI 10.1093/nar/gku917
31. Taylor HR, Harris WE. 2012. An emergent science on the brink of irrelevance: a review of the past 8 years of DNA barcoding. Molecular Ecology Resources 12(3):377-388 DOI 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03119.x
32. Yu DW, Ji Y, Emerson BC, Wang X, Ye C, Yang C, Ding Z. 2012. Biodiversity soup: metabarcoding of arthropods for rapid biodiversity assessment and biomonitoring. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3:613-623 DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00198.x
33. Zhou X, Adamowicz SJ, Jacobus LM, DeWalt RE, Hebert PD. 2009. Towards a comprehensive barcode library for arctic life-Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera of Churchill, Manitoba, Canada. Frontiers in Zoology 6: Article 30 DOI 10.1186/1742-9994-6-30
34. Zhou X, Jacobus LM, DeWalt RE, Adamowicz SJ, Hebert PDN. 2010. Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera fauna of Churchill (Manitoba, Canada): insights into biodiversity patterns from DNA barcoding. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29:814-837 DOI 10.1899/09-121.1
35. Zhou X, Li Y, Liu S, Yang Q, Su X, Zhou L, Tang M, Fu R, Li J, Huang Q. 2013. Ultradeep sequencing enables high-fidelity recovery of biodiversity for bulk arthropod samples without PCR amplification. GigaScience 2: Article 4 DOI 10.1186/2047-217X-2-4