Adjunctive self-hypnotic relaxation for outpatient medical procedures: A prospective randomized trial with women undergoing large core breast biopsy

Pain

Volumn 126, Issue 1-3, 2006, Pages 155-164

  Lang, Elvira V ^a   Berbaum, Kevin S ^b   Faintuch, Salomao ^a   Hatsiopoulou, Olga ^a   Halsey, Noami ^a   Li, Xinyu ^c   Berbaum, Michael L ^c   Laser, Eleanor ^a   Baum, Janet ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Analgesia; Anesthesia; Anxiety; Breast biopsy; Hypnosis; Medical procedures; Pain; Self hypnotic relaxation

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIA; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMPATHY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; HYPNOSIS; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEEDLE BIOPSY; OUTPATIENT; PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RELAXATION TRAINING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANXIETY; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST; EMPATHY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; HYPNOSIS; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; PATIENTS' ROOMS; RELAXATION TECHNIQUES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33750980361     PISSN: 03043959     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.06.035     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Acute Pain Management Guideline Panel. Acute pain management: operative or medical procedures and trauma. Clinical practice guideline. AHCPR Pub. No.92-0032. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1992.
2. American Cancer Society. Breast cancer facts and figures 2005-2006. Atlanta: American Cancer Society Inc, 2005.
3. American College of Radiology. ACR practice guidelines for the performance of stereotactically guided breast interventional procdures. Reston, VA: ACR, 2000.
4. Barabasz A., and Christensen C. Age regression: tailored versus scripted inductions. Am J Clin Hypn 48 (2006) 251-261
5. Benotsch E., Lutgendorf S.K., Watson D.W., Fick L.J., and Lang E.V. Rapid anxiety assessment in medical patients: evidence for the validity of verbal anxiety ratings. Ann Behav Med 22 (2000) 199-203
6. Bugbee M.E., Wellisch D.K., Arnott I.M., Maxwell J.R., Kirsch D.L., Sayre J.W., et al. Breast core-needle biopsy clinical trial of relaxation technique versus medication versus no intervention for anxiety reduction. Radiology 234 (2005) 73-78
7. Caruso A., Efficace F., Parrila A., Angelone L., Ferranti F., and Grandinetti M. Pain and anxiety related to mammography in breast cancer patients. Radiol Med 102 (2001) 335-339
8. Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey data. Atlanta, Georgia: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2002.
9. Folstein M.F., Folstein S.E., and McHugh P.R. "Mini-Mental State": a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12 (1975) 189-198
10. Groenewoud J.H., Pijnappel R.M., van den Akker-Van Marle M.E., et al. Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast lesions compared to open breast biopsy. Br J Cancer 90 (2004) 383-392
11. Helbich T.H., Dantendorfer K., Mostbeck G.H., Schick S., Wunderbaldinger P., Amering M., et al. Randomized comparison of sitting and prone positions for stereotactic fine-needle aspiration breast biopsy. Br J Surg 83 (1996) 1252-1255
12. Jennrich RI, Schluchter MD. Unbalanced repeated measures models with structured covariance matrices, 1986.
13. Kirk R.E. Experimental design: procedures for the behavioral sciences. 3rd ed. (1995), Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove, CA
14. Laird N.M., and Ware J.H. Random effects model for longitudinal data. Biometrics 38 (1982) 963-974
15. Lang E.V., Benotsch E.G., Fick L.J., Lutgendorf S., Berbaum M.L., Berbaum K.S., et al. Adjunctive non-pharmacologic analgesia for invasive medical procedures: a randomized trial. Lancet 355 (2000) 1486-1490
16. Lang E.V., and Berbaum K.S. Educating interventional radiology personnel in nonpharmacologic analgesia: effect on patients' pain perception. Acad Radiol 4 (1997) 753-757
17. Lang E.V., Laser E., Anderson B., Potter J., Hatsiopoulou O., Lutgendorf S.K., et al. Shaping the experience of behavior: construct of an electronic teaching module in nonpharmacologic analgesia and anxiolysis. Acad Radiol 9 (2002) 1185-1193
18. Lang E.V., Lutgendorf S., Logan H., Benotsch E., Laser E., and Spiegel D. Nonpharmacologic analgesia and anxiolysis for interventional radiological procedures. Sem Intervent Radiol 16 (1999) 113-123
19. Lang J.S. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables (1997), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
20. Maxwell J.R., Bugbee M.E., Wellisch D.K., Shalom A., Sayre J., and Bassett L.W. Image-guided core needle biopsy of the breast: study of psychological outcomes. Breast J 6 (2000) 53-61
21. Meyer J.E., Smith D.N., Lester S.C., Kaelin C., DiPiro P.J., Denison C.M., et al. Large-core breast needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. JAMA 281 (1999) 1638-1641
22. Moncher F.J., and Prinz R.J. Treatment fidelity in outcome studies. Clin Psychol Rev 11 (1991) 247-266
23. Montgomery G.H., David D., Winkel G., Silverstein J.H., and Bovberg D.H. The effectiveness of adjunctive hypnosis with surgical patients: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 94 (2002) 1639-1645
24. Murphy D., McDonald A., Power A., Unwin A., and MacSullivan R. Measurement of pain: a comparison of the visual analogue with a nonvisual analogue scale. J Clin Pain 3 (1988) 197-199
25. National Institutes of Health. The integrated approach to the management of pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 1987;2:35-44.
26. Novy D.M., Price M., Huynh P.T., and Schuetz A. Percutaneous core biopsy of the breast. Acad Radiol 8 (2001) 467-472
27. Paice J.A., and Cohen F.L. Validity of a verbally administered numeric rating scale to measure cancer pain intensity. Cancer Nurs 20 (1997) 88-93
28. Raza S., Rosen M.P., Chorny K., Mehta T.S., Hulka C.A., and Baum J.K. Patient expectations and costs of immediate reporting of screening mammography: talk isn't cheap. AJR 177 (2001) 579-583
29. Sachs D., McClenny T., Cardella J.F., and Lewis C.A. Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 14 (2003) S199-S202
30. SAS Institute. SAS/STAT user's guide, Version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, 1999.
31. Spielberger C. Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory STAI (form Y) (1983), Consulting Psychologists, Palo Alto
32. Spitzer RL, Endicott J. Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia. 3rd. edition. 1979.
33. Tabar L., Yen M.F., Vitak B., Tony Chen H.H., Smith R.A., and Duffy S.W. Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening. Lancet 361 (2003) 1405-1410
34. van Vlymen J.M., Sa Rego M.M., and White P.F. Benzodiazepine premedication: can it improve outcome in patients undergoing breast biopsy procedures?. Anesthesiology 90 (1999) 740-747