Quality assessment of systematic reviews or meta-analyses of nursing interventions conducted by Korean reviewers

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Volumn 12, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Seo, Hyun Ju ^a   Kim, Kyeong Uoon ^b  

^a Chosun University   (South Korea)

^b Kangwon National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Meta analysis; Nursing intervention; Quality assessment; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; LITERATURE; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); NURSING CARE; SOUTH KOREA;

DECISION MAKING; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; NURSING CARE; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; REPUBLIC OF KOREA; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84865311892     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-129     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Implementing evidence based nursing: some misconceptions. DiCenso A, Cullum N, Ciliska D, Evid Based Nurs 1998 1 38 40 10.1136/ebn.1.2.38
2. Chalmers I, Altman DG, Systematic review (eds) London: British Medical Journal Publishing Group 1995
3. An analysis of quality of systematic reviews on pharmacist health interventions. Melchiors AC, Correr CJ, Venson R, Pontarolo R, Int J Clin Pharm 2012 34 32 42 10.1007/s11096-011-9592-0 22183578
4. Rational for systematic reviews. Mulrow CD, BMJ 1994 309 597 599 10.1136/bmj.309.6954.597 8086953
5. Slutsky J, Atkins D, Chang S, Collins Sharp B: Methods Reference Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews US Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2008
6. An AMSTAR assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of oral healthcare interventions published in the Journal of Applied Oral Science (JAOS). Sequeira-Byron P, Fedorowicz Z, Jagannath VA, Sharif MO, J Appl Oral Sci 2011 19 440 447 10.1590/S1678-77572011000500002 21986647
7. Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics. Papageorgiou SN, Papadopoulos MA, Athanasiou AE, Orthod Craniofac Res 2011 14 116 137 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2011.01522.x 21771267
8. Quality of systematic reviews in pediatric oncology-a systematic review. Lundh A, Knijnenburg SL, Jørgensen AW, van Dalen EC, Kremer LC, Cancer Treat Rev 2009 35 645 652 10.1016/j.ctrv.2009.08.010 19836897
9. Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of traditional Chinese medicine interventions published in Chinese journals. Ma B, Guo J, Qi G, Li H, Peng J, Zhang Y, Ding Y, Yang K, PLoS One 2011 6 20185 10.1371/journal.pone.0020185 21633698
10. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network: Search filters http://www.sign.ac.uk/methodology/filters.html# systematic.
11. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic review. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, Porter AC, Tugwell P, Moher D, Bouter LM, BMC Med Res Methodol 2007 7 10 10.1186/1471-2288-7-10 17302989 (Pubitemid 46364967)
12. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic review. Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, Kristjansson E, Grimshaw J, Henry DA, Boers M, J Clin Epidemiol 2009 62 1013 1020 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009 19230606
13. External validation of a measurement tool to assess systematic review (AMSTAR). Shea BJ, Bouter LM, Peterson J, Boers M, Andersson N, Ortiz Z, Ramsay T, Bai A, Shukla VK, Grimshaw JM, PLoS One 2007 2 1350 10.1371/journal.pone. 0001350 18159233 (Pubitemid 351736822)
14. Child maltreatment prevention: a systematic review of reviews. Mikton C, Butchart A, Bull World Health Organ 2009 87 353 361 10.2471/BLT.08.057075 19551253
15. Analysis of research papers published in the journal of the Korea academy of nursing-focused on research trends, intervention studies, and level of evidence in the research. Shin HS, Hyun MS, Ku MO, Cho MO, Kim SY, Jeong JS, Jeong GH, Seomoon GA, Son YJ, J Korean Acad Nurs 2010 40 139 149 Korean 10.4040/jkan.2010.40.1.139 20220290
16. Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the meta quality cross sectional study. Moja LP, Telaro E, D'Amico R, Moschetti I, Coe L, Liberati A, BMJ 2005 330 1053 10.1136/bmj.38414.515938.8F 15817526 (Pubitemid 40646556)
17. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic review and meta analysis of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D, J Clin Epidemiol 2009 62 1 e34 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006 19631507
18. PRISMA Group: Reprint-preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta analysis: the PRISMA statement. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Phys Ther 2009 89 873 880 19723669