Minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas interbody fusion for L4-5 spondylolisthesis: Clinical outcomes Presented at the 2013 Spine Section Meeting Clinical article

Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 314-320

  Ahmadian, Amir ^a   Verma, Sean ^a   Mundis Jr , Gregory M ^b   Oskouian Jr , Rod J ^c   Smith, Donald A ^a   Uribe, Juan S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b SAN DIEGO CENTER FOR SPINAL DISORDERS   (United States)

^c SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Extreme lateral interbody fusion; Lateral lumbar interbody fusion; Minimally invasive surgery; Retroperitoneal; Spine fusion; Spondylolisthesis; Transpsoas approach

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FORAMINOTOMY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LAMINECTOMY; LATERAL RETROPERITONEAL TRANSPSOAS INTERBODY FUSION; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); NEUROLOGICAL COMPLICATION; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARESTHESIA; PATIENT SAFETY; PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION DEVICE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PSEUDARTHROSIS; PSOAS MUSCLE; REFERENCE DATABASE; RETROPERITONEUM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SHORT FORM 36; SPINE FUSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSOAS MUSCLES; RETROPERITONEAL SPACE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84884491238     PISSN: 15475654     EISSN: 15475646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3171/2013.6.SPINE1340     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Adogwa O, Parker SL, Bydon A, Cheng J, McGirt MJ: Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: 2-year assessment of narcotic use, return to work, disability, and quality of life. J Spinal Disord Tech 24: 479-484, 2011
2. Ahmadian A, Deukmedjian AR, Abel N, Dakwar E, Uribe JS: Analysis of lumbar plexopathies and nerve injury after lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: diagnostic standardization. A review. J Neurosurg Spine 18: 289-297, 2013
3. Asha MJ, Choksey MS, Shad A, Roberts P, Imray C: The role of the vascular surgeon in anterior lumbar spine surgery. Br J Neurosurg 26: 499-503, 2012
4. Benglis DM, Elhammady MS, Levi AD, Vanni S: Minimally invasive anterolateral approaches for the treatment of back pain and adult degenerative deformity. Neurosurgery 63 (3 Suppl): 191-196, 2008
5. Burnett MG, Zager EL: Pathophysiology of peripheral nerveinjury: a brief review. Neurosurg Focus 16(5): E1, 2004
6. Cummock MD, Vanni S, Levi AD, Yu Y, Wang MY: An analysis of postoperative thigh symptoms after minimally invasive transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 15: 11-18, 2011
7. Dakwar E, Cardona RF, Smith DA, Uribe JS: Early outcomes and safety of the minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for adult degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus 28(3): E8, 2010
8. Eck JC, Hodges S, Humphreys SC: Minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15: 321-329, 2007
9. Elowitz EH, Yanni DS, Chwajol M, Starke RM, Perin NI: Evaluation of indirect decompression of the lumbar spinal canal following minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion: radiographic and outcome analysis. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 54: 201-206, 2011
10. Gibson JN, Waddell G: Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4): CD001352, 2005
11. Gill GG, Manning JG, White HL Surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis without spine fusion; excision of the loose lamina with decompression of the nerve roots. J Bone Joint Surg Am 37-A: 493-520, 1955
12. Hsieh PC, Koski TR, O'Shaughnessy BA, Sugrue P, Salehi S., Ondra S, et al: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance. J Neurosurg Spine 7: 379-386, 2007 (Pubitemid 47584612)
13. Isaacs RE, Hyde J, Goodrich JA, Rodgers W.B., Phillips FM: A prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter evaluation of extreme lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis: perioperative outcomes and complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35 (26 Suppl): S322-S330, 2010
14. Knight RQ, Schwaegler P, Hanscom D, Roh J: Direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative conditions: early complication prozle. J Spinal Disord Tech 22: 34-37, 2009
15. Kwon BK, Berta S, Daffiner SD, Vaccaro A.R., Hilibrand AS, Grauer JN, et al: Radiographic analysis of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 16: 469-476, 2003
