A Comparative Study of the Accuracy of Dies Made from Digital Intraoral Scanning vs. Elastic Impressions: An In Vitro Study

Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 88-93

  Serag, Mahmoud ^a   Nassar, Talal al ^b   Avondoglio, Dane ^c   Weiner, Saul ^c  

^a EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^c RUTGERS SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

dies; Digital impressions; dimensional accuracy; fixed prosthodontics

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; POLYVINYL DERIVATIVE; SILOXANE; VINYL POLYSILOXANE;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IN VITRO STUDY;

DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES; POLYVINYLS; SILOXANES;

EID: 84965178144     PISSN: 1059941X     EISSN: 1532849X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12481     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ng J, Ruse D, Wyatt C: A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:555-560
2. Christensen GJ: Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140:1301-1304
3. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, et al: Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on principal of active waveform sampling. J Dent 2010;38:553-559
4. Giannetopoulos S, van Noort R, Tsitrou E: Evaluation of the marginal integrity of ceramic copings with different marginal angles using two different CAD/CAM systems. J Dent 2010;38:980-986
5. Al-Rababah MA, McFarFarlane TV, McCord JF: Vertical marginal and internal adaptation of all ceramic copings made by CAD/CAM technology. Eur J Prosthodont Res Dent 2008; 16:109-115
6. Lee SJ, Gallucci GO: Digital vs conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:111-115
7. Gordon GE, Johnson GH, Drennon DG: The effect of tray selection on the accuracy of elastic tray materials. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:12-15
8. Dehurtevent M, Robberecht L, Behin P: Influence of dentist experience with scan spray systems used in direct CAD/CAM impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:17-21
9. Hwang YC, Park YS, Kim HK, et al: The evaluation of working casts prepared from digital impressions. Oper Dent 2013;38:655-662
10. Cuperus AMR, Harms MC, Rangel FA, et al. Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:308-313
11. Lei WT, Hsu YY: Accuracy test of five-axis CNC machine tool with 3-D probe-ball. Part I: design and modeling. Int J Machine Tools Manufacture 2002;42:1153-1162
12. Bohez ELJ, Ariyajunya B, Sinlapeecheewa C, et al: Systematic geometric rigid body identification of 5-axis milling machines. Computer-Aided Design 2007;39:229-244
13. Silva DN, Gerhardt de Oliveira M, Meurer A, et al: Dimensional error in selective laser sintering and 3D-printing of models for craniomaxillary anatomy reconstruction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2008;36:443-449
14. Patzelt SB, Emmanouilidi A, Stampf S, et al: Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:1687-1694
15. Ender A, Mehl A: Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. 2013;109:121-128
16. Ender A, Mehl A: In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions. Quintessence Int 2015;46:9-17
17. Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wostmann B: Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:1759-1764
18. Bell A, Ayoub AF, Siebert P: Assessment of the accuracy of a three-dimensional imaging system for archiving dental study models. J Orthod 2003;30:219-223
19. Hazeveld A, Huddlestom Slater JJ, et al: Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques. Am J Orthodont Dentofacial Orthop 2014;145:108-115
20. Kim JH, Kim KB, Kim WC, et al: Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique. Korean J Orthod 2014;44:69-76
21. Luthardt RG, Loos R, Quaas S: Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression. Int J Comput Dent 2005;8:283-294
22. Patzelt SB, Bishti S, Att W, et al: Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data. J Am Dent Assoc 2014;145:1133-1140
23. van der Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D, et al: Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS One 2012;7:e43312
24. Emtiaz S, Goldstein G: Effect of die spacers on precementation space of complete-coverage restorations. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:131-135