All Virtue Is Relative: A Response to Prior

Political Communication

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 635-653

  Goldman, Seth K ^a   Mutz, Diana C ^b   Dilliplane, Susanna ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

measurement; media exposure

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886377001     PISSN: 10584609     EISSN: 10917675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2013.819540     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Adams, W. J. 2000. How people watch television as investigated using focus group techniques. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44: 78 - 93.
2. Allison, P. D. 1990. Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociological Methodology, 20: 93 - 114.
3. Allison, P. D. 2009. Fixed effects regression models, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4. Althaus, S. L.Tewksbury, D.2007Toward a new generation of media use measures for the ANES. http://www.electionstudies.org/resources/papers/Pilot2006/nes011903.pdf (http://www.electionstudies.org/resources/papers/Pilot2006/nes011903.pdf)
5. Barabas, J. and Jerit, J. 2009. Estimating the causal effects of media coverage on policy-specific knowledge. American Journal of Political Science, 53: 73 - 89.
6. Bartels, L. M. 1993. Messages received: The political impact of media exposure. American Political Science Review, 87: 267 - 285.
7. Bauder, D.2013Numbers game: Nielsen finally taking account of time-shifted viewing. http://www.theledger.com/article/20130226/news/130229506 (http://www.theledger.com/article/20130226/news/130229506)
8. Bennett, L. W. and Manheim, J. 2006. The one-step flow of communication. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 608: 213 - 232.
9. Boudreau, C. and Lupia, A. 2011. " Political knowledge ". In The Cambridge handbook of experimental political science, Edited by: Druckman, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H. and Lupia, A. 171 - 186. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Chaffee, S. H. and Hochheimer, J. 1985. " The beginnings of political communication research in the United States: Origins of the "limited effects" model ". In The media revolution in America and Western Europe, Edited by: Rogers, E. M. and Balle, F. 267 - 296. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
11. Chaffee, S. H. and Schleuder, J. 1986. Measurement and effects of attention to media news. Human Communication Research, 13: 76 - 107.
12. Cho, J., Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., McLeod, D. M., Scholl, R. M. and Gotlieb, M. R. 2009. Campaigns, reflection, and deliberation: Advancing an O-S-R-O-R model of communication effects. Communication Theory, 19: 66 - 88.
13. Counting couch potatoes2013 http://www.economist.com/news/business/21571471-measuring-tv-audiences-keeps-getting-harder-counting-couch-potatoes (http://www.economist.com/news/business/21571471-measuring-tv-audiences-keeps-getting-harder-counting-couch-potatoes)
14. Dilliplane, S. 2011. All the news you want to hear: The impact of partisan news exposure on political participation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75: 287 - 316.
15. Dilliplane, S. in press. Activation, conversion, or reinforcement? The impact of partisan news exposure on vote choice. American Journal of Political Science,
16. Dilliplane, S., Goldman, S. and Mutz, D. 2013. Televised exposure to politics: New measures for a fragmented media environment. American Journal of Political Science, 57: 236 - 248.
17. England, P., Allison, P. and Wu, Y. 2007. Does bad pay cause occupations to feminize, does feminization reduce pay, and how can we tell with longitudinal data?. Social Science Research, 36: 1237 - 1256.
18. Eveland, W. P., Hayes, A. F., Shah, D. V. and Kwak, N. 2005. Understanding the relationship between communication and political knowledge: A model comparison approach using panel data. Political Communication, 22: 423 - 446.
19. Gentzkow, M. and Shapiro, J. 2011. Ideological segregation online and offline. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126: 1799 - 1839.
20. Gitlin, T. 1978. Media sociology: The dominant paradigm. Theory and Society, 6: 205 - 253.
21. Goldman, S. K. 2012. Effects of the 2008 Obama presidential campaign on White racial prejudice. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76: 663 - 687.
22. Hallaby, C. N. 2004. Panel models in sociological research: Theory into practice. Annual Review of Sociology, 30: 507 - 544.
23. Heise, D. R. 1969. Separating reliability and stability in test-retest correlation. American Sociological Review, 34: 93 - 101.
24. Huesmann, L., Moise-Titus, J., Podolski, C. and Eron, L. 2003. Longitudinal relations between children's exposure to TV violence and their aggressive and violent behavior in young adulthood: 1977-1992. Developmental Psychology, 39: 201 - 221.
25. Jackman, S. D., LaCour, M., Lewis, J. and Vavreck, L. 2012. Digital fingerprints: A new method for measuring political advertising, Unpublished manuscript.
26. Jerit, J., Barabas, J. and Bolsen, T. 2006. Citizens, knowledge, and the information environment. American Journal of Political Science, 50: 266 - 282.
27. Johnston, R., Hagen, M. and Jamieson, K. H. 2004. The 2000 presidential election and the foundations of party politics, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
28. Katz, E. and Lazarsfeld, P. F. 1955. Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications, New York, NY: Free Press.
29. LaCour, M. J. 2012. A balanced news diet, not selective exposure: Evidence from a direct measure of media exposure, Unpublished manuscript.
30. LaCour, M. J. and Vavreck, L. 2013. Improving media measurement: Evidence from the field, Unpublished manuscript.
31. McLeod, J. M., Guo, Z., Daily, K., Steele, C. A., Huang, H., Horowitz, E. and Chen, H. 1996. The impact of traditional and nontraditional media forms in the 1992 presidential election. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73: 401 - 416.
32. Milavsky, J. R. 1992. " How good is the A. C. Nielsen people-meter system? A review of the report by the Committee on Nationwide Television Audience Measurement ". In Public Opinion Quarterly Vol. 56, 102 - 115.
33. Milner, H. 2002. Civic literacy: How informed citizens make democracy work, Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
34. Napoli, P. M. 2003. Audience economics: Media institutions and the audience marketplace, New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
35. Neuman, W., Just, M. and Crigler, A. 1992. Common knowledge: News and the construction of political meaning, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
36. Norris, P. 2000. A virtuous circle: Political communications in post-industrial societies, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
37. Norris, P. and Sanders, D. 2003. Message or medium? Campaign learning during the 2001 British general election. Political Communication, 20: 233 - 262.
38. Price, V., & Zaller, J. (1990). Evaluation of media exposure items in the 1989 NES pilot study. Report to the Board of Overseers, American National Election Studies.
39. Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Nah, S., Gotlieb, M. R., Hwang, H., Lee, N. J. and McLeod, D. M. 2007. Campaign ads, online messaging, and participation: Extending the communication mediation model. Journal of Communication, 57: 676 - 703.
40. Tewksbury, D. and Althaus, S. L. 2000. Differences in knowledge acquisition among readers of the paper and online versions of a national newspaper. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77: 45 - 79.
41. Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D. and Sechrest, L. 1966. Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences, Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
42. Wonneberger, A., Schoenbach, K. and van Meurs, L. 2012. Dimensionality of TV news exposure: Mapping news viewing behavior with people-meter data. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25: 87 - 107.
43. Wood, W., Quinn, J. M. and Kashy, D. 2002. Habits in everyday life: Thought, emotion and action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83: 1281 - 1297.
44. Zaller, J. 2002. The statistical power of election studies to detect media exposure effects in political campaigns. Electoral Studies, 21: 297 - 329.