Manipulated vs. Measured: Using an Experimental Benchmark to Investigate the Performance of Self-Reported Media Exposure

Communication Methods and Measures

Volumn 10, Issue 2-3, 2016, Pages 99-114

  Jerit, Jennifer ^a   Barabas, Jason ^a   Pollock, William ^a   Banducci, Susan ^b   Stevens, Daniel ^b   Schoonvelde, Martijn ^c  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^c VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84964455470     PISSN: 19312458     EISSN: 19312466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19312458.2016.1150444     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. S.L.Althaus,, & D.H.Tewksbury, (2007). Toward a new generation of media use measures for the ANES. Report to the Board of Overseers, American National Election Studies. Ann Arbor, MI.
2. S.D.Ansolabehere,, & S.Iyengar, (1995). Messages forgotten: Misreporting in surveys and the bias toward minimal effects (Unpublished manuscript). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
3. K.Arceneaux,, A.S.Gerber,, & D.P.Green, (2010). A cautionary note on the use of matching to estimate causal effects: An empirical example comparing matching estimates to an experimental benchmark. Sociological Methods and Research, 39, 256–282. doi:10.1177/0049124110378098
4. K.Arceneaux,, M.Johnson,, & C.Murphy, (2012). Polarized political communication, oppositional media hostility, and selective exposure. Journal of Politics, 74 (1), 174–186. doi:10.1017/S002238161100123X
5. J.Barabas,, & J.Jerit, (2009). Estimating the causal effects of media coverage on policy-specific knowledge. American Journal of Political Science, 53, 73–89. doi:10.1111/ajps.2008.53.issue-1
6. L.M.Bartels, (1993). Messages received: The political impact of media exposure. American Political Science Review, 87, 267–285. doi:10.2307/2939040
7. G.Y.Bizer,, J.A.Krosnick,, R.E.Petty,, D.D.Rucker,, & C.Wheeler, (2000). Need for cognition and need to evaluate in the 1998 national election survey pilot study. Report to the Board of Overseers, American National Election Studies. Ann Arbor, MI.
8. L.Chang,, & J.A.Krosnick, (2003). Measuring the frequency of regular behaviors: Comparing the “typical week” to the “past week”. Sociological Methodology, 33, 55–80. doi:10.1111/some.2003.33.issue-1
9. D.P.Crowne,, & D.Marlowe, (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354. doi:10.1037/h0047358
10. M.X.Delli Carpini,, & S.Keeter, (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
11. S.Dilliplane,, S.K.Goldman,, & D.C.Mutz, (2013). Televised exposure to politics: New measures for a fragmented media environment. American Journal of Political Science, 57, 236–248. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00600.x
12. J.N.Druckman,, & C.D.Kam, (2011). Students as experimental participants: A defense of the ‘Narrow Data Base. In J.Druckman, D.Green, J.Kuklinski, & A.Lupia (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of experimental political science (pp. 41–57). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
13. W.P.Eveland,, Jr. (2002). News information processing as mediator of the relationship between motivations and political knowledge. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 26–40. doi:10.1177/107769900207900103
14. L.Feldman,, N.J.Stroud,, B.Bimber,, & M.Wojcieszak, (2013). Assessing selective exposure in experiments: The implications of different methodological choices. Communication Methods and Measures, 7, 172–194. doi:10.1080/19312458.2013.813923
15. B.J.Gaines,, & J.H.Kuklinski, (2011). Experimental estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects related to self-selection. American Journal of Political Science, 55, 724–736. doi:10.1111/ajps.2011.55.issue-3
16. S.K.Goldman,, D.C.Mutz,, & S.Dilliplane, (2013). All virtue is relative: A response to Prior. Political Communication, 30, 635–653. doi:10.1080/10584609.2013.819540
17. D.P.Green,, T.Y.Leong,, H.L.Kern,, A.S.Gerber,, & C.W.Larimer, (2009). Testing the accuracy of regression discontinuity analysis using experimental benchmarks. Political Analysis, 1, 400–417. doi:10.1093/pan/mpp018
18. A.M.Guess, (2015). Measure for measure: An experimental test of online political media exposure. Political Analysis, 23, 59–75. doi:10.1093/pan/mpu010
19. D.Hefner,, T.Rothmund,, C.Klimmt,, & M.Gollwitzer, (2011). Implicit measures and media effects research: Challenges and opportunities. Communication Methods and Measures, 5, 181–202. doi:10.1080/19312458.2011.597006
20. S.D.Jackman,, M.J.LaCour,, J.B.Lewis,, & L.Vavreck, (2012, April). Digital fingerprints: A new method for measuring political advertising. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
21. A.Kohut,, S.Keeter,, C.Doherty,, M.Dimock,, & L.Christian, (2012, May 15). Assessing the representativeness of public opinion surveys. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts Report.
22. R.J.LaLonde, (1986). Evaluating the econometric evaluations of job training with experimental data. American Economic Review, 76, 604–620.
23. J.Miller,, & D.Peterson, (2004). Theoretical and empirical implications of attitude strength. Journal of Politics, 66, 847–867. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00279.x
24. R.Morton,, & K.Williams, (2010). Experimental political science and the study of causality: From nature to the lab. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
25. D.C.Mutz, (2011). Population-based survey experiments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26. R.E.Petty,, & J.T.Cacioppo, (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
27. V.Price,, & J.Zaller, (1993). Who gets the news? Alternative measures of news reception and their implications for research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 133–164. doi:10.1086/269363
28. M.Prior, (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
29. M.Prior, (2009a). Improving media effects research through better measurement of news exposure. Journal of Politics, 71, 893–908. doi:10.1017/S0022381609090781
30. M.Prior, (2009b). The immensely inflated news audience: Assessing bias in self-reported news exposure. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73, 130–143. doi:10.1093/poq/nfp002
31. M.Prior, (2012). Who watches presidential debates? Measurement problems in campaign effects research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 350–363. doi:10.1093/poq/nfs019
32. M.Prior, (2013). The challenge of measuring media exposure: Reply to Dilliplane, Goldman, and Mutz. Political Communication, 30, 620–634. doi:10.1080/10584609.2013.819539
33. A.Romantan,, R.Hornik,, V.Price,, J.Cappella,, & K.Viswanath, (2008). A comparative analysis of the performance of alternative measures of exposure. Communication Methods and Measures, 2, 80–99. doi:10.1080/19312450802062539
34. N.Schwarz, (1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54, 93–105. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.2.93
35. N.Schwarz,, & D.Oyserman, (2001). Asking questions about behavior: Cognition, communication, and questionnaire construction. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 127–160. doi:10.1177/109821400102200202
36. W.R.Shadish,, T.D.Cook,, & D.T.Campbell, (2002). Experimental and quasi-Experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
37. N.J.Stroud, (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. New York: Oxford University Press.
38. L.Timotijevic,, J.Barnett,, R.Shepherd,, & V.Senior, (2009). Factors influencing self-report of mobile phone use: The role of response prompt, time reference and mobile phone use in recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 664–683. doi:10.1002/acp.v23:5
39. R.Tourangeau,, L.J.Rips,, & K.Rasinski, (2000). The psychology of survey response. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
40. E.J.Van Elsas,, R.Lubbe,, T.W.G.Van Der Meer,, & W.Van Der Brug, (2014). Vote recall: A panel study on the mechanisms that explain vote recall inconsistency. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26, 18–40. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edt031
41. L.Vavreck, (2007). The exaggerated effects of advertising on turnout: The dangers of self-reports. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2, 325–343. doi:10.1561/100.00006005