Antimicrobial and biocompatible ϵ-polylysine-γ-poly(glutamic acid)-based hydrogel system for wound healing

Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 242-259

  Wang, Rui ^a   Zhou, Bo ^b   Xu, De Lei ^a   Xu, Hong ^a   Liang, Lei ^c   Feng, Xiao Hai ^a   Ouyang, Ping Kai ^a   Chi, Bo ^a  

^a NANJING TECH UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b ANHUI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c NANJING GENERAL HOSPITAL OF NANJING MILITARY COMMAND   (China)

Author keywords

antimicrobial; biocompatible; hydrogels; wound healing; poly(glutamic acid); Polylysine

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVES; AMINO ACIDS; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIODEGRADABILITY; BIODEGRADATION; CROSSLINKING; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; GELATION; MORPHOLOGY; SURFACE MORPHOLOGY; TISSUE REGENERATION;

ANTIMICROBIAL; BIOCOMPATIBLE; POLYGLUTAMIC ACIDS; POLYLYSINE; WOUND HEALING;

HYDROGELS;

1 (3 DIMETHYLAMINOPROPYL) 3 ETHYLCARBODIIMIDE; FIBRIN GLUE; N HYDROXYSUCCINIMIDE; POLYGLUTAMIC ACID; POLYLYSINE; TISSUE ADHESIVE;

ADHESION; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS LINKING; DEGRADATION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GELATION; HYDROGEL DRESSING; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; L929 CELL LINE; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PIG; RAT; SKIN INJURY; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; SURFACE PROPERTY; WOUND HEALING; YOUNG MODULUS;