16. Lee P, Fessler RG: Perioperative and postoperative complications of single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in elderly adults. J Clin Neurosci 19: 111-114, 2012
17. Marchi L, Abdala N, Oliveira L, Amaral R., Coutinho E, Pimenta L Stand-alone lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis. Scientific-World Journal 2012: 456346, 2012
18. Mardjetko SM, Connolly PJ, Shott S: Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. A meta-analysis of literature 1970-1993. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19 (20 Suppl):2256S-2265S, 1994 (Pubitemid 24326560)
19. Martin CR, Gruszczynski AT, Braunsfurth HA, Fallatah S.M., O'Neil J, Wai EK: The surgical management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32: 1791-1798, 2007 (Pubitemid 47075541)
20. Mehta VA, McGirt MJ, Garcés Ambrossi GL, Parker SL, Sciubba DM, Bydon A, et al: Trans-foraminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of surgical morbidity. Neurol Res 33: 38-42, 2011
21. Moller DJ, Slimack NP, Acosta FL Jr, Koski TR, Fessler RG, Liu JC: Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transpsoas approach-related morbidity. Neurosurg Focus 31(4): E4, 2011
22. Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR: Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 6: 435-443, 2006 (Pubitemid 43964530)
23. Pelton MA, Phillips FM, Singh K: A comparison of perioperative costs and outcomes in patients with and without workers' compensation claims treated with minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37: 1914-1919, 2012
24. Pimenta L, Oliveira L, Schaffa T, Coutinho E., Marchi L Lumbar total disc replacement from an extreme lateral approach: clinical experience with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 14: 38-45, 2011
25. Rodgers WB, Gerber EJ, Patterson J: Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36: 26-32, 2011
26. Rodgers WB, Gerber EJ, Rodgers JA: Lumbar fusion in octogenarians: the promise of minimally invasive surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35 (26 Suppl): S355-S360, 2010
27. Rousseau MA, Lazennec JY, Bass EC, Saillant G: Predictors of outcomes after posterior decompression and fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 14: 55-60, 2005 (Pubitemid 40379288)
28. Sharma AK, Kepler CK, Girardi FP, Cammisa F.P., Huang RC, Sama AA: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1 year: a preliminary report. J Spinal Disord Tech 24: 242-250, 2011
29. Sunderland S: Nerves and Nerve Injuries, ed 2. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1978
30. Than KD, Wang AC, Rahman SU, Wilson T.J., Valdivia JM, Park P, et al: Complication avoidance and management in anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurg Focus 31(4): E6, 2011
31. Tohmeh AG, Rodgers WB, Peterson MD: Dynamically evoked, discrete-threshold electromyography in the extreme lateral interbody fusion approach. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 14: 31-37, 2011
32. Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L, Deyo R Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Attempted meta-analysis of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17: 1-8, 1992
33. Uribe JS, Arredondo N, Dakwar E, Vale FL: Defining the safe working zones using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: an anatomical study. Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Spine 13: 260-266, 2010
34. Wang MY, Mummaneni PV: Minimally invasive surgery for thoracolumbar spinal deformity: initial clinical experience with clinical and radiographic outcomes. Neurosurg Focus 28(3): E9, 2010
35. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Zhao W, Blood EA, Tosteson AN, et al: Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91: 1295-1304, 2009
36. Yan DL, Pei FX, Li J, Soo CL: Comparative study of PILF and TLIF treatment in adult degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 17: 1311-1316, 2008
37. Youssef JA, McAfee PC, Patty C.A., Raley E., DeBauche S, Shucosky E, et al: Minimally invasive surgery: lateral approach interbody fusion: results and review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35 (26 Suppl): S302-S311, 2010
38. Zagra A, Giudici F, Minoia L, Corriero A.S., Zagra L Long-term results of pediculo-body fixation and posterolateral fu sion for lumbar spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 18 (Suppl 1): 151-155, 2009