Flipped classrooms and student learning: Not just surface gains

Advances in Physiology Education

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 47-55

  McLean, Sarah ^a   Attardi, Stefanie M ^a   Faden, Lisa ^a   Goldszmidt, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Deep learning; Flipped classroom; Strategy; Student engagement; Time on task

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; PROCEDURES; STUDENT; YOUNG ADULT;

EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; STUDENTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84964819326     PISSN: 10434046     EISSN: 15221229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/advan.00098.2015     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bailey BP, Konstan JA. On the need for attention-aware systems: measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state. Comput Hum Behav 22: 685-708, 2006.
2. Basit T. Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis. Educ Res 45: 143-154, 2003.
3. Billings-Gagliardi S, Mazor KM. Student decisions about lecture attendance: do electronic course materials matter? Acad Med 82: S73-S76, 2007.
4. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualit Res Psychol 3: 77-101, 2006.
5. Chen B, Denoyelles A. Exploring Students' Mobile Learning Practices in Higher Education (online). http://er.educause.edu/articles/2013/10/exploringstudents-mobile-learning-practices-in-higher-education [7 October 2013].
6. Clark D. Psychological myths in e-learning. Med Teacher 24: 598-604, 2002.
7. Entwhistle NJ. Promoting Deep Learning Through Teaching and Assessment: Conceptual Frameworks and Educational Contexts. Leicester: ESRC Teaching and Learning Research Programme Conference, 2000.
8. Entwistle NJ, Ramsden P. Understanding Student Learning. London: Croom Helm, 1982.
9. Favero TG. Active review sessions can advance student learning. Adv Physiol Educ 35: 247-248, 2011.
10. Fleiss JL. The measurement of interrater agreement. Stat Methods Rates Proport 2: 212-236, 1981.
11. Fried CB. In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Comput Educ 50: 906-914, 2008.
12. Griffin P, Care E. Assessment & Teaching of 21st Century Skills: Methods and Approach. Dordecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 2014.
13. Jensen JL, Kummer TA, Godoy PD. Improvements from a flipped classroom may simply be the fruits of active learning. CBE Life Sci Educ 14: ar5, 2015.
14. Kirschner PA, Karpinski AC. Facebook and academic performance. Comput Hum Behav 26: 1237-1245, 2010.
15. Kreber C. The relationship between students' course perception and their approaches to studying in undergraduate science courses: a Canadian experience. Higher Educ Res Dev 22: 57-75, 2003.
16. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159-174, 1977.
17. Luckie DB, Aubry JR, Marengo BJ, Rivkin AM, Foos LA, Maleszewski JJ. Less teaching, more learning: 10-yr study supports increasing student learning through less coverage and more inquiry. Adv Physiol Educ 36: 325-335, 2012.
18. Mayer RE, Moreno R. Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educ Psychologist 38: 43-52, 2003.
19. Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldaña J. Qualitative Data analysis: a Methods Sourcebook. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2013.
20. Mueller PA, Oppenheimer DM. The pen is mightier than the keyboard: advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychol Sci 25: 1159-1168, 2014.
21. Nieder GL, Borges NJ. An eight-year study of online lecture use in a medical gross anatomy and embryology course. Anat Sci Educ 5: 311-320, 2012.
22. Novak GM. Just-in-time teaching. N Direct Teach Learn 2011: 63-73, 2011.
23. O'Flaherty J, Phillips C. The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: a scoping review. Internet Higher Educ 25: 85-95, 2015.
24. Ophir E, Nass C, Wagner AD. Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 15583-15587, 2009.
25. Rodenbaugh DW, Lujan HL, DiCarlo SE. Learning by doing: construction and manipulation of a skeletal muscle model during lecture. Adv Physiol Educ 36: 302-306, 2012.
26. Roehl A, Reddy SL, Shannon GJ. The flipped classroom: an opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning strategies. J Family Consumer Sci 105: 44-49, 2013.
27. Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci 15: 398-405, 2013.
28. Williams JB. Assertion-reason multiple-choice testing as a tool for deep learning: a qualitative analysis. Assess Eval Higher Educ 31: 287-301, 2007.