The efficacy, safety and applications of medical hypnosis - A systematic review of meta-analyses;Wirksamkeit, Sicherheit und Anwendungsmöglichkeiten medizinischer Hypnose: Eine systematische Übersicht von Metaanalysen

Deutsches Arzteblatt International

Volumn 113, Issue 17, 2016, Pages 289-296

  Häuser, Winfried ^a   Hagl, Maria ^b   Schmierer, Albrecht ^c   Hansen, Ernil ^d  

^a KLINIKUM SAARBRÜCKEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c Anschrift für die Verfasser ^*  (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HYPNOSIS; SAFETY; ADULT; AGED; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL STRESS; META ANALYSIS; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; PATIENT SAFETY; PREVALENCE; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROCEDURES; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPNOSIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; PATIENT SAFETY; PREVALENCE; RISK FACTORS; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84966286523     PISSN: 18660452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2016.0289     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. British Medical Association. Medical use of hypnotism: report of a subcommittee appointed by the Psychological Medicine Group Committee of the British Medical Association. BMJ Suppl 1955; 23: 190-3.
2. Council on Mental Health: Medical use of hypnosis. JAMA 1958; 168: 186-9.
3. Baethge C: Evidenzbasierte Medizin. In der Versorgung angekommen, aber noch nicht heimisch. Dtsch Arztebl 2014; 111: 1630-40.
4. Peter B: Hypnosis. In: Wright DE: International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. 2nd edition, Volume 11. Oxford: Elsevier 2015; 458-64.
5. Higgins JPT, Green S (eds.): Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. www.cochrane-handbook.org (last accessed on 1 August 2015).
6. Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey C, et al.: Methodology for jbi umbrella reviews. The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers Manual 2014. http://arrow.monash.edu.au/hdl/1959.1/1131560 (last accessed on 1 June 2015).
7. Andrew Moore R, Eccleston C, Derry S, et al.: ACTINPAIN Writing Group of the IASP Special Interest Group on Systematic Reviews in Pain Relief; Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Systematic Review Group Editors: "Evidence" in chronic pain-establishing best practice in the reporting of systematic reviews. Pain 2010; 15: 386-9.
8. Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, et al.: AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: 1013-20.
9. Seo HJ, Kim KU: Quality assessment of systematic reviews or meta-analyses of nursing interventions conducted by Korean reviewers. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012; 12: 129.
10. Kekecs Z, Nagy T, Varga K: The effectiveness of suggestive techniques in reducing postoperative side effects: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg 2014; 119: 1407-19.
11. Madden K, Middleton P, Cyna AM, Matthewson M, Jones L: Hypnosis for pain management during labour and childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 11: CD009356.
12. Schaefert R, Klose P, Moser G, Häuser W: Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of hypnosis in adult irritable bowel syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychosom Med 2014; 76: 389-98.
13. Schnur JB, Kafer I, Marcus C, Montgomery GH: Hypnosis to manage distress related to medical procedures: a meta-analysis. Contemp Hypn 2008; 25: 114-28.
14. Tefikow S, Barth J, Maichrowitz S, Beelmann A, Strauss B, Rosendahl J: Efficacy of hypnosis in adults undergoing surgery or medical procedures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Psychol Rev 2013; 33: 623-36.
15. Klinkhammer G: Förderung der ärztlichen Kommunikationskompetenz gefordert. Dtsch Arztebl 2015; www.aerzteblatt.de/nachrichten/62808/Aerztetag-Foerderungder-aerztlichen-Kommunikationskompetenz-gefordert (last accessed on 1 July 2015).
16. Bingel U, Placebo Competence Team: Avoiding nocebo effects to optimize treatment outcome. JAMA 2014; 312: 693-4.
17. Häuser W, Hansen E, Enck P: Nocebo phenomena in medicine: their relevance in everyday clinical practice. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2012; 109: 459-65.
18. Hansen E, Bejenke C: [Negative and positive suggestions in anaesthesia: Improved communication with anxious surgical patients]. Anaesthesist 2010; 59: 199-202, 204-6, 208-9.
19. Seemann M, Zech N, Graf BM, Hansen E: [The premedication visit-suggestions for a patient-friendly design]. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2015; 50: 142-6.
20. Lang EV, Benotsch EG, Fick LJ, et al.: Adjunctive non-pharmacological analgesia for invasive medical procedures: a randomised trial. Lancet 2000; 355: 1486-90.
21. Lang EV, Berbaum KS, Faintuch S, et al.: Adjunctive self-hypnotic relaxation for outpatient medical procedures: a prospective randomized trial with women undergoing large core breast biopsy. Pain 2006; 126: 155-64.
22. Lang EV, Berbaum KS, Pauker SG, et al.: Beneficial effects of hypnosis and adverse effects of empathic attention during percutaneous tumor treatment: when being nice does not suffice. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008; 19: 897-905.
23. Ott J, Aust S, Nouri K, Promberger R: An everyday phrase may harm your patients. Clin J Pain 2012; 28: 324-8.
24. Varelmann D, Pancaro C, Cappiello EC, Camann WR: Nocebo-induced hyperalgesia during local anesthetic injection. Anesth Analg 2010; 110: 868-70.
25. Oktay C, Eken C, Goksu E, Dora B: Contribution of verbal suggestion to the therapeutic efficacy of an analgesic agent for acute primary headache. Cephalalgia 2015; 35: 579-84.