The exaggerated effects of advertising on turnout: The dangers of self-reports

Quarterly Journal of Political Science

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 325-343

  Vavreck, Lynn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 71649109054     PISSN: 15540626     EISSN: 15540634     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1561/100.00006005     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ansolabehere, S. D., S. Iyengar and A. Simon. 1999. "Replicating Experiments Using Aggregate and Survey Data: The Case of Negative Advertising and Turnout." American Political Science Review 93(4): 901-909.
2. Ansolabehere, S. D. and S. Iyengar. 1995. Going Negative: How Attack Ads Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free Press.
3. Dennis, J.M. 2001. "Are Internet Panels Creating Professional Respondents? The Benefits from Online Panels Far Outweigh the Potential for Panel Effects." Marketing Research, Summer: 34-38.
4. Dillman, D., 1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys. New York: Wiley.
5. Finkel, S. E. and J. G. Geer. 1998. "Spot Check: Casting Doubt on the Demobilizing Effect of Attack Advertising." American Journal of Political Science 42(2): 573-595.
6. Freedman, P. and K. Goldstein. 1999. "Measuring Media Exposure and the Effects of Negative Campaign Ads." American Journal of Political Science 43(4): 1189-1208.
7. Freedman, P.,M. Franz and K. Goldstein. 2004. "Campaign Advertising and Democratic Citizenship." American Journal of Political Science 48(4): 723.
8. Hillygus, D. S. 2005. "Campaign Effects and the Dynamics of Turnout Intention in Election 2000," Journal of Politics 67(1): 50-68. (Pubitemid 41602119)
9. Johnston, R., M. Hagen and K. Hall Jamieson. 2004. Dynamics of the 2000 Presidential Campaign: Evidence from the Annenberg Survey. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Katosh, J. P. and M. W. Traugott. 1981. "The Consequences of Validated and Self-Reported Voting Measures. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45: 519.
11. Krosnick, J. and D. Rivers. 2005. "Comparing the Results of Probability and Non-Probability Sample Surveys." Paper Presented at 2005 American Association of Public Opinion Research conference, Miami, Florida.
12. Krosnick, J. and L. Chang. 2001. "A Comparison of Random Digit Dialing Telephone Survey Methodology as Implemented by Knowledge Networks and Harris Interactive." Unpublished Manuscript.
13. Locander,W., S. Sudman and N. Bradburn. 1976. "An Investigation of Interview Method, Threat and Response Distortion." Journal of the American Statistical Association 71: 269-275.
14. Madalla, G. S. 1992. Introduction to Econometrics, 2nd edn. New York: Macmillan.
15. Parry, H. J. and H. M. Crossley. 1950. "Validity of Responses to Survey Questions." Public Opinion Quarterly 14: 61.
16. Rogers, T. F. 1976. "Interviews by Telephone and in Person: Quality of Responses and Field Performance." Public Opinion Quarterly 40: 51.
17. Silver, B.D., B. A. Anderson and P. R. Abramsom. 1986. "Who OverreportsVoting?" American Political Science Review 80(2): 613.
18. Sudman, S. and N. M. Bradburn. 1974. Response Effects in Surveys: A Review and Syntehsis. Chicago: Aldine.
19. Wattenberg,M. P. and Craig L. Brians. 1999. "Negative Campaign Advertising: Demobilizer or Mobilizer?" American Political Science Review 93(4): 891-899.
20. Zaller, J. R. 2002. "The Statistical Power of Election Studies to Detect Media Exposure Effects in Political Campaigns." Electoral Studies 21: 297-329.