Development and preliminary evaluation of an online educational video about whole-genome sequencing for research participants, patients, and the general public

Genetics in Medicine

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 501-512

  Sanderson, Saskia C ^a   Suckiel, Sabrina A ^a   Zweig, Micol ^a   Bottinger, Erwin P ^a   Jabs, Ethylin Wang ^a   Richardson, Lynne D ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; GENOME; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; SATISFACTION; VIDEORECORDING; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EDUCATION; FEMALE; GENETICS; HUMAN GENOME; INTERNET; MALE; MASS MEDIUM; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; RESEARCH; VERY ELDERLY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COMMUNICATIONS MEDIA; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; GENOME, HUMAN; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; RESEARCH; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 84964866092     PISSN: 10983600     EISSN: 15300366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2015.118     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bainbridge MN, Wiszniewski W, Murdock DR, et al. Whole-genome sequencing for optimized patient management. Sci Transl Med 2011;3:87re3.
2. Link DC, Schuettpelz LG, Shen D, et al. Identification of a novel TP53 cancer susceptibility mutation through whole-genome sequencing of a patient with therapy-related AML. JAMA 2011;305:1568-1576.
3. Lupski JR, Reid JG, Gonzaga-Jauregui C, et al. Whole-genome sequencing in a patient with Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy. N Engl J Med 2010;362: 1181-1191.
4. Welch JS, Westervelt P, Ding L, et al. Use of whole-genome sequencing to diagnose a cryptic fusion oncogene. JAMA 2011;305:1577-1584.
5. Dewey FE, Grove ME, Pan C, et al. Clinical interpretation and implications of whole-genome sequencing. JAMA 2014;311:1035-1045.
6. Sanderson SC, Linderman MD, Kasarskis A, et al. Informed decision-making among students analyzing their personal genomes on a whole genome sequencing course: a longitudinal cohort study. Genome Med 2013; 5:113.
7. Angrist M. Eyes wide open: the personal genome project, citizen science and veracity in informed consent. Per Med 2009;6:691-699.
8. Patel CJ, Sivadas A, Tabassum R, et al. Whole genome sequencing in support of wellness and health maintenance. Genome Med 2013;5:58.
9. G2P. The MedSeq Project. http://www.genomes2people.org/the-medseq-project/. Accessed 5 August 2014.
10. Genomics England. The 100, 000 Genomes Project. http://www. genomicsengland.co.uk/the-100000-genomes-project/. Accessed 5 August 2014.
11. Illumina. Understand Your Genome (UYG) Sequencing Conference. http://www.illumina.com/company/events/understand-your-genome.ilmn. Accessed 5 August 2014.
12. Bekker H. Genetic screening: facilitating informed choices. eLS 2006:1-5.
13. Marteau TM, Dormandy E, Michie S. A measure of informed choice. Health Expect 2001;4:99-108.
14. O'Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making 1995;15:25-30.
15. Rimer BK, Briss PA, Zeller PK, Chan EC, Woolf SH. Informed decision making: what is its role in cancer screening? Cancer 2004;101(suppl 5):1214-1228.
16. van den Berg M, Timmermans DR, ten Kate LP, van Vugt JM, van der Wal G. Informed decision making in the context of prenatal screening. Patient Educ Couns 2006;63:110-117.
17. Catz DS, Green NS, Tobin JN, et al. Attitudes about genetics in underserved, culturally diverse populations. Community Genet 2005;8:161-172.
18. Jallinoja P, Aro AR. Knowledge about genes and heredity among Finns. New Genet Soc 1999;18:101-110.
19. Lanie AD, Jayaratne TE, Sheldon J P, et al. Exploring the public understanding of basic genetic concepts. J Genet Couns 2004;13:305-320.
20. Resta R, Biesecker BB, Bennett RL, et al. A new definition of genetic counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors' Task Force report. J Genet Couns 2006;15:77-83.