EID: 84964922730     PISSN: 08839115     EISSN: 15308030     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0883911515610019     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Yatesa CC, Whaley D, Babu R, et al. The effect of multifunctional polymer-based gels on wound healing in full thickness bacteria-contaminated mouse skin wound models. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 3977-3986.
2. Kima HN, Hong Y, Kim MS, et al. Effect of orientation and density of nanotopography in dermal wound healing. Biomaterials 2012; 33: 8782-8792.
3. Harmon AM, Kong W, Buensuceso CS, et al. Effects of fibrin pad hemostat on the wound healing process in vivo and in vitro. Biomaterials 2011; 32: 9594-9601.
4. Gurtner GC, Werner S, Barrandon Y, et al. Wound repair and regeneration. Nature 2008; 453: 314-321.
5. Ishihara M, Nakanishi K, Ono K, et al. Photocrosslinkable chitosan as a dressing for wound occlusion and accelerator in healing process. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 833-840.
6. Ono K, Ishihara M, Ozeki Y, et al. Experimental evaluation of photocrosslinkable chitosan as a biologic adhesive with surgical applications. Surgery 2001; 130: 844-850.
7. Ogden S, Griffiths TW., A review of minimally invasive cosmetic procedures. J Dermatol 2008; 159: 1036-1050.
8. Anseth KS, Metters AT, Bryant SJ, et al. In situ forming degradable networks and their application in tissue engineering and drug delivery. J Control Release 2008; 78: 199-209.
9. Sierra DH., Fibrin sealant adhesive systems: a review of their chemistry, material properties and clinical applications. J Biomater Appl 1993; 7: 309-352.
10. Spotnitz WD., Fibrin sealant in the United States: clinical use at the University of Virginia. Thromb Haemostasis 1995; 74: 482-485.
11. Spotnitz WD, Burks SG, Prabhu R., Fibrin-based adhesives and hemostatic agents: tissue adhesives in clinical medicine. 2nd ed. Hamilton, ON: BC Decker Inc., 2005, pp. 77-112.
12. Radosevich M, Goubran I, Burnouf T., Fibrin sealant: scientific rationale, production methods, properties, and current clinical use. Vox San 1997; 72: 133-143.
13. Joch C., The safety of fibrin sealants. Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 11: 23-28.
14. Traver MA, Assimos DG., New generation tissue sealants and hemostatic agents: innovative urologic applications. Rev Urol 2006; 8: 104-111.
15. Albes JM, Krettek C, Hausen B, et al. Biophysical properties of the gelatin-resorcin-formaldehyde/glutaraldehyde adhesive. Ann Thorac Surg 1993; 56: 910-915.
16. Conrad K, Yoskovitch A., The use of fibrin glue in the correction of pollybeak deformity. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003; 5: 522-527.
17. Brennan M., Fibrin glue. Blood Rev 1991; 5: 240-244.
18. Mobley SR, Hilinski J, Toriumi DM., Surgical tissue adhesives. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2002; 10: 147-154.
19. Leggat PA, Smith DR, Kedjarune U., Surgical applications of cyanoacrylate adhesives: a review of toxicity. ANZ J Surg 2007; 77: 209-213.
20. Singer AJ, Quinn JV, Hollander JE., The cyanoacrylate topical skin adhesives. Am J Emerg Med 2008; 26: 490-496.
21. Eaglstein WH, Sullivan T., Cyanoacrylates for skin closure. Dermatol Clin 2005; 23: 193-198.
22. Gong CY, Wu QJ, Wang YJ, et al. A biodegradable hydrogel system containing curcumin encapsulated in micelles for cutaneous wound healing. Biomaterials 2013; 34: 6377-6387.
23. Anumolu SNS, Menjoge AR, Deshmukh M, et al. Doxycycline hydrogels with reversible disulfide crosslinks for dermal wound healing of mustard injuries. Biomaterials 2011; 32: 1204-1217.
24. Okan D, Woo K, Ayello EA, et al. The role of moisture balance in wound healing. Adv Skin Wound Care 2007; 20: 39-53.
25. Balakrishnan B, Mohanty M, Fernandez AC, et al. Evaluation of the effect of incorporation of dibutyryl cyclic adenosine monophosphate in an in situ-forming hydrogel wound dressing based on oxidized alginate and gelatin. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 1355-1361.
26. Lee Y, Bae JW, Oh DH, et al. In situ forming gelatin-based tissue adhesives and their phenolic content-driven properties. J Mater Chem B 2013; 1: 2407-2414.
27. Zhang Y, Feng XH, Xu H, et al. ϵ-Poly-L-lysine production by immobilized cells of Kitasatospora sp. MY 5-36 in repeated fed-batch cultures. Bioresource Technol 2010; 101: 5523-5527.
28. Nakajima N, Sugai H, Tsutsumi S, et al. Self-degradable bioadhesive. Key Eng Mat 2007; 342: 713-716.
29. Nie W, Yuan XY, Zhao J, et al. Rapidly in situ forming chitosan/ϵ-polylysine hydrogels for adhesive sealants and hemostatic materials. Carbohyd Polym 2013; 96: 342-348.
30. Wang R, Zhou B, Liu W, et al. Fast in situ generated ϵ-polylysine-poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogels as tissue adhesives and hemostatic materials using an enzyme-catalyzed method. J Biomater Appl 2014; 29: 1167-1179.
31. Zhou CC, Li P, Qi XB, et al. A photopolymerized antimicrobial hydrogel coating derived from epsilon-poly-L-lysine. Biomaterials 2011; 32: 2704-2712.
32. Liu HX, Pei HB, Han ZN, et al. The antimicrobial effects and synergistic antibacterial mechanism of the combination of ϵ-Polylysine and nisin against. Bacillus subtilis. Food Control 2015; 47: 444-450.
33. Zhang LM, Li RC, Dong F, et al. Physical, mechanical and antimicrobial properties of starch films incorporated with ϵ-poly-L-lysine. Food Chemistry 2015; 166: 107-114.
34. Shima S, Matsuoka H, Iwamoto T, et al. Antimicrobial action of ϵ-poly-L-lysine. J Antibiot 1984; 37: 1449-1455.
