Assessing hypothetical scenario methodology in genetic susceptibility testing analog studies: A quantitative review

Genetics in Medicine

Volumn 9, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 727-738

  Persky, Susan ^a   Kaphingst, Kimberly A ^a   Condit, Celeste M ^b   McBride, Colleen M ^a  

^a NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Genetic testing; Hypothetical; Methodology; Uptake

Indexed keywords

GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC CODE; GENETIC PROCEDURES; GENETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW;

GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMANS;

EID: 36248973674     PISSN: 10983600     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318159a344     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Lerman C, Croyle RT, Tercyak KP, Hamann H. Genetic testing: psychological aspects and implications. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002;70:784-797.
2. Vallone RP, Griffin DW, Lin S, Ross L. Overconfident prediction of future actions and outcomes by self and others. J Pers Soc Psychol 1990;58:582-592.
3. Sheeran P. Intention-behavior relations: a conceptual and empirical review. Eur Rev Social Psychol 2002;12:1-36.
4. Meiser B. Psychological impact of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: an update of the literature. Psychooncology 2005;14:1060-1074.
5. Ropka ME, Wenzel J, Phillips EK, Siadaty M, et al. Uptake rates for breast cancer genetic testing: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:840-855.
6. Pasacreta JV. Psychosocial issues associated with genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk: an integrative review. Cancer Invest 2003;21:588-623.
7. Chaiken S. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. J Pers Soc Psychol 1980;39:752-766.
8. Trumbo CW. Heuristic-systematic information processing and risk judgment. Risk Anal 1999;19:391-399.
9. Steginga SK, Occhipinti S. The application of the heuristic-systematic processing model to treatment decision making about prostate cancer. Med Decis Making 2004;24:573-583.
10. Weiner M, Mehrabian A. Language within language: immediacy, a channel in verbal communication. New York: Appleton-Centruy-Crofts, 1968.
11. Trope Y, Liberman N. Temporal construal. Psychol Rev 2003;110:403-421.
12. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol 1983;51:390-395.
13. Jacobsen PB, Valdimarsdottier HB, Brown KL, Offit K. Decision-making about genetic testing among women at familial risk for breast cancer. Psychosom Med 1997;59:459-466.
14. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, Rossi JS, Goldstein MG, et al. Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors. Health Psychol 1994;13:39-46.
15. Bratt O, Damber J-E, Emanuelsson M, Kristoffersson U, et al. Risk perception, screening practice and interest in genetic testing among unaffected men in families with hereditary prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer 2000;36:235-241.
16. Donovan KA, Tucker DC. Knowledge about genetic risk for breast cancer and perceptions of genetic testing in a sociogemographically diverse sample. J Behav Med 2000;23:15-36.
17. Durfy SJ, Bowen DJ, McTiernan A, Sporleder J, et al. Attitudes and interest in genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility in diverse groups of women in western Washington. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:369-375.
18. Doak CC, Doak LG, Root JH. Teaching patients with low literacy skills. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, 1996.
19. Miki Y, Swensen J, Shattuck-Eidens D, Futreal PA, et al. A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science 1994;266:66-71.
20. Lerman C, Daly M, Masny A, Balshem A. Attitudes about genetic testing for breastovarian cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:843-850.
21. Lerman C, Seay J, Balshem A, Audrain J. Interest in genetic testing among first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients. Am J Med Genet 1995;57:385-392.
22. Struewing JP, Lerman C, Kase RG, Giambarresi TR, et al. Anticipated uptake and impact of genetic testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1995;4:169-173.
23. Julian-Reynier C, Eisinger F, Vennin P, Chabal F, et al. Attitudes toward cancer predictive testing and transmission of information to the family. J Med Genet 1996;33:731-736.
24. Lerman C, Marshall J, Audrain J, Gomez-Caminero A. Genetic testing for colon cancer susceptibility: anticipated reactions of patients and challenges to providers. Int J Cancer 1996;69:58-61.
25. Patenaude AF, Basili L, Fairclough DL, Li FP. Attitudes of 47 mothers of pediatric oncology patients toward genetic testing for cancer predisposition. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:415-421.
26. Andrykowski MA, Lightner R, Studts JL, Munn RK. Hereditary cancer risk notification and testing: how interested is the general population? J Clin Oncol 1997;15:2139-2148.
27. Bratt O, Kristoffersson U, Lundgren R, Olsson H. Sons of men with prostate cancer: their attitudes regarding possible inheritance of prostate cancer, screening, and genetic testing. Urology 1997;50:360-365.