21. Brunham LR, Hayden MR. Medicine. Whole-genome sequencing: the new standard of care? Science 2012;336:1112-1113.
22. O'Daniel JM. The prospect of genome-guided preventive medicine: a need and opportunity for genetic counselors. J Genet Couns 2010;19:315-327.
23. Kaphingst KA, Facio FM, Cheng MR, et al. Effects of informed consent for individual genome sequencing on relevant knowledge. Clin Genet 2012;82:408-415.
24. Green MJ, Fost N. Who should provide genetic education prior to gene testing? Computers and other methods for improving patient understanding. Genet Test 1997;1:131-136.
25. Bickmore TW, Pfeifer LM, Paasche-Orlow MK. Using computer agents to explain medical documents to patients with low health literacy. Patient Educ Couns 2009;75:315-320.
26. Jeste DV, Dunn LB, Folsom DP, Zisook D. Multimedia educational aids for improving consumer knowledge about illness management and treatment decisions: a review of randomized controlled trials. J Psychiatr Res 2008;42:1-21.
27. Eggers C, Obliers R, Koerfer A, et al. A multimedia tool for the informed consent of patients prior to gastric banding. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2007;15:2866-2873.
28. Mayer RE, Moreno R. Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educ Psychol Rev 2002;14:87-99.
29. Michie S, Dormandy E, Marteau TM. The multi-dimensional measure of informed choice: a validation study. Patient Educ Couns 2002;48:87-91.
30. O'Connor AM, Rostom A, Fiset V, et al. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. BMJ 1999;319:731-734.
31. Mullen PD, Allen JD, Glanz K, et al. Measures used in studies of informed decision making about cancer screening: a systematic review. Ann Behav Med 2006;32:188-201.
32. Henneman L, Timmermans DR, van der Wal G. Public experiences, knowledge and expectations about medical genetics and the use of genetic information. Community Genet 2004;7:33-43.
33. Andermann AA, Austoker J, Watson EK, Lucassen AM, Mackay J. Development and evaluation of a general information leaflet for women with a family history of breast cancer. J Cancer Educ 2002;17:155-160.
34. O'Connor AM, Cranney A. User Manual-Acceptability. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute: Ottawa, Canada, 1996, modified 2002. http://decisionaid. ohri.ca/docs/develop/User-Manuals/UM-Acceptability.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2015.
35. Ishiyama I, Nagai A, Muto K, et al. Relationship between public attitudes toward genomic studies related to medicine and their level of genomic literacy in Japan. Am J Med Genet A 2008;146A:1696-1706.
36. Sanderson SC, Diefenbach MA, Zinberg R, et al. Willingness to participate in genomics research and desire for personal results among underrepresented mino rity patients: a structured interview study. J Community Genet 2013;4:469-482.
37. Hartzler A, McCarty CA, Rasmussen LV, et al. Stakeholder engagement: a key component of integrating genomic information into electronic health records. Genet Med 2013;15:792-801.
38. Green MJ, Peterson SK, Baker MW, et al. Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004;292: 442-452.
39. Mancini J, Noguès C, Adenis C, et al. Impact of an information booklet on satisfaction and decision-making about BRCA genetic testing. Eur J Cancer 2006;42:871-881.
40. Peterson SK, Pentz RD, Blanco AM, et al. Evaluation of a decision aid for families considering p53 genetic counseling and testing. Genet Med 2006;8:226-233.
41. Persky S, Kaphingst KA, Condit CM, McBride CM. Assessing hypothetical scenario methodology in genetic susceptibility testing analog studies: a quantitative review. Genet Med 2007;9:727-738.
42. Sanderson SC, O'Neill SC, Bastian LA, Bepler G, McBride CM. What can interest tell us about uptake of genetic testing? Intention and behavior amongst smokers related to patients with lung cancer. Public Health Genomics 2010;13:116-124.
43. Sanderson SC, Linderman MD, Suckiel SA, et al. Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project. Eur J Hum Genet; e-pub ahead of print 3 June 2015.