Preserving Theoretical Divergence in Management Research: Why the Explanatory Potential of Qualitative Research Should Be Harnessed Rather than Suppressed

Journal of Management Studies

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 368-383

  Cornelissen, Joep P ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

management studies; qualitative methods; qualitative research; theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84964986661     PISSN: 00222380     EISSN: 14676486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/joms.12210     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Abbott, A. (1988). ‘Transcending general linear reality’. Sociological Theory, 6, 169–86.
2. Abbott, A. (2004). Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for the Social Sciences. New York: W. W. Norton.
3. Alvesson, M. and Sandberg, J. (2013). ‘Has management studies lost its way? Ideas for more imaginative and innovative research’. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 128–52.
4. Bansal, P. and Corley, K. (2011). ‘The coming of age for qualitative research: Embracing the diversity of qualitative methods’. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 233–7.
5. Bluhm, D. J., Harman, W., Lee, T. W. and Mitchell, T. R. (2011). ‘Qualitative research in management: A decade of progress’. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 1866–91.
6. Cornelissen, J. P., Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2014). ‘The contraction of meaning: The combined effect of communication, emotions, and materiality on sensemaking in the stockwell shooting’. Journal of Management Studies, 51, 699–736.
7. Courpasson, D. (2013). ‘On the erosion of “passionate scholarship”’. Organization Studies, 34, 1243–9.
8. Delbridge, R. and Fiss, P. C. (2013). ‘Editors’ comments: Styles of theorizing and the social organization of knowledge’. Academy of Management Review, 38, 325–31.
9. Dyer, W. G. Jr and Wilkins, A. L. (1991). ‘Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory: A rejoinder to Eisenhardt’. Academy of Management Review, 16, 613–9.
10. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). ‘Building theories from case study research’. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–50.
11. Eisenhardt, K. M. and Graebner, M. E. (2007). ‘Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges’. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25–32.
12. Felin, T. and Foss, N. J. (2009). ‘Performativity of theory, arbitrary conventions, and possible worlds: A reality check’. Organization Science, 20, 676–8.
13. Felin, T., Foss, N. J. and Ployhart, R. E. (2015). ‘The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory’. Academy of Management Annals, 9, 575–632.
14. Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J. and Sutton, R. I. (2005). ‘Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling’. Academy of Management Review, 30, 8–24.
15. Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J. and Sutton, R. I. (2009). ‘How and why theories matter: A comment of Felin and Foss’. Organization Science, 20, 669–75.
16. Fiss, P. C. (2007). ‘A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations’. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1180–98.
17. Fiss, P. C. (2011). ‘Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organizational research’. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 393–420.
18. Folger, R. and Turillo, C. J. (1999). ‘Theorizing as the thickness of thin abstraction’. Academy of Management Review, 24, 742–58.
19. Gaskell, G. and Bauer, M. W. (2000). ‘Towards public accountability: Beyond sampling, reliability and validity’. In Bauer, M. W. and Gaskell, G. (Eds), Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound: A Practical Handbook. London: Sage, 336–50.
20. Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic.
21. Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G. and Hamilton, A. L. (2013). ‘Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology’. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 15–31.
22. Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.
23. Harley, B. (2015). ‘The one best way? “Scientific” research on HRM and the threat to critical scholarship’. Human Resource Management Journal, in press.
24. Harrison, J. R., Lin, Z., Carroll, G. R. and Carley, K. M. (2007). ‘Simulation modeling in organizational and management research’. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1229–45.
25. Langley, A. (1999). ‘Strategies for theorizing from process data’. Academy of Management Review, 24, 691–710.
26. Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H. and Van De Ven, A. H. (2013). ‘Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow’. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 1–13.
27. Lee, T. W. (1999). Using Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Mackie, J. L. (1974). The Cement of the Universe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Mantere, S. and Ketokivi, M. (2013). ‘Reasoning in organization science’. Academy of Management Review, 38, 70–89.
30. Mintzberg, H. (1970). ‘Structured observation as a method to study managerial work’. Journal of Management Studies, 7, 87–104.
31. Pentland, B. T. (1999). ‘Building process theory with narrative: From description to explanation’. Academy of Management Review, 24, 711−24.
32. Pratt, M. G. (2008). ‘Fitting oval pegs into round holes: Tensions in evaluating and publishing qualitative research in top-tier North American journals’. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 481–509.
33. Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34. Schneiberg, M. and Clemens, E. S. (2006). ‘The typical tools for the job: Research strategies in institutional analysis’. Sociological Theory, 24, 195–227.
35. Stake, R. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Suddaby, R. (2006). ‘What grounded theory is not’. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 633–42.
37. Sutton, R. I. and Staw, B. M. (1995). ‘What theory is not’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 371–84.
38. Tilly, C. (2006). Why? What Happens When People Give Reasons … and Why. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39. Tsoukas, H. (2009). ‘Craving for generality and small-N studies: A Wittgensteinian approach towards the epistemology of the particular in organization and management studies’. In Buchanan, D. and Bryman, A. (eds), Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods. London: Sage, 285–301.
40. Van Maanen, J. (1995). ‘Style as theory’. Organization Science, 6, 133–43.
41. Van Maanen, J. (2011). ‘Ethnography as work: Some rules of engagement’. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 218–34.
42. Van Maanen, J., Sørensen, J. B. and Mitchell, T. R. (2007). ‘The interplay between theory and method’. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1145–54.
43. Watson, T. J. (2011). ‘Ethnography, reality, and truth: the vital need for studies of ‘how things work’ in organizations and management’. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 202–17.
44. Wright, P. (2015). ‘Rethinking contribution’. Journal of Management, 41, 765–8.
45. Wright, P. M., Coff, R. and Moliterno, T. (2014). ‘Strategic human capital: Crossing the great divide’. Journal of Management, 40, 353–70.