28. Tambor ES, Rimer BK, Strigo TS. Genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: awareness and interest among women in the general population. Am J Med Genet 1997;68:43-49.
29. Braczkowski R, Nowakowska-Zajdel E, Zubelewicz B, Muc-Wierzgon M, et al. Genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: Polish women's attitudes. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 1998;17:299-302.
30. Graham ID, Logan DM, Hughes-Benzie R, Evans WK, et al. How interested is the public in genetic testing for colon cancer susceptibility? Report of a cross-sectional population survey. Cancer Prev Control 1998;2:167-172.
31. Mogilnger A, Otten M, Cunningham JD, Brower ST. Awareness and attitudes concerning BRCA gene testing. Ann Surg Oncol 1998;5:607-612.
32. Ulrich CM, Kristal AR, White E, Hunt JR, et al. Genetic testing for cancer risk: a population survey on attitudes and intention. Community Genet 1998;1:213-222.
33. Glanz K, Grove J, Lerman C, Gotay C, et al. Correlates of intentions to obtain genetic counseling and colorectal cancer gene testing among at-risk relatives from three ethnic groups. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:329-336.
34. Lipkus IM, Iden D, Terrenoire J, Feaganes JR. Relationships among breast cancer concern, risk perceptions, and interest in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility among African-American women with and without a family history of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:533-539.
35. Ludman EJ, Curry SJ, Hoffman E, Taplin S. Women's knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility. Eff Clin Pract 1999;2:158-162.
36. Petersen GM, Larkin E, Codori A-M, Wang C-Y, et al. Attitudes toward colon cancer gene testing: survey of relatives of colon cancer patients. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:334-344.
37. Bosompra K, Flynn BS, Ashikaga T, Rairikar CJ, et al. Likelihood of undergoing genetic testing for cancer risk: a population-based study. Prev Med 2000;30:155-166.
38. Diefenbach MA, Schnoll RA, Miller SM, Brower L. Genetic testing for prostate cancer. Cancer Pract 2000;8:82-86.
39. Kash KM, Ortega-Verdejo K, Dabney MK, Holland JC, et al. Psychosocial aspects of cancer genetics: women at high risk for breast and ovarian cancer. Semin Surg Oncol 2000;18:333-338.
40. Miesfeldt S, Jones SM, Cohn W, Lippert M, et al. Men's attitudes regarding genetic testing for hereditary prostate cancer risk. Urology 2000;55:46-50.
41. Myers RE, Hyslop T, Jennings-Dozier K, Wolf TA, et al. Intention to be tested for prostate cancer risk among African-American men. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2000;9:1323-1328.
42. Roberts JS. Anticipating response to predictive genetic testing for Alzheimer disease: a survey of first-degree relatives. Gerontologist 2000;40:43-52.
43. Capelli M, Surh L, Walker M, Korneluk Y, et al. Psychological and social predictors of decisions about genetic testing for breast cancer in high-risk women. Psychol Health Med 2001;6:321-333.
44. Green MJ, Biesecker BB, McInerney AM, Mauger D, et al. An interactive computer program can effectively educate patients about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility. Am J Med Genet 2001;103:16-23.
45. Kinney AY, Croyle RT, Dudley WN, Bailey CA, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and Interest in breast-ovarian cancer gene testing: a survey of a large African-American kindred with a BRCA1 mutation. Prev Med 2001;33:543-551.
46. Neumann PJ, Hammitt JK, Mueller C, Fillit HM, et al. Public attitudes about genetic testing for Alzheimer disease. Health Aff 2001;20:252-264.
47. Press NA, Yasui Y, Reynolds S, Durfy SJ, et al. Women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility may be based on unrealistic expectations. Am J Med Genet 2001;99:99-110.
48. Armstrong K, Weber B, Ubel PA, Guerra C, et al. Interest in BRCA 1/2 testing in a primary care population. Prev Med 2002;34:590-595.
49. Bottorff JL, Ratner PA, Balneaves LG, Richardson CG, et al. Women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk: the influence of sociodemographics and knowledge. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002;11:89-95.
50. Bunn JY, Bosompra K, Ashikaga T, Flynn BS, et al. Factors influencing intention to obtain a genetic test for colon cancer risk: a population-based study. Prev Med 2002;34:567-577.
51. Bottorff JL, Ratner PA, Richardson C, Balneaves LG, et al. The influence of question wording on assessments of interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk. Psychooncology 2003;12:720-728.
52. Sanderson SC, Wardle J, Jarvis MJ, Humphries SE. Public interest in genetic testing for susceptibility to heart disease and cancer: a population-based survey in the UK. Prev Med 2004;39:458-464.
53. Westmaas JL, Woicik PB. Dispositional motivations and genetic risk feedback. Addict Behav 2005;30:1524-1534.
54. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20:37-46.
55. Mountcastle-Shah E, Tambor E, Bernhardt BA, Geller G, et al. Assessing mass media reporting of disease-related genetic discoveries. Sci Commun 2003;24:458-478.
56. Blascovich J, Loomis J, Beall A, Swinth K, et al. Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychol Inq 2002;13:146-149.