35. Puppi D, Dinucci D, Bartoli C, et al. Development of 3D wet-spun polymeric scaffolds loaded with antimicrobial agents for bone engineering. J Bioact Compat Pol 2011; 26: 478-492.
36. Winter GD., Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelization of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig. Nature 1962; 193: 293-294.
37. Bajaj I, Singhal R., Poly (glutamic acid)-an emerging biopolymer of commercial interest. Bioresource Technol 2011; 102: 5551-5561.
38. Tsao CT, Chang CH, Lin YY, et al. Evaluation of chitosan/γ-poly(glutamic acid) polyelectrolyte complex for wound dressing materials. Carbohyd Polym 2011; 84: 812-819.
39. Wang S, Cao XY, Shen MW, et al. Fabrication and morphology control of electrospun poly(γ-glutamic acid) nanofibers for biomedical applications. Colloid Surfaces B 2012; 89: 254-264.
40. Otani Y, Tabata Y, Ikada Y., A new biological glue from gelatin and poly (L-glutamic acid). J Biomed Mater Res 1996; 31: 157-166.
41. Otani Y, Tabata Y, Ikada Y., Hemostatic capability of rapidly curable glues from gelatin, poly(L-glutamic acid), and carbodiimide. Biomaterials 1998; 19: 2091-2098.
42. Otani Y, Tabata Y, Ikada Y., Rapidly curable biological glue composed of gelatin and poly(l-glutamic acid). Biomaterials 1996; 17: 1387-1391.
43. Zhang D, Feng XH, Zhou Z, et al. Economical production of poly(γ-glutamic acid) using untreated cane molasses and monosodium glutamate waste liquor by Bacillus subtilis NX-2. Bioresource Technol 2012; 114: 583-588.
44. Censi R, Vermonden T, Deschout H, et al. Photopolymerized thermosensitive poly(HPMAlactate)-PEG-based hydrogels: effect of network design on mechanical properties, degradation, and release behavior. Biomacromolecules 2010; 11: 2143-2151.
45. Lih E, Joung YK, Bae JW, et al. An in situ gel-forming heparin-conjugated PLGA-PEG-PLGA copolymer. J Bioact Compat Pol 2008; 23: 444-457.
46. Jin R, Hiemstra C, Zhong ZY, et al. Enzyme-mediated fast in situ formation of hydrogels from dextran-tyramine conjugates. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 2791-2800.
47. Park KM, Shin YM, Joung YK, et al. In situ forming hydrogels based on tyramine conjugated 4-arm-PPO-PEO via enzymatic oxidative reaction. Biomacromolecules 2010; 11: 706-712.
48. Wang LS, Chung JE, Chan PP, et al. The role of stiffness of gelatin-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid hydrogels formed by enzyme-mediated crosslinking on the differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cell. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 1148-1157.
49. Duan X, Sheardown H., Dendrimer crosslinked collagen as a corneal tissue engineering scaffold: mechanical properties and corneal epithelial cell interactions. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 4608-4617.
50. Tsao CT, Chang CH, Li YD, et al. Development of chitosan/dicarboxylic acid hydrogels as wound dressing materials. J Bioact Compat Pol 2011; 26: 519-536.
51. Chang CH, Tsao CT, Chang KY, et al. Chitosan membrane with surface-bonded growth factor in guided tissue regeneration applications. J Bioact Compat Pol 2010; 25: 465-482.
52. Muzzarelli RAA,. Chitins and chitosans for the repair of wounded skin, nerve, cartilage and bone. Carbohyd Polym 2009; 76: 167-182.
53. Olde Damink LH, Dijkstra PJ, van Luyn MJ, et al. Cross-linking of dermal sheep collagen using a water-soluble carbodiimide. Biomaterials 1996; 17: 765-773.
54. Lee F, Chung JE, Kurisawa M., An injectable hyaluronic acid-tyramine hydrogel system for protein delivery. J Control Release 2009; 134: 186-193.
55. Godin B, Touitou E., Transdermal skin delivery: predictions for humans from in vivo, ex vivo and animal models. Adv Drug Deliver Rev 2007; 59: 1152-1161.
56. Kong R, Bhargava R., Characterization of porcine skin as a model for human skin studies using infrared spectroscopic imaging. Analyst 2011; 136: 2359-2366.
57. Barbero AM, Frasch HF., Pig and guinea pig skin as surrogates for human in vitro penetration studies: a quantitative review. Toxicol In Vitro 2009; 23: 1-13.
58. Lin YH, Chung CK, Chen CT, et al. Preparation of nanoparticles composed of chitosan/poly-γ-glutamic acid and evaluation of their permeability through caco-2 cells. Biomacromolecules 2005; 6: 1104-1112.
59. Liang CX, Yuan F, Liu FG, et al. Structure and antimicrobial mechanism of epsilon-polylysine-chitosan conjugates through Maillard reaction. Int J Biol Macromol 2014; 70: 427-434.
60. Kull S, Martinelli I, Briganti E, et al. Glubran2 surgical glue: in vitro evaluation of adhesive and mechanical properties. J Surg Res 2009; 157: 15-21.
61. Ninan L, Monahan J, Stroshine RL, et al. Adhesive strength of marine mussel extracts on porcine skin. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 4091-4099.
62. Burke SA, Jones MR, Lee BP, et al. Thermal gelation and tissue adhesion of biomimetic hydrogels. Biomed Mater 2007; 2: 203-210.
63. Strehin I, Nahas Z, Arora K, et al. A versatile pH sensitive chondroitin sulfate-PEG tissue adhesive and hydrogel. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 2788-2797.
64. Phuong NT, Ho VA, Nguyen DH, et al. Enzyme-mediated fabrication of an oxidized chitosan hydrogel as a tissue sealant. J Bioact Compat Pol. 2015; 30: 412-423.
65. Fiebrig I, Harding S, Davis S., Sedimentation analysis of potential interactions between mucins and a putative bioadhesive polymer. Prog Coll Pol Sci 1994; 94: 66-73.
66. Oelker AM, Grinstaff MW., Ophthalmic adhesives: a materials chemistry perspective. J Mater Chem B 2008; 18: 2521-2536.
67. Ryou M, Thompson CC., Tissue adhesives: a review. Tech Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 8: 33-37.