Degenerative spondylolisthesis: An analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample database

Spine

Volumn 40, Issue 15, 2015, Pages 1219-1227

  Norton, Robert P ^a   Bianco, Kristina ^a   Klifto, Christopher ^a   Errico, Thomas J ^a   Bendo, John A ^a  

^a NYU HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES   (United States)

Author keywords

Complications; Degenerative spondylolisthesis; Hospital characteristics; Hospital charges; Lumbar fusion; National trends; Outcomes; Procedures; Treatment decisions

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANEMIA; ANTERIOR INSTRUMENTED INTERBODY FUSION; ANTERIOR SPINE FUSION; ARTICLE; CHRONIC LUNG DISEASE; DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASE; HEART DISEASE; HOME CARE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAID; MEDICARE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; NEUROLOGICAL COMPLICATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTERIOR INTERBODY FUSION; POSTERIOR INTERBODY FUSION WITH POSTERIOR INSTRUMENTATION; POSTEROLATERAL FUSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE FUSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; FACTUAL DATABASE; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HOSPITAL CHARGE; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TEACHING HOSPITAL; TRENDS; UNITED STATES;

DROSOPHILA PROTEIN; INSOMNIAC PROTEIN, DROSOPHILA;

DATABASES, FACTUAL; DROSOPHILA PROTEINS; FEMALE; HEALTH FACILITY SIZE; HOSPITAL CHARGES; HOSPITALS, TEACHING; HUMANS; INSURANCE, HEALTH; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84942596704     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000987     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Rovsing H, et al. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: an epidemiological perspective: the Copenhagen Osteoarthritis Study. Spine 2007; 32 : 120-5.
2. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Overview of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Rockville, MD : Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012.
3. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45 : 613-9.
4. Herkowitz HN. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: evolution of surgical management. Spine J 2009; 9 : 605-6.
5. Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991; 73 : 802-8.
6. Fischgrund JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz HN, et al. 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine 1997; 22 : 2807-12.
7. Kornblum MB, Fischgrund JS, Herkowitz HN, et al. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective long-term study comparing fusion and pseudarthrosis. Spine 2004; 29 : 726-33; discussion 733-4.
8. Mardjetko SM, Connolly PJ, Shott S. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. A meta-Analysis of literature 1970-1993. Spine 1994; 19 ( suppl ): 2256S-65S.
9. Satomi K, Hirabayashi K, Toyama Y, et al. A clinical study of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Radiographic analysis and choice of treatment. Spine 1992; 17 : 1329-36.
10. Zdeblick TA. A prospective, randomized study of lumbar fusion. Preliminary results. Spine 1993; 18 : 983-91.
11. Bridwell KH, Sedgewick TA, O'Brien MF, et al. The role of fusion and instrumentation in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord 1993; 6 : 461-72.
12. Martin CR, Gruszczynski AT, Braunsfurth HA, et al. The surgical management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review. Spine 2007; 32 : 1791-8.
13. Booth KC, Bridwell KH, Eisenberg BA, et al. Minimum 5-year results of degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and instrumented posterior fusion. Spine 1999; 24 : 1721-7.
14. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, et al. Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 : 1295-304.
15. Abdu WA, Lurie JD, Spratt KF, et al. Degenerative spondylolisthesis: does fusion method influence outcome Four-year results of the spine patient outcomes research trial. Spine 2009; 34 : 2351-60.
16. Watters WC, III Bono CM, Gilbert TJ, et al. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine J 2009; 9 : 609-14.
17. Tosteson AN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al. Comparative effectiveness evidence from the spine patient outcomes research trial: surgical versus nonoperative care for spinal stenosis, degenerative spondylolisthesis, and intervertebral disc herniation. Spine 2011; 36 : 2061-8.
18. Adogwa O, Parker SL, Davis BJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis . J Neurosurg Spine 2011; 15 : 138-43.
19. Farjoodi P, Skolasky RL, Riley LH. The effects of hospital and surgeon volume on postoperative complications after LumbarSpine surgery. Spine 2011; 36 : 2069-75.